[GitHub] [flink] dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: [FLINK-25792][connectors] Only flushing the async sink base if it is …
dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18651#discussion_r803594934 ## File path: flink-connectors/flink-connector-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/base/sink/writer/AsyncSinkWriter.java ## @@ -267,18 +267,31 @@ private void registerCallback() { @Override public void write(InputT element, Context context) throws IOException, InterruptedException { +while (mailboxExecutor.tryYield()) {} Review comment: I'm not saying there is an issue. I just don't feel comfortable saying there is not, and if Piotr is not comfortable with that on the first sight as well, it's worth giving it a closer look. Unfortunately I don't have enough context in this area to provide more insight myself. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: [FLINK-25792][connectors] Only flushing the async sink base if it is …
dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18651#discussion_r803594934 ## File path: flink-connectors/flink-connector-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/base/sink/writer/AsyncSinkWriter.java ## @@ -267,18 +267,31 @@ private void registerCallback() { @Override public void write(InputT element, Context context) throws IOException, InterruptedException { +while (mailboxExecutor.tryYield()) {} Review comment: I'm not saying there is an issue. I just don't feel comfortable saying there is not, and if Piotr is not comfortable with that on the first sight as well, it's worth giving closer look. Unfortunately I don't have enough context in this area to provide more insight myself. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: [FLINK-25792][connectors] Only flushing the async sink base if it is …
dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18651#discussion_r803587452 ## File path: flink-connectors/flink-connector-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/base/sink/writer/AsyncSinkWriter.java ## @@ -267,18 +267,31 @@ private void registerCallback() { @Override public void write(InputT element, Context context) throws IOException, InterruptedException { +while (mailboxExecutor.tryYield()) {} Review comment: Maybe to rephrase that a bit, so it doesn't come out wrong: we shouldn't rush things that require more context from people that are busy with other efforts, just for sake of getting something merged before the feature freeze -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: [FLINK-25792][connectors] Only flushing the async sink base if it is …
dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18651#discussion_r803580523 ## File path: flink-connectors/flink-connector-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/base/sink/writer/AsyncSinkWriter.java ## @@ -267,18 +267,31 @@ private void registerCallback() { @Override public void write(InputT element, Context context) throws IOException, InterruptedException { +while (mailboxExecutor.tryYield()) {} Review comment: @dannycranmer It sounds fishy and doesn't align with the quality standards we require for Flink contributions. If you're concerned about the feature freeze, this can still be merged after that as the current implementation is broken. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: [FLINK-25792][connectors] Only flushing the async sink base if it is …
dmvk commented on a change in pull request #18651: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18651#discussion_r803439528 ## File path: flink-connectors/flink-connector-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/base/sink/writer/AsyncSinkWriter.java ## @@ -267,18 +267,31 @@ private void registerCallback() { @Override public void write(InputT element, Context context) throws IOException, InterruptedException { +while (mailboxExecutor.tryYield()) {} Review comment: This seems weird 樂 If I understand it correctly in means something along the lines of ... don't write results until we have anything else to do, so for example if user has a super frequent checkpointing (edge case), we can not make progress? @pnowojski Can you please verify? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org