[GitHub] metron issue #1015: METRON-1544 Flaky test: org.apache.metron.stellar.common...

2018-05-16 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
Is there not some relevant Caffeine test we can ape for this?


---


[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1544) Flaky test: org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477236#comment-16477236
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1544:


Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
Is there not some relevant Caffeine test we can ape for this?


> Flaky test: 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching
> 
>
> Key: METRON-1544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544
> Project: Metron
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 0.4.3
> Environment: #uname -a
> Linux 60a83dc7a2ce 4.4.0-112-generic #135-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 19 11:48:36 UTC 
> 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>Reporter: Pravin Dsilva
>Assignee: Nick Allen
>Priority: Major
>
> command used: mvn test
> The test fails intermittently on master branch.
> {code:java}
> Running org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.054 sec <<< 
> FAILURE! - in org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> testCaching(org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest) 
> Time elapsed: 0.053 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<6> but was:<4>
>  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
>  at 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest.testCaching(CachingStellarProcessorTest.java:73)
>  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
>  at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[GitHub] metron issue #1015: METRON-1544 Flaky test: org.apache.metron.stellar.common...

2018-05-16 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
> @ben-manes You’re code shouldn’t make assumptions on what is evicted 
as we will try to maximize the hit rate using various techniques.

That makes a ton of sense.  Thanks for the tips.


---


[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1544) Flaky test: org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477268#comment-16477268
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1544:


Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
> @ben-manes You’re code shouldn’t make assumptions on what is evicted as 
we will try to maximize the hit rate using various techniques.

That makes a ton of sense.  Thanks for the tips.


> Flaky test: 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching
> 
>
> Key: METRON-1544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544
> Project: Metron
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 0.4.3
> Environment: #uname -a
> Linux 60a83dc7a2ce 4.4.0-112-generic #135-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 19 11:48:36 UTC 
> 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>Reporter: Pravin Dsilva
>Assignee: Nick Allen
>Priority: Major
>
> command used: mvn test
> The test fails intermittently on master branch.
> {code:java}
> Running org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.054 sec <<< 
> FAILURE! - in org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> testCaching(org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest) 
> Time elapsed: 0.053 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<6> but was:<4>
>  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
>  at 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest.testCaching(CachingStellarProcessorTest.java:73)
>  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
>  at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[GitHub] metron issue #1015: METRON-1544 Flaky test: org.apache.metron.stellar.common...

2018-05-16 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
In the latest, I removed the problematic test case.  There is no need to 
test the eviction policy of the underlying cache, which is effectively what is 
happening.  If anyone can find gaps in test coverage, please let me know.


---


[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1544) Flaky test: org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477301#comment-16477301
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1544:


Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
In the latest, I removed the problematic test case.  There is no need to 
test the eviction policy of the underlying cache, which is effectively what is 
happening.  If anyone can find gaps in test coverage, please let me know.


> Flaky test: 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching
> 
>
> Key: METRON-1544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544
> Project: Metron
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 0.4.3
> Environment: #uname -a
> Linux 60a83dc7a2ce 4.4.0-112-generic #135-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 19 11:48:36 UTC 
> 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>Reporter: Pravin Dsilva
>Assignee: Nick Allen
>Priority: Major
>
> command used: mvn test
> The test fails intermittently on master branch.
> {code:java}
> Running org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.054 sec <<< 
> FAILURE! - in org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> testCaching(org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest) 
> Time elapsed: 0.053 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<6> but was:<4>
>  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
>  at 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest.testCaching(CachingStellarProcessorTest.java:73)
>  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
>  at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (METRON-1566) Alert updates are not propagated to metaalert child alerts

2018-05-16 Thread Ryan Merriman (JIRA)
Ryan Merriman created METRON-1566:
-

 Summary: Alert updates are not propagated to metaalert child alerts
 Key: METRON-1566
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1566
 Project: Metron
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Ryan Merriman


This can be reproduced as follows:
 * Create a metaalert from an alert

 * Update that alert with the patch endpoint

 * The change to the alert is not reflected in the metaalert child alert



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[GitHub] metron pull request #1016: METRON-1564: Full dev kafka has offsets.topic.rep...

2018-05-16 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1016


---


[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1564) Full dev kafka has offsets.topic.replication.factor set to 3 instead of 1

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477529#comment-16477529
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1564:


Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1016


> Full dev kafka has offsets.topic.replication.factor set to 3 instead of 1
> -
>
> Key: METRON-1564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1564
> Project: Metron
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Justin Leet
>Assignee: Justin Leet
>Priority: Major
>
> I saw an issue where no data was flowing through any topologies. A repeated 
> error in kafka showed offsets.topic.replication.factor being too low. We 
> should default this on full dev to 1 to avoid this issue.
> On further investigation, it looks like this setting changes between kafka 
> versions and will no longer auto create the offset topic on some versions if 
> the replication factor is too high, preventing data from flowing through.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[GitHub] metron pull request #1018: METRON-1566: Alert updates are not propagated to ...

2018-05-16 Thread merrimanr
GitHub user merrimanr opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1018

METRON-1566: Alert updates are not propagated to metaalert child alerts

## Contributor Comments
Updates to alerts will now be reflected in metaalert child alerts.  This 
was caused by the ElasticsearchMetaAlertDao class calling the update method on 
IndexDao directly rather than calling it's own update method.  Steps to 
reproduce:

1.  Find an alert.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "fields": [
"guid"
  ],
  "from": 0,
  "indices": [
"snort"
  ],
  "query": "*",
  "size": 1
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/search/search'
```

2. Create a metaalert from the alert in step 1.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "alerts": [
{
  "guid": "dc4abb51-3b7e-4875-b3af-a03b5fd783d9",
  "index": "snort",
  "sensorType": "snort"
}
  ],
  "groups": [
"test"
  ]
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/metaalert/create'
```

3. Update the original alert.
```
curl -u user:password -X PATCH --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "guid": "dc4abb51-3b7e-4875-b3af-a03b5fd783d9",
  "index": "snort",
  "patch": [
{
  "op": "add"
, "path": "/newField"
, "value": "value"
}
  ],
  "sensorType": "snort"
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/update/patch'
```

4. Verify the change was applied to the alert.  The "newField" field should 
be present.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "guid": "dc4abb51-3b7e-4875-b3af-a03b5fd783d9",
  "index": "snort",
  "sensorType": "snort"
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/search/findOne'
```

5. Verify the change was also applied to the child alert in the metaalert.  
The "newField" field should also be present in the child alert.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "guid": "a76e0bae-4420-4f31-b2b3-234cd9fb9e60",
  "index": "metaalert",
  "sensorType": "metaalert"
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/search/findOne'
```
I hit another bug when testing that resulted from timestamp being set to 0 
when updating metaalert objects.  Since it was keeping this use case from 
working I added the fix to this PR.  I also added a change to HBaseDao to guard 
against this in the future and a test to go with it.

I verified this in full dev.

## Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  


In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:

### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?


### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
- [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
- [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
  ```
  mvn -q clean integration-test install && 
dev-utilities/build-utils/verify_licenses.sh 
  ```

- [x] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to 
verify your changes?
- [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [x] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building 
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?

### For documentation related changes:
- [x] Have you e

[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1566) Alert updates are not propagated to metaalert child alerts

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478040#comment-16478040
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1566:


GitHub user merrimanr opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1018

METRON-1566: Alert updates are not propagated to metaalert child alerts

## Contributor Comments
Updates to alerts will now be reflected in metaalert child alerts.  This 
was caused by the ElasticsearchMetaAlertDao class calling the update method on 
IndexDao directly rather than calling it's own update method.  Steps to 
reproduce:

1.  Find an alert.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "fields": [
"guid"
  ],
  "from": 0,
  "indices": [
"snort"
  ],
  "query": "*",
  "size": 1
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/search/search'
```

2. Create a metaalert from the alert in step 1.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "alerts": [
{
  "guid": "dc4abb51-3b7e-4875-b3af-a03b5fd783d9",
  "index": "snort",
  "sensorType": "snort"
}
  ],
  "groups": [
"test"
  ]
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/metaalert/create'
```

3. Update the original alert.
```
curl -u user:password -X PATCH --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "guid": "dc4abb51-3b7e-4875-b3af-a03b5fd783d9",
  "index": "snort",
  "patch": [
{
  "op": "add"
, "path": "/newField"
, "value": "value"
}
  ],
  "sensorType": "snort"
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/update/patch'
```

4. Verify the change was applied to the alert.  The "newField" field should 
be present.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "guid": "dc4abb51-3b7e-4875-b3af-a03b5fd783d9",
  "index": "snort",
  "sensorType": "snort"
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/search/findOne'
```

5. Verify the change was also applied to the child alert in the metaalert.  
The "newField" field should also be present in the child alert.
```
curl -u user:password -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' 
--header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{
  "guid": "a76e0bae-4420-4f31-b2b3-234cd9fb9e60",
  "index": "metaalert",
  "sensorType": "metaalert"
}' 'http://node1:8082/api/v1/search/findOne'
```
I hit another bug when testing that resulted from timestamp being set to 0 
when updating metaalert objects.  Since it was keeping this use case from 
working I added the fix to this PR.  I also added a change to HBaseDao to guard 
against this in the future and a test to go with it.

I verified this in full dev.

## Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  


In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:

### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?


### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
- [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
- [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
  ```
  mvn -q clean integration-test install && 
dev-utilities/build-utils/verify_licenses.sh 
  ```

- [x] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to 
verify your changes?
- [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apac

[GitHub] metron pull request #1019: METRON-1555: Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs

2018-05-16 Thread merrimanr
GitHub user merrimanr opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1019

METRON-1555: Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs

## Contributor Comments
This PR sets us up to run YARN and MR jobs inside our REST application.  
Changes include:
- addition of maven dependencies
- addition of -Dhdp.version parameter to the REST startup script
- MPack now supplies the hdp.version parameter
- MPack now sets up a "metron" service user HDFS directory needed for 
running MR jobs
- MPack now sets up a pcap HDFS directory 
- addition of a sample Pcap controller and service to demonstrate running 
MR jobs in REST

This should work in full dev as is.  All you need to do is generate some 
pcap data and hit the pcap endpoint included in this PR.  It should return raw 
binary pcap data.

It is assumed the PcapContoller, PcapService, PcapServiceImpl and 
PcapResponse classes will all be replaced or significantly changed in future 
tasks.  There are presented here temporarily as examples.

## Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  


In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:

### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?


### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
- [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
- [] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
  ```
  mvn -q clean integration-test install && 
dev-utilities/build-utils/verify_licenses.sh 
  ```

- [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to 
verify your changes?
- [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [x] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building 
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?

### For documentation related changes:
- [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run 
the following commands and the verify changes via 
`site-book/target/site/index.html`:

  ```
  cd site-book
  mvn site
  ```

 Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up 
for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before 
submitting a pull request.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/merrimanr/incubator-metron pcap-rest-test

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1019.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1019


commit 4dcee51dd544e6c064dcc9dd1478c923a00c8281
Author: merrimanr 
Date:   2018-05-07T20:52:09Z

added simple pcap endpoint to rest

commit 22fe5e9ff3c167b42ebeb7a9f1000753a409aff1
Author: merrimanr 
Date:   2018-05-08T22:32:03Z

pcap query runs in rest




---


[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1555) Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478072#comment-16478072
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1555:


GitHub user merrimanr opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1019

METRON-1555: Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs

## Contributor Comments
This PR sets us up to run YARN and MR jobs inside our REST application.  
Changes include:
- addition of maven dependencies
- addition of -Dhdp.version parameter to the REST startup script
- MPack now supplies the hdp.version parameter
- MPack now sets up a "metron" service user HDFS directory needed for 
running MR jobs
- MPack now sets up a pcap HDFS directory 
- addition of a sample Pcap controller and service to demonstrate running 
MR jobs in REST

This should work in full dev as is.  All you need to do is generate some 
pcap data and hit the pcap endpoint included in this PR.  It should return raw 
binary pcap data.

It is assumed the PcapContoller, PcapService, PcapServiceImpl and 
PcapResponse classes will all be replaced or significantly changed in future 
tasks.  There are presented here temporarily as examples.

## Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  


In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:

### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?


### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
- [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
- [] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
  ```
  mvn -q clean integration-test install && 
dev-utilities/build-utils/verify_licenses.sh 
  ```

- [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to 
verify your changes?
- [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [x] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building 
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?

### For documentation related changes:
- [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run 
the following commands and the verify changes via 
`site-book/target/site/index.html`:

  ```
  cd site-book
  mvn site
  ```

 Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up 
for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before 
submitting a pull request.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/merrimanr/incubator-metron pcap-rest-test

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1019.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1019


commit 4dcee51dd544e6c064dcc9dd1478c923a00c8281
Author: merrimanr 
Date:   2018-05-07T20:52:09Z

added simple pcap endpoint to rest

commit 22fe5e9ff3c167b42ebeb7a9f1000753a409aff1
Author: merrimanr 
Date:   2018-05-08T22:32:03Z

pcap query runs in rest




> Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs
> ---
>
> Key: METRON-1555
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1555
> Project: Metron
>  Issue

[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1555) Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs

2018-05-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478415#comment-16478415
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1555:


Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1019
  
Based on the temporary/example state of some of this PR would it make sense 
to explicitly keep this one out of the upcoming release, regardless of the 
review cycle?


> Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs
> ---
>
> Key: METRON-1555
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1555
> Project: Metron
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Ryan Merriman
>Assignee: Ryan Merriman
>Priority: Major
>
> This task involves enabling REST to submit YARN or MR jobs.  We will likely 
> need to:
>  * update Maven dependencies to include YARN and MR libraries in the 
> classpath and resolve any version conflicts
>  * update REST start script to include properties required for YARN
>  * update the MPack for any additional setup work (create user HDFS directory 
> for example) and properties needed



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[GitHub] metron issue #1019: METRON-1555: Update REST to run YARN and MR jobs

2018-05-16 Thread JonZeolla
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1019
  
Based on the temporary/example state of some of this PR would it make sense 
to explicitly keep this one out of the upcoming release, regardless of the 
review cycle?


---