Re: Lucene 8.7 error searching an index created with 8.3
I'd like to add that if I enable assertions I get a stack trace like this:
java.lang.AssertionError
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:903)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.firstPosition(PhrasePositions.java:46)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.initSimple(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:368)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.initPhrasePositions(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:356)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.reset(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:153)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:49)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631)
at
org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53)
at
org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270)
at
org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344)
at
org.apache.lucene.queries.function.ValueSource$WrappedDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(ValueSource.java:215)
at
com.wolfram.textsearch.MultiplicationDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(MultiplicationDoubleValuesSource.java:60)
... 27 more
Meaning that posPendingCount in Lucene50PostingsReader is 0 when
nextPosition() is called.
At the point the assertion fails these are the other values in this object:
encoded = {byte[512]@2705} [0, 112, 7, 20, -48, -8, 16, 96, -99, 25,
+502 more]
docDeltaBuffer = {int[147]@2706} [1164, 2, 506, 183, 3, 190, 1, 1, 1,
57, +137 more]
freqBuffer = {int[147]@2707} [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 3, +137 more]
posDeltaBuffer = {int[147]@2708} [7, 7, 333, 248, 262, 157, 414, 104,
157, 409, +137 more]
payloadLengthBuffer = null
offsetStartDeltaBuffer = null
offsetLengthBuffer = null
payloadBytes = null
payloadByteUpto = 0
payloadLength = 0
lastStartOffset = 0
startOffset = -1
endOffset = -1
docBufferUpto = 3
posBufferUpto = 3
skipper = null
skipped = false
startDocIn = {ByteBufferIndexInput$SingleBufferImpl@2709}
"MMapIndexInput(path="/usr/local/Wolfram/Mathematica/12.3/Documentation/English/SearchIndex/3/_0.cfs")
[slice=_0_Lucene50_0.doc]"
docIn = {ByteBufferIndexInput$SingleBufferImpl@2710}
"MMapIndexInput(path="/usr/local/Wolfram/Mathematica/12.3/Documentation/English/SearchIndex/3/_0.cfs")
[slice=_0_Lucene50_0.doc]"
posIn = {ByteBufferIndexInput$SingleBufferImpl@2704}
"MMapIndexInput(path="/usr/local/Wolfram/Mathematica/12.3/Documentation/English/SearchIndex/3/_0.cfs")
[slice=_0_Lucene50_0.pos]"
payIn = null
payload = null
indexHasOffsets = false
indexHasPayloads = false
docFreq = 69
totalTermFreq = 146
docUpto = 3
doc = 1672
accum = 1672
freq = 1
position = 333
posPendingCount = 0
posPendingFP = -1
payPendingFP = 0
docTermStartFP = 683174
posTermStartFP = 236756
payTermStartFP = 0
lastPosBlockFP = 236949
skipOffset = -1
nextSkipDoc = 2147483647
needsOffsets = false
needsPayloads = false
singletonDocID = -1
Maybe this information is useful to see what's going on, or at least add
some code somewhere to help clarify this issue.
Thanks!
El 24/11/20 a las 11:36, Nicolás Lichtmaier escribió:
This is reproducible only within our product, I haven't yet been able
to isolate this and reproduce it standalone. It's Java 11.
Yes, I've run CheckIndex with the "-slow" option and with assertions
enabled.
El 24/11/20 a las 11:32, Adrien Grand escribió:
This is related to phrase matching indeed. Positions are stored in
blocks of 128 values, where every block is encoded with a different
number of bits per value. And the error you are seeing suggests that
one block reports 69 bits per value.
The fact that CheckIndex didn't complain is surprising. Did you only
verify checksums (the -fast option) or did you run the full CheckIndex?
Is your problem reproducible? If yes, does it still reproduce if you
move to a recent JVM?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:22 PM Nicolás Lichtmaier
mailto:nicol...@wolfram.com>> wrote:
Lucene 8.7's CheckIndex says there are no errors in the index.
On closer inspection this seems related to phrase matching...
El 24/11/20 a las 05:18, Adrien Grand escribió:
> Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not
Re: Lucene 8.7 error searching an index created with 8.3
This is reproducible only within our product, I haven't yet been able to isolate this and reproduce it standalone. It's Java 11. Yes, I've run CheckIndex with the "-slow" option and with assertions enabled. El 24/11/20 a las 11:32, Adrien Grand escribió: This is related to phrase matching indeed. Positions are stored in blocks of 128 values, where every block is encoded with a different number of bits per value. And the error you are seeing suggests that one block reports 69 bits per value. The fact that CheckIndex didn't complain is surprising. Did you only verify checksums (the -fast option) or did you run the full CheckIndex? Is your problem reproducible? If yes, does it still reproduce if you move to a recent JVM? On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:22 PM Nicolás Lichtmaier mailto:nicol...@wolfram.com>> wrote: Lucene 8.7's CheckIndex says there are no errors in the index. On closer inspection this seems related to phrase matching... El 24/11/20 a las 05:18, Adrien Grand escribió: > Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not corrupt? > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:01 AM Nicolás Lichtmaier > wrote: > >> I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): >> >> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for >> length 33 >> at >> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) >> at >> >> org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) >> at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) >> >> They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and >> user in formulas to affect the scores. >> >> Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? >> Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase >> here) >> >> Thanks! >> >> >>
Re: Lucene 8.7 error searching an index created with 8.3
This is related to phrase matching indeed. Positions are stored in blocks of 128 values, where every block is encoded with a different number of bits per value. And the error you are seeing suggests that one block reports 69 bits per value. The fact that CheckIndex didn't complain is surprising. Did you only verify checksums (the -fast option) or did you run the full CheckIndex? Is your problem reproducible? If yes, does it still reproduce if you move to a recent JVM? On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:22 PM Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > Lucene 8.7's CheckIndex says there are no errors in the index. > > On closer inspection this seems related to phrase matching... > > El 24/11/20 a las 05:18, Adrien Grand escribió: > > Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not corrupt? > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:01 AM Nicolás Lichtmaier > > wrote: > > > >> I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): > >> > >> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for > >> length 33 > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) > >> at > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) > >> at > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) > >> at > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) > >> at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) > >> at > >> > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) > >> at > >> org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) > >> > >> They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and > >> user in formulas to affect the scores. > >> > >> Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? > >> Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase > >> here) > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > -- Adrien
Re: Lucene 8.7 error searching an index created with 8.3
Lucene 8.7's CheckIndex says there are no errors in the index. On closer inspection this seems related to phrase matching... El 24/11/20 a las 05:18, Adrien Grand escribió: Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not corrupt? On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:01 AM Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for length 33 at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) at org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) at org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) at org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) at org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) at org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) at org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) at org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) at org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) at org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and user in formulas to affect the scores. Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase here) Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene 8.7 error searching an index created with 8.3
Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not corrupt? On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:01 AM Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): > > java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for > length 33 > at > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) > at > > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) > at > > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) > at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) > > They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and > user in formulas to affect the scores. > > Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? > Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase > here) > > Thanks! > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Adrien
Lucene 8.7 error searching an index created with 8.3
I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for length 33 at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) at org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) at org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) at org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) at org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) at org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) at org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) at org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) at org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) at org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and user in formulas to affect the scores. Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase here) Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
