Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-06-04 Thread Judy Jones
Here here!  Some things were broken in Jaws 17.  I had Jaws 16 at work for a
long time and it served me well.

Judy


-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of Kenny
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 3:16 PM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Press the [f6] key until you're placed in the Address bar field. 
[Tab] once and you should be placed in the Toolbar. Then you simply use the
left and right arrow keys to navigate to each toolbar entry and hit [Enter]
or [Spacebar] to activate it.

At 06:01 PM 5/25/2017, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>Yeah, I'm finding out that most people that aren't using the latest 
>version of JAWS are using version 16, which is encouraging.
>
>I use Windows 7 because I hated the Metro interface Microsoft tried to 
>force on us in Windows 8, and because I believe Microsoft is over 
>reaching their authority with some of the changes they made in Windows 
>10. It's my Computer damn it! And nobody but me has the right to tell 
>me what software runs on it! When they restore the user's ability to 
>decide which updates get installed on their computers, among other 
>things, then I'll consider Windows 10.
>
>I used to have Office XP which I really liked, but gave it to my dad 
>and got Office 2007 because I could get it for $10 through my employer. 
>If I could have, I'd have gotten 2003 to avoid the ribbons.
>
>So far JAWS 16 is proving to be quite stable, however the dictionary 
>manager still keeps crashing when it is first run, I was hoping that 
>that was a version 17 and 18 problem that would go away with the switch 
>to 16, oh well.
>
>I found out that it gets pricey if you let your SMA lapse, so for $5 a 
>month, I'll keep it current even if I don't use those newer versions of
JAWS.
>
>Later...
>
>
>
>
>On 5/25/2017 4:52 PM, John M. wrote:
>>Hi Gene,
>>
>>I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found 
>>that some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my 
>>opinion, version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After 
>>the upgrade, I had nothing but problems. After several months of 
>>struggling, I eventually installed version 16 and that is what I am 
>>still using today. I tried version 18 for a short while, but it was 
>>still not as stable and reliable as version 16. I am using Windows 7 
>>also. One more thing...I still use Office 2003, because I just like it 
>>a lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003 was terrible.
>>
>>I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because 
>>you can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version 
>>of Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or 
>>hardware, doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. 
>>I rely on my computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my 
>>clients. I demand that my core software is extremely stable and 
>>reliable. I have Jaws SMAs through version 20. I don't know if I will 
>>actually switch to those versions. Time will tell.
>>
>>Best,
>>John
>>
>>
>>- Original Message - From: "Gene Warner" 
>><genewarn...@gmail.com>
>>To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
>>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
>>Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16
>>
>>
>>>Hi everyone!
>>>
>>>Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to 
>>>switch from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.
>>>
>>>As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the 
>>>Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had 
>>>with it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with 
>>>the addition of the very useful command search function.
>>>
>>>Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the 
>>>engine. From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was 
>>>running into another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came 
>>>out wasn't much better.
>>>
>>>So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently 
>>>recalcitrant version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version
>>>16 to see how it compares to version 18. If it works as well as my 
>>>memory of it recalls, I will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and 
>>>consider not maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction 
>>>with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements are 
>>>for Windows 10 and have no eff

Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-06-04 Thread Kenny
Press the [f6] key until you're placed in the Address bar field. 
[Tab] once and you should be placed in the Toolbar. Then you simply 
use the left and right arrow keys to navigate to each toolbar entry 
and hit [Enter] or [Spacebar] to activate it.


At 06:01 PM 5/25/2017, you wrote:

Hi

Yeah, I'm finding out that most people that aren't using the latest 
version of JAWS are using version 16, which is encouraging.


I use Windows 7 because I hated the Metro interface Microsoft tried 
to force on us in Windows 8, and because I believe Microsoft is over 
reaching their authority with some of the changes they made in 
Windows 10. It's my Computer damn it! And nobody but me has the 
right to tell me what software runs on it! When they restore the 
user's ability to decide which updates get installed on their 
computers, among other things, then I'll consider Windows 10.


I used to have Office XP which I really liked, but gave it to my dad 
and got Office 2007 because I could get it for $10 through my 
employer. If I could have, I'd have gotten 2003 to avoid the ribbons.


So far JAWS 16 is proving to be quite stable, however the dictionary 
manager still keeps crashing when it is first run, I was hoping that 
that was a version 17 and 18 problem that would go away with the 
switch to 16, oh well.


I found out that it gets pricey if you let your SMA lapse, so for $5 
a month, I'll keep it current even if I don't use those newer versions of JAWS.


Later...




On 5/25/2017 4:52 PM, John M. wrote:

Hi Gene,

I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found
that some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my
opinion, version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After
the upgrade, I had nothing but problems. After several months of
struggling, I eventually installed version 16 and that is what I am
still using today. I tried version 18 for a short while, but it was
still not as stable and reliable as version 16. I am using Windows 7
also. One more thing...I still use Office 2003, because I just like it a
lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003 was terrible.

I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because
you can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version
of Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or hardware,
doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. I rely on my
computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my clients. I demand
that my core software is extremely stable and reliable. I have Jaws SMAs
through version 20. I don't know if I will actually switch to those
versions. Time will tell.

Best,
John


- Original Message - From: "Gene Warner" <genewarn...@gmail.com>
To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16



Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to
switch from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the
Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had
with it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the
addition of the very useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the
engine. From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was
running into another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out
wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently
recalcitrant version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version
16 to see how it compares to version 18. If it works as well as my
memory of it recalls, I will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and
consider not maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction
with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements are
for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows 7 system which I have
no plans to upgrade. If things do change for the better in the future,
I can always reestablish a new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has
already preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/



For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/



For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-28 Thread Gene Warner
I don't need JAWS for work, when I lost my vision, I had so few working 
years left, that I decided to just retire early. But when I sit down in 
front of my computer, regardless of what I'm doing; emailing, surfing 
the web, playing game, online shopping or banking, the last thing I want 
or need is to have to fight with a program that refuses to work 
properly. So arfter a year and a half of fighting with JAWWS 17 and 18, 
I finally gave up and went back to JAWS16.


If I had discovered the Outlook Express that is usable on Windows 7 
before I started using Thunderbird, I'd probably be using it now.


Later...



On 5/27/2017 3:27 PM, Andrew James Bontrager wrote:

I've still got JAWS version 9 running on this Windows XP machine, along with 
Microsoft Word 2003 and Outlook Express.
I also have a Windows 7 laptop with JAWS 17 instaled. But sadly, on that 
computer, JAWS seems to get stuck and has to restart itself rather more 
frequently than I like. I can tell you, that makes for some very anxious 
moments when speech stops and will not restart.
My advice is, do what you need to, in order for you to do your job. If a newer 
version would give you better productivity, by all means upgrade it if you can.
In my case, if I want to use Windows 7, I have to use the later JAWS version. 
But after several attempts to fully upgrade, I only use that system as a backup.
Conversely, if you find that a piece of software isn't helping you, and you're 
spending time trying to force it to perform its function, it's best to go to an 
earlier version or try another program.
This is why I use the fine port someone made of Outlook Express to Windows 7. 
Why? because other email programs (and believe me, I've tried many) don't meet 
the requirements which OE has met for all these years.


---
I am, therefore I think.
Ande
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/



For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-27 Thread Andrew James Bontrager
I've still got JAWS version 9 running on this Windows XP machine, along with 
Microsoft Word 2003 and Outlook Express.
I also have a Windows 7 laptop with JAWS 17 instaled. But sadly, on that 
computer, JAWS seems to get stuck and has to restart itself rather more 
frequently than I like. I can tell you, that makes for some very anxious 
moments when speech stops and will not restart.
My advice is, do what you need to, in order for you to do your job. If a newer 
version would give you better productivity, by all means upgrade it if you can.
In my case, if I want to use Windows 7, I have to use the later JAWS version. 
But after several attempts to fully upgrade, I only use that system as a backup.
Conversely, if you find that a piece of software isn't helping you, and you're 
spending time trying to force it to perform its function, it's best to go to an 
earlier version or try another program.
This is why I use the fine port someone made of Outlook Express to Windows 7. 
Why? because other email programs (and believe me, I've tried many) don't meet 
the requirements which OE has met for all these years.


---
I am, therefore I think.
Ande
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Gene Warner

Hi!

From what some have said about some web sites being harder to navigate 
with older versions of JAWS, I have decided not to uninstall JAWS 18, it 
just won't be my primary screen reader. I also have NVDA installed for 
those few programs, mostly games written with BGT, that don't play well 
with any version of JAWS. There are also parts of some web sites that 
don't work right with JAWS, for those too I'll switch to NVDA. I don't 
like NVDA as much as I like JAWS, but it does get me around those few 
things that JAWS won't do.


Later...

On 5/25/2017 6:17 PM, John Fitzgerald  wrote:

Hi,

Your plan sounds good to me, as long as it works for you.   I have a win 7
machine running JAWS 15 and have no plans to upgrade in the hopes of missing
all the headaches with versions 17 and 18.  And like you when my win 7 machine
dies I will probably wind up with a win 10 machine, so for now I'm just trying
to keep what little bit of hair I have left.

John Fitzgerald
Muse, Oklahoma
Article V Convention of States
http://www.cosaction.com/?recruiter_id=1022484

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of Gene Warner
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:26 PM
To: JAWS Users
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch from
Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the Lighthouse
here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with it, it just
worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition of the very
useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine.
From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into
another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant
version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it
compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I will
eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA anymore.
Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the
enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows 7 system
which I have no plans to upgrade.
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always reestablish a
new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already
preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/



For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Gene Warner

Hi

Yeah, I'm finding out that most people that aren't using the latest 
version of JAWS are using version 16, which is encouraging.


I use Windows 7 because I hated the Metro interface Microsoft tried to 
force on us in Windows 8, and because I believe Microsoft is over 
reaching their authority with some of the changes they made in Windows 
10. It's my Computer damn it! And nobody but me has the right to tell me 
what software runs on it! When they restore the user's ability to decide 
which updates get installed on their computers, among other things, then 
I'll consider Windows 10.


I used to have Office XP which I really liked, but gave it to my dad and 
got Office 2007 because I could get it for $10 through my employer. If I 
could have, I'd have gotten 2003 to avoid the ribbons.


So far JAWS 16 is proving to be quite stable, however the dictionary 
manager still keeps crashing when it is first run, I was hoping that 
that was a version 17 and 18 problem that would go away with the switch 
to 16, oh well.


I found out that it gets pricey if you let your SMA lapse, so for $5 a 
month, I'll keep it current even if I don't use those newer versions of 
JAWS.


Later...




On 5/25/2017 4:52 PM, John M. wrote:

Hi Gene,

I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found
that some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my
opinion, version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After
the upgrade, I had nothing but problems. After several months of
struggling, I eventually installed version 16 and that is what I am
still using today. I tried version 18 for a short while, but it was
still not as stable and reliable as version 16. I am using Windows 7
also. One more thing...I still use Office 2003, because I just like it a
lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003 was terrible.

I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because
you can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version
of Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or hardware,
doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. I rely on my
computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my clients. I demand
that my core software is extremely stable and reliable. I have Jaws SMAs
through version 20. I don't know if I will actually switch to those
versions. Time will tell.

Best,
John


- Original Message - From: "Gene Warner" <genewarn...@gmail.com>
To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16



Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to
switch from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the
Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had
with it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the
addition of the very useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the
engine. From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was
running into another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out
wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently
recalcitrant version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version
16 to see how it compares to version 18. If it works as well as my
memory of it recalls, I will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and
consider not maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction
with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements are
for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows 7 system which I have
no plans to upgrade. If things do change for the better in the future,
I can always reestablish a new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has
already preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/




For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Miriam Vieni
I am so envious. I tried so hard to keep Office 2003, but Word was somewhat
corrupted and I had to really play around with it  to get it to work
properly part of the time. And then Outlook began producing multiple copies
of emails. I had a patch that was supposed to take care of such problems,
but it stopped. And I was using magic at a very high magnification. My old
Magic wouldn't work with newer versions of Jaws like 16 and the new version
of Magic wouldn't work with Office 2003. So then someone installed new
everything for me. Jaws 18 seems to be a bit better after yesterday's
upgrade. At least I hope it is. But there are certain kinds of html emails
that Jaws did fine with in Outlook 2003, and that, even with all kinds of
work arounds, it's difficult to deal with, with Jaws in later versions of
Office. I retired 10 years ago. Otherwise, I'd be tearing my hair out!

Miriam

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of John M.
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:53 PM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi Gene,

I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found that
some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my opinion,
version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After the upgrade, I
had nothing but problems. After several months of struggling, I eventually
installed version 16 and that is what I am still using today. I tried
version 18 for a short while, but it was still not as stable and reliable as
version 16. I am using Windows 7 also. One more thing...I still use Office
2003, because I just like it a lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003
was terrible.

I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because you
can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version of
Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or hardware,
doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. I rely on my
computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my clients. I demand that
my core software is extremely stable and reliable. I have Jaws SMAs through
version 20. I don't know if I will actually switch to those versions. Time
will tell.

Best,
John


- Original Message -
From: "Gene Warner" <genewarn...@gmail.com>
To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16


> Hi everyone!
>
> Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch 
> from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.
>
> As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the 
> Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with 
> it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition

> of the very useful command search function.
>
> Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine.

> From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into 
> another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much 
> better.
>
> So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant 
> version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it 
> compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I 
> will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA 
> anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like

> most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my 
> Windows 7 system which I have no plans to upgrade. If things do change for

> the better in the future, I can always reestablish a new SMA.
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already 
> preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Later...
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
> 


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread John Fitzgerald
Hi,

Your plan sounds good to me, as long as it works for you.   I have a win 7
machine running JAWS 15 and have no plans to upgrade in the hopes of missing
all the headaches with versions 17 and 18.  And like you when my win 7 machine
dies I will probably wind up with a win 10 machine, so for now I'm just trying
to keep what little bit of hair I have left.

John Fitzgerald
Muse, Oklahoma 
Article V Convention of States
http://www.cosaction.com/?recruiter_id=1022484

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of Gene Warner
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:26 PM
To: JAWS Users
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch from
Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the Lighthouse
here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with it, it just
worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition of the very
useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine.
>From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into
another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant
version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it
compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I will
eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA anymore.
Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the
enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows 7 system
which I have no plans to upgrade. 
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always reestablish a
new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already
preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Joseph Lee
Hi,
It depends on what Windows 10 release one is using. The latest builds of 17
and 18 will work reasonably well with Windows 10 Version 1703 (Creators
Update), although for some, audio ducking in JAWS 18 is somewhat broken when
using latest Windows 10 release.
Cheers,
Joseph

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of Judy
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:35 PM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Gene and John, you have given me some very useful information and I thank
  You both. I wonder if Jaws 17 and 18 work better with Windows 10, but I am
still using Win 7 and am happy with it. No plans to upgrade until I have to,
and while considering upgrading my Jaws perhaps in the near future, you have
both convinced me to go with 16.  Judy & Libby
 
-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of John M.
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:53 PM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi Gene,

I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found that
some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my opinion,
version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After the upgrade, I
had nothing but problems. After several months of struggling, I eventually
installed version 16 and that is what I am still using today. I tried
version 18 for a short while, but it was still not as stable and reliable as

version 16. I am using Windows 7 also. One more thing...I still use Office
2003, because I just like it a lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003
was terrible.

I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because you
can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version of
Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or hardware,
doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. I rely on my
computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my clients. I demand that

my core software is extremely stable and reliable. I have Jaws SMAs through
version 20. I don't know if I will actually switch to those versions. Time
will tell.

Best,
John


- Original Message -
From: "Gene Warner" <genewarn...@gmail.com>
To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16


> Hi everyone!
>
> Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch 
> from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.
>
> As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the 
> Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with 
> it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition

> of the very useful command search function.
>
> Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine.

> From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into 
> another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much 
> better.
>
> So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant 
> version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it 
> compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I 
> will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA 
> anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like

> most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my 
> Windows 7 system which I have no plans to upgrade. If things do change for

> the better in the future, I can always reestablish a new SMA.
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already 
> preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Later...
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
> 


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Judy
Gene and John, you have given me some very useful information and I thank
  You both. I wonder if Jaws 17 and 18 work better with Windows 10, but I am
still using Win 7 and am happy with it. No plans to upgrade until I have to,
and while considering upgrading my Jaws perhaps in the near future, you have
both convinced me to go with 16.  Judy & Libby
 
-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of John M.
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:53 PM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi Gene,

I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found that 
some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my opinion, 
version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After the upgrade, I 
had nothing but problems. After several months of struggling, I eventually 
installed version 16 and that is what I am still using today. I tried 
version 18 for a short while, but it was still not as stable and reliable as

version 16. I am using Windows 7 also. One more thing...I still use Office 
2003, because I just like it a lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003 
was terrible.

I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because you 
can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version of 
Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or hardware, 
doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. I rely on my 
computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my clients. I demand that

my core software is extremely stable and reliable. I have Jaws SMAs through 
version 20. I don't know if I will actually switch to those versions. Time 
will tell.

Best,
John


- Original Message - 
From: "Gene Warner" <genewarn...@gmail.com>
To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16


> Hi everyone!
>
> Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch 
> from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.
>
> As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the 
> Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with 
> it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition

> of the very useful command search function.
>
> Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine.

> From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into 
> another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much 
> better.
>
> So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant 
> version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it 
> compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I 
> will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA 
> anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like

> most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my 
> Windows 7 system which I have no plans to upgrade. If things do change for

> the better in the future, I can always reestablish a new SMA.
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already 
> preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Later...
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
> 


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Adrian Spratt
By the way, I also have a Win7, 64-bit system, along with Office 2010. As John 
says, no need to upgrade for the sake of it. JAWS is one of my rare exceptions 
to the rule.

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On Behalf 
Of Adrian Spratt
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 5:22 PM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Gene,

When FS publicizes new features in each annual upgrade, they don't mention what 
I believe are a slew of behind-the-scenes changes they make in order to keep on 
top of developments on the Web. Sometimes I suspect these background 
improvements are what cause a deterioration in performance for some users with 
some websites. It's why many JAWS users keep more than one version on their 
systems. But if you decide to give up your SMA, you will find the Web 
increasingly more difficult to navigate because your old version can't catch 
up. That's been my experience as JAWS has gone from V. 2 to today's V. 18. 

There are always wrinkles. For example, when you install a new version, it will 
share components with any previous versions on your system. It can affect 
performance on the old version, which I've experienced. In fact, even when I've 
uninstalled an old version, decided I wanted it back, then uninstalled the new 
version in order to eliminate shared components, the old version comes back 
with problems associated with those shared components. Perhaps I've failed to 
get rid of all traces, but I won't mess with the registry. Others here do so 
all the time.

I think Miriam's point about the SMA functioning as insurance is a good one. It 
fits in with what I'm saying here. 

Finally, I see no deterioration in performance between JAWS 16 and 18. In the 
past, a JAWS upgrade has made certain websites less easy to navigate, but I 
haven't had that experience in a long time. Moreover, there are so many 
workarounds now, most of all the success many of us have had with turning the 
virtual cursor off in certain situations. 

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On Behalf 
Of Gene Warner
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:26 PM
To: JAWS Users
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch from 
Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the Lighthouse 
here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with it, it just 
worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition of the very 
useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine. From 
there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into another 
misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant version 
of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it compares to 
version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I will eventually 
uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my 
dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements 
are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows 7 system which I have no 
plans to upgrade. 
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always reestablish a 
new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already 
preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Adrian Spratt
Gene,

When FS publicizes new features in each annual upgrade, they don't mention what 
I believe are a slew of behind-the-scenes changes they make in order to keep on 
top of developments on the Web. Sometimes I suspect these background 
improvements are what cause a deterioration in performance for some users with 
some websites. It's why many JAWS users keep more than one version on their 
systems. But if you decide to give up your SMA, you will find the Web 
increasingly more difficult to navigate because your old version can't catch 
up. That's been my experience as JAWS has gone from V. 2 to today's V. 18. 

There are always wrinkles. For example, when you install a new version, it will 
share components with any previous versions on your system. It can affect 
performance on the old version, which I've experienced. In fact, even when I've 
uninstalled an old version, decided I wanted it back, then uninstalled the new 
version in order to eliminate shared components, the old version comes back 
with problems associated with those shared components. Perhaps I've failed to 
get rid of all traces, but I won't mess with the registry. Others here do so 
all the time.

I think Miriam's point about the SMA functioning as insurance is a good one. It 
fits in with what I'm saying here. 

Finally, I see no deterioration in performance between JAWS 16 and 18. In the 
past, a JAWS upgrade has made certain websites less easy to navigate, but I 
haven't had that experience in a long time. Moreover, there are so many 
workarounds now, most of all the success many of us have had with turning the 
virtual cursor off in certain situations. 

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On Behalf 
Of Gene Warner
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:26 PM
To: JAWS Users
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch from 
Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the Lighthouse 
here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with it, it just 
worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition of the very 
useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine. From 
there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into another 
misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant version 
of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it compares to 
version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I will eventually 
uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my 
dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements 
are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows 7 system which I have no 
plans to upgrade. 
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always reestablish a 
new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already 
preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread John M.

Hi Gene,

I have been using Jaws since version 5. Over the years, I have found that 
some versions of Jaws are very good and others are junk. In my opinion, 
version 17 is junk. I had upgraded from Jaws 15 to 17. After the upgrade, I 
had nothing but problems. After several months of struggling, I eventually 
installed version 16 and that is what I am still using today. I tried 
version 18 for a short while, but it was still not as stable and reliable as 
version 16. I am using Windows 7 also. One more thing...I still use Office 
2003, because I just like it a lot. Jaws version 17 support for Office 2003 
was terrible.


I always go back to a saying that I have used for years--"Just because you 
can doesn't mean you should.". Just because there is a new version of 
Windows or Office or Jaws or any other piece of software or hardware, 
doesn't mean you have to rush to install it or purchase it. I rely on my 
computer on a daily basis to do my job and service my clients. I demand that 
my core software is extremely stable and reliable. I have Jaws SMAs through 
version 20. I don't know if I will actually switch to those versions. Time 
will tell.


Best,
John


- Original Message - 
From: "Gene Warner" <genewarn...@gmail.com>

To: "JAWS Users" <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16



Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch 
from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.


As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the 
Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with 
it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition 
of the very useful command search function.


Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine. 
From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into 
another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much 
better.


So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant 
version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it 
compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I 
will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA 
anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like 
most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my 
Windows 7 system which I have no plans to upgrade. If things do change for 
the better in the future, I can always reestablish a new SMA.


I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already 
preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.


Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/




For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Mike B.
Hi Gene,

Although I have J15 thru J18 on all my computers my main & favorite version 
is J16.  I use J16 about 95% of the time.
Take care.  Mike.  Go Dodgers!
Sent from my iBarstool.
Arguing with a woman is like reading a software license agreement.  In the 
end you have to ignore everything, & click I agree.
- Original Message - 
From: Gene Warner
To: JAWS Users
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 12:25 PM
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16


Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to
switch from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the
Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had
with it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the
addition of the very useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the
engine. From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was
running into another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out
wasn't much better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant
version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how
it compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it
recalls, I will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not
maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17
and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and
have no effect on my Windows 7 system which I have no plans to upgrade.
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always
reestablish a new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has
already preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/ 
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


Re: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Miriam Vieni
I think that perhaps the latest upgrade of 18 may have fixed the issue I
kept having, which was that Jaws periodically disappeared  when I changed
from one window to the next. I may be wrong. I only did the upgrade
yesterday. But it's really expensive to stop paying for those SMA's. The one
for personal use averages out to be $60 a year. Even if you don't use it,
$60 a year is like an insurance plan in case you need a later version. If
you stop paying for them and then need a new version, it will cost a lot
more money.

Miriam

-Original Message-
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of Gene Warner
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:26 PM
To: JAWS Users <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to switch
from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.

As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the Lighthouse
here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had with it, it just
worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the addition of the very
useful command search function.

Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the engine.
>From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was running into
another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out wasn't much
better.

So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant
version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how it
compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it recalls, I
will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not maintaining my SMA
anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 and 18, it seems like
most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and have no effect on my Windows
7 system which I have no plans to upgrade. 
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always reestablish a
new SMA.

I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has already
preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.

Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/


[JAWS-Users] Downgrading to JAWS 16

2017-05-25 Thread Gene Warner

Hi everyone!

Back in 2013, when I was finally declared legally blind and had to 
switch from Zoom Text to JAWS, JAWS was at version 15.


As I recall, other than having to learn it on my own because the 
Lighthouse here is a bad joke, there were few, if any problems I had 
with it, it just worked. JAWS 16 was pretty much the same but with the 
addition of the very useful command search function.


Then came JAWS 17 with the apparent almost complete rewrite of the 
engine. From there it seemed like every time I turned around I was 
running into another misfunction of JAWS. Version 18, when it came out 
wasn't much better.


So, after long thought, as well as fighting an apparently  recalcitrant 
version of JAWS, I've finally decided to install version 16 to see how 
it compares to version 18. If it works as well as my memory of it 
recalls, I will eventually uninstall JAWS 18, and consider not 
maintaining my SMA anymore. Besides my dissatisfaction with versions 17 
and 18, it seems like most of the enhancements are for Windows 10 and 
have no effect on my Windows 7 system which I have no plans to upgrade. 
If things do change for the better in the future, I can always 
reestablish a new SMA.


I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this idea or has 
already preceded me in downgrading back to version 16.


Thanks!

Later...

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/