[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0/EJBQL spec (was: Jboss 3.2.2/EJB-QL with = or =?)
Hey all, Just for kicks I downloaded EJB 2.0 Final Release 2 specifications. On page 229 under section 11.2.7.6 the operators '=' and '=' are specified. In fact, in the next section they use these operators in an example to replace the 'BETWEEN' SQL command. However, Dain did catch this (see forum link below) but tells how you can not use those operators with DATES. Unfortunately, that was my scenario (which I agree is kinda silly) but the '=' and '=' do work for integer types. http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=18352 -D On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:02 PM, Darren Hartford wrote: Hey all, Is there any reason why Jboss 3.2.2 throws an exception when an EJB-QL statement contains '=' or '='? Yes, because EJB-QL is retarded. Use jboss-ql instead. Isn't that EJB/CMP2 spec great? :-/ S. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0/EJBQL spec (was: Jboss 3.2.2/EJB-QL with = or =?)
Better yet, use Hibernate. Darren Hartford wrote: Hey all, Just for kicks I downloaded EJB 2.0 Final Release 2 specifications. On page 229 under section 11.2.7.6 the operators '=' and '=' are specified. In fact, in the next section they use these operators in an example to replace the 'BETWEEN' SQL command. However, Dain did catch this (see forum link below) but tells how you can not use those operators with DATES. Unfortunately, that was my scenario (which I agree is kinda silly) but the '=' and '=' do work for integer types. http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=18352 -D On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:02 PM, Darren Hartford wrote: Hey all, Is there any reason why Jboss 3.2.2 throws an exception when an EJB-QL statement contains '=' or '='? Yes, because EJB-QL is retarded. Use jboss-ql instead. Isn't that EJB/CMP2 spec great? :-/ S. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -- Bill Burke Chief Architect JBoss Group LLC. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0/EJBQL spec (was: Jboss 3.2.2/EJB-QL with
Actually, Hibernate is looking more and more like a good idea. Unfortunately, I'm a little ignorant on how Hibernate falls under a J2EE umbrella for those that want to stay true to J2EE. Is there any good information/articles available on the subject and/or how to migrate from EJB/CMP to Hibernate? -D Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:40:52 -0500 From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Better yet, use Hibernate. Darren Hartford wrote: Hey all, Just for kicks I downloaded EJB 2.0 Final Release 2 specifications. On page 229 under section 11.2.7.6 the operators '=' and '=' are specified. In fact, in the next section they use these operators in an example to replace the 'BETWEEN' SQL command. However, Dain did catch this (see forum link below) but tells how you can not use those operators with DATES. Unfortunately, that was my scenario (which I agree is kinda silly) but the '=' and '=' do work for integer types. http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=18352 -D On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:02 PM, Darren Hartford wrote: Hey all, Is there any reason why Jboss 3.2.2 throws an exception when an EJB-QL statement contains '=' or '='? Yes, because EJB-QL is retarded. Use jboss-ql instead. Isn't that EJB/CMP2 spec great? :-/ S. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] ejb 2.0
when is jboss expected to be ejb 2.0 compliant (i guess its 1.1 so far!) ?Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
RE: [JBoss-user] ejb 2.0
I believe that 3.0 (which is currently in beta) is fully EJB 2.0 compliant. -Todd -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alice AdSent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:46 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [JBoss-user] ejb 2.0 when is jboss expected to be ejb 2.0 compliant (i guess its 1.1 so far!) ? Do You Yahoo!?Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 CMP SAMPLES
I am new to the CMP implementation of Jboss. Can anyone direct me a good doc source and sample? ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 CMP implementation class must be abstrac t
Dain, basically explained. I had a look at the source. JBoss uses a 'special' class loader to dynamically generate a 'byte code' class presumably 'wrapper' the ejb abstract class before it is instantiated. Very clever! Kar - Original Message - From: Andreas Joseph Krogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:56 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 CMP implementation class must be abstrac t Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: According to this article http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/ebeans/ejbmigrate/ ?frontpage-jdc an EJB 2.0 CMP bean implementation class must be abstract, will it work in JBoss? Yes. As I understand it JBoss does not generate wrapper class instead it uses the Proxy class to wrap the bean, the call to Class.newInstance() will not work on an abstract class. I am just wondering how it is done. Kar You got it half right. We use a proxy class, but the proxy does not as you put it, wrap the bean. JBoss uses dynamic proxies (java.lang.reflect.Proxy). Read the javadocs, but to summarize, a dynamic proxy is a lot of black magic that code generates the byte code for a class that implements an arbitrary set of interfaces. For CMP JBoss uses a custom implementation of dynamic proxies that will generate a proxy that is a subclass of an abstract class. It is pretty simple except for the code that generates the proxy, which I didn't write. I thought the dynamic proxy thing wouldn't work with CMP-2.0 and that JBoss would seriously suffer from this as SUN wouldn't take it out of the spec. Can you/anyone please elaborate more on this, and how JBoss solved it? -- Andreas Joseph Krogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 CMP implementation class must be abstrac t
Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: According to this article http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/ebeans/ejbmigrate/ ?frontpage-jdc an EJB 2.0 CMP bean implementation class must be abstract, will it work in JBoss? Yes. As I understand it JBoss does not generate wrapper class instead it uses the Proxy class to wrap the bean, the call to Class.newInstance() will not work on an abstract class. I am just wondering how it is done. Kar You got it half right. We use a proxy class, but the proxy does not as you put it, wrap the bean. JBoss uses dynamic proxies (java.lang.reflect.Proxy). Read the javadocs, but to summarize, a dynamic proxy is a lot of black magic that code generates the byte code for a class that implements an arbitrary set of interfaces. For CMP JBoss uses a custom implementation of dynamic proxies that will generate a proxy that is a subclass of an abstract class. It is pretty simple except for the code that generates the proxy, which I didn't write. I thought the dynamic proxy thing wouldn't work with CMP-2.0 and that JBoss would seriously suffer from this as SUN wouldn't take it out of the spec. Can you/anyone please elaborate more on this, and how JBoss solved it? -- Andreas Joseph Krogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 CMP implementation class must be abstract
According to this article http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/ebeans/ejbmigrate/?frontpage-jdc an EJB 2.0 CMP bean implementation class must be abstract, will it work in JBoss? As I understand it JBoss does not generate "wrapper" class instead it uses the Proxy class to "wrap" the bean, the call to Class.newInstance() will not work on an abstract class. I am just wondering how it is done. Kar
RE: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 CMP implementation class must be abstract
According to this article http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/ebeans/ejbmigrate/ ?frontpage-jdc an EJB 2.0 CMP bean implementation class must be abstract, will it work in JBoss? Yes. As I understand it JBoss does not generate wrapper class instead it uses the Proxy class to wrap the bean, the call to Class.newInstance() will not work on an abstract class. I am just wondering how it is done. Kar You got it half right. We use a proxy class, but the proxy does not as you put it, wrap the bean. JBoss uses dynamic proxies (java.lang.reflect.Proxy). Read the javadocs, but to summarize, a dynamic proxy is a lot of black magic that code generates the byte code for a class that implements an arbitrary set of interfaces. For CMP JBoss uses a custom implementation of dynamic proxies that will generate a proxy that is a subclass of an abstract class. It is pretty simple except for the code that generates the proxy, which I didn't write. -dain ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 and Jboss 2.4.1/3.0
Ok, I seem to be confused what is Jboss's status on support for EJB 2.0? Is it available in 2.4.1 or are we waiting for 3.0. Sorry for the dumb question. Thanks, Jake T. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 and Jboss 2.4.1/3.0
3.0 Jake Thompson wrote: Ok, I seem to be confused what is Jboss's status on support for EJB 2.0? Is it available in 2.4.1 or are we waiting for 3.0. Sorry for the dumb question. Thanks, Jake T. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] ejb 2.0 cmr in jboss
Check out http://www.mvcsoft.com. They offer an EJB 2.0 plugin persistence manager. It currently supports PFD1, but thats a great place ot start and they are planning a PDF2 product. Jim --On Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:52 PM +1000 Omilian, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've used the container managed relationship stuff in weblogic 6 (with the ejb2.0.jar added), and found it incredibly usefull. I'm now developing on JBoss 2.2.1, and would like to make use of that feature. Can anyone tell me if cmr is offered by JBoss, and if not, when it might be? Thanks, Alex. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. - Robert Frost, 1916 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] ejb 2.0 cmr in jboss
Hi, I've used the container managed relationship stuff in weblogic 6 (with the ejb2.0.jar added), and found it incredibly usefull. I'm now developing on JBoss 2.2.1, and would like to make use of that feature. Can anyone tell me if cmr is offered by JBoss, and if not, when it might be? Thanks, Alex. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] ejb 2.0 cmr in jboss
Hi, thats only in 2.4 and above. Burkhard - Original Message - From: Omilian, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:52 AM Subject: [JBoss-user] ejb 2.0 cmr in jboss Hi, I've used the container managed relationship stuff in weblogic 6 (with the ejb2.0.jar added), and found it incredibly usefull. I'm now developing on JBoss 2.2.1, and would like to make use of that feature. Can anyone tell me if cmr is offered by JBoss, and if not, when it might be? Thanks, Alex. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 Home Methods
Hello, I have a possibly silly question. How are EJB 2.0 Home Methods implemented in JBoss? When a home method gets called is a random instance from the cache selected and it's remote interface returned just for that method call? I'm trying to determine the overhead of using them, as well as comparing home method implementations between JBoss and WebLogic. On that note, a WebLogic vs. JBoss explanation of home methods would be very useful if anyone happens to know how WebLogic handles them. Thanks Chris Murphy ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 Features
One of the nicest 2.0 features you get from JBoss is support for message beans. Right now I'm using this feature by setting up a bunch of message beans that basically act as asynchronous event handlers. The major changes to the persistence model in 2.0 (container managed relationships and local interfaces) have not yet been implemented in jboss. (Note, though, that jboss does handle calls to other beans in the same server very efficiently, which was a major purpose of local interfaces). Alex |+-- || John Patterson| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by:| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || eforge.net | || | || | || 06/26/01 04:35 PM | || Please respond to jboss-user| || | |+-- ---| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 Features | ---| What features of EJB2.0 have been implemented on JBoss 2.4? How can they be utilised? Thanks. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 QL
How do you get something similar to SQL ORDER BY in EJB QL? -- Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Straight Shooter With Upper Management Written All Over ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 QL
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 QL ordercolumn/order; don't put the order by string inside of the tag. -Original Message- From: Hunter Hillegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:19 PM To: JBoss 2 Subject: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 QL How do you get something similar to SQL ORDER BY in EJB QL? -- Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Straight Shooter With Upper Management Written All Over ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 QL
Hi Hunter... --On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:19 PM -0700 Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you get something similar to SQL ORDER BY in EJB QL? You can't. MVC Soft is planning a propritary extension to provide for this, but a strict implementation of QL can't do it, as of PFD2. In fact, I think QL has several annoying limitations. The potential for it to be great is there, so its very disappointing. I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. - Robert Frost, 1916 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 home methods for Entity EJBs
Hi. In some JBoss documentation I was reading about EJB 2.0 support, but I couldn't find any details (except of an EJB 2.0 CMP plugin), so I want to ask my question here: Does JBoss support EJB 2.0 home methods for Entity EJBs? Martin ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 home methods for Entity EJBs
Hi. I asked this question because I already tried to use a home method, but then I got an error message during the deployment. Now, I tried it again and it works... Strange world :-) Martin Yes it does In some JBoss documentation I was reading about EJB 2.0 support, but I couldn't find any details (except of an EJB 2.0 CMP plugin), so I want to ask my question here: Does JBoss support EJB 2.0 home methods for Entity EJBs? ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support in jBoss
I was reading through some threads on theserverside and thru the new EJB 2.0 PFD2, and it looks like the persistence manager will be removed from the spec? Is this true? Any feedback on this, and to what it will mean? Thanks, Darren --- Jim Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Daryl... Currently, jBoss does not support EJB 2.0 CMP relationships by itself. However, you can solve this problem for $28. MVC Soft sells an EJB 2.0 Persistence Manager for jBoss for $28 and it includes a great manual on how to use it. I have had great luck with it. Of course, it implements EJB 2.0 PFD1, which is the first proposed final draft. The second proposed final draft came out yesterday. So don't use dependent objects. http://www.mvcsoft.com Good luck! Jim --On Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:55 PM +1000 Daryl Wilding-McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Does jBoss 2.2 support the new CMP entity bean relationships described in EJB 2.0? More generally, is there a document somewhere that describes the specs supported by jBoss? Thanks, Daryl. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. - Robert Frost, 1916 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support in jBoss
Hi Daryl... Currently, jBoss does not support EJB 2.0 CMP relationships by itself. However, you can solve this problem for $28. MVC Soft sells an EJB 2.0 Persistence Manager for jBoss for $28 and it includes a great manual on how to use it. I have had great luck with it. Of course, it implements EJB 2.0 PFD1, which is the first proposed final draft. The second proposed final draft came out yesterday. So don't use dependent objects. http://www.mvcsoft.com Good luck! Jim --On Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:55 PM +1000 Daryl Wilding-McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Does jBoss 2.2 support the new CMP entity bean relationships described in EJB 2.0? More generally, is there a document somewhere that describes the specs supported by jBoss? Thanks, Daryl. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. - Robert Frost, 1916 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support in jBoss
Yes...please check www.mvcsoft.com They have an add in for JBoss to support CMP EJB 2.0 style. It is an 'educational' release and cost $28.00. It has a nice manual that is well worth the $28.00. Khaled - Original Message - From: Daryl Wilding-McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 7:55 PM Subject: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support in jBoss Hello, Does jBoss 2.2 support the new CMP entity bean relationships described in EJB 2.0? More generally, is there a document somewhere that describes the specs supported by jBoss? Thanks, Daryl. ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support
Title: EJB 2.0 support -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 First of all, I just want to tell the development team how impressed I am with JBoss. Thanks for an awesome product. I'm new to the list, and I didn't see any mention of this in the archives, but I saw that there are a couple EJB 2.0 features in the current JBoss implementation, and I wondered if there was a list of other 2.0 features that people are working on and/or what priority they're being given. Thanks. Tim McCune Software Architect, ChannelPoint If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, then you ARE the sucker. -- Mike McDermott, Rounders -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOuU3t9UPOr8a7vy5EQKBhgCguqF2qJ/h5hvg8COwG/17b4IABsIAn0pq vvHIXQiwwVn53i2KDTC9iaZI =YTYp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support
I was wondering how much EJB 2.0 support is there currently in JBoss and whats the tentative schedule for full support? Kashif _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support
Hi Kashif, JBoss 2.2 supports some features of EJB 2.0 (message driven beans, for example) but doesn't implement full support because the EJB 2.0 spec hasn't been finalized. Once the spec is done, JBoss will support it. For info on MDBs, check out the manual at http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/index.html Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kashif Noorani Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support I was wondering how much EJB 2.0 support is there currently in JBoss and whats the tentative schedule for full support? Kashif _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] EJB 2.0 support
Kashif, there is a persistence manager for use with jBoss that implements almost all of the features of EJB 2.0 persistence, including the sophisticated relationships between EBs and dependents (it implements dependents as well). Its $28.00 and includes a manual in PDF form that does an excellant job explaining the persistence features of EJB 2.0 and use of the product. You can check it out at http://www.mvcsoft.com As has been pointed out, EJB 2.0 is not a final spec yet and the final spec may look different that the current proposed final draft. This product implements the EJB 2.0 PFD spec. Good luck! Jim --On Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:43 PM -0500 Kashif Noorani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering how much EJB 2.0 support is there currently in JBoss and whats the tentative schedule for full support? Kashif _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
