The problem appears to be related to the ISA Firewall Client. When
activated, I get Address already in use: JVM_Bind errors for ports
1099, , 8080 and others. When deactivated, the errors go away.
I would still be interested to know why JBoss 3.0.4 works fine with
the ISA Firewall Client activated. What changed in 3.2.x that might
account for the incompatibility?
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Jim Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Unable to run 3.2.2 on Windoze
I just tried the tomcat version and got the same result. I've tried
both on XP and Win2k with the same result, some with 1.4.1 and some with
1.4.2. Always with the default config. Always the same results, as if
something is listening on 8080 when the web server tries to start, but I
know nothing is. I can run the default config of JBoss 3.0.4 on these
boxes fine. (And no it's not running when I attempt to start bring up
3.2.2).
I'm really doing nothing special at all. It should work. It does work
on my Linux boxen. What could I be missing?
Thanks,
Jim
Rod Macpherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using the tomcat version (seems to be the server of choice now)
on XP no problemo. Either you have multiple copies of it running
(assume you rebooted) or something is wacky about your system. Did you
try telnet to 8080 on localhost before starting JBoss? Speaking of
localhost, not sure if this matters but do you have localhost in your
windoze/system32/driver/etc/hosts file?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/19/2003 2:11 PM
To: JBoss Users
Cc:
Subject: [JBoss-user] Unable to run 3.2.2 on Windoze
I'm having a heck of a time getting JBoss 3.2.2-Jetty to run on
either
Win2K or XP. (I can run it on multiple Linux's fine).
I've verified that I have no other services listening on JBoss'
ports
(8080, 8009, 1099, , etc), but Jetty doesn't seem to be
happy when
it comes up. Even odder, when I shutdown and restart
immediately,
it's as if the ports from the previous run are still being used
and I
get all kinds of errors -- mostly JNDI errors because 1099 is
still
bound.
Is there some Windoze setting somewhere I need to turn on so
that my
ports aren't in TIME_WAIT for so long after shutdown?
2003-11-19 17:04:22,538 INFO [org.jboss.jbossweb] Starting
Jetty/4.2.11
2003-11-19 17:04:22,568 INFO [org.jboss.jbossweb] Started
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-19 17:04:22,588 WARN [org.jboss.jbossweb] WARNING:
Failed to
start: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080
2003-11-19 17:04:22,618 INFO [org.jboss.jbossweb] Started
AJP13Listener on 0.0.0.0:8009
2003-11-19 17:04:22,628 INFO [org.jboss.jbossweb] NOTICE: AJP13
is
not a secure protocol. Please protect the port 0.0.0.0:8009
2003-11-19 17:04:22,638 ERROR [org.jboss.jetty.JettyService]
multiple
exceptions...
2003-11-19 17:04:22,648 ERROR [org.jboss.jetty.JettyService]
exception
java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind
at
java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native
Method)
at
java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:331)
at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:309)
at java.net.ServerSocket.init(ServerSocket.java:183)
at
org.mortbay.util.ThreadedServer.newServerSocket(ThreadedServer.java:317)
at
org.mortbay.util.ThreadedServer.start(ThreadedServer.java:389)
at
org.mortbay.http.SocketListener.start(SocketListener.java:153)
at
org.mortbay.http.HttpServer.start(HttpServer.java:671)
at
org.jboss.jetty.JettyService.startService(JettyService.java:175)
How does anyone get anything done on an MS platform?!?! ;-)
Thanks,
Jim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
*
NOTE: An attachment named winmail.dat was deleted from this message
because it contained a windows executableor other potentially
dangerous file type.Contact the system administrator for more
information.
--
Jim Crossley
http://crossleys.org/~jim
404.409.9085
---
This SF.net email is
