Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 3rd party optic/DAC
Handy commands... I've got Juniper ones and a non-Juniper one here: Xcvr 51 REV 01 740-038623 QSFP+-40G-CU1M Xcvr 52 REV 01 740-038623 QSFP+-40G-CU1M Xcvr 53 NON-JNPR UNKNOWN And I'm seeing some interesting stuff. On the Juniper cable: TFXPC0(vty)# show qsfp 1 identifier Identifier: QSFP+ Connector type: No Separable Connector Encoding: Unspecified Vendor name:Molex Inc. Vendor OUI: 00093A Vendor PN: 1110409055 Vendor Rev: B ...redacted... Transceiver code: 10G/40G Ethernet: 40GBase-CR4 On the Non working one: FXPC0(vty)# show qsfp 3 iden Identifier: QSFP Connector type: Copper Pigtail Encoding: Unspecified Vendor name:Molex Inc. Vendor OUI: 00093A Vendor PN: 112-00178 Vendor Rev: A0 ...redacted... Transceiver code: Gigabit Ethernet: 1000Base-CX So maybe this cable is only 1000Base? What makes this even more weird is that the 4300 sees it as the same, but it comes up as 40Gb: (vty)# show qsfp 1 identifier Identifier: QSFP Connector type: Copper Pigtail Encoding: Unspecified Vendor name:Molex Inc. Vendor OUI: 00093A Vendor PN: 112-00178 Vendor Rev: A0 ...redacted... Transceiver code: Gigabit Ethernet: 1000Base-CX root@4300-STACK show virtual-chassis vc-port fpc0: -- Interface Type Trunk Status SpeedNeighbor or ID (mbps) ID Interface PIC / Port 1/1 Configured -1Up 41 vcp-255/1/0 I would expect this to come up at 1Gb if that was the case. The QFX5100s also refuse to bring up those DACs even if they are the only cables available. Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:34:27 -0700 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 3rd party optic/DAC From: jackson@gmail.com To: darre...@outlook.com CC: aaron.dew...@gmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Some good debugging: start shell vty fpc0 show qsfp list show qsfp id On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote: I've got the very latest code on as it's in a lab D25 I've got two 3rd party DACs and it's going from QFX5100 to QFX5100. Both have the same issue. Same two cables in QSFP ports on the back of the 4300s works perfectly fine. Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:25:38 -0600 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 3rd party optic/DAC From: aaron.dew...@gmail.com To: darre...@outlook.com CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net What version of code? D10 (frs) had some issues with some cables which is resolved in more current versions. Also if this is 5100 to 4300 make sure you have auto negotiation turned off on the 4300 (but that would probably fail with a juniper branded dac as well so unlikely to be the issue). On Sep 29, 2014 6:43 AM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote: Anyone having any luck with this? I've got a few QSFP DACs that work perfectly fine on a 4300 stack, but the QFX5100 refuses to work with them. Work fine with a Juniper branded DAC. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Port-Mirroring on auto-configuration interfaces
Hi guys,
does anybody know if it’s possible to setup a port-mirror for
autoconfiguration-interfaces or do i need an externel tap device ?
Here’s the configuration of ge-1/0/3 where i would like to see all
input- and output-traffic (for all VLANs). Dynamic profiles are attached
below
MX240 show configuration interfaces ge-1/0/3
flexible-vlan-tagging;
auto-configure {
stacked-vlan-ranges {
dynamic-profile AUTOVLAN-DEMUX-PROFILE {
accept any;
ranges {
any,132-132;
any,232-232;
any,432-432;
any,532-532;
}
}
authentication {
password lab;
username-include {
interface-name;
}
}
access-profile NO-RADIUS-AUTH;
}
remove-when-no-subscribers;
}
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
Dynamic profiles:
-
AUTOVLAN-DEMUX-PROFILE {
routing-instances {
$junos-routing-instance {
interface $junos-interface-name;
}
}
interfaces {
demux0 {
unit $junos-interface-unit {
demux-source [ inet inet6 ];
vlan-tags outer $junos-stacked-vlan-id inner
$junos-vlan-id;
demux-options {
underlying-interface $junos-interface-ifd-name;
}
family inet {
rpf-check fail-filter RPF-PASS-DHCP;
unnumbered-address $junos-loopback-interface;
}
family inet6 {
unnumbered-address $junos-loopback-interface;
}
}
}
}
}
IP-DEMUX-PROFILE {
routing-instances {
$junos-routing-instance {
interface $junos-interface-name {
any;
}
}
}
interfaces {
demux0 {
unit $junos-interface-unit {
proxy-arp;
demux-options {
underlying-interface $junos-underlying-interface;
}
family inet {
demux-source {
$junos-subscriber-ip-address;
}
unnumbered-address $junos-loopback-interface;
}
family inet6 {
demux-source {
$junos-subscriber-ipv6-multi-address;
}
unnumbered-address $junos-loopback-interface;
}
}
}
}
protocols {
router-advertisement {
interface $junos-interface-name {
managed-configuration;
other-stateful-configuration;
prefix ::/0 {
no-on-link;
no-autonomous;
}
}
}
}
}
Regards,
Alex
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 3rd party optic/DAC
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote: So maybe this cable is only 1000Base? What makes this even more weird is that the 4300 sees it as the same, but it comes up as 40Gb: FWIW, I have seen 1G and 10G optics which a QFX5100 rejects as Fibre Channel optics which the EX3300 use quite happily... Richard ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling
Hi all, We're doing a bunch of 2 x EX4200 in VC. Once we connect the VC cables, one of the Junos seems to be corrupted. We're currently using the ring X cabling.. but I have seen another option for a 2 member stack of | | Anyone got any thoughts? * ** ** ** WARNING: THIS DEVICE HAS BOOTED FROM THE BACKUP JUNOS IMAGE ** ** ** ** It is possible that the primary copy of JUNOS failed to boot up ** ** properly, and so this device has booted from the backup copy.** ** ** ** Please re-install JUNOS to recover the primary copy in case ** ** it has been corrupted and if auto-snapshot feature is not** ** enabled. ** ** ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling
I've never had any issues doing it either way. It'll auto-detect the topology, even if you have only a single link. What I have seen though is a bunch of units (at least a couple of months back) coming out of the factory booting form the backup image (like the build image was corrupt), so it may have nothing to do with your VC build at all. Just upgrade to JTAC preferred, snapshot all members (and read a long novel while you wait for that to finish) and then reboot the whole chassis. On 1 Oct 2014, at 9:23 am, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Hi all, We're doing a bunch of 2 x EX4200 in VC. Once we connect the VC cables, one of the Junos seems to be corrupted. We're currently using the ring X cabling.. but I have seen another option for a 2 member stack of | | Anyone got any thoughts? * ** ** ** WARNING: THIS DEVICE HAS BOOTED FROM THE BACKUP JUNOS IMAGE ** ** ** ** It is possible that the primary copy of JUNOS failed to boot up ** ** properly, and so this device has booted from the backup copy.** ** ** ** Please re-install JUNOS to recover the primary copy in case ** ** it has been corrupted and if auto-snapshot feature is not** ** enabled. ** ** ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling
Awesome.. thanks. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering On 1 October 2014 09:33, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote: I've never had any issues doing it either way. It'll auto-detect the topology, even if you have only a single link. What I have seen though is a bunch of units (at least a couple of months back) coming out of the factory booting form the backup image (like the build image was corrupt), so it may have nothing to do with your VC build at all. Just upgrade to JTAC preferred, snapshot all members (and read a long novel while you wait for that to finish) and then reboot the whole chassis. On 1 Oct 2014, at 9:23 am, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Hi all, We're doing a bunch of 2 x EX4200 in VC. Once we connect the VC cables, one of the Junos seems to be corrupted. We're currently using the ring X cabling.. but I have seen another option for a 2 member stack of | | Anyone got any thoughts? * ** ** ** WARNING: THIS DEVICE HAS BOOTED FROM THE BACKUP JUNOS IMAGE ** ** ** ** It is possible that the primary copy of JUNOS failed to boot up ** ** properly, and so this device has booted from the backup copy.** ** ** ** Please re-install JUNOS to recover the primary copy in case ** ** it has been corrupted and if auto-snapshot feature is not** ** enabled. ** ** ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling
I have 4 VC stacks of 2x EX4200 in X ring, with no issues. I am running 11.4R1, 11.4R2, 11.4R5, (they have deployed overtime, and have not had a reason to schedule downtime yet). Some are auto-config, others are pre-provisioned. -Mike Gonnason On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Awesome.. thanks. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering On 1 October 2014 09:33, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote: I've never had any issues doing it either way. It'll auto-detect the topology, even if you have only a single link. What I have seen though is a bunch of units (at least a couple of months back) coming out of the factory booting form the backup image (like the build image was corrupt), so it may have nothing to do with your VC build at all. Just upgrade to JTAC preferred, snapshot all members (and read a long novel while you wait for that to finish) and then reboot the whole chassis. On 1 Oct 2014, at 9:23 am, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Hi all, We're doing a bunch of 2 x EX4200 in VC. Once we connect the VC cables, one of the Junos seems to be corrupted. We're currently using the ring X cabling.. but I have seen another option for a 2 member stack of | | Anyone got any thoughts? * ** ** ** WARNING: THIS DEVICE HAS BOOTED FROM THE BACKUP JUNOS IMAGE ** ** ** ** It is possible that the primary copy of JUNOS failed to boot up ** ** properly, and so this device has booted from the backup copy.** ** ** ** Please re-install JUNOS to recover the primary copy in case ** ** it has been corrupted and if auto-snapshot feature is not** ** enabled. ** ** ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling
we've got around 20 racks of vc stuff nowadays. some in 4 switch, most in 2 switch, a mix of ex4200 and now ex4300, ranging from 11.4R2.14 to newer 13.2X51-D25.2. the trick for me has always been to get one working and configured as you like (including slice alternate), set auto-sw-update with the image of choice, and then attach one switch at a time, allowing each one to join the virtual chassis before adding another. once done, i always snapshot slice alternate once more just for fun(?). after that, really, it's been quite stable for my environment. purely layer 2, mind you, and i haven't tried an ISSU yet (no need). oldest: $ ssh -A fsaa-rs1 show system uptime | grep days 12:45AM up 777 days, 18:51, 0 users, load averages: 0.58, 0.48, 0.41 12:45AM up 788 days, 56 mins, 0 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Mike Gonnason gonna...@gmail.com wrote: I have 4 VC stacks of 2x EX4200 in X ring, with no issues. I am running 11.4R1, 11.4R2, 11.4R5, (they have deployed overtime, and have not had a reason to schedule downtime yet). Some are auto-config, others are pre-provisioned. -Mike Gonnason On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Awesome.. thanks. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering On 1 October 2014 09:33, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote: I've never had any issues doing it either way. It'll auto-detect the topology, even if you have only a single link. What I have seen though is a bunch of units (at least a couple of months back) coming out of the factory booting form the backup image (like the build image was corrupt), so it may have nothing to do with your VC build at all. Just upgrade to JTAC preferred, snapshot all members (and read a long novel while you wait for that to finish) and then reboot the whole chassis. On 1 Oct 2014, at 9:23 am, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Hi all, We're doing a bunch of 2 x EX4200 in VC. Once we connect the VC cables, one of the Junos seems to be corrupted. We're currently using the ring X cabling.. but I have seen another option for a 2 member stack of | | Anyone got any thoughts? * ** ** ** WARNING: THIS DEVICE HAS BOOTED FROM THE BACKUP JUNOS IMAGE ** ** ** ** It is possible that the primary copy of JUNOS failed to boot up ** ** properly, and so this device has booted from the backup copy. ** ** ** ** Please re-install JUNOS to recover the primary copy in case ** ** it has been corrupted and if auto-snapshot feature is not ** ** enabled. ** ** ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
