[j-nsp] EX4500 SFP+ laser lit when interface is admin down and vice versa
Hi, I've got an EX4500 running 12.3R8.7 that has a port that's misbehaving in a rather odd way: If I disable the interface in the config and commit, the laser is turned on (normal Tx levels in show interfaces diagnostics optics). If I re-enable the interface and commit, the laser is switched off (Tx level of -Inf dBm). So it's doing precisely the opposite of what I'd expect it to. When I commit the configuration that enables the interface, the following message is logged: chassism[1405]: Tx Disable called for port: 0, enable: 0 I've tried multiple SFP+ modules and they all behave the same. Also I've tried re-seating the SFP+ with as many different combinations of the interface being disabled/enabled when I remove/insert the module as I could think of, no luck. Finally it's only impacting port 0, e.g., port 4 works as expected (i.e., Tx off when interface is disabled and on when enabled) - even with the very same module that don't work right when inserted in port 0. Anyone seen anything like that? I'm hoping to find a way fix it without needing a maintenance window to reboot it. Tore ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX and VZ FIOS question
Thanks.. Exactly the answer that I was looking.. Just needed to know the feature/solution name so I can go research it. Found this doc: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/solutions/information-products/pathway-pages/solutions/8010092-en.pdf IPoE would be what it is. Another Example: http://rickmur.com/bras-on-juniper-mx/ On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 6/Mar/15 00:34, Chris Evans wrote: I'm a FIOS user and they use Juniper MX in many locations (along with E series in older installs) and I'm curious of a typical configuration they'd be using. WIth FIOS I just have a straight ethernet connection, no logging in, no providing user information, etc.. So since i'm not logging in would that still be a BRAS configuration? Also they have a feature enabled that poisons ARP entries if you try to put a box on the wire that has a different IP than what your DHCP lease is given you. What feature would that be? Very curious how they'd do this. I've only worked with JUNOS boxes in the enterprise so I don't have experience with features like this. Yes, it would still be a BNG solution, but using DHCP (in lieu of PPPoE). Authentication could be based on several things such as MAC address, VLAN ID, switch/OLT port, or a combination of them. The MX as a BNG supports DHCP subscriber management. I'm sure the ERX does too. Personally, I prefer DHCP to PPPoE. Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX and VZ FIOS question
On 6/Mar/15 16:48, Chris Evans wrote: Thanks.. Exactly the answer that I was looking.. Just needed to know the feature/solution name so I can go research it. Found this doc: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/solutions/information-products/pathway-pages/solutions/8010092-en.pdf IPoE would be what it is. Another Example: http://rickmur.com/bras-on-juniper-mx/ Yes, IPoE is the industry marketing term that used to float around a lot. I prefer the DHCP term :-). Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
We didnt find a solution because ex4550 (junos) code does not support 2 different families for the same interface (yet) ... Using 12.3R8 I think the new switches ex4600, ex4300 fiber and qfx5100 will support it considering junos ELS and it new hardware Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2015, at 18:01, Levi Pederson levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net wrote: Giuliano, I thank you for the prompt reply. I had originally thought that would create a loop on the switch, but I believe you are right in that it will just shunt the VLAN as anticipated. However, I was wondering if there was a a solution that can be accomplished without having to use a loop-cable? Thank you, Levi Pederson Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Giuliano (WZTECH) giuli...@wztech.com.br wrote: We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in a optical cable loop ... One that came from a trunk interface ... Family ethernet-switching and other family mpls with L2-circuit to do a vlan traffic to enter in a mpls interface Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2015, at 17:51, Levi Pederson levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net wrote: All, I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring situation. I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to proceed. Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a vlan-tagged MX-10. I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
All, I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring situation. I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to proceed. Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a vlan-tagged MX-10. I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in a optical cable loop ... One that came from a trunk interface ... Family ethernet-switching and other family mpls with L2-circuit to do a vlan traffic to enter in a mpls interface Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2015, at 17:51, Levi Pederson levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net wrote: All, I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring situation. I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to proceed. Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a vlan-tagged MX-10. I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EX4550
Giuliano, I thank you for the prompt reply. I had originally thought that would create a loop on the switch, but I believe you are right in that it will just shunt the VLAN as anticipated. However, I was wondering if there was a a solution that can be accomplished without having to use a loop-cable? Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Giuliano (WZTECH) giuli...@wztech.com.br wrote: We have a situation here and we find a way ... We connect 2 interfaces in a optical cable loop ... One that came from a trunk interface ... Family ethernet-switching and other family mpls with L2-circuit to do a vlan traffic to enter in a mpls interface Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2015, at 17:51, Levi Pederson levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net wrote: All, I've got a simple MPLS setup with 4 EX4550's. They are currently in an incomplete ring but will soon have a full ring situation. I've currently got 3 circuits on the transport working wonderfully. However I'm trying to add another alas I'm a bit confused as how to proceed. Previous other circuits were easier in the fact they were simply saying the port on MPLS1-1 is equivalent to this port on MPLS 3-1. The new circuit is different in that I have to take a VLAN recieved on a trunk port and send it through the MPLS network to 3-1 and then into a vlan-tagged MX-10. I was wondering if anyone has attempted this and has any pointers. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipeder...@mankatonetworks.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
