[j-nsp] OSPF question
I have a router with a 10G feed into a switch. I have a server with 2 1G ethernets connected to the same switch. Can I configure OSPF such that the router and server are neighbors and OSPF will perform ECMP load balancing across the 2 1G ports? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] dhcp not working across lacp link
Ok, test setup is 2) ex2200 switched, reset back to factory defaults. Configuring a 2 port trunked LAG between the switches results in dhcp not working across the link. Regular web traffic seems ok. Is there some magic command make this work? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] LAG/LACP problem
On my testbench, 2 juniper EX switches running 12.3. If I connect them together with an ethernet cable, my laptop connected to the far-end switch get DHCP. If I use the two uplink ports (yes, VC is disabled) as a LAG, DHCP does not work. Giving my laptop a static address works and I can surf web pages. Any ideas? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX backup/primary partitions switched?
My EX2200 thinks da0s1a is the backup and da0s2a is the primary. How do I correct this? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX boot loader
Anyone know what the various variables (e.g. bootsequencing, bootsuccess) do? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX series questions
In playing around with a couple of switched yesterday, I managed to wedge them so they wouldn’t boot. I later fixed that problem. Do Ex2200, EX3300, etc run the same image? Can I use a 3300 snapshot to recover a 2200 that won’t boot? Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX2200 rate limiting/shaping question
Can someone explain the difference between filter-specific and term-specific? I want to create a filter for rate limiting and apply it to multiple physical ports and have each interface rate limited independently, not as an aggregate. Thanks, Joe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX2200 rate limiting per port ?
I'm looking for a small switch that can rate limit traffic in and out per port with a granularity of 5mb or less. Typical application would be ethernet distribution within a building where each office gets a (possibly different) amount of bandwidth. Can the EX2200 do this? Thanks, Joe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX2200 OSPF question
My understanding is that the EX2200 can run OSPF on 4 interfaces with the standard software license - right? How well does the OSPF work? Just from goofing around on the console, the response of the switch seems a little slow - like the cpu is a bit underpowered... Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 - restricted bundles and disabled 10G ports.
Think for a second what this means about the manufacturing cost of a 10G port if they can literally give 2 away. And then think about the profit margin on said ports when Juniper sells them for what? 6k or 7k each? Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax On Apr 12, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:05:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Derick Winkworth dwinkwo...@att.net Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net Argh! Please tell me this is a joke! From: David Ball davidtb...@gmail.com To: Juniper-Nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 9:46:45 AM Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 - restricted bundles and disabled 10G ports. A question almost too obvious to ask, but can someone with one of the restricted MX80 bundles (which disables 2 of the 10G ports) confirm that ports 0/0/0 and 0/0/1 are the ones left enabled? I don't have a restricted one yet, and am trying to finish a standards doc. Thanksjust trying to avoid assumptions here. g David ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp Oh, it most certainly is a joke! A bad one. But that does not make it less real. Reminds me of 20 or 25 years ago when Digital came out with a cheap micro-VAX system that was identical to a much more expensive system with the exception of the epoxy with which they filled the expansion slots. The cost of a replacement Q-Bus backplane was far below the difference between the two systems, so guess what everyone was doing! That joke turned out to be on DEC. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: ober...@es.netPhone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] AC-DC converter question
Unipower http://www.unipower-corp.com/Unipower_Telecom/Telecom_Product_Line/Telecom_Inverters/telecom_inverters.html Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax On May 17, 2010, at 10:09 AM, OnePacket - Scott wrote: Hi Everybody, I have a question and was hoping somebody could point me in the right direction, I searched around but couldn't find any satisfying solution. We have a Juniper T320 router (comes with dual DC power supplies at -48VDC) which in the current configuration needs around 40A / 1900W. The facility where this unit will be located does not offer DC power so we need some sort of AC-DC converter. Any ideas where I can buy such a converter? Thanks ! Scott ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX240
Hey Richard, What are the differences/features of the new TRIO cards? Do they work only with the MX80? Joe On May 10, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:38:41PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: Richard's suggestion to consider the MX80 is a good idea, especially if you're looking at having two for redundancy. My main concern is JUNOS 10.x, especially since you're somewhat new to Juniper. But if you can hang in there, the code will improve with time. The MX80 is definitely great for peering... it's a role we're considering for it here, since it's too pricey to stick in the metro :-). Eh... Given his incredibly simple sounding config, personally I'd just just get the Trio/MX80 cards and call it a better long term investment. Depending on your exact config they're somewhere between a little and a lot cheaper than the old DPCs, and they integrate a lot of the things that you previously needed services DPCs for too. Now if only they'd fix the damn BGP bugs, we're seeing 4-5 minute stalls from flapping a single IBGP session in 10.1 tests. -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX-3200-24T questions
Can this switch perform ingress and egress rate limiting per interface? QoS features? MPLS features like VLL (e,g, EoMPLS), etc. QinQ? Native V6 in hardware V6 routing protocols? Thanks, Joe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] juniper trinity
Why didn't they name it 'Turbo' ? Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax On Oct 31, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 05:35:45PM -0700, Judah Scott wrote: The datasheet for the new MX 3D line cards is a little strange. Assuming that a find-and-replace of KB to K will make it more coherent, this is Oh and on the subject of technical fail, what's up with the naming scheme of the 16x10GE card? MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP 16 port 10 GbE MPC requires small form factor pluggable transceiver (SFP+) interfaces The 16 port 10GbE fixed configuration MPC for the MX Series 3D routers provide unprecedented port density and performance for the metro core and for large enterprises. What idiot thought hey I know, let's call this a fixed-configuration modular port concentrator, instead of a DPC like all the other fixed config cards we have? Probably the same one who thought throwing 3D into the part numbers made everything cooler. I wonder if the cards come with glasses that make the logo pop out at you or something. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] LX SFP Question
I recently saw an interesting article that claimed that Cisco consumed 60-65% of the SFP market and thus was able to set pricing. Supposedly, Cisco pays about $25 for an SX SFP. Optical modules represent one of the (if not the highest) margin product in their catalog. No wonder they want to vendor lock the optics... Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications j...@via.net 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax On Sep 25, 2009, at 8:00 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:18:44AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks to everyone for the response. I did want to add one last thing to the comment below regarding you get what you pay for. We pay just over 10X the price for Juniper authentic SFP's to date compared to generic. In the past 10 years I've had exactly 2 generic SFP's fail in the Cisco world. With this substantial price increase to Juniper authentic why wouldn't they build in dB meters in their SFP's? Remember all the problem caused by them shipping REs for m7i/m10i with only notebook rated (4 hour use per day) hard-drives rather than server rated (24 hours use per day) drives, for a cost savings of ~$25? :) 1GE LX is the magic line where they make some slightly cheaper optics that don't include DOM, for every other product they don't even bother making it without. The price difference is probably about $10 on the wholesale side. http://www.finisar.com/optical_modules_2 Notice the only GE product available without DOM support? -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] M40 route.log file?
Our M40 disk failed (ruining a 5+ year uptime) causing the machine to wedge. We rebooted and it's running fine from flash except for the problem that it insists on writing route.log files which eat up all the free space on the flash. Is there a way to convince the routing process to not write these files? Joe McGuckin ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Converting MD5 secrets to/from Cisco format?
Is there a way to convert Juniper MD5 secrets to Cisco format? Thanks, Joe Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Building install media on OS X?
So, what's recommended way to put the install image on a CD card under OS X? OS X doesn't have premade /dev entries for devices, and it deletes / dev entries when you unmount a FS, so how do you create a /dev entry that is attached to a CF card in a USB reader so you can use dd?? Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Upgrading from 7.1 to ?
Any reason not to upgrade to the latest 8.X version? Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
