KR> Type 4 failures
Eduardo wrote: I think in armonic vibrations. What hapens if you put on it a PSRU? --- I have been discussing the ongoing questions of Direct Drive and the changes of a damaged crank. This is what I got from VW Engines, Now people might realize that the reality of direct drive engines is the probability of breaking a crank is high. Our gear drive engines are not subjected to: 1 The concertina effect of thrust on one end and the thrust bearing on the other. 2 Direct prop forces acting against the crankshaft placing very high loads which the crank was never designed for. 3 Cushioning devise minimising or eliminating harmonics back to the crankshaft. 4 The result of gearing allows the engine to produce optimum hp at a normal operation rpm range and produce efficient propeller rpm. The crankshaft is subjected to normal conditions that the engine was designed for in the first place. I am talking gear drive not belt drive because this also places a high belt tension load in one direction and even an out rigger bearing is not the complete solution in this case either. Ron Slender VW Engine Centre Phil Matheson mathe...@dodo.com.au VH-PKR ( reserved) 61 3 58833588 See our VW Engines and Home built web page at http://www.vw-engines.com/ www.homebuilt-aviation.com/
KR> Type 4 Failures
Good morning Net This morning I got another update from Steve re his failures. The following is his reply to my request for more details. Orma I had 3 failures, they all seemed to crack in the same place. The 2 stock cranks cracked just past the bearing. and the crank sort of orbited around and spewed out oil out the front seal. I never had a prop strike and I ran my engines at 3200 rpm cruise because there was some speculation that if you ran them under 3000 rpm there were harmonics that were set up. I really don't know but that was why I went a different route. Good luck. Steve
KR> Type 4 failures
> > >Now people might realize that the reality of direct drive engines is the >probability of breaking a crank is high. One might consider the Great Plains Rear Drive (off the fly wheel) as the solution. Biggest bearing - isolated prop. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852 lar...@socal.rr.com
KR> Type 4 failures
In a message dated 4/21/2004 9:58:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time, lar...@socal.rr.com writes: > Now people might realize that the reality of direct drive engines is the > >probability of breaking a crank is high. > -- I think the above needs to be qualified by the fact most props get installed on the fan pulley end of the crankshaft, on a whimsically small bit of shafting never designed for that level of output and an engine away from the thrust bearing. I went several broken crank episodes with the Type I more than fifty years ago and came to the conclusion that the typical VW 'expert' didn't know his ass from his elbow. Indeed, it took only a modest amount of research to discover that of the four accepted experts of that era NONE had actually built a flying Volkswagen and only ONE had even flown behind such a thing. It was my dad who pointed out that he'd never heard of anyone any successful conversion in which the prop was attached to the pulley-hub. (Bernard Pietenpol tried it with the Model 'T' with mixed success. He readily admitted the 'A' model conversion -- with the prop on the clutch-end of the crankshaft -- was the best way to go.) After I put the prop on the other end of the crank flying became down-right boring :-) It amazes me that folks don't seem to realize that all of these fantastic prop/hub/bearing/crank modifications are band-aid-attempts to make a bad idea work. Expensive band-aids, too. To attach a prop to the clutch-end of the crankshaft all you need is a matching spacer. The idea that the engine is more difficult to mount or that the bell housing gets in the way is blown away the first time you see such an installation. In fact, the only reason they put the fan on the pulley-hub to begin with was because the original engines were FREE (ie, the 985cc twirler out of the 2WD Kubelwagen), only put out about 20hp and weighed barely a hundred pounds. They never lasted very long -- SOP was to replace the crankshaft ($17.00, US) every 200 hours or so, but the result was a flying club hack that could give you an hours flight-time for less than $5, a critical factor in post-WWII Europe with gasoline going for $2.50 a gallon... when you could get it. (Great Britain didn't go off rationing until the 1950's). Reality has never been aviation's strong suit. Nor hard-ball engineering, when you get right down to it. (The maximum sustainable output of ANY aircooled engine is determined by its ability to cool itself. Rather than counting fallacious horsepower you'd be better off counting the number of fins on the heads.) The fabled superiority of the Corvair over the VW probably stems from the fact they put the prop where it belongs. -R.S.Hoover
KR> type 4 Failures
This is from another list. Ryan 6:50.21.04 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Q-LIST/message/10392 From: HawkiDoug@a... Date: Thu Jan 2, 2003 8:34 am Subject: VW type 4 fix For those who might be interested, here's what we have come up with as a fix to my prop hub coming off last fall. To recap briefly, the end of a type 4 crank has a smaller taper on the very end and a "sleeve" is fitted over the end and then machined for the Force One Prop hub. We are confident this was the weak link and the source of the failure. Steve Bennett of Great Plains and I looked at several solutions and the one both Steve & I liked best was to have a new crank made the way we want it made. It will actually be better than the std. VW crank. Cost= $1000.00. The other solutions looked to be about half this cost, so it was a no brainer for me to spend the extra money. I believe I will still have about $5500.00 invested in the engine. Steve sent a letter to his type 4 customers offering this option at his cost on this initial run. If things go as planned (do they ever?), I should be back in the air by early summer. Now, I have a question to you VW experts. What do you think of using Lycoming thread to seal the case halves with? See any problems doing this? Doug "Hawkeye" Humble Omaha NE N25974 A Sign Above == If there are cranks failing I personally really want to know who and why. Tweedy and I are both getting older and would like to continue to do so without having experienced crank failure. So, this post is a call for any one with direct knowledge to sing out. Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI 19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR (Tweedy) http://www.aviation-mechanics.com
KR> type 4 Failures
I have just started my kr2s and i am thinking of using a vw fear drive to help eliminate the crank problem. By the way rand robinson is out of WAF's, any sugesstions? is there another kr projet in or near lakeport,ca? -- Original Message --- From: "Ryan" <rr...@san.rr.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:50:58 -0700 Subject: Re: KR> type 4 Failures > This is from another list. > Ryan > 6:50.21.04 > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Q-LIST/message/10392 > > From: HawkiDoug@a... > Date: Thu Jan 2, 2003 8:34 am > Subject: VW type 4 fix > > For those who might be interested, here's what we have come up > with as a fix to my prop hub coming off last fall. To recap > briefly, the end of a type 4 crank has a smaller taper on the > very end and a "sleeve" is fitted over the end and then > machined for the Force One Prop hub. We are confident this was > the weak link and the source of the failure. Steve Bennett of Great > Plains and I looked at several solutions and the one both Steve > & I liked best was to have a new crank made the way we want it > made. It will actually be better than the std. VW crank. Cost= > $1000.00. The other solutions looked to be about half this cost, > so it was a no brainer for me to spend the extra money. I > believe I will still have about $5500.00 invested in the engine. > > Steve sent a letter to his type 4 customers offering this > option at his cost on this initial run. If things go as planned > (do they ever?), I should be back in the air by early summer. > > Now, I have a question to you VW experts. What do you think of > using Lycoming thread to seal the case halves with? See any > problems doing this? > > Doug "Hawkeye" Humble > Omaha NE > N25974 > A Sign Above > > == > > If there are cranks failing I personally really want to know > who and why. Tweedy and I are both getting older and would like > to continue to do so without having experienced crank failure. > So, this post is a call for any one with direct knowledge to > sing out. > > Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI > 19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR (Tweedy) > http://www.aviation-mechanics.com > > ___ > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html --- End of Original Message ---
KR> type 4 Failures :rand robinson is out of WAF's
Will she be getting more latter on or what? I'm going south to pickup two Kr's but if she isn't going to sell parts I might have to rethink this. Thanks Kevin -Original Message- From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On Behalf Of danhar...@pacific.net Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 9:39 PM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> type 4 Failures I have just started my kr2s and i am thinking of using a vw fear drive to help eliminate the crank problem. By the way rand robinson is out of WAF's, any sugesstions? is there another kr projet in or near lakeport,ca? -- Original Message --- From: "Ryan" <rr...@san.rr.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:50:58 -0700 Subject: Re: KR> type 4 Failures > This is from another list. > Ryan > 6:50.21.04 > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Q-LIST/message/10392 > > From: HawkiDoug@a... > Date: Thu Jan 2, 2003 8:34 am > Subject: VW type 4 fix > > For those who might be interested, here's what we have come up > with as a fix to my prop hub coming off last fall. To recap > briefly, the end of a type 4 crank has a smaller taper on the > very end and a "sleeve" is fitted over the end and then > machined for the Force One Prop hub. We are confident this was > the weak link and the source of the failure. Steve Bennett of Great > Plains and I looked at several solutions and the one both Steve > & I liked best was to have a new crank made the way we want it > made. It will actually be better than the std. VW crank. Cost= > $1000.00. The other solutions looked to be about half this cost, > so it was a no brainer for me to spend the extra money. I > believe I will still have about $5500.00 invested in the engine. > > Steve sent a letter to his type 4 customers offering this > option at his cost on this initial run. If things go as planned > (do they ever?), I should be back in the air by early summer. > > Now, I have a question to you VW experts. What do you think of > using Lycoming thread to seal the case halves with? See any > problems doing this? > > Doug "Hawkeye" Humble > Omaha NE > N25974 > A Sign Above > > == > > If there are cranks failing I personally really want to know > who and why. Tweedy and I are both getting older and would like > to continue to do so without having experienced crank failure. > So, this post is a call for any one with direct knowledge to > sing out. > > Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI > 19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR (Tweedy) > http://www.aviation-mechanics.com > > ___ > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html --- End of Original Message --- ___ to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> type 4 Failures
Use 3M trim cement to seal the case halves, no thread. The yellow sticky stuff, Virg On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:50:58 -0700 "Ryan"writes: > This is from another list. > Ryan > 6:50.21.04 > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Q-LIST/message/10392 > > From: HawkiDoug@a... > Date: Thu Jan 2, 2003 8:34 am > Subject: VW type 4 fix > > > For those who might be interested, here's what we have come up > with as a fix > to my prop hub coming off last fall. To recap briefly, the end > of a type 4 > crank has a smaller taper on the very end and a "sleeve" is > fitted over the > end and then machined for the Force One Prop hub. We are > confident this was > the weak link and the source of the failure. Steve Bennett of > Great Plains > and I looked at several solutions and the one both Steve & I > liked best was > to have a new crank made the way we want it made. It will > actually be better > than the std. VW crank. Cost= $1000.00. The other solutions > looked to be > about half this cost, so it was a no brainer for me to spend > the extra money. > I believe I will still have about $5500.00 invested in the > engine. > > Steve sent a letter to his type 4 customers offering this > option at his cost > on this initial run. If things go as planned (do they ever?), > I should be > back in the air by early summer. > > Now, I have a question to you VW experts. What do you think of > using > Lycoming thread to seal the case halves with? See any problems > doing this? > > Doug "Hawkeye" Humble > Omaha NE > N25974 > A Sign Above > > == > > If there are cranks failing I personally really want to know > who and why. > Tweedy and I are both getting older and would like to continue > to do so > without having experienced crank failure. > So, this post is a call for any one with direct knowledge to > sing out. > > Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI > 19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR (Tweedy) > http://www.aviation-mechanics.com > > > > ___ > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > Virgil N. Salisbury - AMSOIL www.lubedealer.com/salisbury Miami ,Fl
KR> type 4 Failures
Hello Steve and KR netters, After a few posts that I put on the net about the rebuild of my type 4, Mark L. suggested that I should talk to you and others about you crank failures. My experiences with the type 4 have been really good and others have been the opposite. Your experiences could help me prevent from some future failure. I would like to ask a few questions of you and anyone else that has had a failure of a type 4 Crankshaft. 1. What part of the crank failed. 2. What size was the crank 3. Was it a stock VW crank 4. Was it in any way modified, ie for the prop hub, and how was it modified 5. Was it damaged prior to failure, such as prop strike etc. 6. Any significant history from the engine in it prior usage, such as sudden stoppage from an auto accident or engine dropped #3 valve etc. I appreciate any and all comments.
KR> type 4 Failures
Hello again Netters. I just finished reading the Archives search for Crankshaft failures. I entered the dates present to 1990. There were 31 hits on the subject. There was a lot of discussion on failures, but not ONE posting by anyone with a failure that gave any details at all. This is significant. Some members make decisions based on the word of the net. I have flown my type 4 off and on now for over 19 years. My 66 mm crank looks as new. I am moving up to a stock 71 mm crank in what will be a completely different engine. If there are cranks failing I personally really want to know who and why. Tweedy and I are both getting older and would like to continue to do so without having experienced crank failure. So, this post is a call for any one with direct knowledge to sing out. Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI 19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR (Tweedy) http://www.aviation-mechanics.com
KR> type 4 Failures? What failures
My 2 cents worth, as an operator of and a strong believer in the Type 4. - All the literature (engine rebuild manuals, etc.) I could find on the subject states that the Type 4 is by far the best VW air cooled engine. Better than Type 1, 2, 3, and 4. No wonder: it is the most recent one, and it is the fruit of a redesign. - Therefore, it should be less failure-prone than the other VWs - Moreover, we tend to make our VW air cooled less reliable by increasing their power output one way or another. With the Type 4, you start with a block tha was designed for an output of 65hp; therefore, an increase up to, say, 80 to 100 hp is still fairly reasonable. Conclusion: - The VW is not the best engine in the world, but it is still a very affordable and fairly proven solution; - If you have to choose a VW engine, choose a Type 4; you'll be on the safe side; - Have the block and the crankshaft tested, and you'll stand even better on that safe side; - Have the engine rebuilt and modified by people who know what they are doing, and you'll really be entrenched on that safe side; In any case, your Type4 will be as safe (or even safer) as a rebuilt Lycoming or a Continental... Even more if you give it a decent ignition system, to replace those Cavemen's magnetos. Serge Vidal KR2 ZS-WEC - Taildragger, VW powered (2.4 liter, dual electronic ignition) - Total aircraft time: 390h - Aircraft hangared at: Orleans, France - Pilot moaning in: Tunis, Tunisia E-mail: serge.vi...@ate-international.com <mailto:serge.vi...@ate-international.com> -Original Message- From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On Behalf Of Orma Robbins Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 13:22 To: Orma Robbins; KRnet Subject: Re: KR> type 4 Failures Hello again Netters. I just finished reading the Archives search for Crankshaft failures. I entered the dates present to 1990. There were 31 hits on the subject. There was a lot of discussion on failures, but not ONE posting by anyone with a failure that gave any details at all. This is significant. Some members make decisions based on the word of the net. I have flown my type 4 off and on now for over 19 years. My 66 mm crank looks as new. I am moving up to a stock 71 mm crank in what will be a completely different engine. If there are cranks failing I personally really want to know who and why. Tweedy and I are both getting older and would like to continue to do so without having experienced crank failure. So, this post is a call for any one with direct knowledge to sing out. Orma L. Robbins Southfield MI 19 Years flying KR-2 N110LR (Tweedy) http://www.aviation-mechanics.com ___ to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> type 4 Failures
- Original Message - From: "Orma Robbins" <o...@aviation-mechanics.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>; <srmak...@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:33 PM Subject: KR> type 4 Failures Hello Orma,- from over the pond ,the only crankshaft failure that I heard about was Dan's, and I believe his was a type 4. Revmaster told me recently they'd never had a 4340 chrome /moly?failure-so I bought one.Gullible or what! Regards, Mac UK > Hello Steve and KR netters, After a few posts that I put on the net about the rebuild of my type 4, Mark L. suggested that I should talk to you and others about you crank failures. > ___ > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
Fwd: KR> type 4 Failures
my viewpoints on the use of the type 4,for reliable service all aspects must be set up properly ,not guess work or it's close. my type 4 is a stock 71 mm crank, with a big bore kit, the bore size is not important,,the compression ratio is! i use 8 to 1 comp. to make the engine live a long life,, 8 to 1 comp. or less . also the timing set to 26 degrees or less! also a egt & cht on all 4 cyls. i run 1200 egt max& 375 cht max sensed on the plugs. another point is to balance the engine. the prop must be wood & balanced on the engine too. i run 100ll avgas only& the oil press @ 50psi @ 3000rpm which is max in flight. i cruise @ 2400 to 2600 rpm. this is my method of type 4 survival & durability, steve jones n212kr i almost forgot to thank greatplains for there quality parts,,without the force 1 hub setup, it wouldn't work as well,,,
KR> type 4 Failures
Thanks for the feedback Orma
KR> type 4 Failures
Below is a message from the CorvAircraft archives ( http://www.maddyhome.com/corvairsrch/index.jsp ). List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: 29-Jan-04 6:14 AM From: srmak...@aol.com Subject: CorvAircraft>VW Cranks Hi all. The subject of these cranks has been a sore spot with me since I broke a type 4 scat 78 mm in flight. at exactly 220 hours. I broke the next stocker too in about the same amount of time. Bob Lester (another vair Kr driver broke a revmaster crank at 200 hours or so. This seems to be the MAGIC number. Someone told me that this is why Hapi engines went under because they had to replace 80 thousand dollars worth of bad cranks on their engines. I don't know how true this is, but it must have some truth to it. I finally had Steve Bennett put in a force one hub and did not have a problem after that and it ran until I went with another conversion. Great Plains stuff seems to work well and Steve is a good friend of mine and a straight shooter.Regards, StevePS> Dan Diehl broke his type 4 crank on the way back from Oshkosh to Tulsa, same setup as mine and about the same hours._
KR> Type 4 failures
The following arrived this evening from Steve Makish about his type 4 failures. Orma Hello, Steve here. My crank was a 78mm scat. It broke across the # 3 rod (I think, it was so long ago) The crank was brand new and no mods were done to it. It broke at about 220 hours. Dan Diehl broke one on his type 4 engine also right about the same amount of hours. I also cracked a stock 71mm, but I found that out on the ground and not in the air. I rebuilt the engine again with a stock crank but had Steve Bennett put in his force one hub. I flew it for about 25-50 hours before I sold it to a guy locally who was building a kr2s. Strange sidenote. Last week at sun and fun a beautiful kr tri gear pulled in from Venice fl. We got talking and he was a real nice fellow. Come to find out he bought the guys project, finished it and is flying with my old engine (110) hours so far. He was not happy with the performance and was looking into putting in a corvair. funny how things work out. Hope this answers your questions, Regards, Steve
KR> Type 4 failures
I think in armonic vibrations. What hapens if you put on it a PSRU? - Original Message - From: "Orma Robbins" <o...@aviation-mechanics.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 11:00 PM Subject: KR> Type 4 failures > The following arrived this evening from Steve Makish about his type 4 failures. > > Orma > > Hello, Steve here. My crank was a 78mm scat. It broke across the # 3 rod (I think, it was so long ago) The crank was brand new and no mods were done to it. It broke at about 220 hours. Dan Diehl broke one on his type 4 engine also right about the same amount of hours. I also cracked a stock 71mm, but I found that out on the ground and not in the air. I rebuilt the engine again with a stock crank but had Steve Bennett put in his force one hub. I flew it for about 25-50 hours before I sold it to a guy locally who was building a kr2s. Strange sidenote. Last week at sun and fun a beautiful kr tri gear pulled in from Venice fl. We got talking and he was a real nice fellow. Come to find out he bought the guys project, finished it and is flying with my old engine (110) hours so far. He was not happy with the performance and was looking into putting in a corvair. funny how things work out. Hope this answers your questions, > Regards, > Steve > > ___ > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]