[lace] Re: Magazine sharing

2004-08-26 Thread Chris Vail
*snip snip* > His reasoning, which I suppose is
> the norm in  magazine world, 
> is that the more people to whom the magazine is
> passed, the more  secure the 
> subscription. Mom, he claims, is not going to fail
> to renew her  subscription 
> if her daughter likes to read the magazine too.
> Well, you could  have knocked 
> me over with a feather, because we in the lace world
> have the  opposite 
> approach, ie. daughter should get her own
> subscription. 

Is that really how the lace world thinks?  I can't for
the life of me think why anyone should be expected to
get two copies of a magazine for the household - Guild
membership, sure, but that's more than the magazine.

I think the Pennsylvania magazine guy was right.  If I
like 50% of what a magazine usually covers, I'll
subscribe.  If I like 25% of what's regularly in that
publication, I'll never subscribe.  If my (imaginary)
daughter likes 25%, it's likely to be a different %
and again we'll subscribe because we'll make enough
use of the magazine between us to make it worth while.

If my neighbor Betsy likes some part of the magazine
as well but not enough to subscribe herself, and we
regularly share it, then I'm a lot less likely to drop
my subscription even if I don't care for what the
magazine holds - the friendshp is worth the
subscription, and the magazine at least gets one
subscription instead of none.  I'm actually thinking
of cross-stitch and crochet magazines here, as those
are what I've subscribed to, but I don't see why lace
would be different.  It's  the same type of product
from a pattern issue.  Especially as magazines
diversify more, and more similar ones come on the
market trying to capture a niche, it becomes strangely
important for each individual magazine to capture and
keep it's own audience by diversifying towards the
audience's extensions of family and friends.  If that
makes any sense.

On the actual making of lace side of things, I think
I've found my next project.  I picked up a little
torchon-ish doily pricking with minimal directions
from a bargain bin last summer, and I think it's time
to give it a whirl. It's as much an excuse to clear
threads off of bobbins as anything else, but it's a
good excercise in forging my own path from A to B
within the framework of what the doily is 'supposed
to' look like.  And it'll be test to see if I like
parts of it enough to make Christmas ornaments or some
such from it.  Adaptation I can do :)

Chris :)



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Re: Magazine sharing

2004-08-26 Thread Jane Partridge
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris
Vail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> I'm actually thinking
>of cross-stitch and crochet magazines here, as those
>are what I've subscribed to, but I don't see why lace
>would be different.  It's  the same type of product
>from a pattern issue.  Especially as magazines
>diversify more, and more similar ones come on the
>market 

Except that cross stitch magazines tend to all be produced by one of a
fairly small number of publishing houses - ie one magazine company
produces a number of magazines, often across a number of interests. If
one of their magazines fails to maintain its subscriber base, it fails,
but the company isn't necessarily put in danger.

On the other hand, most of the lace magazines are often the newsletters
of individual (even if fairly major) guilds - and their sole publication
- and if they fail to get the number of subscribers (in other words,
members) then the major source of income to the guild fails, and the
guild goes under. This is why several of the guilds have associate
membership - another member of the household can have membership
(usually restricted in some way) at a cheaper rate, because they will
share the magazine of the main household member.

-- 
Jane Partridge

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Re: Magazine sharing

2004-08-26 Thread Panza, Robin
>>>From: Jane Partridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is why several of the guilds have associate membership - another member
of the household can have membership (usually restricted in some way) at a
cheaper rate, because they will share the magazine of the main household
member.<<<

Pittsburgh Lace Group has "Family Membership" rates for a similar reason.
We've had mother-daughter and husband-wife pairs as members.

Robin P.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
http://www.pittsburghlace.8m.com/

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]