Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-05-28 Thread Tore Johnsen
Dear list,
I recently received a full-blown advertisement (SPAM) from a company that 
uses THIS LIST to gather email addresses. The sender is a member of the 
list: John Toto at Superlogics.

I don't at all mind members peddling their products in direct response to 
questions posted to the list (as John has done before). That can actually 
be quite helpful. However, when it degenerates into full-blown full-page 
unsolicited advertisements with all the bells and whistles sent directly to 
members of the list - well that's when I make a NEVER BUY FROM entry in the 
list I keep for that purpose. Sorry John: Gotta try to nip this in the bud 
before it degenerates further.

- Tore




Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-05-28 Thread Rochefort, Paul
Title:  Not quite off-topic: List misuse





I was not on the spam list but I agree with Tore


Paul A. Rochefort
AECL
Chalk River Laboratories


-Original Message-
From: Tore Johnsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: May 28, 2004 13:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not quite off-topic: List misuse



Dear list,
I recently received a full-blown advertisement (SPAM) from a company that 
uses THIS LIST to gather email addresses. The sender is a member of the 
list: John Toto at Superlogics.


I don't at all mind members peddling their products in direct response to 
questions posted to the list (as John has done before). That can actually 
be quite helpful. However, when it degenerates into full-blown full-page 
unsolicited advertisements with all the bells and whistles sent directly to 
members of the list - well that's when I make a NEVER BUY FROM entry in the 
list I keep for that purpose. Sorry John: Gotta try to nip this in the bud 
before it degenerates further.


- Tore







RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-06-01 Thread Harden Chris
List,

I disagree - targeted emails that are specific to LV or NI users can be
useful in bringing ones attention to products that may otherwise remain
undiscovered (don't know if this one was, didn't see it).  Especially useful
where advertised products are cheaper and possibly offer better
functionality than similar NI products.

I have been especially appreciative of certain low cost DAQ products that
have come to my attention via the list.

I do however agree that totally unrelated advertisements are a no no.

Regards,

Chris Harden.

Test System Design Engineer.

FR-HiTEMP Ltd,
Brook Road,
Wimborne,
Dorset.  UK.



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Rochefort, Paul
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:48 PM
> To:   'Tore Johnsen'; Info-Labview (E-mail)
> Subject:  Not quite off-topic: List misuse
> 
> I was not on the spam list but I agree with Tore 
> 
> Paul A. Rochefort 
> AECL 
> Chalk River Laboratories 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Tore Johnsen [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
> Sent: May 28, 2004 13:12 
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: Not quite off-topic: List misuse 
> 
> 
> Dear list, 
> I recently received a full-blown advertisement (SPAM) from a company that 
> uses THIS LIST to gather email addresses. The sender is a member of the 
> list: John Toto at Superlogics. 
> 
> I don't at all mind members peddling their products in direct response to 
> questions posted to the list (as John has done before). That can actually 
> be quite helpful. However, when it degenerates into full-blown full-page 
> unsolicited advertisements with all the bells and whistles sent directly
> to 
> members of the list - well that's when I make a NEVER BUY FROM entry in
> the 
> list I keep for that purpose. Sorry John: Gotta try to nip this in the bud
> 
> before it degenerates further. 
> 
> - Tore 
> 
> 
> 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("E-mail") is intended solely for the 
addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.  If 
you are not the addressee(s), any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution or 
other use of the E-mail is prohibited.  If you have received this E-mail in error, 
please delete it and notify the sender immediately via our switchboard or return 
e-mail.  

Neither the company nor any individual sending this E-mail accepts any liability in 
respect of the content (including errors and omissions) and timeliness of the E-mail 
which arise as a result of transmission.  If verification is required, please request 
a hard copy version





RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-06-01 Thread Ross, Michael
As a list administrator for a small specialized mailing list and a
participant in Info-LabVIEW I have some opinions on this topic.

This list has never been commmercial content free, but commercial
mailings are expected to be kept inobtrusive and brief.  That seems to
work and who am I to argue.

It makes sense to give *participants* in this list (who have to make a
living) some leeway and let them plug for themselves a bit.  What are
our sigs but a little bit of advertisement, eh?.  However, I think
limiting commercial content to contributors is a good idea.  I wouldn't
like to see folks who add nothing free of charge on a week to week or
month to month basis to start hawking their wares here.

>From the admin POV, no list admin wants to scrutinize the list for
infractions as a regular task.  We can self-police without adding to the
SN ratio by just sending our complaints directly to the offending party.
People trying to get our money will listen closely when complained to
directly in the vein of: If you ever do that again, I will never buy
your schmiztengrubben.

On the other hand it would seem that this John Toto of Superlogics did
not post to the list (I never saw or noticed the posting).  Maybe he
harvested the list membership for addresses.  That would be a real
no-no.  If he used Info-LabVIEW in the subject as camoflage that would
be another real no-no.  

If that is what happened then I think shunning is definitely in order.
If I an example of the offending ad, and had the email address of
Superlogics I would send an expression of my disappointment.

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Harden Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 6:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Rochefort, Paul'
Subject: RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse


List,

I disagree - targeted emails that are specific to LV or NI users can be
useful in bringing ones attention to products that may otherwise remain
undiscovered (don't know if this one was, didn't see it).  Especially
useful where advertised products are cheaper and possibly offer better
functionality than similar NI products.

I have been especially appreciative of certain low cost DAQ products
that have come to my attention via the list.

I do however agree that totally unrelated advertisements are a no no.

Regards,

Chris Harden.

Test System Design Engineer.

FR-HiTEMP Ltd,
Brook Road,
Wimborne,
Dorset.  UK.



> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tore Johnsen [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
> Sent: May 28, 2004 13:12 
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: Not quite off-topic: List misuse 
> 
> 
> Dear list,
> I recently received a full-blown advertisement (SPAM) from a company
that 
> uses THIS LIST to gather email addresses. The sender is a member of
the 
> list: John Toto at Superlogics. 
> 
> I don't at all mind members peddling their products in direct response

> to
> questions posted to the list (as John has done before). That can
actually 
> be quite helpful. However, when it degenerates into full-blown
full-page 
> unsolicited advertisements with all the bells and whistles sent
directly
> to 
> members of the list - well that's when I make a NEVER BUY FROM entry
in
> the 
> list I keep for that purpose. Sorry John: Gotta try to nip this in the
bud
> 
> before it degenerates further.
> 
> - Tore





RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-06-01 Thread John Toto
Sorry Tore. Your name was in our database and a special Data Acq. email ad
was sent.  I believe that is the only one you have ever gotten since we went
deep into our data base.  I'm very sorry for that.  Your name was removed.
No, I do not mine this or any other site for emails.  I have no need to. I'm
sure other members of this list may have gotten an email, but I doubt more
than a few.  You either have to email, phone, purchase or otherwise request
to be on my list - but the database is large and I can't speak for each
record. Again, sorry for the inconvenience.  If anyone received one and
wants to be removed just send me an email with remove in the subject and I
will personally do it.

Best Regards,

John

John C. Toto
Sales Director
SUPERLOGICS, INC.
"Simplifying Data Acquisition"
85 River Street,  Waltham, MA 02453
Ph:781-893-1600,ext.110; Fax:781-893-0600
www.superlogics.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tore Johnsen
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not quite off-topic: List misuse


Dear list,
I recently received a full-blown advertisement (SPAM) from a company that
uses THIS LIST to gather email addresses. The sender is a member of the
list: John Toto at Superlogics.

I don't at all mind members peddling their products in direct response to
questions posted to the list (as John has done before). That can actually
be quite helpful. However, when it degenerates into full-blown full-page
unsolicited advertisements with all the bells and whistles sent directly to
members of the list - well that's when I make a NEVER BUY FROM entry in the
list I keep for that purpose. Sorry John: Gotta try to nip this in the bud
before it degenerates further.

- Tore







RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-06-01 Thread ALTENBACH,CHRISTIAN
Quoting John Toto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Sorry Tore. Your name was in our database and a special Data Acq. email
> ad
> was sent.  I believe that is the only one you have ever gotten since we
> went
> deep into our data base.  I'm very sorry for that.  Your name was
> removed.
> No, I do not mine this or any other site for emails.  I have no need to.
> I'm
> sure other members of this list may have gotten an email, but I doubt
> more
> than a few.  You either have to email, phone, purchase or otherwise
> request
> to be on my list - but the database is large and I can't speak for each
> record. Again, sorry for the inconvenience.  If anyone received one and
> wants to be removed just send me an email with remove in the subject and
> I
> will personally do it.


John,

Issues addressed here are covered by S.877, aka. the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.

- Harvesting of addresses is not allowed, and I don't think you did.

- You are allowed to send unsolicited advertisements as long as the format
conforms to the requirements of S.877. In particular, it must be labeled as
advertisements and must contain opt-out instructions as well as your
physical address.

- once you receive an opt-out request, that particular e-mail address will
be off-limits.

- I don't know where your company gets internet access, but many providers
have stricter rules, dealing with the number of complaints allowed etc. You
are well advised to maintain rock-solid records of all subscribe and
unsubscribe requests, and all relevant records on how the address
originally was obtained.

Current best practices require confirmed opt-in, see e.g.:

http://www.spamhaus.org/mailinglists.html
http://www.aota.net/Email_Spam_Prevention_and_Mgmt/listmanagement.php4
http://www.cluelessmailers.org/info/listmanagement.html
http://www.mail-abuse.org/manage.html

If some of your addresses are possibly old or of questionable origin, it
would be a good procedure to consolidate all your old e-mail lists, and
send a brief note to all, requesting confirmation to remain on the list.

Your privacy policy on superlogics.com is quite reasonable, so I trust
you're one of the "good guys". I did not e.g. test your order process, but
you should make sure that there is also a checkbox next to the e-mail
address field (blank by default!) that, if checked by the customer, will
allow you to send marketing material in the future. If the customer decides
to leave it blank, only e-mails directly related to the current order are
allowed.

Thanks
Christian





RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse

2004-06-02 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
"Ross, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>As a list administrator for a small specialized mailing list and a
>participant in Info-LabVIEW I have some opinions on this topic.
>
>This list has never been commmercial content free, but commercial
>mailings are expected to be kept inobtrusive and brief.  That seems to
>work and who am I to argue.

Just my two cents here. From the original post I got the impression
that the poster had previous contacts with this person, as an answer
to some question he had put on Info-LabVIEW. At that time the mailing
was appearently appreciated or at least no hard feelings were present.

If that is really the case (and I really don't know if my impression
is right) then what has been happening was that the advertiser appaerently
kept the posters address in his address book and later on sent again
some marketing mailing out to these addresses, maybe not really related
to the original inquiry.

As such the whole issue would be a little bit unclear. I for myself
probably wouldn't think to good about such an advertiser but on the
other hand I certainly wouldn't report him as a spammer to blocklists
either and most probably just delete the mail without thinking much
further. If I however receive a mailing out of the blue, it would
almost certainly be reported to the blocklists I use and maybe even
manually reported to its ISP and then disposed off.

Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Nederland BVtel: +31 (070) 415 9190
Treubstraat 7H  fax: +31 (070) 415 9191
2288 EG Rijswijkhttp://www.citengineering.com
Netherlands mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





Thanks (was: RE: Not quite off-topic: List misuse)

2004-06-02 Thread Tore Johnsen
John, thanks for your response.
I did not intend to start a long discussion questioning the list policy. 
IMHO the official policy of allowing short product/company notices has 
worked well in the past to everybody's benefit.

Considering how carefully I've controlled access to this email address and 
the timing of the ad I did find sufficient reason to react. John, with your 
response I have no longer any reason for complaint and I wish you and your 
company well.

I'll remove myself from this thread and take any further discussion of this 
topic in private.

-Tore
At 09:53 6/1/2004, John Toto wrote:
Sorry Tore. Your name was in our database and a special Data Acq. email ad
was sent.  I believe that is the only one you have ever gotten since we went
deep into our data base.  I'm very sorry for that.  Your name was removed.
No, I do not mine this or any other site for emails.  I have no need to. I'm
sure other members of this list may have gotten an email, but I doubt more
than a few.  You either have to email, phone, purchase or otherwise request
to be on my list - but the database is large and I can't speak for each
record. Again, sorry for the inconvenience.  If anyone received one and
wants to be removed just send me an email with remove in the subject and I
will personally do it.
Best Regards,
John
John C. Toto
Sales Director
SUPERLOGICS, INC.