RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup

2000-12-05 Thread Pedro Barreto

At 15:20 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>At 09:48 PM 12/5/00 +, Pedro Barreto wrote:
> >At 08:28 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
> >>At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common
> >>>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd be happy with
> >>>a process where we all look at the candidate logos and express our
> >>>opinions. Then someone makes a decision, and all the rest of us shut up
> >>>and soldier on.
> >
> >minor correction, we shut up, and start to help on the selected site!!! :)
>
>That is, in context, the idiomatic meaning of "soldier on". More or less:
>get down to work.

thanks Ray, that's the kind of english we non-english speaking people will 
always miss! but I'm learning!

pedro


>--
>"Never tell me the odds!"---
>Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo
>Palo Alto, CA[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>___
>Leaf-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel




RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup

2000-12-05 Thread Ray Olszewski

At 09:48 PM 12/5/00 +, Pedro Barreto wrote:
>At 08:28 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common 
>>>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd be happy with 
>>>a process where we all look at the candidate logos and express our 
>>>opinions. Then someone makes a decision, and all the rest of us shut up 
>>>and soldier on.
>
>minor correction, we shut up, and start to help on the selected site!!! :)

That is, in context, the idiomatic meaning of "soldier on". More or less:
get down to work.


--
"Never tell me the odds!"---
Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo
Palo Alto, CA[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup

2000-12-05 Thread Pedro Barreto

At 08:28 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common 
>>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd be happy with 
>>a process where we all look at the candidate logos and express our 
>>opinions. Then someone makes a decision, and all the rest of us shut up 
>>and soldier on.

minor correction, we shut up, and start to help on the selected site!!! :)


>>Mike is the obvious candidate for "someone". His hard work getting this 
>>site running surely entitles him to the opportunity to take the blame for 
>>... err, I mean have the honor of ... making this decision.

MHO is, couldn't be any other way!

pedro

>LOL, thanks Ray. :)
>I hope we can reach a consensus on the logo and web site.
>
>--
>Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
>
>___
>Leaf-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel




RE: [Leaf-devel] LEAF Home Page Design

2000-12-05 Thread Pedro Barreto

At 10:01 05-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>At 01:59 AM 12/5/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>At 16:42 04-12-2000 +, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I added your entries url to our temporary home page. Unfortunately, I
>>>can't comment on your page, because I keep getting no such domain: 
>>>pxb.ods.org
>>>.
>>
>>yes, that's what you get with free domain names! :)
>>http://213.22.1.229/leaf/
>>that name is still valid, ods will eventualy recover from whatever happened.
>>
>>sorry for the glitch
>
>Pedro,
>No problem. I changed the link on our temporary home page.
>
>Comments on your home page entry:
>It looks great in IE, and lynx. Plus, it's a lot less html than my entry. :)

mike, my html is awful! it's not finished, optimized, nor the accessibility 
is enough, and I just looked at the pages using netscape, ugh! very 
unpleasant! :/

>It looks ok in Mozilla M18, but it appears Mozilla doesn't support css2 
>table properties yet.
>
>It's not so pleasing in Netscape 4.7. I think Netscape has problems with 
>closing td tags on separate lines, and it doesn't support css2 table 
>properties.

talking about netscape, how should we address the browser compatibility 
issue, should we create one set of all-complying pages or a double set of 
pages with redirection based on client applied?

yes I know, so much discussion about it and I could not catch it. :)

pedro

>--
>Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
>
>___
>Leaf-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel




RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup

2000-12-05 Thread Mike Noyes

At 11:22 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Way cool.  I'll have to get my logo entry together this weekend.  :)
>hmmm...LEAF
>Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall
>think what visuals that brings to mind.

Yeah, Ray came up with a great name for the project. :)

>And yep, I got a few early emails on the list, then no more.  I was 
>thinking it was real low traffic till I saw references while cleaning up 
>my LRP list mail.  'course if I hadn't been so busy with 'real life(tm)' I 
>might have noticed sooner.
>
>In any case, the resubscription seems to have taken so, as a former boss 
>used to say, 'it's all good'.

I'm sorry you got dropped. If Mailman does this again I'll open a support 
request with the SF staff.

--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel




RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup

2000-12-05 Thread Mike Noyes

At 06:21 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Seriously, I hope that the decision process will be guided more by common 
>sense and courtesy than any strict process. Personally, I'd be happy with 
>a process where we all look at the candidate logos and express our 
>opinions. Then someone makes a decision, and all the rest of us shut up 
>and soldier on.
>
>Mike is the obvious candidate for "someone". His hard work getting this 
>site running surely entitles him to the opportunity to take the blame for 
>... err, I mean have the honor of ... making this decision.

LOL, thanks Ray. :)
I hope we can reach a consensus on the logo and web site.

--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel




RE: [Leaf-devel] LEAF Home Page Design

2000-12-05 Thread Mike Noyes

At 01:59 AM 12/5/00 +, Pedro Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 16:42 04-12-2000 +, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I added your entries url to our temporary home page. Unfortunately, I
>>can't comment on your page, because I keep getting no such domain: 
>>pxb.ods.org
>>.
>
>yes, that's what you get with free domain names! :)
>http://213.22.1.229/leaf/
>that name is still valid, ods will eventualy recover from whatever happened.
>
>sorry for the glitch

Pedro,
No problem. I changed the link on our temporary home page.

Comments on your home page entry:
It looks great in IE, and lynx. Plus, it's a lot less html than my entry. :)

It looks ok in Mozilla M18, but it appears Mozilla doesn't support css2 
table properties yet.

It's not so pleasing in Netscape 4.7. I think Netscape has problems with 
closing td tags on separate lines, and it doesn't support css2 table 
properties.

--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel




Re: [Leaf-devel] Serial Console access for LRP

2000-12-05 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

> I'm working on developing serial console access for Oxygen.  What I
> want to do is have everything on /dev/tty0 replicate onto /dev/ttyS0.
> Syslinux does this without blinking; I think the kernel might too.
> However, other things (like /linuxrc, /etc/init.d/rc, and
> /etc/init.d/rcS) won't do this; either it goes to /dev/ttyS0 or it
> goes to /dev/tty0 - how would you tie these TOGETHER?
>
> Inittab is the source that runs rc, rcS, and getty; once getty is
> loaded I don't want things in two places
>
> I also want to tie both the keyboard and serial input together.
>
> Basically, this would allow one to boot a version of LRP, and pick
> either the virtual console or the serial console without changing
> anything but which keyboard/screen you use - no configuration
> changes.  Isn't this possible?
>
> Once the system is loaded, I don't want these two tied together like
> that; ttyS0 and tty0 should be separate then - two different gettys.
> But BEFORE that

linuxrc uses the /linuxrc.tty device.  Change the properties of this device
to get the linuxrc output to go where you want.  You can play with the
kernel parameters to get the kernel to spit out startup info on specific (or
multiple) terminals.

You can perhaps replicate the output of linuxrc using the tee command or
creative use of redirects in linuxrc, but I'm not sure how you'd join the
keyboard and serial inputs...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



[Leaf-devel] Re: [LRP-dev] /sbin/halt during boot

2000-12-05 Thread David Douthitt

On 5 Dec 2000, at 4:00, Dave Cinege wrote:

> I'm guessing you're doing this from /linuxrc? You can't go to
> runlevel 0. (Halt) There are no runlevels. init isn't running yet. 

I'm still learning about "halt" and so on.  There are several options 
for halt that I have used; they cut down on the errors but DO NOT 
stop the system altogether:

-f   Don't do a shutdown(8) - force halt or reboot
-n   Don't do a sync
-d   Don't write wtmp record (implied by -n) trying to write wtmp 
is what caused most of the errors
-i   Shutdown all network interfaces first
-p   When halting the system, do a power off - this is what happens 
when it is called as /sbin/poweroff

Here is the actual call:

/sbin/poweroff -idfn

Ideal would be to get:

System is halted.
--press any key to reboot--

But I'd settle for:

System is halted.



-- 
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



[Leaf-devel] Re: [LRP-dev] /sbin/halt during boot

2000-12-05 Thread David Douthitt

On 5 Dec 2000, at 4:00, Dave Cinege wrote:

> I'm guessing you're [trying to use /sbin/halt] from /linuxrc?

Yes.

> You can't go to runlevel 0. (Halt) There are no runlevels. init isn't
> running yet.

Ack!  Duh

> > How do I use halt properly to get it to *STOP* instead of all this
> > other stuff?
> 
> Hmmm... exec /bin/false? 
> cat /dev/zero >/proc/kcore ?  ;>

Heh.  I was thinking of:

trap "" 0 2 5 15
while true; do
done

Eh?

-- 
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] /sbin/halt won't halt!

2000-12-05 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

> For whatever reason, I *CANNOT* get /sbin/halt to really halt!  This
> sounds truly bizarre, but it is true: on my screen right now, I have:
>
> LINUXRC: halting system
> Power down.
> LINUXRC: Enter the URL(s) to load data disks from:
>
> (yes, generic URL loads :-)
>
> I would have expected:
>
> LINUXRC: halting system
> Power down.
>
> ...and then a system that responds only to Ctrl-Alt-Delete, or maybe
> not even that (typical PCs... ugh!)
>
> Do I need to write a lockup loop? :-)

Um...when you're running in linuxrc, there is NO INIT PROCESS!!!  You're
still running in the kernel bootstrap code.

This will probably confuse the hell out of any shutdown program, which is
probably trying to switch to runlevel six, or kill init, or something
similar.

I think to halt from linuxrc, you'll need to either write some code or do
something that will cause a kernel panic, like unmount the root file-system.

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup

2000-12-05 Thread Steven Peck

Way cool.  I'll have to get my logo entry together this weekend.  :)
hmmm...LEAF
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall
think what visuals that brings to mind.

And yep, I got a few early emails on the list, then no more.  I was thinking
it was real low traffic till I saw references while cleaning up my LRP list
mail.  'course if I hadn't been so busy with 'real life(tm)' I might have
noticed sooner.  

In any case, the resubscription seems to have taken so, as a former boss
used to say, 'it's all good'.

-sp

> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 5:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Home Page cleanup
> 
> 
> At 04:00 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >All right,
> >
> >What's the rules on the logo entries? I joined the early 
> list but got 
> >dropped off and want to help out.
> 
> Great! There aren't any rules, and all contributions are appreciated.
> Links to the current entries are here:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Regarding the list, were you dropped from leaf-devel?
> 
> --
> Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
> 
> ___
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel
> 
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] /sbin/halt won't halt!

2000-12-05 Thread Sergey Kozhedub

On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 05:37:20PM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:

This is right. 'halt' dowsn't mean 'reboot'.
Use 'reboot' to reboot you router.
You can also use halt -p to power down your system after halt (works
only on atx boards).



> For whatever reason, I *CANNOT* get /sbin/halt to really halt!  This 
> sounds truly bizarre, but it is true: on my screen right now, I have:
> 
> LINUXRC: halting system
> Power down.
> LINUXRC: Enter the URL(s) to load data disks from:
> 
> (yes, generic URL loads :-)
> 
> I would have expected:
> 
> LINUXRC: halting system
> Power down.
> 
> ...and then a system that responds only to Ctrl-Alt-Delete, or maybe 
> not even that (typical PCs... ugh!)
> 
> Do I need to write a lockup loop? :-)


-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kozhedub
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel



[Leaf-devel] Download times

2000-12-05 Thread George Metz

For those of you with any remaining doubts that Sourceforge's speed
problems might not be resolved, I did yet another test via FTP from
download.sourceforge.net to my server at work, and over the OC-3 I was
able to reach a whopping, mind-boggling 1.07MBytes/sec Mind you, this
was standard FTP, so that was the average; I have no clue what it bursted
at. Again, the file was the EigerStein Beta package tarball, weighing in
at 13 megs.

--
George Metz
Commercial Routing Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel