[leaf-devel] rebuilding initrd packages

2006-05-02 Thread Andrea Fino

Hi to all,

I am trying to rebuild the leaf env from scratch on a debian sarge, 
using buildtool.


When i use builpacket.pl --package=initrd --all, all the initrd packages 
are built in packages, initrd.lrp, initrd_ide.lrp, initrd_ide_cd.lrp, 
initrd_usb.lrp.


That's fine, but if I use the ide or the usb version, the system does 
not boot: infact in these the libc, shell, and so are missing  
(basically only the modules and the lrp defs are present on them).


The initrdl.lrp is just fine.

What can cause such a thing?

Regards,
Andrea

--
Andrea Fino 8-) - Sistemi su misura di qualita' industriale
 Handcrafted systems with industrial quality
[Web: http://www.faino.org ]+[Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Hosts.deny hosts.allow

2006-05-02 Thread David Douthitt

Martin Hejl wrote:

Hm - I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean that if you hit reply
to a mail on the list (instead of reply all) it will only go to the
person who wrote the mail, instead of the list? If that's the case, and
you really care to know the gory details, it's something that's part of
the configuration of all our lists (and it's a good thing


...well that's debatable ;-)

I noticed that, while Sourceforge does this as a matter of course, 
Yahoo! does not


For whoever cares about such things...


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Hosts.deny hosts.allow

2006-05-02 Thread David Douthitt

Jorn Eriksen wrote:

I guess the question would be then - for new users - how will they know what
to search for (i.e hosts.deny hosts.allow) when they do not know that
is/could be the problem?



If a new users take the Floppy, CD or Stick version, add a package (say
SNMPD) and open the correct ports in Shorewall and try to get snmp to work
(f.ex from MRTG) - it will not work out of the box.


My thoughts would be these:

* Add comments liberally
* Create documentation, both in general (available elsewhere) and within 
the package being added
* Add a script that will configure the proper openings into the firewall 
and/or tcpwrappers


Thoughts?



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Hosts.deny hosts.allow

2006-05-02 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:55, David Douthitt wrote:
 Martin Hejl wrote:
  Hm - I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean that if you hit reply
  to a mail on the list (instead of reply all) it will only go to the
  person who wrote the mail, instead of the list? If that's the case, and
  you really care to know the gory details, it's something that's part of
  the configuration of all our lists (and it's a good thing
 
 ...well that's debatable ;-)

David,
Very, and it usually ends in a flame war. :-(

 I noticed that, while Sourceforge does this as a matter of course, 
 Yahoo! does not

SF isn't the one responsible for this behavior. Mailman defaults this
way, and SF is following the Mailman recommended setting.

The Mailman Cabal follow RFC's when possible. Munging email header
fields isn't recommended for a variety of reasons.

Does Yahoo implement list headers?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2369.txt

The preferred solution is mail user agent (MUA) support for
reply-to-list. I note you're using Thunderbird. Unfortunately, that MUA
doesn't support reply-to-list at this time.

Note: there is a mailman patch from Marc Merlin that makes list
reply to munging user configurable. I'm not sure if it made it
into the 2.1.x releases.


http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2002-March/011104.html

 For whoever cares about such things...

Lots of people do, and it's debated often. :-(


https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6695group_id=1#reply_to_munging
Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful
Reply-To Munging Considered Useful
List Reply-To considered harmful, by Marc Merlin (former
postmaster for SourceForge.net)

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel