Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 10:38, Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:34, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :) K.-P., Yes. I didn't think things through when I created the bin/packages/uclibc directory in our cvs repository. :-( Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs? Done. I'll update our CVSROOT/avail after the SF staff completes the restructuring. Everyone, The SF staff just completed our requested restructuring. Please use cvs up -Pd to update your checked out working copies. Alternately, you can use the new modules I defined for bering-uclibc and packages. Example: $ cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf co bering-uclibc $ cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf co packages Name: bering-uclibc Size as of 2003-02-19: 97M Directories: bin/bering-uclibc src/bering-uclibc Name: packages Size as of 2003-02-19: 41M Directories: bin/packages doc/man src/packages -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure
Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 16:02 schrieb Mike Noyes: Everyone, I made a mistake when I originally created the 'uclibc' directory without major.minor numbers. I believe the name should have been 'uclibc-0.9'. I updated our bin/packages README with information that should avoid this problem in the future. Please let me know if the README is understandable. Thanks. We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs... ref. README http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/ Bering-uClibc team, I greatly appreciate you efforts committing packages to our package repository. However, I see a few structure problems with the committed files/directories. * There is a kernel file (linux-2.4.20.upx) in our packages repository. Can you give me a link? * A subdirectory (0_9_15) was created -- probably my fault as noted above. Yes; there are some files which are specific for Bering-uClibc release but unrelated to uClibc version, like etc.lrp, others are just the files we use for the floppy image - like modules.lrp unspecific to uclibc. In the subdir you find files compiled with uClibc version 0.9.15. Since uClibc is under development, there is no guarantee at the time for binary compatibilty - in fact 0.9.18 has broken it. If we change uClibc version we have to recompile and have have a new cvs dir - either leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9.18 or as we thought leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_18 The first one needs your intervention, the second solution allows us to work without bothering you. * I see no Bering-uClibc specific packages in your bin/bering-uclibc directory. I don't understand how this is possible. You'll find two subdirs, cd (for iso-images) and fd0u1680 (for floppy images). This is not really necessary and IMHO we can move them one dir up - the file names should be clear enough. Proposed Solutions: A) Move all packages (.lrp) in bin/packages/uclibc and bin/pakcages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9. Move all other files to bin/bering-uclibc. (Bering-uClibc team, Here is a slight correction for clarity to option A. A) Move all uClibc v0.9 LEAF release/branch generic packages (.lrp) in bin/packages/uclibc and bin/pakcages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9. Move all other files to bin/bering-uclibc. ) We'll do, but it should be it is /bin/packages/uclibc-0.9.15. Can anyone add a directory in /bin/packages? kp --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs... K.-P., Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team? D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ . Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 . This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9 indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be appropriate. Structure of proposed change: toplevel/ - bin/ -- uclibc-0.9/ --- 15/ --- 18/ -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs... K.-P., Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team? D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ . Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 . This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9 indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be appropriate. Structure of proposed change: toplevel/ - bin/ -- uclibc-0.9/ --- 15/ --- 18/ K.-P., I forgot to add the packages directory to the example above. Sorry. toplevel/ - bin/ -- packages/ --- uclibc-0.9/ 15/ 18 -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure
Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :) Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs... K.-P., Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team? D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ . Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 . This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9 indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be appropriate. Structure of proposed change: toplevel/ - bin/ -- uclibc-0.9/ --- 15/ --- 18/ K.-P., I forgot to add the packages directory to the example above. Sorry. toplevel/ - bin/ -- packages/ --- uclibc-0.9/ 15/ 18 ok we move everything frrom uclibc to bering-uclibc and from uclibc/0_9_15 to uclibc-0.9/15 Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs? kp --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:34, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :) K.-P., Yes. I didn't think things through when I created the bin/packages/uclibc directory in our cvs repository. :-( When uClibc reaches 1.0 we'll want a new directory. Also, we shouldn't need the subdirectories then, as I would expect all 1.0 bug-fix releases to be backward compatible. Just like the glibc major.minor bug-fix releases are compatible with each other. Example future structure: toplevel/ - bin/ -- packages/ README --- glibc-2.0 --- glibc-2.1 --- glibc-2.2 --- glibc-3.0 --- uclibc-0.9/ README 15/ 18/ --- uclibc-1.0/ --- uclibc-1.1/ --- uclibc-2.0/ Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs... K.-P., Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team? D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ . Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 . ok we move everything frrom uclibc to bering-uclibc and from uclibc/0_9_15 to uclibc-0.9/15 Do you want the files in bin/packages/uclibc placed in a subdirectory of bin/bering-uclibc or the root? mv cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 mv /cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc /cvsroot/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc/packages -OR- mv cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 mv /cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/*.lrp /cvsroot/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc mv /cvsroot/leaf/bin/pakcages/uclibc/*.upx /cvsroot/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc rm -rf /cvsroot/leaf/bin/pakcages/uclibc Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs? Done. I'll update our CVSROOT/avail after the SF staff completes the restructuring. -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
