Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure

2003-03-03 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 10:38, Mike Noyes wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:34, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote:
  Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :)
 
 K.-P.,
 Yes. I didn't think things through when I created the
 bin/packages/uclibc directory in our cvs repository. :-(
 
  Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs?
 
 Done. I'll update our CVSROOT/avail after the SF staff completes the
 restructuring.

Everyone,
The SF staff just completed our requested restructuring. Please use cvs
up -Pd to update your checked out working copies. Alternately, you can
use the new modules I defined for bering-uclibc and packages.
Example:

$ cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf co bering-uclibc
$ cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf co packages


  Name: bering-uclibc
  Size as of 2003-02-19: 97M
  Directories: bin/bering-uclibc
   src/bering-uclibc

  Name: packages
  Size as of 2003-02-19: 41M
  Directories: bin/packages
   doc/man
   src/packages

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes  users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/  http://sitedocs.sf.net/  http://ffl.sf.net/




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure

2003-02-28 Thread K.-P. Kirchdrfer
Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 16:02 schrieb Mike Noyes:
 Everyone,
 I made a mistake when I originally created the 'uclibc' directory
 without major.minor numbers. I believe the name should have been
 'uclibc-0.9'. I updated our bin/packages README with information that
 should avoid this problem in the future. Please let me know if the
 README is understandable. Thanks.

We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs...


 ref. README
 http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/


 Bering-uClibc team,
 I greatly appreciate you efforts committing packages to our package
 repository. However, I see a few structure problems with the committed
 files/directories.

 * There is a kernel file (linux-2.4.20.upx) in our packages
 repository.

Can you give me a link?

 * A subdirectory (0_9_15) was created -- probably my fault as noted
 above.

Yes; there are some files which are specific for Bering-uClibc release but 
unrelated to uClibc version, like etc.lrp, others are just the files we use 
for the floppy image - like modules.lrp unspecific to uclibc.
In the subdir you find files compiled with uClibc version 0.9.15.  Since 
uClibc is under development, there is no guarantee at the time for binary 
compatibilty - in fact 0.9.18 has broken it. If we change uClibc version we 
have to recompile and have have a new cvs dir - either 
leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9.18 
or as we thought
leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_18

The first one needs your intervention, the second solution allows us to work 
without bothering you.

 * I see no Bering-uClibc specific packages in your bin/bering-uclibc
 directory. I don't understand how this is possible.

You'll find two subdirs, cd (for iso-images) and fd0u1680 (for floppy images).
This is not really necessary and IMHO we can move them one dir up - the file 
names should be clear enough. 

 Proposed Solutions:

 A) Move all packages (.lrp) in bin/packages/uclibc and
 bin/pakcages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9. Move all
 other files to bin/bering-uclibc.

(Bering-uClibc team,
Here is a slight correction for clarity to option A.

A) Move all uClibc v0.9 LEAF release/branch generic packages (.lrp)
in bin/packages/uclibc and bin/pakcages/uclibc/0_9_15 to
bin/packages/uclibc-0.9. Move all other files to bin/bering-uclibc.
)

We'll do, but it should be it is /bin/packages/uclibc-0.9.15.

Can anyone add a directory in /bin/packages?

kp


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure

2003-02-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote:
 We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs...

K.-P.,
Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team?

D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ .
Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename
bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 .

This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to
create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to
address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9
indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be
appropriate.

Structure of proposed change:

toplevel/
- bin/
-- uclibc-0.9/
--- 15/
--- 18/

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes  users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/  http://sitedocs.sf.net/  http://ffl.sf.net/




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure

2003-02-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote:
  We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs...
 
 K.-P.,
 Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team?
 
 D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ .
 Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename
 bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 .
 
 This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to
 create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to
 address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9
 indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be
 appropriate.
 
 Structure of proposed change:
 
 toplevel/
 - bin/
 -- uclibc-0.9/
 --- 15/
 --- 18/

K.-P.,
I forgot to add the packages directory to the example above. Sorry.

toplevel/
- bin/
-- packages/
--- uclibc-0.9/
 15/
 18

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes  users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/  http://sitedocs.sf.net/  http://ffl.sf.net/




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure

2003-02-28 Thread K.-P. Kirchdrfer
Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :)

Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes:
 On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote:
  On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote:
   We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs...
 
  K.-P.,
  Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team?
 
  D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ .
  Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename
  bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 .
 
  This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to
  create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to
  address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9
  indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be
  appropriate.
 
  Structure of proposed change:
 
  toplevel/
  - bin/
  -- uclibc-0.9/
  --- 15/
  --- 18/

 K.-P.,
 I forgot to add the packages directory to the example above. Sorry.

 toplevel/
 - bin/
 -- packages/
 --- uclibc-0.9/
  15/
  18

ok we move everything frrom uclibc to bering-uclibc and from uclibc/0_9_15 to 
uclibc-0.9/15

Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs?

kp




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository uclibc-0.9 structure

2003-02-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:34, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote:
 Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :)

K.-P.,
Yes. I didn't think things through when I created the
bin/packages/uclibc directory in our cvs repository. :-(

When uClibc reaches 1.0 we'll want a new directory. Also, we shouldn't
need the subdirectories then, as I would expect all 1.0 bug-fix releases
to be backward compatible. Just like the glibc major.minor bug-fix
releases are compatible with each other.

Example future structure:

toplevel/
- bin/
-- packages/
README
--- glibc-2.0
--- glibc-2.1
--- glibc-2.2
--- glibc-3.0
--- uclibc-0.9/
README
 15/
 18/
--- uclibc-1.0/
--- uclibc-1.1/
--- uclibc-2.0/


 Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes:
  On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote:
   On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote:
We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs...
  
   K.-P.,
   Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team?
  
   D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ .
   Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename
   bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 .
 
 ok we move everything frrom uclibc to bering-uclibc and from uclibc/0_9_15 to 
 uclibc-0.9/15

Do you want the files in bin/packages/uclibc placed in a subdirectory of
bin/bering-uclibc or the root?

mv cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15
cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15

mv /cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc
/cvsroot/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc/packages

-OR-

mv cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15
cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15

mv /cvsroot/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc/*.lrp
/cvsroot/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc

mv /cvsroot/leaf/bin/pakcages/uclibc/*.upx
/cvsroot/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc

rm -rf /cvsroot/leaf/bin/pakcages/uclibc


 Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs?

Done. I'll update our CVSROOT/avail after the SF staff completes the
restructuring.

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes  users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/  http://sitedocs.sf.net/  http://ffl.sf.net/




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel