Re: [Leaf-user] booting from harddisk
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, ahmd hgj wrote: > i wantto boot my lrp 2.9.8 from harddisk.i read the ohw to for that.in this > how to it is written that i need syslinux.com > i am unable to find it. > from where i can get it? > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/ -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] couple of questions....
I am just getting back into trying LRP (been away for quite a while). I noticed several things on the LRP home page. It really should be updated and include links to LEAF and EigerStein 1) The latest is still 2.9.8 (1 year old) -- with no clear references to EigerStein, Oxygen, or LEAF 2) The mailing list link indicates no mailing lists found, so I had to visit the archive list to find the subscription address for this mailing list. 3) Sourceforge lists the EigerStein 2 beta as 11/6/2000 but there are several newer betas (I have the one from May). Question. Should I use the May EigerStein 2 beta for a couple of 486-based DSL routers (with hard disk for logging)? Cheers, -- W. Wade, Hampton ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] couple of questions....
Hi Wade At 10:42 10/09/01 -0400, Wade Hampton wrote: >I am just getting back into trying LRP (been away for quite a while). > >I noticed several things on the LRP home page. It really should >be updated and include links to LEAF and EigerStein You're talking about linuxrouter.org, yes? Trying to be as impartial as I can, about three months ago there was a big fall out amongst a lot of the LRP big boys. The guy who runs linuxrouter.org posted some political things on one of his web sites that a lot of people found pretty outrageous. Indeed, enough people were sufficiently and genuinely upset for a lot of the links between the linuxrouter.org guy and the rest of the LRP community to be severed. LRP development seems to be centred around http://leaf.sourceforge.net these days, but I generally start at http://lrp.c0wz.com:81 because it's good for more general LEAF/LRP info, and seems to have links to just about everywhere you need. The linuxrouter.org list is still running, but a lot of the gurus don't go there any more, so I'd advise that you're more likely to get the answers you need on this list. hope that helps cheers Julian Church -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ljchurch.co.uk ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] shell script - problem ...
Jeff Newmiller wrote: > grep is not grep on LRP... it is implemented with sed, and apparently the > return values do not behave the same. Informational note: Oxygen uses busybox grep. > Try: > > xx=`ip ro | grep 10.10.10.0` > if test ! "$xx" ; then > # do whatever you want if route is not there > fi Or: if [ -z "$(ip ro | grep 10.10.10.0)" ] ; then :# do whatever if route is missing... fi Note that "[" (test) in Oxygen is busybox test too - in fact, Oxygen uses busybox quite extensively. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] couple of questions....
Wade Hampton wrote: > > I am just getting back into trying LRP (been away for quite a while). > 1) The latest is still 2.9.8 (1 year old) -- with no clear references > to EigerStein, Oxygen, or LEAF LRP is in a quasi-state of dying away; the developer is focusing on a new version codenamed "Butterfly" which is supposed to diverge from UNIX where he feels it is needed, and which is supposed to be easier to use and more powerful. The Floppy-Based distribution LRP will fade away; Butterfly may or may not take its place (depending on size constraints, apparently). LEAF is a "super-project" which includes EigerStein and Oxygen. EigerStein is a single purpose firewall solution descending from the Materhorn distribution series, starting with LRP 2.9.4. Oxygen is a multipurpose general Linux distribution descending from LRP 2.9.7. As I understand the future of Eigerstein (Dachstein is the new generation of Eigerstein), it will remain true to its single focus. As primary developer of Oxygen, future plans include: upgrading to Linux 2.4; upgrading to glibc 2.2; upgrading packages; enhancing package format; cleaner CDROM booting; built-in support for LCD displays... ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Re: [LRP] PPP problems (added PPPD problem)
I'm sorry about the ppp question, I guess that was pretty obvious. I was asking about the routing problem so I just added it. Now there's a new problem, I think I now what it is, but not how to solve it. How do I get PPPD to run (add it to inittab(and how)??) where do I put it and with what parameters? My modem's IP is 10.0.0.138, it's an ADSL modem(512kb/s downstream; 64kb/s upstream) if you need anymore info, mail me. About the manually adding routes, here's my network.conf, I hope you can find anything in it: ### # Auto configuration bypass (Say NO to use this file) ### DIRECT_SETTINGS_ONLY=NO ### # Default Settings ### VERBOSE=YES MAX_LOOP=2 DHCP_SLEEP=15 IPFWDING_KERNEL=YES IPFWDING_FW=YES IPMASQ_DLOOSE=NO CONFIG_HOSTNAME=YES CONFIG_HOSTSFILE=NO CONFIG_DNS=YES ### # Interfaces ### IF0_IFNAME=eth0 IF0_IPADDR=10.0.0.150 IF0_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IF0_BROADCAST=10.0.0.255 IF0_IP_SPOOF=YES IF1_IFNAME=eth1 IF1_IPADDR=192.168.0.150 IF1_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IF1_BROADCAST=192.168.0.255 IF1_IP_SPOOF=YES #IF2_IFNAME=eth1:0 IF2_IPADDR=192.168.0.1 IF2_NETMASK=$IF1_NETMASK IF2_BROADCAST=$IF1_BROADCAST IF2_IP_SPOOF=NO ### # Hosts ### #HOST0_IPADDR=192.168.7.123 HOST0_GATEWAY_IF=default HOST0_GATEWAY_IP=192.168.1.200 HOST0_IPMASQ=NO HOST0_IPMASQ_IF=default ### # Networks ### NET0_NETADDR=10.0.0.0 NET0_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NET0_GATEWAY_IF=default NET0_GATEWAY_IP=default NET0_IPMASQ=YES NET0_IPMASQ_IF=default NET1_NETADDR=192.168.0.0 NET1_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NET1_GATEWAY_IF=default NET1_GATEWAY_IP=default NET1_IPMASQ=YES NET1_IPMASQ_IF=default ### # Gateways (Default Routes) ### GW0_IPADDR=10.0.0.138 GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_NAME GW0_METRIC=1 ### # Port Fowarding ### #PF0_IFNAME=$IF0_IFNAME PF0_DESTIP=192.168.0.10 PF0_TPORTS=53:5353,80:80,25:25,110:110,21:21,20:20,22:22 PF0_UPORTS=53:5353 ### # Hostname Requires: CONFIG_HOSTNAME=YES ### HOSTNAME=Tux-Guard ### # Hosts file (Static domainname entires)Requires: CONFIG_HOSTSFILE=YES ### # IP FQDNhostname alias1 alias2.. HOSTS0="$IF1_IPADDR $HOSTNAME.psychosis.com $HOSTNAME t" ### # Domain Search Order and Name Servers Requires: CONFIG_DNS=YES ### DOMAINS="xs4all.nl" DNS0=194.109.6.66 DNS1=194.109.9.99 ### # Brief instructions for this file ### # # DIRECT_SETTINGS_ONLY=(YES/NO) Default: YES # Bypass automatic configuration using this file's settings, # and only execute the commands in /etc/network_direct.conf # # VERBOSE=(YES/NO) Default: Yes # Be verbose about settings. # # MAX_LOOP=(int)Default: 10 # Maximum number of incrementable entries to search for. # IE: If you create a DNS7=, and MAX_LOOP=7, it will not be reached. # (DNS0 - DNS7 == 8 entires) # Setting this value too high will decrease the speed of the configuation # system. # # IPFWDING_KERNEL=(YES/NO) Default: NO # Enable IP forwarding in the kernel. # # IPFWDING_FW=(YES/NO) Default: NO # Set firewall forwarding policy to 'allow'. # # CONFIG_HOSTNAME=(YES/NO) Default: NO # Create /etc/hostname file using HOSTNAME entry. # Any current hostname file will be **OVERWRITTEN** # # CONFIG_HOSTSFILE=(YES/NO) Default: NO # Create
RE: [Leaf-user] Re: [LRP] PPP problems (added PPPD problem)
Um, I already suggested a fix for your pppd startup problem. Did you try it? There are several well known bugs in the 2.9.8 scripts. One of them is in > ## > # > # Gateways (Default Routes) > ## > # > > GW0_IPADDR=10.0.0.138 > GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_NAME $IF0_NAME is undefined. Change this line to read: GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_IFNAME -Richard ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Re: [LRP] PPP problems (added PPPD problem)
I do see two problem in the network.conf file you posted, though it is unclear to me if, alone or together, they are causing the routing failure you reported in your earlier message. Problem 1 -- the line GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_NAME should read GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_IFNAME This is an ancient typo in the file, one that keeps getting fixed, then unfixed somehow. Problem 2 -- you are trying to make an address on eth0 your default gateway, with these lines: >GW0_IPADDR=10.0.0.138 >GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_NAME >GW0_METRIC=1 But you are also trying to MASQ traffic from 10.0.0.0/24, with this line: >NET0_IPMASQ=YES These two settings do not go together, and I don't know without testing what behavior this inconsistency would produce. Your earlier message only mentioned needing to configure eth0 by hand; it didn't even indicate that you had an eth1 interface. Do both interfaces fail to configure, or only eth0 (before you do anything by hand, what do "ifconfig -a" and "netstat -nr" report)? As I haven't used ppp in ages (except for Kenneth Hadley's PPPoE image), I'll lave that question to someone wih fresher experience. But you might want to consider switching to Ken's image (available somewhere at leaf.sourceforge.net - look around for it) rather than struggling with whatever you have ... if you are actually running PPPoE with you DSL service, something that isn't clear to me from what you posted. At 10:44 PM 9/10/01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I'm sorry about the ppp question, I guess that was pretty obvious. I was asking about the routing problem so I just added it. > >Now there's a new problem, I think I now what it is, but not how to solve it. How do I get PPPD to run (add it to inittab(and how)??) where do I put it and with what parameters? My modem's IP is 10.0.0.138, it's an ADSL modem(512kb/s downstream; 64kb/s upstream) if you need anymore info, mail me. > >About the manually adding routes, here's my network.conf, I hope you can find anything in it: > >### ># Auto configuration bypass (Say NO to use this file) >### >DIRECT_SETTINGS_ONLY=NO > >### ># Default Settings >### > >VERBOSE=YES >MAX_LOOP=2 >DHCP_SLEEP=15 > >IPFWDING_KERNEL=YES >IPFWDING_FW=YES > >IPMASQ_DLOOSE=NO > >CONFIG_HOSTNAME=YES > >CONFIG_HOSTSFILE=NO > >CONFIG_DNS=YES > >### ># Interfaces >### > >IF0_IFNAME=eth0 >IF0_IPADDR=10.0.0.150 >IF0_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >IF0_BROADCAST=10.0.0.255 >IF0_IP_SPOOF=YES > >IF1_IFNAME=eth1 >IF1_IPADDR=192.168.0.150 >IF1_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >IF1_BROADCAST=192.168.0.255 >IF1_IP_SPOOF=YES > >#IF2_IFNAME=eth1:0 >IF2_IPADDR=192.168.0.1 >IF2_NETMASK=$IF1_NETMASK >IF2_BROADCAST=$IF1_BROADCAST >IF2_IP_SPOOF=NO > >### ># Hosts >### > >#HOST0_IPADDR=192.168.7.123 >HOST0_GATEWAY_IF=default >HOST0_GATEWAY_IP=192.168.1.200 >HOST0_IPMASQ=NO >HOST0_IPMASQ_IF=default > >### ># Networks >### > >NET0_NETADDR=10.0.0.0 >NET0_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >NET0_GATEWAY_IF=default >NET0_GATEWAY_IP=default >NET0_IPMASQ=YES >NET0_IPMASQ_IF=default > >NET1_NETADDR=192.168.0.0 >NET1_NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >NET1_GATEWAY_IF=default >NET1_GATEWAY_IP=default >NET1_IPMASQ=YES >NET1_IPMASQ_IF=default > >### ># Gateways (Default Routes) >### > >GW0_IPADDR=10.0.0.138 >GW0_IFNAME=$IF0_NAME >GW0_METRIC=1 > >### ># Port Fowarding >### >#PF0_IFNAME=$IF0_IFNAME >PF0_DESTIP=192.168.0.10 >PF0_TPORTS=53:5353,80:80,25:25,110:110,21:21,20:20,22:22 >PF0_UPORTS=53:5353 > > >### ># Hostname Requires: CONFIG_HOSTNAME=YES >### >HOSTNAME=Tux-Guard > >### ># Hosts file (Static domainname entires) Requires: CONFIG_HOSTSFILE=YES >### ># IP FQDN
Re: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released
I am trying to get a CounterStrike server going using this release. The firewall seems to work and the new additions to the services are great. The problem is, when I start the server, it keeps trying to use a 169.254.*.* IP address which is the bogus address assigned by Windows when one is not found. This is the address of my WAN Adapter, and if I disable it, the server then tries to use the Internal Ip address of my LAN Adapter...both of which are not seen from outside of the firewall. I know the external IP address...but I use PPPoE, and am using Kenneth Hadley's PPPoE package. I added HLIFE to the Wanted Services, and added the MAC Address for the machine acting as the server, and it shows the services directed to the correct machine (when starting Echowall), using the correct Internal IP address. Any ideas what I am missing? Any help would be appreciated. Mark - Original Message - From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 4:05 AM Subject: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released > > Heyaz. I found a spare pair of hours over the > last few days, and so the latest version of echowall has > now been posted to the usual places: > > ftp://ftp.echogent.com/EchoWall/echowall.lrp > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/sbest/echowall/ > > Here are the changes from 1.22: > > 1. Basic DMZ support. If you want the HTTP server to >be treated with DMZ considerations, simply put >"HTTP" into the DMZ_SERVICES list. More details >in the README file. > > 2. Added support for Half-Life, its descendant Counter >Strike, and Unreal Tournament. Whole list of masq >apps directly supported is now over 30. > > 3. Added the "all" designation for port forwarding. >So if you want to enable IPSEC to all of your LAN >members, put "all" into the IPSEC_HOST_MACID line. >Works for both PPTP and IPSEC, so far. > > Hope it proves useful! Feedback welcome. > > cheers, > Scott > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released
Mark: Heya. This sounds like it's either an interface problem, or a problem with the CounterStrike server setup. In echowall.conf, did you choose "ppp0" or "eth0" for IF_EXT? For PPPoE, I believe it should be the first one. The 169.254.0.0/16 address you speak about is actually what a DHCP client will default to if a valid DHCP server doesn't give it a lease when it asks for one. AFAIK, it shouldn't be a usable address, so I'm confused where you're seeing it. Just in the CStrike server, or do you see it in "ip addr show"? Finally, perhaps there's a config setting in the CStrike server, telling it whether to use static or DHCP addresses? I could imagine that the server itself is asking for an DHCP lease unless you tell it not to. Sorry that I don't know the particulars of this server setup any better... Lemme know what you find out! cheers, Scott > I am trying to get a CounterStrike server going using this release. The > firewall seems to work and the new additions to the services are great. The > problem is, when I start the server, it keeps trying to use a 169.254.*.* IP > address which is the bogus address assigned by Windows when one is not > found. This is the address of my WAN Adapter, and if I disable it, the > server then tries to use the Internal Ip address of my LAN Adapter...both of > which are not seen from outside of the firewall. I know the external IP > address...but I use PPPoE, and am using Kenneth Hadley's PPPoE package. I > added HLIFE to the Wanted Services, and added the MAC Address for the > machine acting as the server, and it shows the services directed to the > correct machine (when starting Echowall), using the correct Internal IP > address. Any ideas what I am missing? Any help would be appreciated. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Multiple Interfaces
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Jeff Newmiller wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Jack Coates wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > I've been trying off-and-on to get multi-interface routing working on my > > ES2B system... during the off periods there's been a lot of trying to > > restart from scratch with another LEAF distro or stripping a full > > distro, but these efforts have been stymied by bad hardware and software > > problems and just not having the time or energy to learn a new OS, so > > I'm back to the first router. > > > > Hardware: > > 486/33 with 24MB RAM and two 1680KB floppies, two NE2000s, one USR > > Courier v.Everything. > > > > Diagram (IP's not obfuscated because it just takes dig to find them): > > > > TSOFT SPRINT > > || > > PPP0 ETH0 > > 198.144.201.9 66.1.155.123 > > EigerStein2BETA > > 192.168.1.254 > > ETH1 > > | > > HUB > > > > Goal: > > So, I've got Kenneth Hadley's PPP package working pretty well, and I've > > modified Charles' scripts pretty extensively (see attachments). The goal > > is to have inbound DNS, SMTP, SSH, and maybe IRC sent to the modem via > > DNS records. I can then catch those protocols on the outbound trip and > > send them through the modem as well (see > > http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO.html for how to do this > > -- I haven't gotten 100% there yet but close enough that I do think it > > will work). There are a number of design problems to look out for here > > but I'll deal with them later as they are easy (for instance, multiple > > mail servers sending mail from the proper public IP addresses). > > Motivation: Sprint doesn't want you to provide those services? The AUP of course says no, but they don't care enough to block service. Yet. Because it's there (though starting to look like it'll need oxygen bottles and a Sherpa). So I can write it up for the load-balancing howto if it's doable. > > > > > Problem: > > It don't route from PPP0 to ETH1. > > 207.201.34.1 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 198.144.201.9 > > Do you really mean to limit yourself to one and only one host connection > through the ppp link? > No, but I also don't want to have two default routes because Linux won't use both of them -- basically I want to route by protocol rather than address, which is where the rub is because that's not what the systems (or Internet) are designed to do. > > 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.254 > > 66.1.155.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 66.1.155.123 > > default via 66.1.155.122 dev eth0 > > > > The packets aren't being blocked by ipchains, so I think I have the > > filters right -- I also think the routing looks right. So I'm > > thinking the problem is the fact that I'm trying to do two ipmasq > > statements... But I don't know for sure what the problem is. Any ideas? > > Nor I, but guesses are free. > > are your masquerades interface-specific? In particular, making the ppp if > masq specific to eth1 would seem to be a good idea. > # Masquerade internal network to world if [ "$MASQ_SWITCH" = "YES" -o "$MASQ_SWITCH" = "Yes" \ -o "$MASQ_SWITCH" = "yes" ]; then for NET in $INTERN_NET; do $IPCH -A forward -j MASQ -p all -s $NET -d 0/0 -i $EXTERN_IF $IPCH -A forward -j MASQ -p all -s $NET -d 0/0 -i $EXTERN_IF2 done; unset NET seems that this is masq'ing from the inside out, which ought to have the intended effect. > Then again, why would you route betwee ppp0 and eth0? If I'm not careful with default route, I could imagine this happening, which would be not good. > > --- > Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... > DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... > Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing > Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with > /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k > --- > -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
FW: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released
There is a command line variable for the HL server to explicitly state the IP address. The shortcut that starts your server should look something like this: \hlds.exe -game cstrike +ip +maxplayers 10 Or, when you lose your baby teeth, and move up to Linux , it will look like this: ./hlds_run -game cstrike +ip +maxplayers 10 All the goods on server admin are here: http://server.counter-strike.net/howto.html Makes me miss the old days, before Speakeasy moved my POP 800 miles further down the copper, and raised my gateway ping from <20 to >100 ms. That move put my servers out of business. :( Now I just have an expensive, high-latency SDSL line but no servers... Did I mention Speakeasy is off my holiday greeting card list? D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott C. Best Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released Mark: Heya. This sounds like it's either an interface problem, or a problem with the CounterStrike server setup. In echowall.conf, did you choose "ppp0" or "eth0" for IF_EXT? For PPPoE, I believe it should be the first one. The 169.254.0.0/16 address you speak about is actually what a DHCP client will default to if a valid DHCP server doesn't give it a lease when it asks for one. AFAIK, it shouldn't be a usable address, so I'm confused where you're seeing it. Just in the CStrike server, or do you see it in "ip addr show"? Finally, perhaps there's a config setting in the CStrike server, telling it whether to use static or DHCP addresses? I could imagine that the server itself is asking for an DHCP lease unless you tell it not to. Sorry that I don't know the particulars of this server setup any better... Lemme know what you find out! cheers, Scott > I am trying to get a CounterStrike server going using this release. The > firewall seems to work and the new additions to the services are great. The > problem is, when I start the server, it keeps trying to use a 169.254.*.* IP > address which is the bogus address assigned by Windows when one is not > found. This is the address of my WAN Adapter, and if I disable it, the > server then tries to use the Internal Ip address of my LAN Adapter...both of > which are not seen from outside of the firewall. I know the external IP > address...but I use PPPoE, and am using Kenneth Hadley's PPPoE package. I > added HLIFE to the Wanted Services, and added the MAC Address for the > machine acting as the server, and it shows the services directed to the > correct machine (when starting Echowall), using the correct Internal IP > address. Any ideas what I am missing? Any help would be appreciated. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released
FYI -- Remember that the HL engine will only use Public IP addresses in order to be seen in a Game browser. (GameSpy, or the HL server browser) You can still launch the server but you will have to post the External IP somewhere (webpage,e-mail) that will forward the packets to the internal IP so people can connect to it. the +ip option is if you have Multiple Nics/IPs on the same machine (or Nic) so you can bind the game to that specific Nic or IP. It will not work if the IP does NOT exist on that machines Nics. - Original Message - From: DPG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:44 AM Subject: FW: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released There is a command line variable for the HL server to explicitly state the IP address. The shortcut that starts your server should look something like this: \hlds.exe -game cstrike +ip +maxplayers 10 Or, when you lose your baby teeth, and move up to Linux , it will look like this: ./hlds_run -game cstrike +ip +maxplayers 10 All the goods on server admin are here: http://server.counter-strike.net/howto.html Makes me miss the old days, before Speakeasy moved my POP 800 miles further down the copper, and raised my gateway ping from <20 to >100 ms. That move put my servers out of business. :( Now I just have an expensive, high-latency SDSL line but no servers... Did I mention Speakeasy is off my holiday greeting card list? D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott C. Best Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] echowall 1.3 released Mark: Heya. This sounds like it's either an interface problem, or a problem with the CounterStrike server setup. In echowall.conf, did you choose "ppp0" or "eth0" for IF_EXT? For PPPoE, I believe it should be the first one. The 169.254.0.0/16 address you speak about is actually what a DHCP client will default to if a valid DHCP server doesn't give it a lease when it asks for one. AFAIK, it shouldn't be a usable address, so I'm confused where you're seeing it. Just in the CStrike server, or do you see it in "ip addr show"? Finally, perhaps there's a config setting in the CStrike server, telling it whether to use static or DHCP addresses? I could imagine that the server itself is asking for an DHCP lease unless you tell it not to. Sorry that I don't know the particulars of this server setup any better... Lemme know what you find out! cheers, Scott > I am trying to get a CounterStrike server going using this release. The > firewall seems to work and the new additions to the services are great. The > problem is, when I start the server, it keeps trying to use a 169.254.*.* IP > address which is the bogus address assigned by Windows when one is not > found. This is the address of my WAN Adapter, and if I disable it, the > server then tries to use the Internal Ip address of my LAN Adapter...both of > which are not seen from outside of the firewall. I know the external IP > address...but I use PPPoE, and am using Kenneth Hadley's PPPoE package. I > added HLIFE to the Wanted Services, and added the MAC Address for the > machine acting as the server, and it shows the services directed to the > correct machine (when starting Echowall), using the correct Internal IP > address. Any ideas what I am missing? Any help would be appreciated. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] LCDproc
Has anyone done extensive work with this yet? I've just tried using it, and have worked with PalmOrb (a Matrox Orbital LCD display emulator for the PalmPilot!) and it seems nice. Has anyone worked on a good client for this on a LRP system? I'll probably buy one of the internal displays and create a client for LRP, unless someone else has done it already. But then, I never DID let that stop me either :) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
