Re: [Leaf-user] 56k modem : BERING
Watch out with the internal 56k modem, it could be a win modem which will not work with Linux. Robert Chambers Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote: >Ah oh a newbie question. How does one get a internal 56k modem to work >in bering? Ive read the howtos but none on modem. Im trying to get a >router goin to share verizon dialup for office. Right now office is >using ICS on a ME machine(very unreliable). Any response would be more >than helpful. Thank you. > > >___ >Leaf-user mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] 56k modem : BERING
Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote: > Ah oh a newbie question. How does one get a internal 56k modem to work > in bering? Ive read the howtos but none on modem. Im trying to get a > router goin to share verizon dialup for office. Right now office is > using ICS on a ME machine(very unreliable). Any response would be more > than helpful. Thank you. It sounds like you need a ppp.lrp sort of package. There must some info on those. Hopefully someone will post about that. I'm not sure if Bering or Dachstein would behave any differently with that, but I have a feeling you could find more info in the mailing list archives about DF and ppp. Regards, Matthew ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] is this a possible LEAF, configuration- idea's
Gary Dodge wrote: >2kserver > (192.168.1.1) > (gigabit) > | > (gigabit) > LEAF >eth1(gigabit) eth2(100m)eth3(100m) > || | > (gigabit) (100m switch)(dsl) > super users majority > > eth1 and eth2 would have to be on the same > subnet, the super user would need access to > the 2kserver as well as print servers on eth2 > thanks for any ideas I think CS replied recently to somone about the GB ethernet cards. I can only figure that at least one or more work, though I don't know which ones. There doesn't seem to be anything inherantly impossible about your setup, though the dsl connection to the world is almost always eth0. You will make you life very difficult if you make that eth0. You didn't include in the drawing what ip addresses you were going to use for all the nics. So it's harder to guess as to the broad approach, NAT, Bridging, or the like. Try not to use tabs or proportional fonts when you make the drawings if you can. What are your concerns with this setup? Support for GB nics? Routing? If you don't know already, Charles reguarly builds his systems with a Dlink 4 port ethernet card. So handling 4 nics is no problem for Dachstein. Regards, Matthew ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] 56k modem : BERING
Ah oh a newbie question. How does one get a internal 56k modem to work in bering? Ive read the howtos but none on modem. Im trying to get a router goin to share verizon dialup for office. Right now office is using ICS on a ME machine(very unreliable). Any response would be more than helpful. Thank you. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] 4 NIC LEAF -Dachstein CD- DNS issues
Gary Dodge wrote: > Hi all.. > and Thanks to all of you that have contributed to this message > board and even more to all who have specifically address my questions.!! That's very kind and statesmanly of you :) > I have a Dachstein CD LEAF, with multiple subnet's (eth1-eth3) > I have been working on this for weeks and I have made it to the point > eth0 =(cable modem) > where the subnet on eth1 works fine. > > the second subnet (eth2) however does not here's where its at. > the lrp box is configured for dhcp on both eth1 and eth2 > workstations on eth2 receive the following. > > Windows 2000 IP Configuration > > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : test > Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . : > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : private.network2 > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : private.network2 > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : AcerLAN ALN-325 10/100 Base-PX Fast > Ethernet Adapter > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-60-67-73-EC-3E > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.10 > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.254 > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.254 > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.254 > Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:35:48 PM > Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, March 15, 2002 4:35:48 AM > > eth1 is configured as above but changing all ip's to a 192.168.1. subnet, > dhcp server and dns server. > and the connection specific DNS suffix is (private.network) > > from a cmd prompt on a 2k workstation connected to eth2, I ping a www > address such as www.utahweb.com > the name eventually resolves, maybe 15 seconds later, and I get a reply, > the same or similar ping from a > workstation connected to eth1 resolves instantly! every time. > also from the NON working eth2 subnet, not a single web page will open, > other then the > page inside the lrp box. the all time out. > > on the LRP I have configured the following in the DNSCACHE configuration. > 1) lrp box internal IP > 0.0.0.0 > 192.168.1.254 > 10.10.10.254 > 2) querying hosts IP's > 192.168.1 > 10.10.10 > 127.0.0.1 > > I don't know what other areas to look in, or what other information I can > post. > any MORE help..lol would be fantastic!! So you can sit behind eth2 and ping to the internet by name and get a response, but you can't web surf there? You mentioned that name resolution from behind eth2 took 15 secs and from behind eth1 is instantaneous. Were you thinking this was bad? It sound fine. Are you now just trying to get the web surfing to work, because you figure that your routing is ok because ping works? Are you using the Dachstein builtin firewall script or something different like Shorewall or Echowall? Have you checked your syslog for denial messages? What do they say? ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Are all recent ssh packages so large?
> Brian Boonstra wrote: > > Hi > > > > I note that Jacques Nilo has a nice modern pair of sshd.lrp and > > ssh.lrp on the LEAF website. I was thinking of upgrading, but I still like > > to try to get by with a single floppy, while those packages are > 300K each > > (and the binaries inside > 600K). > > > > My old versions are less than 300K for both of them put together. > > Is there anything both small and modern out there? > > > > > > Brian > > JN can speak to is better because he compiles them, > but the short answer is no. The newer openssl and > openssh programs have a lot more code in them. There > was an issue with shared libraries vs static ones > that obviously affects the size, but I can only recall > him (and David) trying to minimze the size and couldn't. > > Don't go far Brian! Come by every once in a while > and tell us funny stories about your new hobbies :) > Matt I can - alas - only confirm what Matt is saying. openssh has been getting bigger and bigger with each new release. It does not preclude to use it even if you only have one floppy drive on your LEAF box (which is my case). Check the doc: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/openssh2.html#AEN94 Jacques ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Are all recent ssh packages so large?
Brian Boonstra wrote: > Hi > > I note that Jacques Nilo has a nice modern pair of sshd.lrp and > ssh.lrp on the LEAF website. I was thinking of upgrading, but I still like > to try to get by with a single floppy, while those packages are > 300K each > (and the binaries inside > 600K). > > My old versions are less than 300K for both of them put together. > Is there anything both small and modern out there? > > > Brian JN can speak to is better because he compiles them, but the short answer is no. The newer openssl and openssh programs have a lot more code in them. There was an issue with shared libraries vs static ones that obviously affects the size, but I can only recall him (and David) trying to minimze the size and couldn't. Don't go far Brian! Come by every once in a while and tell us funny stories about your new hobbies :) Matt ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Sudo in Cgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I couldn't get a reply with history past the moderator. Could you explain this Phillip? Nobody in the LEAF group wants to make it difficult for you. Let us know the details and if we can/need to fix something on our end. Thanks! Matt ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Connection to web dies
I am using the floppy image of Dachstein with pppoe from Kenneth Hadley. The system is a PII 266 mhz with 64 meg of ram and 2 Netgear FA310 nics which use the tulip driver. The connection can be up for 1 or 2 weeks and then later in the day I can not connect to anything. Looking at the weblet, ppp0 is not showing an inet address. I have rebooted the router several times and it will not aquire an ip address from Covad. Only after I power off the router and then boot up then it aquires an ip address. My question is, I remember a thread here awhile back about the connection dying with the FA310 cards. But I am not sure what to search for in the archives. Any thoughts on this? Thank you in advance Robert Chambers ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] DHCP renew bug?
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:20:18:8c:e4:9c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 24.81.204.141/23 brd 24.81.205.255 scope global eth0 inet 24.81.192.89/22 brd 24.81.195.255 scope global eth0 Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 24.81.204.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 00 eth0 24.81.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 00 eth0 0.0.0.0 24.81.204.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 I am running stock Dachstein, November 2001 release. Above is captured from the weblet. After my internal network stopped working to the outside world. It appears that my ISP has just changed IP subnetting and ETH0 has 2 IP addresses, probably an anomoly. My plan does allow 2 DHCP addresses, but I wouldn't expect my firewall to use 2 of them, unless I configure proxy arp or something like that, but I haven't. And the routing table has not been updated to use the new IP address. I hope this helps. I've just rebooted the firewall to get it back and now using: inet 24.81.192.89/22 Don ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Are all recent ssh packages so large?
Hi I note that Jacques Nilo has a nice modern pair of sshd.lrp and ssh.lrp on the LEAF website. I was thinking of upgrading, but I still like to try to get by with a single floppy, while those packages are > 300K each (and the binaries inside > 600K). My old versions are less than 300K for both of them put together. Is there anything both small and modern out there? Brian ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] martians on internal network ???
>> It maybe interesting to know that aol installs a special ``adapter'' >> that is purported to behave similarly to an hardware nic. In fact, on >> win9x, at least, it is next to the nic in network neighborhood >> properties and is near identically configured. >from Charles Steinkuehler > >As mentioned in other replies, and strenghtened by the above, it sure sounds >like AOL is setting up a virtual network (or tunnel) of some sort from the >client system to somewhere in AOL land. [cut] >As mentioned elsewhere, apparently the AOL traffic is creating a tunnel >through your firewall for it's traffic, which fundamentally represents a >'back door' to your internal net. Anyone seen a recent security review of >the AOL client source code, to know if this is "safe" or not? Since I was the one who had initially responded with the "its a dial-up user on our network" response, I decided to do some additional checking. My current martian packets now seem to be coming from the following - AOL 7.0 client installed on a W2k machine, accessing AOL via our LEAF router. The martian packets are like this - 3 per login Mar 15 15:23:27 isdnfirewall kernel: martian source eab898ac for , dev eth1 Mar 15 15:23:27 isdnfirewall kernel: ll header: ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 d0 b7 7f 5a 38 08 00 giving an ip of 172.152.184.234 doing a tracert gives this ip as AC98B8EA.ipt.aol.com As a fix for my network, I am removing the AOL client(s), and instructing the individuals to get to AOL mail, etc. - ONLY via the browser, and never the AOL client. Since I am able to control these types of actions on my network, and because we have no BUSINESS reason to login to AOL - this is an acceptable solution for me. Logging into AOL via the browser does not generate these packets (of course - but I checked it just to be sure). FYI for the list. Doug ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Dachsstein 1.02 Application server
Hi, I'm trying to setup Dachstein 1.02 as an application server. Which settingd other than: IPFWDING_KERNEL=NO IPFILTER_SWITCH=NONE eth0_IPADDR=192.168.1.245 eth0_MASKLEN=24 eth0_BROADCAST=+ eth0 starts but ping to network does not work # ip route 192.168.1.245/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.245 default via 192.168.1.250 dev eth0 Any hints?? TIA Sergio D. Morilla Sistemas Tipoiti SATIC San Martín 647 Piso 2 Tel. : +54 11 4314-4482 C1004AAM - Buenos Aires Fax : +54 11 4508-6425 Argentina e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] is this a possible LEAF, configuration- idea's
2kserver (192.168.1.1) (gigabit) | (gigabit) LEAF eth1(gigabit) eth2(100m) eth3(100m) || | (gigabit) (100m switch) (dsl) super users majority eth1 and eth2 would have to be on the same subnet, the super user would need access to the 2kserver as well as print servers on eth2 thanks for any ideas ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Sudo in Cgi
I couldn't get a reply with history past the moderator. You were asking about root priviledge from Apache CGI. Usesudo , a package which gives per job/ per owner access. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] can´t access /etc/* files
I´m trying to build a web interface in php to admin the network and ipsec configuration, using DachsteinCD and apache.lrp. The problem is that php doesn´t have permissions to write to the /etc/* files, because apache is run as nobody and these files are owned by root, and have rwx r-- r--. What can I do to update the files? Running apache as root it´s not an alternative, because the way it´s compiled doesn´t allow that. Thanx in advance.. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] embedded NICs / rack server
Merrick Munday wrote:
> >Also, I think Donald Becker has drivers for the GBit Intel cards, and his
> >drivers are almost always easy to compile and usually work
> >quite well...
>
> Actually, Donald Becker's page at http://www.scyld.com/network/ says:
>
> "Contact Intel directly for the Linux driver for their gigabit card. They
> have a non-GPL driver. Because of the license conflict this driver may not
> be pre-linked or pre-patched into the Linux kernel. "
See below. I had no trouble compiling the driver for Redhat 7.1. I am
at Redhat Kernel 2.4.3 and SGI XFS file system. The warning below
doesn't support anything past kernel 2.2.16. Although a new driver just
released 2/13/2002 now supports, "Linux* kernels 2.2.x through 2.2.20
and 2.4.x kernels through 2.4.16"
http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df/Detail_Desc.asp?ProductID=749&DwnldID=2897.
I use this box as a Samba server. I am playing with a dedicated 1gbit
line from server to one client. All the kids games are loaded on the
samba server and they pull them over the net. 100 mbit is ok 1000 gbit
is better. The 13 year old can burn cds over 100 at 4x. It is an old
hp burner. I haven't finished the speed tests yet to see how fast the
1gbit card can support. Naturally this playland is protected by a LEAF
firewall.
>
> >From where I sit this is a not a positive sign, does this mean I should
> avoid PRO/1000 cards and/or embedded 82544 chips?
Becker is only saying that this is not a GPLed driver. You may have
challenges getting the driver compiled for leaf however. Moreover, I
don't know if it could be precompiled and distributed as a binary with a
leaf distro.
If this is a router for an internal segment of a LAN, then the more
speed the better. If this is a firewall attached to a cable modem or
dsl line, then save your money and use the 10/100 cards. The cable
modem cannot saturate a 10 mbit card.
You can "evaluate" some Intel products. There are also 32bit and 64bit
1gbit cards in the eval program.
You are only supposed to be able to buy one adapter in a year. How to
save money:
http://inteleval.ententeweb.com/product_detail.asp?item=PWLA8390T.
Use two different email accounts, two different credit card numbers, and
one network crossover cable, then you too can have a--turn head and
cough--cheaper 1gbit link. ;-) You will need to use netscape with two
different profiles for the cookies Intel records.
Greg
>From the Intel cd-rom readme /mnt/cdrom/PRO1000/info/p1000.htm
"Linux
This file describes the PRO/1000 driver for the Linux operating system.
This package includes the source code for a Linux driver for the Intel
PRO/1000
Server Adapter. This driver is known to build properly on 2.2.0 and
newer Linux
kernels. Most testing by Intel has been performed on the Linux 2.2.14
kernel on PCs
with Intel processors. Kernels prior to 2.2.0 and beyond 2.2.16 are not
officially
supported.
The PRO/1000 driver is only supported as a loadable module at this time.
Intel is not
supplying patches against the kernel source to allow for static linking
of the driver.
Please refer to the documentation supplied with your PRO/1000 adapter to
answer
any questions related to hardware requirements. All hardware
requirements listed
apply to use with Linux.
Building and Installation
Note: For the build to work properly it is important that the currently
running kernel
match the version and configuration of the installed kernel sources (and
the header
files in /usr/include/linux)
1) Enter the src directory ('cd src').
The rest of the build process should be run from here.
2) Run 'make' to build the driver as a loadable module.
3) Test the loading of the driver by running 'insmod e1000.o'.
4) Run 'make install' to install the e1000.o binary.
The binary will be installed as:
/lib/modules/[KERNEL_VERSION]/net/e1000.o
Basic Configuration
Once the driver has been installed it can be loaded by running 'modprobe
e1000'.
This will create a new Ethernet interface. For example, if no other
Ethernet drivers are
loaded the PRO/1000 will be called eth0.
The interface can be activated and assigned an IP address by running:
`ifconfig ethX yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy'
where ethX is the Ethernet device and yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is the IP address.
...
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Bering Kernel 2.4 IDE Support?
> > Is there a Bering kernel with IDE support? > I'm trying to set up Bering booting from HD > and I current linux file does nor support HD. > > Where can I get it?? Standard Bering kernel supports IDE. You need to download the 3 following modules from the module directory: ide-mod ide-disk ide-probe-mod and to load them in this order through the modules package (there is a template for that in the modules configuration file). Check the doc: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/leaffw04.html#AEN3 93 Jacques -- Profitez de l'offre spéciale Tiscali Liberty Surf ! 50% de temps en plus pendant 3 mois sur tous les forfaits Internet. http://register.libertysurf.fr/subscribe_fr/signup.php3 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Bering Kernel 2.4 IDE Support?
Hi, Is there a Bering kernel with IDE support? I'm trying to set up Bering booting from HD and I current linux file does nor support HD. Where can I get it?? Sergio D. Morilla Sistemas Tipoiti SATIC San Martín 647 Piso 2 Tel. : +54 11 4314-4482 C1004AAM - Buenos Aires Fax : +54 11 4508-6425 Argentina e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Looking for alternate 3c59x module for 3c905c
I've found that using older NICs is generally your best bet if using a consumer DSL or Cable connection. You'll probably never saturate the 10 Mb/s offered by them and you can avoid all the potential Driver related pitfalls (different chipset revisions etc). At home I'm using 2 old 10 Mb NICs that have ports for AUX, BNC, and Cat 5 - and they work wonderfully. Unfortunately I've never seen a version of the 3c905 driver from 3com that was compiled for LEAF/LRP... S >From: "Boyd Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Simon Bolduc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [Leaf-user] Looking for alternate 3c59x module for 3c905c >Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:02:22 -0800 > >Hello Simon, > >(Or should I say "Salut'?) > >'Problems with 905c's'. Interesting comment. I just went out a got a >couple of 3c905c's and they don't work with Dach's 3c59x module. Works >with LRP 2.9.8 3c59x, and also no prob with Red Hat 7.2 3c59x. > >Posted question on Vortex list, and received the reply below. > >Does anyone have the 3c905 from 3com compiled for Dachstein? > >http://support.3com.com/infodeli/tools/nic/linuxdownloads.htm > >Maybe that would work. Or other suggestion? > >Thanks, > >Boyd > > > >On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Boyd Kelly wrote: > > > I am trying to load the 3c59x module for two 3c905CX TXNM cards in a > > dachstein LRP (Kernel 2.2.19). The module seems to load ok. > > > > Mar 10 22:14:19 kernel: 3c59x.c:v0.99Rb 8/8/2000 Donald Becker, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >The CX cards need a longer time to reset the Rx part. I don't know (and >don't have time to check now) if the 0.99Rb driver has this fix. A newer >driver should work. > >-- >Bogdan Costescu > >IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen >Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY >Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 >E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Simon Bolduc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wed 06/03/2002 5:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: > Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk > > > > Nah - the 59x module supports the 90x series of cards - altho I have had > problems with it and 905c's previously... > > S > > > >From: Stephen Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Leaf-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk > >Date: 06 Mar 2002 16:44:49 -0800 > > > >Hi, > > > >Maybe I'm missing something here but don't you want to load the 3c90x > >module? > > > >Stephen > > > >On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 10:56, Simon Bolduc wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether the 905c's are supported by this driver - I do >know > > > that 905c's are quite different from 905b's - and did require >different > > > drivers when I was using certain dists. Have you uncommented the > >pci-scan > > > module? > > > > > > S > > > > > > > > > >From: "Boyd Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Subject: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk > > > >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:18:31 -0800 > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >I have a 3c905C card. When I try to insmod 3c59x, i get error: > > > > > > > >Unresolved symbol acpi_wake, acpi_set_pwr_state, pci_drv_unregister, > > > >pci_drv_register. > > > > > > > >Tried to download a copy dated dec 1 from > > > >devel/cstein/files/kernels/Dachstein-small/modules/net with same > >result. > > > > > > > >Any other possibilities? > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > >Boyd > > > > > > > > > > >___ > >Leaf-user mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > > > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Looking for alternate 3c59x module for 3c905c
Hello Simon, (Or should I say "Salut'?) 'Problems with 905c's'. Interesting comment. I just went out a got a couple of 3c905c's and they don't work with Dach's 3c59x module. Works with LRP 2.9.8 3c59x, and also no prob with Red Hat 7.2 3c59x. Posted question on Vortex list, and received the reply below. Does anyone have the 3c905 from 3com compiled for Dachstein? http://support.3com.com/infodeli/tools/nic/linuxdownloads.htm Maybe that would work. Or other suggestion? Thanks, Boyd On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Boyd Kelly wrote: > I am trying to load the 3c59x module for two 3c905CX TXNM cards in a > dachstein LRP (Kernel 2.2.19). The module seems to load ok. > > Mar 10 22:14:19 kernel: 3c59x.c:v0.99Rb 8/8/2000 Donald Becker, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] The CX cards need a longer time to reset the Rx part. I don't know (and don't have time to check now) if the 0.99Rb driver has this fix. A newer driver should work. -- Bogdan Costescu IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Simon Bolduc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wed 06/03/2002 5:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk Nah - the 59x module supports the 90x series of cards - altho I have had problems with it and 905c's previously... S >From: Stephen Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Leaf-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk >Date: 06 Mar 2002 16:44:49 -0800 > >Hi, > >Maybe I'm missing something here but don't you want to load the 3c90x >module? > >Stephen > >On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 10:56, Simon Bolduc wrote: > > I'm not sure whether the 905c's are supported by this driver - I do know > > that 905c's are quite different from 905b's - and did require different > > drivers when I was using certain dists. Have you uncommented the >pci-scan > > module? > > > > S > > > > > > >From: "Boyd Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: [Leaf-user] Problem with 3c59x.o on Dachstein disk > > >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:18:31 -0800 > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >I have a 3c905C card. When I try to insmod 3c59x, i get error: > > > > > >Unresolved symbol acpi_wake, acpi_set_pwr_state, pci_drv_unregister, > > >pci_drv_register. > > > > > >Tried to download a copy dated dec 1 from > > >devel/cstein/files/kernels/Dachstein-small/modules/net with same >result. > > > > > >Any other possibilities? > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > >Boyd > > > > > >___ >Leaf-user mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user y§î±êæj)b b²ÒÞiû¬z¹b²Û,¢êÜyú+éÞ¶m¦Ïÿ+-²Ê.Ç¢¸ ë+-³ùb²Ø§~åy§î±ê
[Leaf-user] udhcp problems
I've noticed since I started using the udchpd.lrp package, that after a few days I can longer obtain an IP through using a ipconfig /renew (WinNT 4.0). I keep the IP I've got right up until I decide to /release it, however one I drop it, its gone until I reboot the lrp box. I know the obvious solution would be to go back to using the standard dhcpd/dhclient files, however the purpose for using this was for size, and I still need the space. I don't know if this is affecting anyone else, but I thought I would mention it and see if I get any feed back... Joey ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Routing Problem/Solution
I had a problem which I fixed in a way I haven't seen reference to. Thanks to Charles Steinkuehler of LEAF for assistance. I have an Eiger router with IPSec and an NT Proxy server, each with a DSL connection, each routing to the inside LAN On the inside is a mail server and an AS400, which road warriors need to acccess thru VPN DSL DSL | | Proxy Linux Router ServerIPSec VPN 123.x.x.1 123.x.x.2 | 123.x.x.0/24 | -- | | mailas400 The problem is that the Proxy server is the default gateway. So requests which pass thru the Linux router respond thru the Proxy Server unencrypted. I didn't want to burden my Linux Router with a proxy to solve this. Solution: Masquerade external to internal on the Linux router ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -p all -s ! 123.x.x.0/24 -d 123.x.x.0/24 This of course causes the mail server to respond to the correct router. What is SO COOL is that ipsec deencapsulates, before passing to the forward chain, THEN the response is seen by NAT, unmangled correctly, THEN the ipsec routing table sees the destination address( the road warrior ) and says "that's mine", encapsulates and puts it back on the output chain. Try that on Windows. Of course this will work fine in any dual router situation, it doesn't have anything to do with IPSec. Warning to IPSec users: IF you specify leftfirewall=yes, the clever fellows at FreeS/Wan make a hole in your firewall for VPN traffic. They do this in the the _updown script. Problem is they INSERT forwarding rules rather than ADD them. So when a connection comes up, my MASQ rule above gets superceded by their ACCEPT rule. I just patched _updown. Well, hope this helps someone someday. ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Re: Bering Beta4 / ifup
> There are really quit nice fatures in ipupdown! > > >My advice: use the -s flag to see what an ifup eth1 > >command is doing > >ifup -s eth1 (or ifdown -s eth1) > >It will show you the precise sequences of command that > >will be executed when starting/stopping the interface. > > Sorry but this doesn´t work: > Sorry for the mistake. You should read the -v flag - for verify :-) Jacques -- Profitez de l'offre spéciale Tiscali Liberty Surf ! 50% de temps en plus pendant 3 mois sur tous les forfaits Internet. http://register.libertysurf.fr/subscribe_fr/signup.php3 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] IP aliases, kernel 2.4 and Leaf-Bering
> Sorry i found an answer where add routes, Good :-) > so the only one missing is where > i find "traceroute" command :) Marek: The traceroute command was removed from Bering to save space and to avoid giving access to a useful tool to hackers. At this stage my advice would be to move the traceroute program either from Bering beta3 (I think it was still there in beta3) or from Dachstein and then save root.lrp to have it in your own distro. I will package it separately for those users who need it. Jacques -- Profitez de l'offre spéciale Tiscali Liberty Surf ! 50% de temps en plus pendant 3 mois sur tous les forfaits Internet. http://register.libertysurf.fr/subscribe_fr/signup.php3 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Re: Bering Beta4 / ifup
> > > I tried to set up ip aliases but it does not work: > > > > >Honestly I have never tried :-) The following setup > >should work > > > >auto eth0 > >iface eth0 inet static > > address 192.168.1.254 > > masklen 24 > > gateway xx.xx.xx.xx > >up ip address add 192.168.1.254 dev eth0 label eth0:0 > > This works, but there are more problems with ipup: > > --- > auto eth0 eth0 > > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.254 > masklen 24 > gateway 212.18.9.1 > > iface eth1 inet static > address 212.18.9.2 > masklen 28 > --- > > However this won´t work. You have to put the "gateway" option in the "iface > eth1" block. > The system refuses to set a default gw if it can´t route to it (pretty > clever ;-))). > > The "ipup" package is in my opinion "to old" for 2.4.xx and iproute based > systems Well I do not know what you mean by "too old". It is the latest "sid" debian version and I adapted it to replace the ifconfig/route commands by the ip addr/ip route combo. The interface file is very flexible: you can embedded as many ip command as you what through the up/down/pre- up/pre-down prefix. My advice: use the -s flag to see what an ifup eth1 command is doing ifup -s eth1 (or ifdown -s eth1) It will show you the precise sequences of command that will be executed when starting/stopping the interface Jacques -- Profitez de l'offre spéciale Tiscali Liberty Surf ! 50% de temps en plus pendant 3 mois sur tous les forfaits Internet. http://register.libertysurf.fr/subscribe_fr/signup.php3 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] bering and modem dial and demand
> Hi I just installed bering and added ppp to syslinux.cfg and when it > boots up I get kernel either does not support or ppp is not installed > properly. What do I need to install to get a dialup to isp so rest of > office can get net (lan card)? > p.s. never configed intenal modem with lan card combo for linux router You have to load the ppp modules. Configure the modules.lrp package through the LEAF configuration modules and uncomment the ppp and ppp related modules for dialup connection (the template is read for that and the modules are provided in the standard distro). Then save modules.lrp and reboot. Jacques -- Profitez de l'offre spéciale Tiscali Liberty Surf ! 50% de temps en plus pendant 3 mois sur tous les forfaits Internet. http://register.libertysurf.fr/subscribe_fr/signup.php3 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
