Re: [leaf-user] Segmentation Fault on Back-Up Attempt?
Joe could that be a HW problem on the floppy drive? HTH Erich At 00:28 02.10.2003 -0500, you wrote: Hi all. I've got the most annoying problem, and I think I'm...well, screwed. Just today I was trying to back up my Bering floppy, when lrcfg's back up floppy submenu failed on a segmentation fault. Ok, I thought; I've been playing around with p9100.lrp for printserv duties lately, and maybe I screwed something up (never could quite get the printer working, anyway - I'm still using uClibc_1.2.1-b3). So I turned to a recent floppy backup, with no printserv modifications, and booted from that. Router works ok, so I try and back _that_ floppy up. BOOM - segfault on this attempt, too. Weird. Does anyone think that I might have messed with the actual hardware such that Bering is running out of memory? Some mem initializtions from dmesg: THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] bering documentation extra packages
Is there a single place to find bering files? So far I've come across 3 different places Disk images: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751 Extra packages: http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/ Even more extra packages: http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/ As far as I can tell the Bering documentation doesn't mention that last link even though that is where SSH packages are found. Am I missing something? Is there an easier way to find packages? -Mark Ivey- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering: tinydns? maradns? dhcpd?
I'm working on upgrading from bering-1.0 rc3 to bering-1.2 and I'm looking for some advice. Currently, I'm using dnscache/tinydns and dhcp_2_dns so that on my network DHCP-assigned IP addresses can be resolved using DNS. For Bering 1.2, should I continue using tinydns or switch to maradns? The tinydns package hasn't been updated in over 2 years...is it no longer maintained, or just good enough that it doesn't need to be updated? If I switch to maradns, is there an easy way to link it to my DHCP server? -Mark Ivey- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] DHRelay.lrp for Bering Uclibc 2.0 RC1
Is there a dhcrelay.lrp and netutils.lrp for Bering Uclibc 2.0 RC1? If there is can someone please send me a link to them. Thanks in advance. Troy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering/Bering-uClibc: any differences besides space?
Is there a compelling reason to pick Bering-uClibc 2.0rc1 over Bering 1.2 *besides* the space saved? I already have a 2-floppy Bering system running so I don't care about tiny files. Are there other important differences? I assume Bering is still be developed, and not everyone is switching over to Bering-uClibc...is that correct? -Mark Ivey- This is my last post tonight...I promise :) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] bering documentation extra packages
Le Dimanche 5 Octobre 2003 09:09, Mark Ivey a écrit : Is there a single place to find bering files? So far I've come across 3 different places Disk images: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751 Extra packages: http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/ Even more extra packages: http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/ As far as I can tell the Bering documentation doesn't mention that last link even though that is where SSH packages are found. Am I missing something? Is there an easier way to find packages? bering/latest/packages are Bering specific packages that is either requiring 2.4 kernel or having scripts customized for Bering devel/jnilo/packages are LEAF packages that can be used either with Bering or with glibc 2.0 based LRP (most notably the original LRP distro and Dachstein) without any modification. ssh.lrp, qmail.lrp and the like belong to that category. Now I am sure they are some exceptions to that general rule :-) I'll try to make the Bering doc clearer about that. JN --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] DHRelay.lrp for Bering Uclibc 2.0 RC1 [mx][sls]
I know that the DHCRelay.lrp package require ifconfig to run. So I am guessing that I will not need netutils. Thank you so much for doing this. Troy. -Original Message- From: Eric Spakman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:13 PM To: Leaf-User (E-mail); Troy Aden Subject: Re: [leaf-user] DHRelay.lrp for Bering Uclibc 2.0 RC1 [mx][sls] Is there a dhcrelay.lrp and netutils.lrp for Bering Uclibc 2.0 RC1? If there is can someone please send me a link to them. Thanks in advance. Troy Troy, I have add dhcrelay.lrp package to CVS, it will be visable tomorrow. Do you have any special need for the netutils package? The standard ip tools, included in the base image, are more powerfull than ifconfig/route. Netstat is already included in the base image. Regards, Eric Spakman Member of the Bering-uClibc team --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] DHRelay.lrp for Bering Uclibc 2.0 RC1 [mx][sls]
Troy, I'm not aware of an ifconfig requirement with dhcprelay. But if you have any problems with it, just let me know. Eric Spakman I know that the DHCRelay.lrp package require ifconfig to run. So I am guessing that I will not need netutils. Thank you so much for doing this. Troy. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Realtek 8139 Problems
Recently I had problems with the rtl8139 and the 8139too kernel modules with Bering 1.2 on a Axiom Single Board Computer. After looking at the leaf-user group I noticed that others were having similar problems, e.g. kernel panics. Since I did not have the option of using a different NIC (all the slots in the industrial-type case are in use and the NIC was integrated on the SBC) I decided to attempt the solve the problem. Long story short (my two previous, lengthy posts were rejected because I was using the wrong From address) this problem is solved if one downloads the new rtl8139 driver from Scyld and compiles it with the 2.4.20 kernel source. You have to download the 2.4.20 kernel source if you are using the stock Bering woody UML development environment that is available for download. The stock UML environment has the 2.4.18 kernel source and will not build a usable kernel module for Bering 1.2 (the hardware MAC and ethernet broadcast addresses will not be correctly read). I can contribute a working rtl8139 kernel module if anybody is interested. -jd --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering/Bering-uClibc: any differences besides space?
Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2003 09:29 schrieb Mark Ivey: Is there a compelling reason to pick Bering-uClibc 2.0rc1 over Bering 1.2 *besides* the space saved? I already have a 2-floppy Bering system running so I don't care about tiny files. Are there other important differences? Major difference is ipv6 support in Bering-uClibc 2.0x - ipv6 AFAIK cannot supported on LEAF systems based on old glibc. Besides that, updated programs and packages, cleanups and maybe new bugs... If you're current system provides all you want and runs solid, there is no need to change it. If you like to play and testdrive a new LEAF version and look at what's possible with a single floppy, you may download latest version Bering-uClibc rc1. I assume Bering is still be developed, and not everyone is switching over to Bering-uClibc...is that correct? Yes, that's correct. kp --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering xi-626 and hostap - SOLVED
Right order of hostap modules solved the problem. Many Thanks for help. Petr On 03 Oct 2003 11:12:18 +1200 Steve Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this mostly means that hostap.o needs another module inserted first. /steve --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
