RE: [leaf-user] WiFi Adapters - AP ready?
1. Yes, Linksys WPC11 if you can still get it, not sure of the other manufacturers. 2. No to 11G, OK only to 11B with hostap 3. Not sure, ask the uClibC gang about the hostap.o module from bering 1.2, if it works, as I said in my earlier post, I have not yet tried. I have to get openvpn working first, sorry. Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergio D. Morilla Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] WiFi Adapters - AP ready? Hi, I'm currently using bering Bering-uClibc 2.1 I would like to add a third card to the router in order to enable WiFi users to connect to the network. 1) From the following brands, which has a PCI card that can be used as an AP. Which model? LinkSYS Encore Surecom 2) Should I go to 802.11 G?? 3) Is there any how to on how to set up an access point in Bering-uClibc?? Thanks Sergio D. Morilla FiberTel, el nombre de la banda ancha http://www.fibertel.com.ar --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=ick leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] About BeringUclib 2.1.2
Hi: I downloaded BeringUclib 2.1.2 from different mirrors but when They start say "Bering Uclib 2.1.1" Is it normal? I think It is a mistake only in the name of the version Where should I see in order to know if i got the correct version? Sorry for my English Fabricio Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2?
Using Bering 1.2 floppy, I have pump working on eth0, and a static ip (192.168.10.254) on eth1 in my Bering 1.2 box. Eth0 is connected to a campus network that serves DHCP, and I removed the "nodns" parameter from the pump package config. I can look in resolve.conf and see the available dns servers. But, it appears that DNSCACHE can't use them. My internal hosts on eth1 have static Ips and their gateway and dns point to 192.168.10.254. No web browser will work unless I add a secondary DNS (one visible from resolv.conf on the Bering box) to the internal host config. Then everything is fine. Any ideas? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2?
- Since you use 192.168.10.254 (and not 192.1168.1.254 as default in Bering) you need to config DNSCACHE to that IP. - DNSCACHE does not use the name servers in /etc/resolv.conf but uses list of DNSes listed in its configuration. You can add your campus name servers there. Just use lrcfg and you can see where to add them. Just leave the 'nondns' parameters in pump and set your /etc/resolv.conf to 192.168.10.254. M Lu. - Original Message - From: "Tibbs, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:16 AM Subject: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2? Using Bering 1.2 floppy, I have pump working on eth0, and a static ip (192.168.10.254) on eth1 in my Bering 1.2 box. Eth0 is connected to a campus network that serves DHCP, and I removed the "nodns" parameter from the pump package config. I can look in resolve.conf and see the available dns servers. But, it appears that DNSCACHE can't use them. My internal hosts on eth1 have static Ips and their gateway and dns point to 192.168.10.254. No web browser will work unless I add a secondary DNS (one visible from resolv.conf on the Bering box) to the internal host config. Then everything is fine. Any ideas? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=ick leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2?
All is well. See some inline comments below. The only other question comes to mind: who uses resolv.conf? Answer = dhcpd, I imagine. RWT -Original Message- From: M Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:42 AM To: Tibbs, Richard; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2? - Since you use 192.168.10.254 (and not 192.1168.1.254 as default in Bering) you need to config DNSCACHE to that IP. > Yes, "I meant to do that" :-) > I wanted to learn everything about Bering, and new that a lot was defaulted. > So this is a pilrimage. - DNSCACHE does not use the name servers in /etc/resolv.conf but uses list of DNSes listed in its configuration. You can add your campus name servers there. Just use lrcfg and you can see where to add them. Just leave the 'nondns' parameters in pump and set your /etc/resolv.conf to 192.168.10.254. >>> thanks. It all works now. M Lu. - Original Message - From: "Tibbs, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:16 AM Subject: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2? Using Bering 1.2 floppy, I have pump working on eth0, and a static ip (192.168.10.254) on eth1 in my Bering 1.2 box. Eth0 is connected to a campus network that serves DHCP, and I removed the "nodns" parameter from the pump package config. I can look in resolve.conf and see the available dns servers. But, it appears that DNSCACHE can't use them. My internal hosts on eth1 have static Ips and their gateway and dns point to 192.168.10.254. No web browser will work unless I add a secondary DNS (one visible from resolv.conf on the Bering box) to the internal host config. Then everything is fine. Any ideas? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=ick leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2?
That's where you specify the name-server for the router itself - Original Message - From: "Tibbs, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "M Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:15 PM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Why doesn't DNS resolution work through Bering 1.2? All is well. See some inline comments below. The only other question comes to mind: who uses resolv.conf? Answer = dhcpd, I imagine. RWT --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering 1.2 backup destination problem
Dear list: I am following the Bering user guide through the process to "create" a bering CD -- I have a successful Bering 1680k floppy working on the machine. To get the .lrp's onto a 1440 floppy, I am using the backup destination facility, i.e., Take out Bering boot floppy, insert a 1440kb floppy. lrcfg b) backup a package Then for each package etc, shorwall, etc. I change the destination to fd0, msdos by typing d 3 (for etc) and selecting the appropriate options, then b 3 This works for the first package backed up -- but upon backing up a second package i.e. d 5 (select fd0) Then b 5 results in the message "cant mount backup device". I have tried to umount the floppy, but it is not mounted (getting out of lrcfg, then going back into lrcfg). Forever, any further backups to fd0 fail with the above message until reboot from the Bering (fd0u1680) floppy. Any idea what to do? I can reboot between each package, but it is a bit tedious. Rick. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] About BeringUclib 2.1.2
OK the readme show LEAF "Bering-uClibc" Firewall - V2.1.1 so I got the wrong version. Where can I download the correct version? - Original Message - From: "K.-P. Kirchdörfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fabricio Vargas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:07 AM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] About BeringUclib 2.1.2 > Am Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2004 16:39 schrieb Fabricio Vargas: > > Hi: > > > > I downloaded BeringUclib 2.1.2 from different mirrors but when They start > > say "Bering Uclib 2.1.1" > > Is it normal? I think It is a mistake only in the name of the version > > Where should I see in order to know if i got the correct version? > > It's a mistake on our side. > > The readme shouzld show the correct version no. > > kp --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering 1.2 backup destination problem
Hi At 21:01 26.05.2004, Tibbs, Richard wrote: Dear list: I am following the Bering user guide through the process to "create" a bering CD -- I have a successful Bering 1680k floppy working on the machine. To get the .lrp's onto a 1440 floppy, I am using the backup destination facility, i.e., Take out Bering boot floppy, insert a 1440kb floppy. lrcfg b) backup a package Then for each package etc, shorwall, etc. I change the destination to fd0, msdos by typing d 3 (for etc) and selecting the appropriate options, then b 3 I ran into the same, was to lazy to investigate, but entering the backup parameters manually instead selecting them, e.g. using a custom backup destination helped. HTH Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering 1.2 backup destination problem
Tibbs, Richard wrote: Dear list: I am following the Bering user guide through the process to "create" a bering CD -- I have a successful Bering 1680k floppy working on the machine. To get the .lrp's onto a 1440 floppy, I am using the backup destination facility, i.e., Take out Bering boot floppy, insert a 1440kb floppy. lrcfg b) backup a package Then for each package etc, shorwall, etc. I change the destination to fd0, msdos by typing d 3 (for etc) and selecting the appropriate options, then b 3 This works for the first package backed up -- but upon backing up a second package i.e. d 5 (select fd0) Then b 5 results in the message "cant mount backup device". I have tried to umount the floppy, but it is not mounted (getting out of lrcfg, then going back into lrcfg). Forever, any further backups to fd0 fail with the above message until reboot from the Bering (fd0u1680) floppy. Any idea what to do? I can reboot between each package, but it is a bit tedious. I suspect you're having consistency problems going between 1680K and 1440K disks. Note that /dev/fd0 *should* be 1440K, but I believe the default bering floppy backup target is actually /dev/fd0u1680, which is a 1680K formatted disk. I suggest adding a 1440K backup target by running the following at the command line: echo /dev/fd0u1440 >>/var/lib/lrpkg/pkgpath.disks Then you can change the backup target for all packages (d e) to the 1440K disk (probably choice #3). You can also try backing up everything at once (b e), but I prefer to do backups one at a time. Note: You can also just copy the LRP's from one disk to another: # mount bering 1680 disk mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt # copy files to /tmp cp /mnt/*.lrp /tmp # unmount disk umount /mnt # mount 1440K disk mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1440 /mnt # copy files from /tmp cp /tmp/*.lrp /mnt # unmount disk umount /mnt HTH... -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering 1.2 backup destination problem
Hello Isn't it something related to a bug I reported some months ago ? Below my proposal for a correction on /usr/sbin/lrcfg.back script. -- Christian - Grenoble De: "Christian HOSTELET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À: "Eric Spakman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Christian (Free) HOSTELET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Objet: Re: [leaf-user] LRCFG - bug ? Date: mercredi 3 mars 2004 19:23 > > Hello, > > > >I'm looking for the maintainer of the 'config.lrp' package (lrcfg > > utility)... > >I've found a bug in lrcfg.back script (LEAF Bering uClibc 2.1) with > > the > > backup devices list's update. > >I would like to propose a correction. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Christian - Grenoble > > > Christian, > > I'm the maintainer of that package, please propose your correction. > > Regards, > Eric Spakman > > Eric, In the script /usr/sbin/lrcfg.back, when one select "c) custom destination" in the "Select Backup Destination" dialog, the device is not correctly updated/added in the $LRPKG/pkgpath.disks file. The faulty sequence is (near line 133): if ! `grep -q "$DEV $FS" $LRPKG/pkgpath.disks`;then echo "$DEV $FS" >>$LRPKG/pkgpath.disks fi and I changed it to: if ! `grep -q "$DEV $FS" $LRPKG/pkgpath.disks`;then echo "/dev/$DEV $FS" >>$LRPKG/pkgpath.disks fi Hope this will help Christian -- Christian - Grenoble --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] About BeringUclib 2.1.2
> OK > the readme show > LEAF "Bering-uClibc" Firewall - V2.1.1 > > so I got the wrong version. > > Where can I download the correct version? http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751&package_id=6 7534 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Leaf bering-uclibc 2.2beta2 && CF-IDE update
> For modules pls look here: > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751&package_id=6 7534&release_id=220334 Is there modules for the latest beta? I need what I believe is ATP865 - a SIIG PCI IDE card. The Maxtor cards I wanted to use with the Promise chipset turned out to suck. My CF-IDE corruption did turn out to be the 64mb sandisk compact flash cards - both of them. I recommend that all CF-IDE users avoid this size. I am using the 256mb ultra II 256mb sandisk instead. So far no corruption.. (crossing fingers). P --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] About BeringUclib 2.1.2
I can see weblet 1.2.4 rev2, so everything is OK. Thanks for your help Regards: Fabricio - Original Message - From: "K.-P. Kirchdörfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fabricio Vargas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] About BeringUclib 2.1.2 > Am Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2004 21:50 schrieb Fabricio Vargas: > > OK > > the readme show > > LEAF "Bering-uClibc" Firewall - V2.1.1 > > > > so I got the wrong version. > > > > Where can I download the correct version? > > Fabricio; > > I was wrong - the only difference is a small weblet version change > > lrpkg -l shows > weblet 1.2.4 rev2 > instead > weblet 1.2.4 rev1 > as in 2.1.1. > > I said we made a mistake but on the other hand the corrections from 2.1.1 > to 2.1.2 are pretty small. > > sorry for confusion > kp --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering Serial port problem on IBM Aptiva
Yes, I know you will say "what are you doing running Bering 1.2 on an Aptiva"? The Aptiva 2176/C66 is a Pentium 1 66Mhz with 16Mb ram... It is one the many otherwise useless machines I have at home. Bering 1.2 floppy is working fine otherwise, but I wanted to connect one of my PC hosts in through the Aptiva's serial port. When Bering boots I see the message "TTYS01 is a 16550A" The line I use in etc/inittab is T1:23:respawn:/sbin/getty/ -L ttyS01 19200 vt100 But, a few minutes after boot I get the message on the firewall console INIT: id T1 spawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes. Hyperterminal never says it is connected, but there is no reponse. I have googled for IBM Aptiva 2176 C66 serial port and found some radio shack web page with the specs Tried also using ttyS0 and ttyS1 since the aptiva supposedly has two serial ports (one might have been the modem) But no luck with any of the ttyS01, S0 or S1 designations. Any ideas what to do here? TIA, Rick --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering Serial port problem on IBM Aptiva
Dr. Richard W. Tibbs wrote: Yes, I know you will say "what are you doing running Bering 1.2 on an Aptiva"? The Aptiva 2176/C66 is a Pentium 1 66Mhz with 16Mb ram... It is one the many otherwise useless machines I have at home. Bering 1.2 floppy is working fine otherwise, but I wanted to connect one of my PC hosts in through the Aptiva's serial port. When Bering boots I see the message "TTYS01 is a 16550A" The line I use in etc/inittab is T1:23:respawn:/sbin/getty/ -L ttyS01 19200 vt100 But, a few minutes after boot I get the message on the firewall console INIT: id T1 spawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes. Hyperterminal never says it is connected, but there is no reponse. I have googled for IBM Aptiva 2176 C66 serial port and found some radio shack web page with the specs Tried also using ttyS0 and ttyS1 since the aptiva supposedly has two serial ports (one might have been the modem) But no luck with any of the ttyS01, S0 or S1 designations. Instead of: T1:23:respawn:/sbin/getty/ -L ttyS01 19200 vt100 Try w/o the trailing slash and with the proper parameter order: T1:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L 19200 ttyS0 vt100 For additional debugging, you can try running the init entry directly from the command line. If you're having 'respawning' problems, there's almost certainly something wrong with your command syntax, which is causing an immediate abort. When run directly from the command prompt, you'll typically get a helpful error message that's lost when running from init. Note that Bering uses getty from tinylogin, rather than the gnu getty, so there might be some differences in how it operates. -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
