[leaf-user] tc n htb scripts for throttling? I'm developing a solution...
I was just wondering what kind of interest there was on the LRP side of things for a set of scripts for throttling of users based on IP or MAC address using a specific bandwidth allocation per ip. For example IP address: 192.168.0.10 Speed: 256kbit Burst: 384kbit And all these executed by scripts with files containing pertinent information, ran from startup with updates every 5-30 minutes or whatnot. All contained in that tc.lrp file that has been released. If there is enough interest i'll keep you guys posted on how it is going (I'm expecting to be done with everything this month.) It should be sufficient to be able to just type in a few numbers or edit 2-3 text files adding in your information and you'll be good to go. I am actually using this for my job and figured that i've used your guys' stuff long enough it might be a good time to give back a little. And if anybody knows of anything like this already then let me know so I don't waste my time! Thanks! --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Better thoroughput through Ricoh chipsets?
I just got a Ricoh chipset based PCI-PCMCIA setup... originally I had been using the Intel chipset for almost a year and a half now (I do wireless developing for our company) and I just noticed that the speed is better! Transfering an 8meg file through our wireless links only took apx 55 seconds for the Ricoh chipset and with the Intel chipset it took 1 minute 47 seconds! Its not related to the card either. I have tried Avaya's, Orinoco's and Buffalo's cards. All Silver. Now for the Ricoh chipset I DID have to add to /etc/default/pcmcia to the PCIC_OPTS= stuff.. "irq_mode=0" to get it working... and after that it has reduced the signal strength but also the noise levels by apx 3dBm in iwconfig. but it increased the signal quality!? And obviously increased the thoroughput. Has anybody seen or heard of this happening? Anybody done testing like this? Also the machines are identical. Same board, processor, ram, the works. If anybody has seen this happen and can explain why? or just an explanation period would be great! Either way I'm going to Ricoh! Zane --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Help compiling small program in Bering 1.0 environment?
I know it may be a weird request but could somebody possibly compile the ethloop test program for creating plot diagrams for tc(htb specifically) testing? http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/ethloop/ethloop10.tgz thats the link to the software. I would think it would come in real handy for anybody wanting to do any testing of their throttle control. I would do it on mine but i don't quite have a virtual environment setup yet. Could somebody help me out with this one? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Its quite small in fact. Shouldn't take more than 2 minutes of anybodys time :) Thanks! Zane --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Help compiling small program in Bering 1.0 environment?
Dang... if only I knew C... I guess I'll just try the UML stuff next week
when I get the chance and see if I can make something work. I definatly
think this would be a handy tool for those testing throttle control so i'll
make sure and post it somewhere where people can get it.
While I'm at it... when I have that UML stuff installed properly and all.
Would it be too difficult compiling a new version of perl with a bunch of
modules like the current perl5 lrp? I wouldn't think it'd be too tough...
anybody had any chance at looking into that because if not I might as well
do it since i'll have to use it anywho. If anybody has any comments on any
of this feel free ;)
Zane
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Help compiling small program in Bering 1.0
environment?
> Added the list back in, in case somebody has something to add...
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:20:27AM -0800, Zane Wright wrote:
> > Hey nobody replied to my posting. IF you could do it that'd be great! I
>
> It *would* wouldn't it? ;)
>
> I'm having a spot of trouble, though :( Well two actually, or maybe...
> see below
>
> > guess its probably time for me to start looking into the whole UML thing
> > now... joys. But thanks again!
>
> You really should though. It's pretty easy to set it up... (*I* managed
> ;)
> Basically you get a filesystem (which is a big file), a
> 'kernel-executable' and a {rpm|deb|tar.gz} utility package.
>
> You put the "file-system" file somewhere, and the "kernel" in the same
> dir (in your ~/ somewhere).
>
> Install the (in my case rpm) package on your system, and you're set...
> (The package takes care of whatever needs to be on your system, for the
> UML system to be able to access the hosts filesystem, network etc.)
>
> It's pretty easy, follow the docs and you'll have it up in a couple
> hours :)
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/uml01.html
>
> Now, about the trouble:
>
> Problem 1:
>
> uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# ll
> total 16
> -rw-r--r-- 1 500 users 54 Oct 18 2001 Makefile
> -rw-r--r-- 1 500 users9771 May 3 2002 ethloop.c
> uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# make
> gcc -g -O2ethloop.c -o ethloop
> ethloop.c:6: netpacket/packet.h: No such file or directory
>
> "O.K. but I have packet.h on the host system." So I copy that to the UML
> system:
>
> uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# cp ../packet.h /usr/include/netpacket/
>
> - which *seems* to be fine. Because on the next compile, what fails is:
>
> Problem 2:
>
> uml_link:~/mnt/ethloop# gcc -g -O2 ethloop.c -o ethloop
> ethloop.c: In function `send_raw':
> ethloop.c:121: `MSG_DONTWAIT' undeclared (first use this function)
> ethloop.c:121: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ethloop.c:121: for each function it appears in.)
>
> ...now, I know enough C to agree with gcc that MSG_DONTWAIT is indeed
> not declared before line 121 (or later for that matter)... what I don't
> know is what to do about it...
>
> I'm thinking that either it should get declared in packet.h but isn't
> (because the packet.h from the host system [SuSE 8.0] doesn't match) or
> there's some other mismatch somewhere... (?)
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jon
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:
> With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
> Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
> http://hpc.devchannel.org/
>
> leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
> SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] "error -5 writing packet to BAP" error w/ Bering final and orinoco wireless
I had the same problem with my setup. It was actually locking up our AP everytime I did an upload through scp! Pretty awesome actually. I originally thought it was the cards or something and upgraded the firmware and everything. Then I found out the drivers had that issue, and as soon as I moved them to wavelan2_cs driver they didn't come up again. So what I did was move all the pertinent lines from /etc/pcmcia/config to /etc/pcmcia/wavelan2.conf (i think thats where they are... not looking at the box right now sorry) and made the modifications from orinoco_cs to wavelan2_cs and they all worked perfectly. I actually used Buffalo, Avaya, and Orinoco cards and they all worked like a charm with that setup. Hope this helps! Zane - Original Message - From: "Matt Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: [leaf-user] "error -5 writing packet to BAP" error w/ Bering final and orinoco wireless > 'morning all, > > this message repeats itself over and over again both in the console and in > the message and syslog log files. it seems to occur more often when the load > on the server increases. i did a search for this on google, and those that > had the problem said it was due to the v.09 drivers for orinoco. was > anything changed from rc2->final with the orinoco drivers? > > thanks! > -matt > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
