[Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread jmassey

Hello,

I have two Dachstein IPsec gateways in place. One is a static IP, the 
other is Dynamic. I can not get the VPN up. When I change the ipsecrets 
file to reflect the IP assigned to the Dynamic connection it works! but as 
soon as I specify it as Dynamic it doesn't. When this happens 
/var/log/auth.log says that no preshared key could be found for 
68.87.38.109 (the dynamically assigned address)  and 216.29.35.154 (the 
remote static address). Any one have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason Massey

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 I have two Dachstein IPsec gateways in place. One is a static IP, the
 other is Dynamic. I can not get the VPN up. When I change the ipsecrets
 file to reflect the IP assigned to the Dynamic connection it works! but as
 soon as I specify it as Dynamic it doesn't. When this happens
 /var/log/auth.log says that no preshared key could be found for
 68.87.38.109 (the dynamically assigned address)  and 216.29.35.154 (the
 remote static address). Any one have any suggestions?

It sounds like IPSec isn't finding the proper secret to use unless the
secret is tagged with the remote IP.  Are you assigning connection ID's in
ipsec.conf?  IPSec will use the IP as a default ID if you don't assign one
manually.  I typically use unresolved names as a connection ID, rather than
IP addresses...they are easier for me to remember (and make sense of).
IIRC, there may also be some limitations on using pre-shared-secrets vs. RSA
signature keys...which are you trying to use?

Try something like:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

in your connection description at both ends...

If that doesn't help, you'll probably have to provide your ipsec.conf and
ipsec.secrets file for inspection (remove/alter any private info from
ipsec.secrets before posting, but keep it otherwise intact).

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread jmassey

Charles,

It sounds like IPSec isn't finding the proper secret to use unless the
secret is tagged with the remote IP.  Are you assigning connection ID's 
in
ipsec.conf?  IPSec will use the IP as a default ID if you don't assign 
one
manually.  I typically use unresolved names as a connection ID, rather 
than
IP addresses...they are easier for me to remember (and make sense of).
IIRC, there may also be some limitations on using pre-shared-secrets vs. 
RSA
signature keys...which are you trying to use?

Try something like:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

in your connection description at both ends...

If that doesn't help, you'll probably have to provide your ipsec.conf and
ipsec.secrets file for inspection (remove/alter any private info from
ipsec.secrets before posting, but keep it otherwise intact).

I am using shared secrets. I will at one point want to try the RSA 
encryption but I have experience with shared secrets and figured to start 
there and then go to RSA. In my previous experience with Free/SWAN  (v. 
1.34 I believe) I would specify 0.0.0.0 for anyone in the ipsec.secrets 
file on the static gateway and 127.0.0.1 for local IP on the dynamic 
gateway. I have not seen this instructed at all for the v1.91 with which I 
am working. What should the ipsec.secrets file be for the static and 
dynamic gateways. I currently have this for both:

216.29.35.154 0.0.0.0:PSK secretgoeshere

If you like I will provide the files.

Jason Massey

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread Phillip . Watts



I have had similar problems.
Love to know what ipsec version you are using.

It seems that   using 0.0.0.0 as an identifier in ipsec.secrets
is key but I haven't got dynamic to work yet.





[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/25/2002 08:28:33 AM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx)

Subject:  [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy. Almost



Hello,

I have two Dachstein IPsec gateways in place. One is a static IP, the
other is Dynamic. I can not get the VPN up. When I change the ipsecrets
file to reflect the IP assigned to the Dynamic connection it works! but as
soon as I specify it as Dynamic it doesn't. When this happens
/var/log/auth.log says that no preshared key could be found for
68.87.38.109 (the dynamically assigned address)  and 216.29.35.154 (the
remote static address). Any one have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason Massey

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user





___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread jmassey

Charles,

One other thing. The /var/log/auth.log is from the dynamic gateway as this 
is the one starting the tunnel. I must not be specifing for IPsec to use 
the local IP the right way in ipsec.secrets. In ipsec.conf you use 
%defaultroute. What about in ipsec.secrets? 

Jason Massey

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread jmassey

Phillip

Version 1.91 I think I may scrap using the PSK and go to RSA. As Charles 
pointed out, RSA does not use IPs as identifiers but rather uses the keys.

Jason Massey


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread Brock Nanson

If I recall correctly, ipsec.secrets will NOT allow a catch-all entry if
you are using preshared secrets.  That's the reason you want to go to
RSA keys if you have a dynamic end to the tunnel - they will allow this,
if you set a name as Charles suggested.

If you want to stay with the preshared secrets, I'd suggest adding a
dynamic dns daemon on the dynamic end so that you can find the gateway
with ssh - you'll need to edit ipsec.secrets everytime the IP changes!

Once you get your head around RSA, you'll wonder why you wasted any time
with the shared secrets ;-)

Brock

 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy. Almost
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:05:26 -0400
 
 Charles,
 
 It sounds like IPSec isn't finding the proper secret to use 
 unless the 
 secret is tagged with the remote IP.  Are you assigning 
 connection ID's
 in
 ipsec.conf?  IPSec will use the IP as a default ID if you 
 don't assign
 one
 manually.  I typically use unresolved names as a connection 
 ID, rather
 than
 IP addresses...they are easier for me to remember (and make 
 sense of). 
 IIRC, there may also be some limitations on using pre-shared-secrets 
 vs.
 RSA
 signature keys...which are you trying to use?
 
 Try something like:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 in your connection description at both ends...
 
 If that doesn't help, you'll probably have to provide your 
 ipsec.conf 
 and ipsec.secrets file for inspection (remove/alter any private info 
 from ipsec.secrets before posting, but keep it otherwise intact).
 
 I am using shared secrets. I will at one point want to try the RSA 
 encryption but I have experience with shared secrets and 
 figured to start 
 there and then go to RSA. In my previous experience with 
 Free/SWAN  (v. 
 1.34 I believe) I would specify 0.0.0.0 for anyone in the 
 ipsec.secrets 
 file on the static gateway and 127.0.0.1 for local IP on the dynamic 
 gateway. I have not seen this instructed at all for the v1.91 
 with which I 
 am working. What should the ipsec.secrets file be for the static and 
 dynamic gateways. I currently have this for both:
 
 216.29.35.154 0.0.0.0:PSK secretgoeshere
 
 If you like I will provide the files.
 
 Jason Massey


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread Chad Carr

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:54:02 -0700
Brock Nanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If I recall correctly, ipsec.secrets will NOT allow a catch-all entry if
 you are using preshared secrets.  That's the reason you want to go to
 RSA keys if you have a dynamic end to the tunnel - they will allow this,
 if you set a name as Charles suggested.

You can have only one catch-all (and therefore one preshared secret) if you are using 
preshared secrets.  The identifier to use is %any in the ipsec.secrets file.  Like so:

%any 192.168.3.1: PSK unsecure

HTH
Chad

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dynamic VPN Gatewy..... Almost

2002-04-25 Thread jmassey

You can have only one catch-all (and therefore one preshared secret) if 
you are using preshared secrets.  The identifier to use is %any in the 
ipsec.secrets file.  Like so:

%any 192.168.3.1: PSK unsecure

HTH
Chad

Yes, but that would be the ipsec.secrets entry on the static side. What 
about the dynamic gateway? Would it be the same?

Jason Massey

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user