Re: [LegacyUG] GedCom Viewers

2016-06-30 Thread John Magyari
Mudcreek Products and staff are wonderful.  GenViewer is fantastic!!

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Judith Booker 
wrote:

> I love GenViewer!  I take it to the library on a USB and all my
> information is right there.
>
> Judith
>
>
>
> *From:* LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] *On
> Behalf Of *R G Strong-genes
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2016 8:24 AM
> *To:* Legacy User Group
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] GedCom Viewers
>
>
>
> GenViewer is a good one from MudCreek at http://www.mudcreeksoftware.com/
>
>
>
> *From:* Martha Graham 
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 29, 2016 9:21 AM
>
> *To:* Legacy User Group 
>
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] GedCom Viewers
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> --
>
> LegacyUserGroup mailing list
> LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
> To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
> http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
> Archives at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>
>
-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/


Re: [LegacyUG] Big problem

2015-10-15 Thread John Magyari
Before u start making changes dump a gedcom of everything and multipe
backups, so you have a way to get back to your current state.

Depending on how new RIDs are assigned you might get a clue as to what was
added last, so you can unlink last created and not screw up old links.

SInce we are dealing with a database,  it would sure be nice if a changelog
was created showing adds, deletes and changes historically made.  Maybe
this will be a feature of REV 9?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Diane Murach  wrote:

> I have only used Legacy and have for many years.   I’m thinking the
> problem might have been in updates and perhaps it wasn’t finished but I try
> to be careful about this or File/File Maintence/Check Repair
>
>
>
> Right now I have compared the original file (had the 380 error when making
> descendant reports)  to several new files that were created which have
> scrambled marriages.  Wondering about the MRIN numbers.
>
>
>
> The Original file error log reported:
>
> 67 ind records that reference a preferred marriage that does not exist.
> The ones I’ve looked at all seem to be single people.
>
> 3 ind with a blank preferred marriage MRIN and those seem to have been
> corrected.
>
> The rest is inconsistencies with names which doesn’t seem to be the
> problem.
>
>
>
> I need to leave for a while, but I’ll check the first file that was made
> as a solution to Error 380.  It actually solved the error problem for a
> short time.
>
>
>
> I’ll be back,
>
>
>
> Diane Murach
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michele/Support [mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:45 AM
>
> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] Big problem
>
>
>
> Diane,
>
> Interesting.  Has your file ever been in another program? It is pretty
> hard to get Legacy to put a female into the husband’s spot.
>
>
>
> Send me an email at supp...@legacyfamilytree.com Attn: Michele.  Make a
> backup of your file and attach the backup to the email.  When you make the
> backup just back up the data portion, leave the other boxes unchecked.  I
> will fix the more serious errors for you and then tell you what to do from
> there.
>
>
>
> Michele
>
> Technical Support
>
> Millennia Corporation
>
> mich...@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> www.legacyfamilytree.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Diane Murach [mailto:dia...@wavecable.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:37 PM
> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] Big problem
>
>
>
>
>
> I have only imported my own legacy gedcom into a new legacy file to fix
> Error 380.  I have never imported anyone else’s gedcom into my file as I
> always analyze first.  Everything in my file has been entered manually.
>
>
>
> Major problem as some of these people are Swedish and use the old naming
> patterns and  I have no idea who they belong with.  Also many generations
> of sibling descendants so I am unsure who belong with whom.
>
>
>
> Does it matter who I unlink from whom?   I guess I am supposed to unlink
> all these messed up marriages.  I will wait for verification before doing
> anything.
>
>
>
> Diane
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michele/Support [mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com
> ]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:19 AM
> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] Big problem
>
>
>
> Diane,
>
> These are the kinds of errors you see when you import a gedcom or directly
> download a chunk of tree from FamilySearch.  You are inheriting other
> people’s mistakes.
>
>
>
> I would print the Check/Repair error log and just go down the list one at
> a time.  These problems need to be fixed first.  Once you can run a
> Check/Repair with no errors you can work on the Potential Problems list of
> possible problems.
>
>
>
> Michele
>
> Technical Support
>
> Millennia Corporation
>
> mich...@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> www.legacyfamilytree.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Diane Murach [mailto:dia...@wavecable.com ]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:13 PM
> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] Big problem
>
>
>
> I believe I have a huge mess with a scrambled database and unsure how to
> resolve this.
>
> I have a 8 page list errors with as an example a woman b 1941 married to a
> man born in 1886 in Sweden and the marriage is 50 years before either were
> born.
>
>
>
> Earlier I had an error 380 and could not print a descendant report.   We
> followed the directions to correct it, but still not corrected.  Now the
> problem has expanded.
>
>
>
> Results of Error Log
>
> 19 marriage records where husband is in the female position and not to the
> correct wife.
>
>
>
> 17 marriage records where the wife is not female.
>
>
>
> 5 individuals never married but they are married
>
>
>
> 69 individuals that reference a preferred marriage record that has been
> removed
>
>
>
> 13 male individuals with a different husband
>
>
>
> 12 females with a different wife.
>
>
>
> Resetting of MRIN numbers
>
>
>
> Direction please on how 

[LegacyUG] How To Apply Alternate Surname to a Group with Same surname?

2014-08-04 Thread John Magyari
I have several hundred people with 3 varations of a Surname

For example 3 Surnames
OldestMostUsedSurname
Varation1Surname
Varation2Surname

I'd like if Surname is Varation1 or Varation2,
add Alternate Names KEEPing FIRST Names and use OldestMostUsedSurname as
the new alternate name.

Is there a way to accomplish this without manually doing each one
individually?

thanks,
john



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Special characters

2014-07-09 Thread John Magyari
UTF-8,UTF-16, Unicode characters have been possible for 5-6 years via 3rd
party Libraries used with Visual Basic 6.

Legacy 7 and Legacy 8 both could have supported UTF-8 with these libraries.



Some 3rd product libraries and there are others:

http://www.cyberactivex.com/unicodetutorialvb.htm

http://www.hexagora.com/en_dw_unictrl.asp

Unicode would allow you to documet ancestors with Cyrillic, Japanese,
Chinese, Hebrew and many other letters currently not supported.
Whether Legacy 9 departs from VB6 or not it should support Unicode, UTF-8
and UTF-16.
Do we know if this is part of the spec for Version 9?


On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Ron Ferguson 
wrote:

> Ron,
>
> Legacy does not support utf-8 as the program is based on VB6 technology
> and .NET is needed for utf-8.
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Install error GLBxxx.tmp file at about 96% through the install

2013-12-18 Thread John Magyari
Ken,
This worked for me as well.

thanks


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:41 AM, KenMcGinnis
wrote:

> We hope the new build we just did has fixed the error that has stopped
> some of you from installing Legacy 8.
>
> Please give it a try now.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Ken McGinnis
> Millennia Corporation
> kenmcgin...@legacyfamilytree.com
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>  We are changing the world of genealogy!
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 8 Installation - GLBF797.tmp

2013-11-27 Thread John Magyari
Windows 7 sp1 Memory 6 meg Intel Core i7
No Antivirus installed
Legacy 8.0.0 build 353

I uninstalled Avast and the same error still exists preventing installation.
So Avast was not an issue here.

Installation aborts after screen
Skipping file
...\dao360.dll
Then GLBE253.tmp has stopped working

Legacy 7 and Legacy 7 Beta never had this issue on this machine.

Each attempt Temp name changes.

What info do you need, to determine why installation aborts and is
unsuccessful?





On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Gene Young  wrote:

> On 11/26/2013 7:38 PM, Sherry/Support wrote:
> > That's a problem with Avast. Turn it off when you do an install or
> update of Legacy.
> >
> > I just switched to a different AV program since I was getting tired of
> dealing with this every time there was a test update!
> >
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Sherry
> > Technical Support
> > Legacy Family Tree
> >
> >
>
> I run Avast and I just installed Legacy 8.  No problems, no warnings.  It
> may not be the simplest anti-virus program to use but, as with all
> software, the more you learn about it the better it appears to become and
> the easier it becomes to use.
>
> --
>
> Gene Young
> Researching Young, Harer, Cox & Sallada
> With Legacy Family Tree
> http://myyoungs.atspace.com/index.htm
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Legacy 8 Installation - GLBF797.tmp

2013-11-26 Thread John Magyari
Current Version is: 8.0.0.353
Build Date of: 25 November 2013

Win7 - OS
Avast Antivirus

[Window Title]
GLBF797.tmp
[Main Instruction]
GLBF797.tmp has stopped working
[Content]
A problem caused the program to stop working correctly. Windows will close
the program and notify you if a solution is available.
[Debug] [Close program]



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Legacy 8 Install - Installing Not Responding

2013-11-26 Thread John Magyari
Win7 - OS

During Installation of Legacy 8 the module dao360.dll, hung Installation
Not Responding.



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Legacy 8 Install - This Program has know compatibility issues

2013-11-26 Thread John Magyari
WIN7 - OS

During installation of Legacy 8, popup occurred


Program Compatibility Assistant
[Main Instruction]
This program has known compatibility issues.
Program Visual Studio
msdev.exe
[Expanded Information]
Visual Studio has a known compatibility issue with this version of Windows.

 [Check for solutions online] [Run program] [Cancel]



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Legacy 8 Installation - Avast Antivirus - file prevalence/reputation is low msdev.exe

2013-11-26 Thread John Magyari
After being hit by several viruses this year
and having to reformat the drives on 2 PCs
I started using Avast, which has prevented many infections so far.

Avast indicated
We did not find enough evidence to identify the file as malware,
However you should still use extreme caution when accessing it.

msdev.exe

reason: The file prevalence/reputation is low.

Is this file uninfected or should I override the Avast Antivirus Software
during installation?



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Log of Changes

2013-07-19 Thread John Magyari
This would be a great feature for Rev 8.

Even if MSACCESS can't do it.
Summit it to a log before you submit to the Database with a time stamp

John Magyari



On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Matthew Williams <
matthewjwilliams...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> ** **
>
> Is there a way to log the changes made within a legacy database (or is
> there one already built-in)?
>
> ** **
>
> E.g.
>
> ** **
>
> 26/05 Event added to ‘Samuel Brown’
>
> 23/04 New Individual ‘Michael Davis’ added to database
>
> 21/02 Birth date added to ‘Sarah Jones’
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,
>
> ** **
>
> Matthew
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Report with images

2013-07-03 Thread John Magyari

Legacy Family Tree Video Training Series (4-CD Set) - Volume 2
the second CD in this 4 cd set

http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/videos.asp

vol 1 has great info on doing things as well.

John Magyari


Sent from my iPad

On Jul 3, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Jay 1FamilyTree <1familytree@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have finished transcribing and adding an entire cemetery to a legacy 
> database file. How can I create a report for the 500 images that are linked 
> to their respective owners?
>
> I know I can tag all of the persons listed as buried at that cemetery place, 
> but not sure what kind of report will allow me to simply print those results 
> with the images showing as well?
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Jay
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] UTF-8 Polish, Slovak, Ukranian, non-English characters

2012-03-12 Thread John Magyari
After reading Michele's comment about Polish Characters I tried the
following:

In Legacy I tried to use Ukrainian, Polish and Slovak letters and I
could figure out how to enter them.

I exported a UTF-8 Gedcom 5.5.1 file with 4 people in Legacy an English
person whose father was Ukrainian whose father was Polish whose father
was Slovak used all english characters for names..

I then edited created Gedcom file with notepad and added Cyrillic,
Polish and Slovak characters to the appropriate person's name.

I then imported into Genbox, FTM2012 both imported gedcom no errors and
were able to create charts with all characters.

I then imported into Legacy did not see any error messages,  non-English
characters were not displayed correctly.

Names stored in fdb tables IR, MR, NR and NX appeared as they do in
Legacy but not like they do in the Gedcom,

Legacy export mentions UTF-8 and Ansel which both should support Polish,
Slovak and Ukrainian (Cyrillic) characters.

Here's the gedcom

0 HEAD
1 SOUR Legacy
2 VERS 7.5
2 NAME Legacy (R)
2 CORP Millennia Corp.
3 ADDR PO Box 9410
4 CONT Surprise, AZ 85374
1 DEST Gedcom5.5.1
1 DATE 12 Mar 2012
1 SUBM @S0@
1 FILE R:\Program Files\Legacy\Data\UTF8.ged
1 GEDC
2 VERS 5.5.1
2 FORM LINEAGE-LINKED
1 CHAR UTF-8
0 @S0@ SUBM
1 NAME John Magyari
0 @I1@ INDI
1 NAME English /E2/
2 GIVN English
2 SURN E2
1 SEX M
1 _UID D2E6041F943745EFA4B75A476B01DDE302B7
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
1 FAMC @F3@
0 @I2@ INDI
1 NAME Ukrainian /U2лджє/
2 GIVN Ukrainian
2 SURN U2лджє
1 SEX M
1 _UID E4BF8AAB39B34493BAC6D52004B69B056A21
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
1 FAMS @F3@
1 FAMC @F1@
0 @I3@ INDI
1 NAME Polish /P2żśłą/
2 GIVN Polish
2 SURN P2żśłą
1 SEX M
1 _UID 69BD6EF9F49C4624BCE63281EAA9DF4896F4
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
1 FAMS @F1@
1 FAMC @F2@
0 @I4@ INDI
1 NAME Slovak /S2ôúäň/
2 GIVN Slovak
2 SURN S2ôúäň
1 SEX M
1 _UID CF781FD94CA144F6B6496BDE23C5458C67F0
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
1 FAMS @F2@
0 @F1@ FAM
1 HUSB @I3@
1 MARR
1 CHIL @I2@
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
0 @F2@ FAM
1 HUSB @I4@
1 MARR
1 CHIL @I3@
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
0 @F3@ FAM
1 HUSB @I2@
1 MARR
1 CHIL @I1@
1 CHAN
2 DATE 12 Mar 2012
3 TIME 05:03
0 TRLR





On 3/11/2012 5:19 AM, Michele Lewis wrote:
>
> Speaking of Polish locations…  Be aware that Legacy does not include
> the needed alphabet set to be able to write the Polish characters.
>
> Michele
>
> *From:*John Magyari [mailto:jmagy...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:08 AM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields
> vs 4 Fields
>
> Thanks for everyone's ideas.
> Some of my Polish time periods use 4 some 5 positions
>
> I decided to force all 5 location positions into 4.  Having same
> number of fields helps with sorting.
>
> Ideally if would be nice to specify Number of locations field MAX.Â
> Then if entered with less fields specify which fields to become null.
> ie. MaxPositions = 5,  LessPositionOrder if less 2,3if less than MAX
> ie For Me for Poland
> city, administration, county, state, country (1,2,3,4,5)
> If less fields entered enter Nulls
> city, county, state, country (Null 1 field - admin)
> city, state, country (Null other 2 fields -admin, county)
> city, state (Null other 3 fields)
> state (Null other 4 fields)
>
>
> I will use 4 fields, and in the process converted all locations with
> fewer positions to 4 position system.
>
> john
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/11/2012 4:04 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Â
>
> By all means use the American four field standard for American
> locations, but for other countries use their own formats, normally the
> way in which they are written.
>
> Â
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
> Â
>
> Â
>
> *From:*John Magyari <mailto:jmagy...@gmail.com>
>
> *Sent:*Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:35 PM
>
> *To:*LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
>
> *Subject:*[LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4
> Fields
>
> Â
>
> Typically for US locations i have 4 FIELDS
> City, County, State, Country
>
> How do others handle European Countries?
>
> For example I have a village in Poland Area
>
> 1900's part of Austria Hungary
>
> Village, District, Province, Country 4 FIELDS
> Lipowiec, Sanok District, Galicia Province, Austria-Hungary
>
> Same place in 1940's 4 FIELDS
> Lipowiec, Sanok District, Krosno Voivodeship, Poland
>
> Almost all places in Current Day Poland 1950's through today *5 FIELDS
> City, Gmina, County, Voivodeship, COUNTRY
> Lipowiec, Dukla Gmina

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-12 Thread John Magyari
Based on Jerry comments, I can see now that if one uses X positions for
all entered locations, than sorting works
right to left
left to right
any position order for sorting
After converting all to X positions exporting to other programs is
working better for me as well.

because i previous had some locations with one, two, four and five
positions when sorting I was very limited when looking for similar
information.

Now with all entries converted to X positions all sorting works as I was
hoping for.

Thanks for everyone's comments.
john

On 3/11/2012 5:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Sorry, I stated STATES and PROVINCES, but the provinces will be in their
> own list when clicking on CANADA, since they have PROVINCES and the
> United States does not.Jerry
>
> On 03/11/2012 07:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
>> Hi again Mary.  I think you are misunderstanding the whole sorting
>> system in terms of how most websites do the sorting.  It is not simply a
>> matter of whether you go from the left to right or right to left, it is
>> how the sorting schemes deal with each division.  If you want to see
>> where I'm coming from, I welcome you to go to our website at
>> http://www.MerriamFamilyTree.org (enter FullGuest as username and
>> merriam as password).  Then go to the Places menu where you will that
>> when you click on COUNTRY, then you next can see all the STATES and
>> PROVINCES together in a list, then drill down to COUNTIES, and then to
>> CITIES.  This is the way most websites are set up to do sorting and you
>> can't do that without regard to how many divisions you use.  I hope you
>> will go take a look and then I think you will know exactly where I'm
>> coming from, even if you don't think it is necessary.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jerry Boor - http://www.MerriamFamilyTree.org
>>
>> On 03/11/2012 07:31 PM, M. Brenzel wrote:
>>> It doesn't matter how many fields you have in your locations.  Sorting 
>>> right to left puts the largest entity first, whatever that may be.
>>>
>>> I believe that your location examples below somehow got messed up in your 
>>> message.  You have multiple occurrences of Michigan and United States in 
>>> your locations.
>>>
>>> Sorting what I believe you have below from right to left would be as 
>>> follows:
>>>
>>> England, London, 195 Sunset Blvd., Roosevelt Cemetery
>>> United States, Michigan, Detroit
>>> United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit
>>> United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 123 Apple Street
>>>
>>> I don't know why you would have Detroit listed twice, once with Wayne 
>>> County and once without it.
>>>
>>> But sorting this way, all of the locations in Detroit, Wayne County, 
>>> Michigan, United States (with or without street numbers and names, cemetery 
>>> names, or anything else) will appear together in the Location List.
>>>
>>> It's really a very easy concept.  Try it!  You might like it!  You can 
>>> always change it back if you don't like it.  Keep in mind, this sorting is 
>>> just for the display of the Master Location List, not how the locations are 
>>> displayed in context.
>>>
>>> Mary
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Jerry [mailto:jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 5:57 PM
>>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 
>>> Fields
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand that thinking, Mary.  But how could that work if, 
>>> for example, you had the following?
>>>
>>> Detroit, Michigan, United States
>>> Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, United States Michigan, United States
>>> 123 Apple Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, United States Wayne 
>>> County, Michigan, United States Roosevelt Cemetery, 195 Sunset Blvd, 
>>> London, England
>>>
>>> You would be ok with United States and England as COUNTRIES, but then 
>>> moving left, it looks like you would have dissimilar entities together like:
>>>
>>> SECOND DIVISION FROM RIGHT:
>>> Michigan
>>> Michigan
>>> Michigan
>>> Michigan
>>> Michigan
>>> London
>>>
>>> THIRD DIVISION FROM RIGHT:
>>> Detroit
>>> Wayne County
>>> (blank)
>>> Wayne County
>>> Wayne County
>>> 195 Sunset Blvd
>>>
>>> FOURTH DIVISION FROM RIGHT:
>>> (blank)
>>>

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread John Magyari
Ideally I'd like to have some locations with 4 position fields and some
with 5 position fields.

He where I'm confused.

I'll create 2 new locations one with 5 fields and one with 4, next 2 lines
city, admin, county, state, country
city, county, state, country

Now I go to View->Master Lists->Locations

I do a sort trying each of the following
Position 4, Position 3, Position 2, Position 1
also
Position 5, Position 4, Position 3, Position 2, Position 1

in both of the above the country fields are in different places of the
sorted lists.

With a large number of locations some 4, some 5 positions, things don't
line up, when sorting country, state, county.

Forcing 5 fields to 4 or adding a fifth field to all my US locations,
would allow me to sort via any field.

Yes it's a kludge to force 5 into 4.
But then sorting shows variations grouped together.

I would think my rough spec would allow greater input variations.

Even for those who have US only locations the ability to add 5th field
for some entries, while keeping most at 4 would give ability to add
Hospital, City, County, State, Country
Cemetary, City, County, State, Country
Address, City, County, State, Country
City, County, State, Country

then allowing one to sort Country, State, County and have things line up.

Sorry about the misconception,  with the way things are coded and for
sorting to work, to me it seems like one needs to force all locations
either to 4 or 5 positions.








On 3/11/2012 7:58 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
> John,
> Please see below,
> *From:* John Magyari <mailto:jmagy...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:07 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields
> vs 4 Fields
> Thanks for everyone's ideas.
> Some of my Polish time periods use 4 some 5 positions
>
> I decided to force all 5 location positions into 4.  Having same
> number of fields helps with sorting.
> So you believe in having inaccurate records in your file, merely to
> fit artificial American situations?
>
>
> Ideally if would be nice to specify Number of locations field MAX.Â
> Then if entered with less fields specify which fields to become null.
> ie. MaxPositions = 5,  LessPositionOrder if less 2,3if less than MAX
> ie For Me for Poland
> city, administration, county, state, country (1,2,3,4,5)
> If less fields entered enter Nulls
> city, county, state, country (Null 1 field - admin)
> city, state, country (Null other 2 fields -admin, county)
> city, state (Null other 3 fields)
> state (Null other 4 fields)
> Absolutely *wrong* This gives no consideration whatsoever to the
> accurate location as determined by the in country in which the
> location is placed. This will perpetuate, what has recently been a
> decreasing trend, of putting square pegs into round holes. Perhaps
> America should change its way of recording locations?
>
> I will use 4 fields, and in the process converted all locations with
> fewer positions to 4 position system.
> John, you, of course, can do as you wish, but please do not even hint
> at forcing your misconceptions onto the rest of us.
>
> john
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/11/2012 4:04 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
>> John,
>> Â
>> By all means use the American four field standard for American
>> locations, but for other countries use their own formats, normally
>> the way in which they are written.
>> Â
>> Ron Ferguson
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>> Â
>> Â
>> *From:* John Magyari <mailto:jmagy...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:35 PM
>> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
>> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs
>> 4 Fields
>> Â
>> Typically for US locations i have 4 FIELDS
>> City, County, State, Country
>>
>> How do others handle European Countries?
>>
>> For example I have a village in Poland Area
>>
>> 1900's part of Austria Hungary
>>
>> Village, District, Province, Country 4 FIELDS
>> Lipowiec, Sanok District, Galicia Province, Austria-Hungary
>>
>> Same place in 1940's 4 FIELDS
>> Lipowiec, Sanok District, Krosno Voivodeship, Poland
>>
>> Almost all places in Current Day Poland 1950's through today *5
>> FIELDS
>> City, Gmina, County, Voivodeship, COUNTRY
>> Lipowiec, Dukla Gmina, Krosno County
>> , Subcarpathian Voivodeship
>> , Poland
>>
>> and since 2012 *5 Fields
>> Lipowiec, Jasliska Gmina, Krosno County
>> , Subcarpathian Voivodesh

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread John Magyari
Thanks for everyone's ideas.
Some of my Polish time periods use 4 some 5 positions

I decided to force all 5 location positions into 4.  Having same number
of fields helps with sorting.

Ideally if would be nice to specify Number of locations field MAX.  Then
if entered with less fields specify which fields to become null.
ie. MaxPositions = 5,  LessPositionOrder if less 2,3if less than MAX
ie For Me for Poland
city, administration, county, state, country (1,2,3,4,5)
If less fields entered enter Nulls
city, county, state, country (Null 1 field - admin)
city, state, country (Null other 2 fields -admin, county)
city, state (Null other 3 fields)
state (Null other 4 fields)


I will use 4 fields, and in the process converted all locations with
fewer positions to 4 position system.

john







On 3/11/2012 4:04 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
> John,
> By all means use the American four field standard for American
> locations, but for other countries use their own formats, normally the
> way in which they are written.
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
> *From:* John Magyari <mailto:jmagy...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:35 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs
> 4 Fields
> Typically for US locations i have 4 FIELDS
> City, County, State, Country
>
> How do others handle European Countries?
>
> For example I have a village in Poland Area
>
> 1900's part of Austria Hungary
>
> Village, District, Province, Country 4 FIELDS
> Lipowiec, Sanok District, Galicia Province, Austria-Hungary
>
> Same place in 1940's 4 FIELDS
> Lipowiec, Sanok District, Krosno Voivodeship, Poland
>
> Almost all places in Current Day Poland 1950's through today *5 FIELDS
> City, Gmina, County, Voivodeship, COUNTRY
> Lipowiec, Dukla Gmina, Krosno County ,
> Subcarpathian Voivodeship
> , Poland
>
> and since 2012 *5 Fields
> Lipowiec, Jasliska Gmina, Krosno County
> , Subcarpathian Voivodeship
> , Poland
>
> When some locations ideally be 5 FIELDS, do you go back and update
> those with 4 Fields?
>
> With some having 4 some having 5 it's also harder sorting and then
> viewing similar towns over time periods.
>
> thanks,
> john magyari
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
> and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Gedcom Exporting Settings are not remember next time used?

2012-03-08 Thread John Magyari
I am going through process where I need to export updates and gedcom
subsets, doing probably 10-15 per hour.

1) Every time I generate a new Gedcom the character set defaults to
ANSEL, I use UTF-8 100% of the time.

??? Is there a place to set this default to UTF-8?
??? If not can edit the fdb database and force it to what I want?

2) Also 100% of the time I want Privacy Settings For ALL 7 SETTINGS to
be checked and REMOVE [[ ]] unchecked.
After setting these correctly, every subsequent new GEDCOM generation
forces me to set these again.

??? Is there a place I can set these to what I want and they will be
always set correctly, the way I want?
??? If not can edit the fdb database and force it to what I want?

I am willing to re edit the FDB every update I get for Legacy, if I can
just have Legacy remember what I want,  I am spending sop much time re
setting each time and then when I forget to recheck everything I start
doing it again.

thanks,
john magyari




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-08 Thread John Magyari
Typically for US locations i have 4 FIELDS
City, County, State, Country

How do others handle European Countries?

For example I have a village in Poland Area

1900's part of Austria Hungary

Village, District, Province, Country 4 FIELDS
Lipowiec, Sanok District, Galicia Province, Austria-Hungary

Same place in 1940's 4 FIELDS
Lipowiec, Sanok District, Krosno Voivodeship, Poland

Almost all places in Current Day Poland 1950's through today *5 FIELDS
City, Gmina, County, Voivodeship, COUNTRY
Lipowiec, Dukla Gmina, Krosno County ,
Subcarpathian Voivodeship , Poland

and since 2012 *5 Fields
Lipowiec, Jasliska Gmina, Krosno County ,
Subcarpathian Voivodeship , Poland

When some locations ideally be 5 FIELDS, do you go back and update those
with 4 Fields?

With some having 4 some having 5 it's also harder sorting and then
viewing similar towns over time periods.

thanks,
john magyari



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Chart Printing

2011-09-12 Thread John Magyari
Unfortunately, an all blood chart is not possibly with most of the top
Genealogy Programs.  At one time 2 program were able to produce them or
by feeding the proper information into an All-In One Chart they could be
created. Now I think there is only one program left and it has not been
updated for 4-5 years.  Some printing services will print these charts
for you as well.

They are great for family reunions,  others can see what relatives are
giving you info, and see which relative branches are bare.

Other similar charts although not a blood chart, is documenting a
village. You can view what you have and even the branches you have not
been able to connect to the main portion of the tree.

If you do want to get a blood relative tree and have a 3rd party print
it out, lets say for you.

do the following.
Select yourself
Then find your direct-line ancestors with no parents tag each.
Now create a descendant tree for each of those ancestors, and tag the
descendants.
Save the tagged individuals as a gedcom to send to a 3rd party print
company or if others create the ability to make All-In-One Charts you
can shove you data there.
Remember to exclude spouses, if it's a pure blood tree. If you keep the
spouses you have another unique tree which will probably create a really
huge tree.

Then have it all printed.
These are the people you've documented related to you via blood (or at
least have a high probability to being blood related to you).
Viewing these charts allows you to then see who might be potential
candidates to sign up for genealogy tests so you can fill in some of
blanks for those ancestors of yours that did not pass the DNA down to you.


The blood relative tree is a unique type of tree.
In nature this type of tree exists in Hawaii and is called the Banyan
Tree where the tree has multiple trucks that are interconnected via the
branches, similar to you and your blood relatives.

A blood tree is like having multiple descendant trees interconnected
based on a single individual starting point.
Each of your cousins blood trees will be unique to them and their siblings.

On 9/12/2011 2:11 AM, Terry Foxcroft wrote:
> An all blood relatives chart.
>
> This is what I am craving!
>
> Terry
>
> > From: poo...@ozemail.com.au
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Chart Printing
> > Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:28:02 +1000
> >
> > But if the OP wants “ALL” of uncle’s genealogy does she also want
> those who came before him i.e. his ancestors? If she wants both she
> needs a different chart and right now my chemo brain has completely
> forgotten what it is called but as far as I know Legacy doesn’t
> provide for this type of chart. Not sure about Legacy Charting.
> >
> > Becky Malmo
> > Fresno, CA
> >
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
> and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] how do I change sex of spouse

2010-04-14 Thread John Magyari
joan,

I just did it.

Created a  new database with George a male and Frank a female set them
as husband and wife.

Then Export the Database to a Gedcom.

Then with a text editor find the individual with the incorrect sex, here
Frank went from female to male.

Save the file.

Now import the GedCOM into a new database.  Each time you run into this
you will have to export out of legacy, make the change and then import
back into Legacy.

There are ways to directly edit the Microsoft database, but for most
this is not recommended.

Now when you open the database the Married GEORGE and FRANK both males
are correctly identified.

john

Joan Lalonde wrote:
> Thank you.  I'll try the archives, and editing the gedcom.
>
> Joan L.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ron Ferguson" 
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] how do I change sex of spouse
>
>
> Joan Lalonde wrote:
>
>> How do I change the sex of a same sex marriage spouse from female to
>> male?
>>
>> Joan L.
>> Potsdam, NY
>>
>>
>
> Joan,
>
> >From within Legacy, you cannot!
>
> I ubderstand it is possible by exporting the couple to a GEDCOM and amending
> the details and reimporting it can be done, but I have never had to try it.
> I suggest that you search the LUG Archives (Link below) since this matter
> has regularly raised its head.
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] All descendants, of the ancestors for a particular individual

2010-03-30 Thread John Magyari
Then what?

I want to generate a gedcom that is a subset of the Complete Database.

It should include all ancestors for a certain individual.
And for all those ancestors every descendant.

a) find all ancestors with no parents in DB. of individual X
b) Then from all those end branches, generate all their descendants.

john

RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote:
> Go to View '(File Edit Add) View'; drop down to Focus Geoup,
> Rich in LA CA
>
> --- On Mon, 3/29/10, John Magyari  wrote:
>
>
>> From: John Magyari 
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] All descendants, of the ancestors for a particular 
>> individual
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Date: Monday, March 29, 2010, 1:49 PM
>> I need to create a Gedcom
>>
>> 1) for a certain individual in the Database PersonX
>>
>> 2) find the direct-line ancestors of PersonX
>> <---  Like Search Query
>> Direct-Line Ancestors with no Parents
>>
>> 3) Now find all the descendants of those found in step #2
>>
>> 4) then create the gedcom
>>
>> I'd like to create a query so I can do this easily, without
>> having to
>> manually do each individual found in step #2 one by one.
>>
>>
>> IE. I want all descendants, of the ancestors for a
>> particular individual.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>
>>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>
>> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>>
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>>
>> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21
>> 2009:
>>
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/
>>
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>>
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] All descendants, of the ancestors for a particular individual

2010-03-29 Thread John Magyari
I need to create a Gedcom

1) for a certain individual in the Database PersonX

2) find the direct-line ancestors of PersonX  <---  Like Search Query
Direct-Line Ancestors with no Parents

3) Now find all the descendants of those found in step #2

4) then create the gedcom

I'd like to create a query so I can do this easily, without having to
manually do each individual found in step #2 one by one.


IE. I want all descendants, of the ancestors for a particular individual.




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp