Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Richard Van Wasshnova]

Hi Kathy,

No, unfortunately! Not in Legacy anyway but it's easy with ltools or MS
Access.
In Legacy when you do a search, say for all marriages in Toledo you get
results showing Individuals and Ind tags. Even if you fag marriages one at
a time you still can't display them in a list.

--
Richard Van Wasshnova

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Kathy Thompson wrote:

> I
> s there any way to tag more than one marriage at a time?
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Kathy Thompson]

drat!

oh well - no biggy, will just stick with the individual tags.
Was hoping to tag the marriages from a certain place in a marriage tag
after doing a Marriage search for that location.


On 28 December 2013 01:30, Richard Van Wasshnova
wrote:

> Hi Kathy,
>
> No, unfortunately! Not in Legacy anyway but it's easy with ltools or MS
> Access.
> In Legacy when you do a search, say for all marriages in Toledo you get
> results showing Individuals and Ind tags. Even if you fag marriages one at
> a time you still can't display them in a list.
>
> --
> Richard Van Wasshnova
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Kathy Thompson wrote:
>
>> I
>> s there any way to tag more than one marriage at a time?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Kurt Kneeland]

Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate.  Unfortunately, there is not 
yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags.  They can only be 
turned on/off one at a time.

Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct ancestors 
(exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of generations.

You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit the 
search list to just the males.  Then you could go through that search list to 
set the marriage tags.


-Original Message-
From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th 
generation grandparents.  I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.

Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage tag #1. 
 This presumes that the tags are different between general and marriage tags.  
If not I can use a different tag #.

I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work down the 
marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are direct 
ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.

Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.

Thanks

Bernie
--
Bernie H Blog site http://haushornung.weebly.com/ Data site 
http://www3.telus.net/hornunghouse/



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[CE WOOD]

To get a complete picture, you also need to do the paragraph 3 search for 
females. There are more marriages where the ancestry of the wife is unknown, 
but there are several in my 100+ generations where the ancestry of the husband 
is unknown. To be thorough, do both.

Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy will 
soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing.

CE

> From: kurt-kneel...@sbcglobal.net
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600
>
> Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate.  Unfortunately, there is not 
> yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags.  They can only be 
> turned on/off one at a time.
>
> Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct ancestors 
> (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of generations.
>
> You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit the 
> search list to just the males.  Then you could go through that search list to 
> set the marriage tags.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>
> I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th 
> generation grandparents.  I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.
>
> Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage tag 
> #1.  This presumes that the tags are different between general and marriage 
> tags.  If not I can use a different tag #.
>
> I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work down 
> the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are direct 
> ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.
>
> Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bernie


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[David Abernathy]

“in my 100+ generations”

That is a bit to many, I think you need to do another count?

That is back to the BC time period?



Thanks,

David C Abernathy

Email disclaimers



This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.



 <http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com> http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com

== All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  ==



From: CE WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 4:09 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages



To get a complete picture, you also need to do the paragraph 3 search for 
females. There are more marriages where the ancestry of the wife is unknown, 
but there are several in my 100+ generations where the ancestry of the husband 
is unknown. To be thorough, do both.

Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy will 
soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing.


CE


> From: kurt-kneel...@sbcglobal.net
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600
>
> Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate. Unfortunately, there is not 
> yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags. They can only be 
> turned on/off one at a time.
>
> Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct ancestors 
> (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of generations.
>
> You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit the 
> search list to just the males. Then you could go through that search list to 
> set the marriage tags.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>
> I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th 
> generation grandparents. I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.
>
> Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage tag 
> #1. This presumes that the tags are different between general and marriage 
> tags. If not I can use a different tag #.
>
> I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work down 
> the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are direct 
> ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.
>
> Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bernie



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[CE WOOD]

Yes, it is.

CE

From: da...@schmeckabernathy.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:19:33 -0800

“in my 100+ generations”That is a bit to many, I think you need to do another 
count?That is back to the BC time period? Thanks,David C AbernathyEmail 
disclaimersThis
 message represents the official view of the voices in my 
head.http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com==
 All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  == From: CE 
WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 4:09 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages To get a complete picture, you also 
need to do the paragraph 3 search for females. There are more marriages where 
the ancestry of the wife is unknown, but there are several in my 100+ 
generations where the ancestry of the husband is unknown. To be thorough, do 
both.

Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy will 
soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing.

CE
 > From: kurt-kneel...@sbcglobal.net
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600
>
> Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate. Unfortunately, there is not 
> yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags. They can only be 
> turned on/off one at a time.
>
> Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct ancestors 
> (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of generations.
>
> You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit the 
> search list to just the males. Then you could go through that search list to 
> set the marriage tags.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>
> I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th 
> generation grandparents. I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.
>
> Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage tag 
> #1. This presumes that the tags are different between general and marriage 
> tags. If not I can use a different tag #.
>
> I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work down 
> the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are direct 
> ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.
>
> Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bernie


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Paula Ryburn]

Yes, sometimes it feels like the "tag" field was added to a marriage, but any 
functionality beyond "tag/untag" and "go to next tagged" was never developed.  
Hmm...
 
--Paula in Texas
Researching:  Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman 
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field 
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle 
Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche 
Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams



 From: Richard Van Wasshnova 
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages



Hi Kathy,

No, unfortunately! Not in Legacy anyway but it's easy with ltools or MS Access.
In Legacy when you do a search, say for all marriages in Toledo you get results 
showing Individuals and Ind tags. Even if you fag marriages one at a time you 
still can't display them in a list.

-- 
Richard Van Wasshnova


On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Kathy Thompson  wrote:

Is there any way to tag more than one marriage at a time?
>
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Ron Taylor]

I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file that I sent 
out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It sets the marriage record 
"Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is similar.  
The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and Anniversary 
Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living cousins, etc.

How to set
Anniversary and Birthday Reminders for select individuals
1)    Clear tag5 and all UserIDs for everyone in the
Legacy database.  You may also want to
clear all Anniversary and Birthday Reminders so those set by this procedure are
not mixed with others.
2)    Make list of RINs for grandfathers or
great-grandfathers or any other group.
3)    Set tag5 for all descendants (including spouses)
of RINs from step 2.  Easily done with a
Focus Group.  First “Clear List” to start
with an empty Focus Group.  Then click “Add
an Individual and Descendants” for each RIN.  Then Search>Miscellaneous>Focus
Group>Create List>Options>Advanced Tagging>Tag on #5>Everyone in
Search List.  Exit from Legacy.
4)    Set UserID for all biological descendants of the
RINs from step2 with Ltools>Set Special User IDs.  Set radio button “Fill 
descendant’s User ID
with Text + Henry Number”.  Enter “HN-“
in the Text field.  Check the box
“Exclude Non-Biological Relationships”. 
Click “Run” and “Continue”.  The
number of rows (User IDs for individuals) affected will be displayed.  Exit 
from Ltools.
5)    This SQL script will set the Anniversary
Reminder for all marriage records where the marriage status is blank, “This
couple did not marry” is unchecked, both spouses are living and have tag5.
UPDATE (tblMR
INNER JOIN tblIR ON tblMR.IDIRHusb=tblIR.IDIR) INNER JOIN tblIR AS tblIR_1 ON
tblMR.IDIRWife=tblIR_1.IDIR SET tblMR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE (((tblMR.IDMS)=1)
And ((tblMR.NotMarried)=0) And ((tblMR.IDIRHusb)>0) And
((tblMR.IDIRWife)>0) And ((tblIR.Tag5)=1) And ((tblIR_1.Tag5)=1) And
((tblIR.Living)=0) And ((tblIR_1.Living)=0));
6)    This SQL script will set the Birthday Reminder
for husbands of the marriages affected in step 5.
UPDATE tblMR
INNER JOIN tblIR ON tblMR.IDIRHusb=tblIR.IDIR SET tblIR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE
(((tblMR.ReminderTag)=1));
7)    This SQL script will set the Birthday Reminder
for wives of the marriages affected in step 5.
UPDATE tblMR
INNER JOIN tblIR ON tblMR.IDIRWife=tblIR.IDIR SET tblIR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE
(((tblMR.ReminderTag)=1));
8)    This SQL script will set the Birthday Reminder
for all living biological descendants from step 4.  Some of these may already 
have been set in
step 6 or step 7 if they were linked to an active marriage.
UPDATE tblIR
SET tblIR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE (((tblIR.UserRef) Like "HN-*") AND
((tblIR.Living)=0));
9)    Each of the SQL scripts could be executed by
Ltools>“Run Raw SQL”.  Also,
Ltools>”Set Birthday/Anniversary/Death Reminders” could be used to turn off
or turn on the reminders.  You will first
have to set a tag for the individuals or marriages that this process will
affect.  The birthday reminders can be
tagged with Search>Detailed Search>Individual>Birthday
Reminder>Equal to>Checked>Create List>Options>Advanced
Tagging>Tag on #1>Everyone in Search List.  The anniversary reminders can be 
found with
similar logic but Legacy does not provide a method for setting the marriage
tags.  This SQL script will set marriage
tag5 if the Anniversary Reminder is set and then use it in Ltools.
UPDATE tblMR
SET tblMR.Tag5 = 1 WHERE (((tblMR.ReminderTag)=1));
10)This
final search may find a few non-biological living descendants or connected
spouses for whom you may want to set the Birthday Reminder.  They might be step 
children of a biological
descendant, spouse of a deceased descendant, a divorced spouse, an unmarried
spouse, or other linked individuals. 
Search>Detailed Search>Individual>Tag5>Equal to>Tagged
and Individual>Birthday Reminder>Equal to>Unchecked and
Individual>Living>Equal to>Yes.
11)A
marriage marked “This couple did not marry” should be considered as having
status “Unmarried” even if that status has not been explicitly entered.  They 
will be excluded like the divorced
spouses if status is non-blank.  This SQL
script can detect those who “did not marry” with blank marriage status.
SELECT
tblMR.IDMR, tblMR.IDIRHusb, tblMR.HusbSurname, tblMR.HusbGivenName,
tblMR.IDIRWife, tblMR.WifeSurname, tblMR.WifeGivenName, tblMR.IDMS,
tblMR.NotMarried FROM tblMR WHERE (((tblMR.IDMS)=1) AND
((tblMR.NotMarried)=1));



On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:47 PM, CE WOOD  wrote:


Yes, it is. 


CE
 


________
From: da...@schmeckabernathy.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:19:33 -0800


“in my 100+ generations”
That is a bit to many, 

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Kathy Thompson]

, tblMR.IDIRHusb, tblMR.HusbSurname, tblMR.HusbGivenName,
> tblMR.IDIRWife, tblMR.WifeSurname, tblMR.WifeGivenName, tblMR.IDMS,
> tblMR.NotMarried FROM tblMR WHERE (((tblMR.IDMS)=1) AND
> ((tblMR.NotMarried)=1));
>
>
>   On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:47 PM, CE WOOD  wrote:
>   Yes, it is.
>
>
> CE
>
> --
> From: da...@schmeckabernathy.com
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:19:33 -0800
>
> “in my 100+ generations”
> That is a bit to many, I think you need to do another count?
> That is back to the BC time period?
>
> Thanks,
> David C Abernathy
> Email disclaimers
>
> 
> This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.
>
> 
> http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com <http://www.schmeckabernathy.com/>
> == All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  ==
>
> *From:* CE WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 09, 2014 4:09 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>
> To get a complete picture, you also need to do the paragraph 3 search for
> females. There are more marriages where the ancestry of the wife is
> unknown, but there are several in my 100+ generations where the ancestry of
> the husband is unknown. To be thorough, do both.
>
> Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy
> will soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing.
>
>
> CE
>
> > From: kurt-kneel...@sbcglobal.net
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600
> >
> > Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate. Unfortunately, there is
> not yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags. They can only
> be turned on/off one at a time.
> >
> > Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct
> ancestors (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of
> generations.
> >
> > You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit
> the search list to just the males. Then you could go through that search
> list to set the marriage tags.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net ]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> > Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> >
> > I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th
> generation grandparents. I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.
> >
> > Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage
> tag #1. This presumes that the tags are different between general and
> marriage tags. If not I can use a different tag #.
> >
> > I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work
> down the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are
> direct ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.
> >
> > Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Bernie
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Ron Taylor]

ed
spouses if status is non-blank.  This SQL
script can detect those who “did not marry” with blank marriage status.
>SELECT
tblMR.IDMR, tblMR.IDIRHusb, tblMR.HusbSurname, tblMR.HusbGivenName,
tblMR.IDIRWife, tblMR.WifeSurname, tblMR.WifeGivenName, tblMR.IDMS,
tblMR.NotMarried FROM tblMR WHERE (((tblMR.IDMS)=1) AND
((tblMR.NotMarried)=1));
>
>
>
>On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:47 PM, CE WOOD  wrote:
>
>Yes, it is. 
>
>
>CE
> 
>
>
>
>From: da...@schmeckabernathy.com
>To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:19:33 -0800
>
>
>“in my 100+ generations”
>That is a bit to many, I think you need to do another count?
>That is back to the BC time period?
> 
>Thanks,
>David C Abernathy
>Email disclaimers
>
>This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.
>----------------
>http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com
>== All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  ==
> 
>From:CE WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 4:09 PM
>To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> 
>To get a complete picture, you also need to do the paragraph 3 search for 
>females. There are more marriages where the ancestry of the wife is unknown, 
>but there are several in my 100+ generations where the ancestry of the husband 
>is unknown. To be thorough, do both.
> 
>Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy will 
>soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing. 
>
>
>CE 
> 
>> From: kurt-kneel...@sbcglobal.net
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600
>>
>> Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate. Unfortunately, there is not 
>> yet
 an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags. They can only be turned 
on/off one at a time.
>>
>> Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct ancestors 
>> (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of generations.
>>
>> You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit the 
>> search list to just the males. Then you could go through that search list to 
>> set the marriage tags.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>>
>> I would
 like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th generation 
grandparents. I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.
>>
>> Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage tag 
>> #1. This presumes that the tags are different between general and marriage 
>> tags. If not I can use a different tag #.
>>
>> I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work down 
>> the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are direct 
>> ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.
>>
>> Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Bernie
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
>our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
>our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Brian L. Lightfoot]

Does anybody else think it strange to want genealogy software to also remind 
you of birthdays and anniversaries? Isn’t that why drug stores give out those 
free calendars where you just take out a pencil, open to all the appropriate 
months and days, and then write in things like “Uncle Joe’s b’day”? KISS



Brian in CA



From: Ron Taylor [mailto:doit4...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages



I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file that I sent 
out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It sets the marriage record 
"Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is similar.  
The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and Anniversary 
Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living cousins, etc.



How to set Anniversary and Birthday Reminders for select individuals








Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Larry Lee]

Sort of the Swiss Army knife or Leatherman Tool of genealogy software.

Larry Lee
ldlee...@gmail.com



On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot <
br...@the-lightfoots.com> wrote:

> Does anybody else think it strange to want genealogy software to also
> remind you of birthdays and anniversaries? Isn’t that why drug stores give
> out those free calendars where you just take out a pencil, open to all the
> appropriate months and days, and then write in things like “Uncle Joe’s
> b’day”? KISS
>
>
>
> Brian in CA
>
>
>
> *From:* Ron Taylor [mailto:doit4...@yahoo.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2014 7:00 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>
>
>
> I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file that I
> sent out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It sets the marriage
> record "Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is
> similar.  The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and
> Anniversary Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living
> cousins, etc.
>
>
>
> How to set Anniversary and Birthday Reminders for select individuals
>
> 
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[David Abernathy]

Yes, this is just another way of each program trying to outdo the others.

It has been around for a LONG time in some programs and I have just ignored the 
use of this function.

At least this function has NOT been turned on by default!



Thanks,

David C Abernathy

Email disclaimers



This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.



http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com

== All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  ==



From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:04 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages



Does anybody else think it strange to want genealogy software to also remind 
you of birthdays and anniversaries? Isn’t that why drug stores give out those 
free calendars where you just take out a pencil, open to all the appropriate 
months and days, and then write in things like “Uncle Joe’s b’day”? KISS



Brian in CA



From: Ron Taylor [mailto:doit4...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages



I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file that I sent 
out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It sets the marriage record 
"Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is similar.  
The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and Anniversary 
Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living cousins, etc.



How to set Anniversary and Birthday Reminders for select individuals







Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[William Boswell]

I never use it.  It's bad enough getting emails about birthdays on Facebook 
especially for people I hardly know or never met.



Bill Boswell



From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 1:04 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages



Does anybody else think it strange to want genealogy software to also remind 
you of birthdays and anniversaries? Isn’t that why drug stores give out those 
free calendars where you just take out a pencil, open to all the appropriate 
months and days, and then write in things like “Uncle Joe’s b’day”? KISS



Brian in CA



From: Ron Taylor [mailto:doit4...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages



I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file that I sent 
out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It sets the marriage record 
"Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is similar.  
The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and Anniversary 
Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living cousins, etc.



How to set Anniversary and Birthday Reminders for select individuals







Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Bernd Hornung]

Your solution, Ron, is actually going the wrong way for what I wanted,
moving up the lines not down.  There is probably a solution for that
using your methodology.

Legacy appears to "tag" individuals for the purposes of marking the
direct lines (bold names and +) as well as colour coding the grandparent
lines.   If any of these showed up in the Marriage List, I wouldn't need
to ask.  I could just scroll down, see the appropriate indication, and
do what I need to do.  These are the same pieces of data but seem to be
divorced from each other (pun somewhat intended ).

I don't know anything about how the programming works, but is there a
way to have this relationship?

Bernie

On 10/01/2014 8:29 PM, Kathy Thompson wrote:
> That's Easy??
>
> Aside from that - not everyone uses (or wants to use) LTools - and I'd
> rather not clear my UserID's just to set reminders or tag more than
> one marriage at a time.
>
>
> On 11 January 2014 13:00, Ron Taylor  > wrote:
>
> I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file
> that I sent out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It
> sets the marriage record "Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set
> any of the marriage tags is similar.  The process makes it easy to
> set all the Birthday Reminders and Anniversary Reminders for
> descendants of select ancestors...ie living cousins, etc.
>
>

--
Bernie H Blog site http://haushornung.weebly.com/ Data site
http://www3.telus.net/hornunghouse/



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages

[Kurt Kneeland]

Good point.  When Direct Line has been set, the direct line ancestors ought to 
show up as bold on the Marriage List (like they do on the name list).



Ancestor colors on the name and marriage lists would also be nice as an option.



Curious.  I just found a start at an Advanced Tagging for the marriage tags.  
Its under Marriage List -> Options -> Advanced Tagging.  Lets you specify what 
you are using each tag for, shows a count of how many of each tag are in use, 
and lets you specify the 3 default tags.  There’s also a choice back on the 
Marriage List -> Options menu to clear any of the 3 default tags.  
Unfortunately none of the other advanced tagging options are there yet (tag 
ancestors, etc)



From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:ber@telus.net]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:43 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages




Your solution, Ron, is actually going the wrong way for what I wanted, moving 
up the lines not down.  There is probably a solution for that using your 
methodology.

Legacy appears to "tag" individuals for the purposes of marking the direct 
lines (bold names and +) as well as colour coding the grandparent lines.   If 
any of these showed up in the Marriage List, I wouldn't need to ask.  I could 
just scroll down, see the appropriate indication, and do what I need to do.  
These are the same pieces of data but seem to be divorced from each other (pun 
somewhat intended ).

I don't know anything about how the programming works, but is there a way to 
have this relationship?

Bernie

On 10/01/2014 8:29 PM, Kathy Thompson wrote:

That's Easy??

Aside from that - not everyone uses (or wants to use) LTools - and I'd rather 
not clear my UserID's just to set reminders or tag more than one marriage at a 
time.



On 11 January 2014 13:00, Ron Taylor  wrote:

I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit. Â Here is a help file that I sent 
out recently to some of the local Legacy users. Â It sets the marriage record 
"Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is similar. Â 
The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and Anniversary 
Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living cousins, etc.







--
Bernie H Blog site http://haushornung.weebly.com/ Data site 
http://www3.telus.net/hornunghouse/



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[R G Strong-genes]

Laura,
It looks like, currently, that there is no way to quickly tag all marriage
records. However you can Untag all marriage records of a tag # using the
option button on the Marriage List screen. You may be able to do it with MS
Access or the LTools program.

-Original Message-
From: Laura Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 6:34 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

Is there a way to tag ALL marriages in the database?  I can see how to
do it with individuals and I already have done that but I would like to
tag all of the marriages so that I can work through them to correct
problems that were in FTM before I converted the file to Legacy.  As I
correct them, I remove the tag from the individuals but I would like to
do the same thing with all of the marriages as well

--
Russell G. Strong
P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today! This full featured genealogy
program can be downloaded FREE at
http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/Articles.asp?ID=133&Click=1114
Oh so many branches and not enough time to check out all the roots!!!.
Check out my Genealogy Pages at http://www.rgstrong-genes.com .




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Bruce Jones]

What if you Untag all marriaage records of a tag #, then when you correct
them, you TAG them.
Could that work?


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:34 PM, R G Strong-genes
wrote:

> Laura,
> It looks like, currently, that there is no way to quickly tag all marriage
> records. However you can Untag all marriage records of a tag # using the
> option button on the Marriage List screen. You may be able to do it with MS
> Access or the LTools program.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Laura Johnson
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 6:34 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>
> Is there a way to tag ALL marriages in the database?  I can see how to
> do it with individuals and I already have done that but I would like to
> tag all of the marriages so that I can work through them to correct
> problems that were in FTM before I converted the file to Legacy.  As I
> correct them, I remove the tag from the individuals but I would like to
> do the same thing with all of the marriages as well
>
> --
> Russell G. Strong
> P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today! This full featured genealogy
> program can be downloaded FREE at
> http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/Articles.asp?ID=133&Click=1114
> Oh so many branches and not enough time to check out all the roots!!!.
> Check out my Genealogy Pages at http://www.rgstrong-genes.com .
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Byron]

The closest I can find is to tag the Individuals, as Legacy does not seem to 
allow tagging of marriage in the search function.

(Marriage) (MRIN) (Not 
Equal To) (Tagged)  
When list appears, > --when dialog window pops 
up--select your tag#-- 

Now all individuals in your marriage list will be tagged with which ever tag # 
you selected.
Hope it helps.

Byron Schafbuch
The SCHAFBUCH family heritage site

-Original Message-
From: Laura Johnson [mailto:rngad...@madisontelco.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:34 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

Is there a way to tag ALL marriages in the database?  I can see how to do it 
with individuals and I already have done that but I would like to tag all of 
the marriages so that I can work through them to correct problems that were in 
FTM before I converted the file to Legacy.  As I correct them, I remove the tag 
from the individuals but I would like to do the same thing with all of the 
marriages as well






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Mike Fry]

On 2013/10/26 00:34, Laura Johnson wrote:

> Is there a way to tag ALL marriages in the database?  I can see how to
> do it with individuals and I already have done that but I would like to
> tag all of the marriages so that I can work through them to correct
> problems that were in FTM before I converted the file to Legacy.  As I
> correct them, I remove the tag from the individuals but I would like to
> do the same thing with all of the marriages as well

When did you add your first Marriage?

You can select the Marriages by the date they were added. This would then
include those marriages where there's no actual marriage date. Say, you started
using Legacy on 01 Jan 1900 :-0. Then select all marriages where the date-added
was after 01 Jan 1900.

Bit of sledge-hammer meeting nut approach. For example, my file contains 2136
Marriages. Using this approach, I end up with a list of 5607 names. Perfectly
explainable: two people per marriage; multiple marriages.

Then, search list in view, click on Options, then Advanced Tagging. Select your
tag and then click on Everyone In Search List.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg (g)



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Ron Ferguson]

Mike,

An interesting approach.

Do you happen to know if this method would include the pseudo marriages created 
when a child is born out of wedlock? I suspect it will.

On this point I am wondering if it may be possible to exclude marriages where a 
partner has a RIN = 0. Or maybe exclude those where "this couple did not marry" 
is set. Worth playing with?

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Laura Johnson]

This would have been a great idea EXCEPT that once you get the list, you
are NOT getting the marriages to tag.  You still get a list of
individuals to tag.  I already have tagged all individuals in the
database and have been working my way through cleaning those up.

There are 54,833 individuals and 17090 marriages.  The results of the
trial run for this created a list of 52,601.  But if you look at the
list, I would be re-tagging several thousand people that I had already
cleared the tag on as my search list for the tag I was doing shows that
I still have 49,654 still to go from my original tagging.

First, let me tell you what I have been doing.  I have been entering all
of the births, marriages and deaths from 1820 through 1910 from the
microfilmed records from a town in Sicily.  I also have an online
database for this town as well that is fully searchable.  I had been a
loyal user of FTM from the early 1990's and had beta tested for them for
years.  After beta testing their 2008 and 2009 versions, it was evident
that Ver 16 was going to be the last version I would use due to the
changes they had made to the program.  The newer versions cannot handle
my file and scramble the details on sources when they are imported via
gedcom from Ver 16 to FTM 2008, etc.

I switched to Legacy on the advise of a friend who had been using it for
years.  It was far superior to what FTM had in any version that I had
used.  So I bought the deluxe version and have been using it ever since.

But in bringing my files over to Legacy, I noticed that I needed to do
cleanup on the way I had been doing things before I started using Legacy
and even after I first started using Legacy because  I found other
options or ways of doing things that were far superior in Legacy and I
need to cleanup and redo things that were not done that way in the past.

About a year ago, I tagged all individuals in the database with Tag #5.
The description for this tag is:  FTM Cleanup Needed.  I also have tag 2
and tag 3.  These tags designate my paternal great-grandfather's family
(#2) and my maternal great-grandmother's family (#3).  This way I can
easily see if a person is included in my ancestral lines or is just
someone from the town.

I have been working my way through the tag #5 as I enter more data in
the file and cleaning them up as I go.  But it would be easier if I
could see that the marriage tag was cleared because then I would know
that I had already changed or fixed any problems with the children and
descendants of that line.  I wouldn't need to choose each of the
children one by one to confirm whether they were done or not.

My thoughts were originally to use the marriage list to tag so that I
could work through all of the marriage list.  I would select the first
marriage on the search list, correct both the wife and husband and any
children they had and remove the tag numbers for both the marriages and
the individuals as I went for that marriage.  Then once I had worked
through all of the marriages, I could then do a final search to find any
unlinked individuals


On 10/26/2013 12:22 AM, Byron wrote:
> The closest I can find is to tag the Individuals, as Legacy does not seem to 
> allow tagging of marriage in the search function.
>
> (Marriage) (MRIN)  Look>(Not Equal To) (Tagged)  
> When list appears, > --when dialog window pops 
> up--select your tag#-- 
>
> Now all individuals in your marriage list will be tagged with which ever tag 
> # you selected.
> Hope it helps.
>
> Byron Schafbuch
> The SCHAFBUCH family heritage site
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Laura Johnson [mailto:rngad...@madisontelco.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:34 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>
> Is there a way to tag ALL marriages in the database?  I can see how to do it 
> with individuals and I already have done that but I would like to tag all of 
> the marriages so that I can work through them to correct problems that were 
> in FTM before I converted the file to Legacy.  As I correct them, I remove 
> the tag from the individuals but I would like to do the same thing with all 
> of the marriages as well
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old m

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Howard Cady]

Laura,  if you are slightly able to deal with databases and their
structures, then I would suggest considering the Legacy add-on "LTOOLS" for
major clean-up, and special tagging (marriages can have up to three tags).
Dennis Kowallek, the LTOOLS programmer, has helped others with similar
problems.  It may be possible to fix all FTM to Legacy conversions that have
been messed up by the standard export-import process for all of your 54,000
individuals and 17,000 marriages by direct manipulation of a copy of the
Legacy database because you are dealing with only one version of FTM and
only one version of Legacy.  NEVER work on your original family file with
LTOOLS - only use a copy of your original file.
Howard Cady

- Original Message -
From: "Laura Johnson" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages


This would have been a great idea EXCEPT that once you get the list, you
are NOT getting the marriages to tag.  You still get a list of
individuals to tag.  I already have tagged all individuals in the
database and have been working my way through cleaning those up.

There are 54,833 individuals and 17090 marriages.  The results of the
trial run for this created a list of 52,601.  But if you look at the
list, I would be re-tagging several thousand people that I had already
cleared the tag on as my search list for the tag I was doing shows that
I still have 49,654 still to go from my original tagging.

First, let me tell you what I have been doing.  I have been entering all
of the births, marriages and deaths from 1820 through 1910 from the
microfilmed records from a town in Sicily.  I also have an online
database for this town as well that is fully searchable.  I had been a
loyal user of FTM from the early 1990's and had beta tested for them for
years.  After beta testing their 2008 and 2009 versions, it was evident
that Ver 16 was going to be the last version I would use due to the
changes they had made to the program.  The newer versions cannot handle
my file and scramble the details on sources when they are imported via
gedcom from Ver 16 to FTM 2008, etc.

I switched to Legacy on the advise of a friend who had been using it for
years.  It was far superior to what FTM had in any version that I had
used.  So I bought the deluxe version and have been using it ever since.

But in bringing my files over to Legacy, I noticed that I needed to do
cleanup on the way I had been doing things before I started using Legacy
and even after I first started using Legacy because  I found other
options or ways of doing things that were far superior in Legacy and I
need to cleanup and redo things that were not done that way in the past.

About a year ago, I tagged all individuals in the database with Tag #5.
The description for this tag is:  FTM Cleanup Needed.  I also have tag 2
and tag 3.  These tags designate my paternal great-grandfather's family
(#2) and my maternal great-grandmother's family (#3).  This way I can
easily see if a person is included in my ancestral lines or is just
someone from the town.

I have been working my way through the tag #5 as I enter more data in
the file and cleaning them up as I go.  But it would be easier if I
could see that the marriage tag was cleared because then I would know
that I had already changed or fixed any problems with the children and
descendants of that line.  I wouldn't need to choose each of the
children one by one to confirm whether they were done or not.

My thoughts were originally to use the marriage list to tag so that I
could work through all of the marriage list.  I would select the first
marriage on the search list, correct both the wife and husband and any
children they had and remove the tag numbers for both the marriages and
the individuals as I went for that marriage.  Then once I had worked
through all of the marriages, I could then do a final search to find any
unlinked individuals





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Laura Johnson]

I would gladly use LTools IF it was able to do this.  But all of the
features listed on both the regular and deluxe versions do not mention
anything about tagging marriages.  If Dennis can confirm that it will do
this, I would gladly purchase it just to save me the time
On 10/26/2013 1:56 PM, Howard Cady wrote:
> Laura,  if you are slightly able to deal with databases and their
> structures, then I would suggest considering the Legacy add-on "LTOOLS" for
> major clean-up, and special tagging (marriages can have up to three tags).
> Dennis Kowallek, the LTOOLS programmer, has helped others with similar
> problems.  It may be possible to fix all FTM to Legacy conversions that have
> been messed up by the standard export-import process for all of your 54,000
> individuals and 17,000 marriages by direct manipulation of a copy of the
> Legacy database because you are dealing with only one version of FTM and
> only one version of Legacy.  NEVER work on your original family file with
> LTOOLS - only use a copy of your original file.
> Howard Cady
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Laura Johnson" 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 7:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>
>
> This would have been a great idea EXCEPT that once you get the list, you
> are NOT getting the marriages to tag.  You still get a list of
> individuals to tag.  I already have tagged all individuals in the
> database and have been working my way through cleaning those up.
>
> There are 54,833 individuals and 17090 marriages.  The results of the
> trial run for this created a list of 52,601.  But if you look at the
> list, I would be re-tagging several thousand people that I had already
> cleared the tag on as my search list for the tag I was doing shows that
> I still have 49,654 still to go from my original tagging.
>
> First, let me tell you what I have been doing.  I have been entering all
> of the births, marriages and deaths from 1820 through 1910 from the
> microfilmed records from a town in Sicily.  I also have an online
> database for this town as well that is fully searchable.  I had been a
> loyal user of FTM from the early 1990's and had beta tested for them for
> years.  After beta testing their 2008 and 2009 versions, it was evident
> that Ver 16 was going to be the last version I would use due to the
> changes they had made to the program.  The newer versions cannot handle
> my file and scramble the details on sources when they are imported via
> gedcom from Ver 16 to FTM 2008, etc.
>
> I switched to Legacy on the advise of a friend who had been using it for
> years.  It was far superior to what FTM had in any version that I had
> used.  So I bought the deluxe version and have been using it ever since.
>
> But in bringing my files over to Legacy, I noticed that I needed to do
> cleanup on the way I had been doing things before I started using Legacy
> and even after I first started using Legacy because  I found other
> options or ways of doing things that were far superior in Legacy and I
> need to cleanup and redo things that were not done that way in the past.
>
> About a year ago, I tagged all individuals in the database with Tag #5.
> The description for this tag is:  FTM Cleanup Needed.  I also have tag 2
> and tag 3.  These tags designate my paternal great-grandfather's family
> (#2) and my maternal great-grandmother's family (#3).  This way I can
> easily see if a person is included in my ancestral lines or is just
> someone from the town.
>
> I have been working my way through the tag #5 as I enter more data in
> the file and cleaning them up as I go.  But it would be easier if I
> could see that the marriage tag was cleared because then I would know
> that I had already changed or fixed any problems with the children and
> descendants of that line.  I wouldn't need to choose each of the
> children one by one to confirm whether they were done or not.
>
> My thoughts were originally to use the marriage list to tag so that I
> could work through all of the marriage list.  I would select the first
> marriage on the search list, correct both the wife and husband and any
> children they had and remove the tag numbers for both the marriages and
> the individuals as I went for that marriage.  Then once I had worked
> through all of the marriages, I could then do a final search to find any
> unlinked individuals
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyuse

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Ron Taylor]

Ltools has a routine under Run Raw SQL to tag all marriages as follows:

UPDATE tblMR SET tblMR.Tag{TagNumber} = 1


That same script could untag all marriages by changing it to 

UPDATE tblMR SET tblMR.Tag{TagNumber} = 0


I added a custom SQL to untag only tagged marriages as follows:

UPDATE tblMR SET tblMR.Tag{TagNumber} = 0 WHERE ((tblMR.IDMR <> 0) AND 
(tblMR.Tag{TagNumber} <> 0))


More functionality might be added as required.  One routine that I use 
frequently is called "Tag Unknown Spouses w/o Children".  It helps to find and 
tag marriages with spouse RIN = 0 or the blank spouse marriages with no 
offspring.  These often occur in Legacy when a child is displayed in the parent 
position without a spouse and someone clicks on the spouse but then does not 
actually add a spouse.  That creates an empty marriage record with a blank 
spouse.  It show most obviously when you have a young child with a marriage 
record indicator and you are certain the child never married.

One more script that I use is the following which shows all marriages that have 
any of the 9 tags set.  I use it to determine if any marriage tags need to be 
cleared.

SELECT 
tblMR.IDMR,tblMR.Tag1,tblMR.Tag2,tblMR.Tag3,tblMR.Tag4,tblMR.Tag5,tblMR.Tag6,tblMR.Tag7,tblMR.Tag8,tblMR.Tag9
 FROM tblMR WHERE ((tblMR.IDMR <> 0) AND ((tblMR.Tag1 <> 0) OR (tblMR.Tag2 <> 
0) OR (tblMR.Tag3 <> 0) OR (tblMR.Tag4 <> 0) OR (tblMR.Tag5 <> 0) OR 
(tblMR.Tag6 <> 0) OR (tblMR.Tag7 <> 0) OR (tblMR.Tag8 <> 0) OR (tblMR.Tag9 <> 
0))) ORDER BY tblMR.IDMR


Hope this give you some ideas about marriage record tagging.  Of course the SQL 
scripts could be used in MS Access as well.
Ron Taylor




On Saturday, October 26, 2013 3:31 PM, Laura Johnson 
 wrote:

I would gladly use LTools IF it was able to do this.  But all of the
features listed on both the regular and deluxe versions do not mention
anything about tagging marriages.  If Dennis can confirm that it will do
this, I would gladly purchase it just to save me the time
On 10/26/2013 1:56 PM, Howard Cady wrote:
> Laura,  if you are slightly able to deal with databases and their
> structures, then I would suggest considering the Legacy add-on "LTOOLS" for
> major clean-up, and special tagging (marriages can have up to three tags).
> Dennis Kowallek, the LTOOLS programmer, has helped others with similar
> problems.  It may be possible to fix all FTM to Legacy conversions that have
> been messed up by the standard export-import process for all of your 54,000
> individuals and 17,000 marriages by direct manipulation of a copy of the
> Legacy database because you are dealing with only one version of FTM and
> only one version of Legacy.  NEVER work on your original family file with
> LTOOLS - only use a copy of your original file.
> Howard Cady
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Laura Johnson" 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 7:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>
>
> This would have been a great idea EXCEPT that once you get the list, you
> are NOT getting the marriages to tag.  You still get a list of
> individuals to tag.  I already have tagged all individuals in the
> database and have been working my way through cleaning those up.
>
> There are 54,833 individuals and 17090 marriages.  The results of the
> trial run for this created a list of 52,601.  But if you look at the
> list, I would be re-tagging several thousand people that I had already
> cleared the tag on as my search list for the tag I was doing shows that
> I still have 49,654 still to go from my original tagging.
>
> First, let me tell you what I have been doing.  I have been entering all
> of the births, marriages and deaths from 1820 through 1910 from the
> microfilmed records from a town in Sicily.  I also have an online
> database for this town as well that is fully searchable.  I had been a
> loyal user of FTM from the early 1990's and had beta tested for them for
> years.  After beta testing their 2008 and 2009 versions, it was evident
> that Ver 16 was going to be the last version I would use due to the
> changes they had made to the program.  The newer versions cannot handle
> my file and scramble the details on sources when they are imported via
> gedcom from Ver 16 to FTM 2008, etc.
>
> I switched to Legacy on the advise of a friend who had been using it for
> years.  It was far superior to what FTM had in any version that I had
> used.  So I bought the deluxe version and have been using it ever since.
>
> But in bringing my files over to Legacy, I noticed that I needed to do
> cleanup on the way I had been doing things before I started using Legacy
> and even after I first started using Legacy because  I found other
> options or ways of doing t

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Tessa Keough]

Very helpful Ron - there appear to be a number of tasks that LTools
can handle and many Legacy Users have it to add functionality to the
Legacy program. At a recent LVUG Community Hangout, the presenter
mentioned she got her money's worth because she was able to change the
font sizes on the Legacy made website with the LTools program.


Tessa Keough
Guild of One-Name Studies, No. 5089
Legacy Virtual Users' Group
One Place Studies - Plate Cove, Newfoundland


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Ron Taylor  wrote:
> Ltools has a routine under Run Raw SQL to tag all marriages as follows:
>
SNIP



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[JLB]

How DO you tag marriages except going through the Marriage List one by one?
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog

On 5/18/2010 5:22 PM, Jan Roberts wrote:
> I understand HOW to Tag marriages – just wondering if there is a way to
> isolate the marriages I want to tag without going through over 2000
> families one by one and deciding if they are a marriage I want tagged?
> Also, in the Marriage List how do you change the Tags that show – from
> 1, 2 & 3 to say, 1, 2 and 9?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jan
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Jan Roberts]

Thought I might have been able to select a particular descendant line and then 
tag those marriages in one hit - just like you can select a descendant (or 
ancestor) line and tag all relevant individuals in one hit.  There is no way I 
could go through nearly 3000 marriages one by one and identify those that 
belong to the line I am trying to tag.  However, I have just noticed that by 
including a particular individual in the Scrapbook options you also have the 
option of including their marriage pictures as well - so I don't need to tag 
the marriages.  However, I am having awful trouble getting the Scrapbook to 
display anything - it is taking an age to process, even though I have now 
reduced it to images for one person and his wife.  May not bother with it at 
all unfortunately.

Cheers
Jan
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:j...@jgen.ws]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:43
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

How DO you tag marriages except going through the Marriage List one by one?
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog

On 5/18/2010 5:22 PM, Jan Roberts wrote:
> I understand HOW to Tag marriages � just wondering if there is a way to
> isolate the marriages I want to tag without going through over 2000
> families one by one and deciding if they are a marriage I want tagged?
> Also, in the Marriage List how do you change the Tags that show � from
> 1, 2 & 3 to say, 1, 2 and 9?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jan
>
>





Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[RICHARD SCHULTHIES]

What I do instead is a work around, I tag

--- On Tue, 5/18/10, Jan Roberts  wrote:

> From: Jan Roberts 
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 6:04 PM
> Thought I might have been able to
> select a particular descendant line and then tag those
> marriages in one hit - just like you can select a descendant
> (or ancestor) line and tag all relevant individuals in one
> hit.  There is no way I could go through nearly 3000
> marriages one by one and identify those that belong to the
> line I am trying to tag.  However, I have just noticed
> that by including a particular individual in the Scrapbook
> options you also have the option of including their marriage
> pictures as well - so I don't need to tag the
> marriages.  However, I am having awful trouble getting
> the Scrapbook to display anything - it is taking an age to
> process, even though I have now reduced it to images for one
> person and his wife.  May not bother with it at all
> unfortunately.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: JLB [mailto:j...@jgen.ws]
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:43
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>
> How DO you tag marriages except going through the Marriage
> List one by one?
> -
> JL
> JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
> http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
>
> On 5/18/2010 5:22 PM, Jan Roberts wrote:
> > I understand HOW to Tag marriages � just wondering
> if there is a way to
> > isolate the marriages I want to tag without going
> through over 2000
> > families one by one and deciding if they are a
> marriage I want tagged?
> > Also, in the Marriage List how do you change the Tags
> that show � from
> > 1, 2 & 3 to say, 1, 2 and 9?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21
> 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[Ron Ferguson]

Rich,

I am hanging on in suspense!!

_

*New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
And the Fergusons of N.W. England




RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote:
> What I do instead is a work around, I tag
>
> --- On Tue, 5/18/10, Jan Roberts  wrote:
>
>> From: Jan Roberts 
>> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 6:04 PM
>> Thought I might have been able to
>> select a particular descendant line and then tag those
>> marriages in one hit - just like you can select a descendant
>> (or ancestor) line and tag all relevant individuals in one
>> hit. There is no way I could go through nearly 3000
>> marriages one by one and identify those that belong to the
>> line I am trying to tag. However, I have just noticed
>> that by including a particular individual in the Scrapbook
>> options you also have the option of including their marriage
>> pictures as well - so I don't need to tag the
>> marriages. However, I am having awful trouble getting
>> the Scrapbook to display anything - it is taking an age to
>> process, even though I have now reduced it to images for one
>> person and his wife. May not bother with it at all
>> unfortunately.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> -Original Message-
>> From: JLB [mailto:j...@jgen.ws]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:43
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
>>
>> How DO you tag marriages except going through the Marriage
>> List one by one?
>> -
>> JL
>> JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
>> http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
>>
>> On 5/18/2010 5:22 PM, Jan Roberts wrote:
>>> I understand HOW to Tag marriages � just wondering
>> if there is a way to
>>> isolate the marriages I want to tag without going
>> through over 2000
>>> families one by one and deciding if they are a
>> marriage I want tagged?
>>> Also, in the Marriage List how do you change the Tags
>> that show � from
>>> 1, 2 & 3 to say, 1, 2 and 9?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages

[RICHARD SCHULTHIES]

Oops. I thought I had cancelled the whole message. I alway test before sending 
and found my solution wasn't a fix. I try to walk throught any solution, so I 
can use the exact description for clarity. I had done something in the past, 
but could no re-create it, so my memory is fuzzy. Sorry.
Rich in LA CA

--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Ron Ferguson  wrote:

> From: Ron Ferguson 
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 12:38 AM
> Rich,
>
> I am hanging on in suspense!!
>
> _
>
> *New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
> http://www.fergys.co.uk
> Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
> And the Fergusons of N.W. England
>
> 
>
>
> RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote:
> > What I do instead is a work around, I tag
> >
> > --- On Tue, 5/18/10, Jan Roberts 
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Jan Roberts 
> >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
> >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> >> Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 6:04 PM
> >> Thought I might have been able to
> >> select a particular descendant line and then tag
> those
> >> marriages in one hit - just like you can select a
> descendant
> >> (or ancestor) line and tag all relevant
> individuals in one
> >> hit. There is no way I could go through nearly
> 3000
> >> marriages one by one and identify those that
> belong to the
> >> line I am trying to tag. However, I have just
> noticed
> >> that by including a particular individual in the
> Scrapbook
> >> options you also have the option of including
> their marriage
> >> pictures as well - so I don't need to tag the
> >> marriages. However, I am having awful trouble
> getting
> >> the Scrapbook to display anything - it is taking
> an age to
> >> process, even though I have now reduced it to
> images for one
> >> person and his wife. May not bother with it at
> all
> >> unfortunately.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Jan
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: JLB [mailto:j...@jgen.ws]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:43
> >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging Marriages
> >>
> >> How DO you tag marriages except going through the
> Marriage
> >> List one by one?
> >> -
> >> JL
> >> JLog - simple computer technology for
> genealogists
> >> http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
> >>
> >> On 5/18/2010 5:22 PM, Jan Roberts wrote:
> >>> I understand HOW to Tag marriages � just
> wondering
> >> if there is a way to
> >>> isolate the marriages I want to tag without
> going
> >> through over 2000
> >>> families one by one and deciding if they are
> a
> >> marriage I want tagged?
> >>> Also, in the Marriage List how do you change
> the Tags
> >> that show � from
> >>> 1, 2 & 3 to say, 1, 2 and 9?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21
> 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp