RE: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
I reported it a couple of years ago - didn't notice it hadn't been fixed, because I changed from using rtf output to pdf. Cheers Jan -Original Message- From: Mark Lang [mailto:markl...@adam.com.au] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 11:27 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report Elizabeth, Upon further examination, I too have found similar results. I will be reporting this problem. Kind Regards Mark Lang Beta Tester -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 5:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. ?For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Thanks, Laird! Now that you typed it, I seem to remember having read that before. ;) --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams From: Laird lftu...@bayleenet.net To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Wed, February 22, 2012 10:54:49 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report Paula and Elizabeth, You don't have to compromise on the export, you can still keep Source Writer sources. 1. DO NOT export as GEDCOM. 2. Export as a Legacy file, from the file menu:FileExport toLegacy File You can use a focus group or tag the subset you want. 3. Export it. 4. It will ask if you want to open it. Laird snip Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Thanks Laird - I'll try that. Elizabeth On 23 February 2012 04:54, Laird lftu...@bayleenet.net wrote: Paula and Elizabeth, You don't have to compromise on the export, you can still keep Source Writer sources. 1. DO NOT export as GEDCOM. 2. Export as a Legacy file, from the file menu: FileExport toLegacy File You can use a focus group or tag the subset you want. 3. Export it. 4. It will ask if you want to open it. Laird On 2/22/2012 8:29 PM, Paula Ryburn wrote: Elizabeth, I believe you are correct (can't edit standard output) that's why Legacy has the RTF option. Re: showing only some descendents I have seen on this list people recommending you export the subset you need to GEDCOM, then import into a new file, then unlink the branches you don't need in the particular report. (I'm paraphrasing.) Maybe that sort of approach could work for you. ON THE OTHER HAND: There are known issues with GEDCOM vs. Source Writer citations, so maybe it wouldn't work for you. --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams *From:* Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com *Sent:* Tue, February 21, 2012 8:38:14 AM *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report Thanks for all the advice. My original reason for exporting to Word was for subsequent editing. Whilst I probably should be able to get Legacy to produce the wording I need, if I only, for example, need some of the descendants shown, it seems easier to do that in Word. I don't believe one can edit the Standard Output, just print? Elizabeth On 20 February 2012 00:26, Mark Lang markl...@adam.com.au mailto:markl...@adam.com.au wrote: Elizabeth, Upon further examination, I too have found similar results. I will be reporting this problem. Kind Regards Mark Lang Beta Tester -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 5:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. �For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. I think it should simply be a single superscript 1 for the first source quoted. Can anyone suggest where these might have come from, please? - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Elizabeth, I believe you are correct (can't edit standard output) that's why Legacy has the RTF option. Re: showing only some descendents I have seen on this list people recommending you export the subset you need to GEDCOM, then import into a new file, then unlink the branches you don't need in the particular report. (I'm paraphrasing.) Maybe that sort of approach could work for you. ON THE OTHER HAND: There are known issues with GEDCOM vs. Source Writer citations, so maybe it wouldn't work for you. --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams From: Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Tue, February 21, 2012 8:38:14 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report Thanks for all the advice. My original reason for exporting to Word was for subsequent editing. Whilst I probably should be able to get Legacy to produce the wording I need, if I only, for example, need some of the descendants shown, it seems easier to do that in Word. I don't believe one can edit the Standard Output, just print? Elizabeth On 20 February 2012 00:26, Mark Lang markl...@adam.com.au wrote: Elizabeth, Upon further examination, I too have found similar results. I will be reporting this problem. Kind Regards Mark Lang Beta Tester -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 5:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. �For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. I think it should simply be a single superscript 1 for the first source quoted. Can anyone suggest where these might have come from, please? - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4817 - Release Date: 02/18/12 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Paula and Elizabeth, You don't have to compromise on the export, you can still keep Source Writer sources. 1. DO NOT export as GEDCOM. 2. Export as a Legacy file, from the file menu:FileExport toLegacy File You can use a focus group or tag the subset you want. 3. Export it. 4. It will ask if you want to open it. Laird On 2/22/2012 8:29 PM, Paula Ryburn wrote: Elizabeth, I believe you are correct (can't edit standard output) that's why Legacy has the RTF option. Re: showing only some descendents I have seen on this list people recommending you export the subset you need to GEDCOM, then import into a new file, then unlink the branches you don't need in the particular report. (I'm paraphrasing.) Maybe that sort of approach could work for you. ON THE OTHER HAND: There are known issues with GEDCOM vs. Source Writer citations, so maybe it wouldn't work for you. --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams *From:* Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com *Sent:* Tue, February 21, 2012 8:38:14 AM *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report Thanks for all the advice. My original reason for exporting to Word was for subsequent editing. Whilst I probably should be able to get Legacy to produce the wording I need, if I only, for example, need some of the descendants shown, it seems easier to do that in Word. I don't believe one can edit the Standard Output, just print? Elizabeth On 20 February 2012 00:26, Mark Lang markl...@adam.com.au mailto:markl...@adam.com.au wrote: Elizabeth, Upon further examination, I too have found similar results. I will be reporting this problem. Kind Regards Mark Lang Beta Tester -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 5:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. �For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. I think it should simply be a single superscript 1 for the first source quoted. Can anyone suggest where these might have come from, please? - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Thanks for all the advice. My original reason for exporting to Word was for subsequent editing. Whilst I probably should be able to get Legacy to produce the wording I need, if I only, for example, need some of the descendants shown, it seems easier to do that in Word. I don't believe one can edit the Standard Output, just print? Elizabeth On 20 February 2012 00:26, Mark Lang markl...@adam.com.au wrote: Elizabeth, Upon further examination, I too have found similar results. I will be reporting this problem. Kind Regards Mark Lang Beta Tester -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 5:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. �For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. I think it should simply be a single superscript 1 for the first source quoted. Can anyone suggest where these might have come from, please? - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4817 - Release Date: 02/18/12 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:49:46 +, Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com wrote: I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. Have you ever opened an RTF file in a plain text editor? That's the kind of things you would see if you did. You are looking at the RTF markup. Legacy inserts these codes into the .rtf file. If you then open the file in Word as a RICH TEXT document, Word will use that markup to format the display, but you won't actually see the raw markup. It's like HTML. HTML markup might be bthis is bold/b, but what gets displayed is this is bold in bold typeface. -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools NOTE TO LUG USERS: Use plain text if you want me to read your post. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Elisabeth, perhaps you could send a screenshot of what you mean but think you mean the formating information needed from Word. Upto now I don't see a reason to use the RTF Output. With the RTF Output we lose a lot of information from the Standard Output (Screen/Printer). E.g. Position and formating of the included pictures. Most pictures don't have the same size and alignment. The Table of Contents Index of Names have to be created again. The Index of Locations is missing. As an example with 7 Generations. With the Standard Output I get 24 pages with all information. With the RTF Output I get 38 pages with the above information missing. The Standard Output takes in my case about 10 second to creat. The RTF Output takes about the same time for the basic file with a lot of information lost. To get the RTF to like the Standrard Output takes hours every time created and that for adding just one date. Why use it. Something to think about. Bernahrd -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 7:50 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. I think it should simply be a single superscript 1 for the first source quoted. Can anyone suggest where these might have come from, please? - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report
Elizabeth, Upon further examination, I too have found similar results. I will be reporting this problem. Kind Regards Mark Lang Beta Tester -Original Message- From: Elizabeth [mailto:roobee...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 February 2012 5:20 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Using Word for descendant report I have exported a descendant report, via rtf, to Word but am puzzled by various additions to the text which appear to have inserted themselves. �For example, one event should read: He was resident at Gilbert Street, Paddington, London in 1841 but following 1841 is \up51\up0, with the last five digits in superscript. I think it should simply be a single superscript 1 for the first source quoted. Can anyone suggest where these might have come from, please? - - - - - - - Elizabeth researching ALLAMBRIDGE (Dorset, Somerset and anywhere else they might turn up) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4817 - Release Date: 02/18/12 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
