Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance
The LWG has 3 US based legal professionals on it, no need for me to climb out on a limb :-). I'll ask for an opinion internally and get back to you. Simon Am 23.01.2017 um 23:23 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Simon Poole wrote: >> Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? >> > United States > > Cheers > blake > > >> Simon >> >> >> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole wrote: In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause issues that require going back to the licensor. >>> Simon, can you give an example of language you think would be best for this? >>> >>> Something like: >>> >>> "Specific permission is granted to use this imagery for digitizing >>> data into OpenStreetMap and the resulting OpenStreetMap data to be be >>> released under the OSM project's license of choice." >>> >>> Is that what you have in mind? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Blake >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Blake Girardot >>> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager >>> skype: jblakegirardot >>> HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org >>> >>> ___ >>> legal-talk mailing list >>> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> >> >> ___ >> legal-talk mailing list >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Simon Poole wrote: > Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? > United States Cheers blake > Simon > > > Am 23.01.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole wrote: >>> In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would >>> seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so >>> licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause >>> issues that require going back to the licensor. >>> >> Simon, can you give an example of language you think would be best for this? >> >> Something like: >> >> "Specific permission is granted to use this imagery for digitizing >> data into OpenStreetMap and the resulting OpenStreetMap data to be be >> released under the OSM project's license of choice." >> >> Is that what you have in mind? >> >> Cheers, >> Blake >> >> >> >> >> >> Blake Girardot >> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager >> skype: jblakegirardot >> HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org >> >> ___ >> legal-talk mailing list >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > > ___ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > -- Blake Girardot Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager skype: jblakegirardot HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/ BE A PART OF HOT'S MICRO GRANTS: https://donate.hotosm.org/ ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance
Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? Simon Am 23.01.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole wrote: >> In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would >> seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so >> licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause >> issues that require going back to the licensor. >> > Simon, can you give an example of language you think would be best for this? > > Something like: > > "Specific permission is granted to use this imagery for digitizing > data into OpenStreetMap and the resulting OpenStreetMap data to be be > released under the OSM project's license of choice." > > Is that what you have in mind? > > Cheers, > Blake > > > > > > Blake Girardot > Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager > skype: jblakegirardot > HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org > > ___ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole wrote: > > In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would > seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so > licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause > issues that require going back to the licensor. > Simon, can you give an example of language you think would be best for this? Something like: "Specific permission is granted to use this imagery for digitizing data into OpenStreetMap and the resulting OpenStreetMap data to be be released under the OSM project's license of choice." Is that what you have in mind? Cheers, Blake Blake Girardot Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager skype: jblakegirardot HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
