Re: r7105 - in trunk/BOOK/stylesheets/lfs-xsl/docbook-xsl-snapshot
El Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 06:10, Randy McMurchy escribió: I'm wondering if we shouldn't go back to using stock stylesheet versions installed locally, and not a version included with the sources? Looks like DB-XSL-1.73.2 is good enough to be used as the default base XSL code for the next months (maybe the next upgrade will be to DB-5 + DB-XSL-NS-1.74.1, but that is another beast), that is wy I updated the code to that release instead to the most current snapshot code. About going again to system-side installed DB-XSL version, is a matter to update the version and instrucctions in the BLFS page, and to install DB-XSL-1.73.2 on all servers that are rendering *LFS books, i.e., quantum, andiun, and the CLFS servers. CC to lfs-dev and clfs-dev to let editor and servers admins opine about this. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [Clfs-dev] r7105
On 9/10/07, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 09/10/07 12:07 CST: Although both methods have their drawbacks, I prefer the current method of using a snapshot in the sources. That makes it more robust against different hosts since we can enforce the version of the stylesheets used. Not to argue, but for the sake of discussion, what does different hosts have to do with it? anduin, quantum, my host, your host... If any of us are using different stylesheets, then we might see different behavior in the rendered content. But more importantly, my point was that placing an entire 3rd party package into the (B)LFS sources does not conform to the whole philosophy of what our project tries to convey. That would be the drawback to this approach. If we do go back to using the host's stylesheets, then it should be completely clear in the sources (or somewhere else) what version is expected. Possibly we can check and enforce this in the Makefile. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [Clfs-dev] r7105
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 09/10/07 12:26 CST: anduin, quantum, my host, your host... If any of us are using different stylesheets, then we might see different behavior in the rendered content. But is it *possible* to use different stylesheets? (see below) If we do go back to using the host's stylesheets, then it should be completely clear in the sources (or somewhere else) what version is expected. Possibly we can check and enforce this in the Makefile. I thought it already was. I thought that's what the xsl:import href=http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.69.1/xhtml/docbook.xsl/ (or whatever the relevant version may be) line was for. Have I been mistaken about this all along? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:39:00 up 6 days, 12:41, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.09, 0.13 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [Clfs-dev] r7105
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 09/10/07 12:07 CST: Although both methods have their drawbacks, I prefer the current method of using a snapshot in the sources. That makes it more robust against different hosts since we can enforce the version of the stylesheets used. Not to argue, but for the sake of discussion, what does different hosts have to do with it? But more importantly, my point was that placing an entire 3rd party package into the (B)LFS sources does not conform to the whole philosophy of what our project tries to convey. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:15:01 up 6 days, 12:17, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.15, 0.17 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [Clfs-dev] r7105
El Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 19:26, Dan Nicholson escribió: That would be the drawback to this approach. If we do go back to using the host's stylesheets, then it should be completely clear in the sources (or somewhere else) what version is expected. Possibly we can check and enforce this in the Makefile. The expected version is defined on the xsl:import statements placed on the top level stylesheets/ files (see the LFS-6.2 stylesheets for an example), and a sane system must not remap an explicit DB-XSL version to a different one via XML catalogs (that is fine for compatible DTDs releases, but never for XSL versions), thus that should not be an issue. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [Clfs-dev] r7105
On 9/10/07, M.Canales.es [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 19:26, Dan Nicholson escribió: That would be the drawback to this approach. If we do go back to using the host's stylesheets, then it should be completely clear in the sources (or somewhere else) what version is expected. Possibly we can check and enforce this in the Makefile. The expected version is defined on the xsl:import statements placed on the top level stylesheets/ files (see the LFS-6.2 stylesheets for an example), and a sane system must not remap an explicit DB-XSL version to a different one via XML catalogs (that is fine for compatible DTDs releases, but never for XSL versions), thus that should not be an issue. My fault. Scratch that comment. I have no objection to using the host's stylesheets, then. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
