Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-support] Incorrect MD5 for /development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2
On 10/24/2018 11:42 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: Today I came across that issue too because i want to build a 8.3 system (for some reference purposes) and failed because of that chksum mismatches. Currently there are again 3 chksums for lfs-bootscripts- 20180820.tar.bz2 - one in 8.3, one in devel and one at the file i previously downloaded in August - all different ... Isn't there really no way to (re)package the bootscripts a) when changes has been made AND b) with a new version number? The md5sum changes every time the tarball is created due to timestamps. For -devel, they are rebuilt daily with the book from files extracted from svn, even if there are no changes. For 8.3, the md5sum in the downloads directory should match the what is in the md5sums file in that same directory and what is in the book. Both files are also in: http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/lfs-packages-8.3.tar Are you finding something different? -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-support] Incorrect MD5 for /development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2
Am Freitag, den 29.12.2017, 10:05 -0600 schrieb Bruce Dubbs: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:10:06PM +, Nate Costello wrote: > > > I'm getting an incorrect hash for the lfs-bootscripts file. This is using > > > the development branch. Can anyone attempt to repeat my finding or > > > provide guidance? I apologize in advance if it is bad form to email this > > > list about the development version. > > > > > > > First, it's perfectly fine to ask about problems building the dev > > book on this list. But, based on what I note below I'll Cc: the > > -dev list because I didn't expect this. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Nate > > > > > > File path: > > > > > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2 > > > > > > Supposed Correct Hash: > > > > > > 4d886e7f5c3b092991cd0c56f3d8aa31 > > > > > > Listed at: > > > > > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter03/packages.html > > > > I wonder if we have somehow switched to regenerating these ? My > > local copy (downloaded on 19th July) has > > > > c8c20c854d7590662ae04f21949566ea > > > > The 8.1 book, which uses these, says > > > > d4992527d67f28e2d0c12e3495422eab > > And that matches what is in > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/8.1/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2 > > The script that rebuilds the book daily also repackages the boot scripts > and the timestamps will change each time, even though the content does not. > > On my local system, the tarballs are not rebuilt without a change to the > file name because I do not do a fresh checkout of the sources into an > empty directory like the daily scripts do. > > I could update the md5sum in the on-line book daily, but I think that > would also cause problems. > > I suppose I could come up with a way to put in a note that would only > generate in the development versions of the book(s), but right now I think > it is more effort than it is worth. The daily build script has been > unchanged for 18 months and this it the first anyone noticed. > > > All this applies to the lfs systemd development version and blfs tarballs > also. Today I came across that issue too because i want to build a 8.3 system (for some reference purposes) and failed because of that chksum mismatches. Currently there are again 3 chksums for lfs-bootscripts- 20180820.tar.bz2 - one in 8.3, one in devel and one at the file i previously downloaded in August - all different ... Isn't there really no way to (re)package the bootscripts a) when changes has been made AND b) with a new version number? -- Thomas -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-support] Incorrect MD5 for /development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2
Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:10:06PM +, Nate Costello wrote: I'm getting an incorrect hash for the lfs-bootscripts file. This is using the development branch. Can anyone attempt to repeat my finding or provide guidance? I apologize in advance if it is bad form to email this list about the development version. First, it's perfectly fine to ask about problems building the dev book on this list. But, based on what I note below I'll Cc: the -dev list because I didn't expect this. Thanks, Nate File path: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2 Supposed Correct Hash: 4d886e7f5c3b092991cd0c56f3d8aa31 Listed at: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter03/packages.html I wonder if we have somehow switched to regenerating these ? My local copy (downloaded on 19th July) has c8c20c854d7590662ae04f21949566ea The 8.1 book, which uses these, says d4992527d67f28e2d0c12e3495422eab And that matches what is in http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/8.1/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2 The script that rebuilds the book daily also repackages the boot scripts and the timestamps will change each time, even though the content does not. On my local system, the tarballs are not rebuilt without a change to the file name because I do not do a fresh checkout of the sources into an empty directory like the daily scripts do. I could update the md5sum in the on-line book daily, but I think that would also cause problems. I suppose I could come up with a way to put in a note that would only generate in the development versions of the book(s), but right now I think it is more effort than it is worth. The daily build script has been unchanged for 18 months and this it the first anyone noticed. All this applies to the lfs systemd development version and blfs tarballs also. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-support] Incorrect MD5 for /development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:10:06PM +, Nate Costello wrote: > I'm getting an incorrect hash for the lfs-bootscripts file. This is using > the development branch. Can anyone attempt to repeat my finding or > provide guidance? I apologize in advance if it is bad form to email this > list about the development version. > First, it's perfectly fine to ask about problems building the dev book on this list. But, based on what I note below I'll Cc: the -dev list because I didn't expect this. > Thanks, > > Nate > > File path: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/lfs-bootscripts-20170626.tar.bz2 > > Supposed Correct Hash: > > 4d886e7f5c3b092991cd0c56f3d8aa31 > > Listed at: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter03/packages.html I wonder if we have somehow switched to regenerating these ? My local copy (downloaded on 19th July) has c8c20c854d7590662ae04f21949566ea The 8.1 book, which uses these, says d4992527d67f28e2d0c12e3495422eab and my last local svn version (20171219) says 18d03cfa9259542b918cc14c43bdaa9e Looking at the files in trunk/BOOK I have that tarball there, with that (18d0...) md5sum. Comparing the extracted files, nothing has changed but the tarballs are very different. Hmm, extracting both local tarballs, and running ls -lR, I can see that some timestamps differ, e.g. lfs/init.d is dated 29th June in my last local version, but 19th July in trhe earleir version. Similarly the dates of checkfs vary by 10 days, and for cleanfs by 24 days. That is bizarre. I first suspected that for some reason we have changed to recreating this tarball even when nothing has changed. But I'm surprised nobody has commented on this before, at least as far as I remember. But those random date variations (both dates for cleanfs are in 2012) look very odd. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
