Re: Latest Lilypond versions on Ubuntu?
2008/1/9, Joseph Haig [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I use Lilypond on Ubuntu and I just user the installer from lilypond.org. Get the latest from here: http://lilypond.org/web/install/ and then in a console, $ chmod +x lilypond-2.10.33-1.linux-x86.sh $ sudo ./lilypond-2.10.33-1.linux-x86.sh This is correct but there is no need to make the script executable if you launch it as an argument of the sh command, this way: sudo sh lilypond-2.10.33-1.linux-x86.sh As you are on the same directory the script is, and it is a regular filename used as argument, also there is no need of the ./ part. To uninstall, simply write sudo unin and press TAB, it will autoexpand to uninstall-lilypond (unless you have more unin* executables in your path) -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Parallel music
Trevor Daniels napsal(a):
Have a look at the 2.11 development branch Learning Manual
at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-le
arning/index , in particular Section 3.2 Voices contain
music. You will find the answer there. Although this
documentation is for release 2.11 it applies equally well to
release 2.10 in this respect.
O.K. - problem solved
It has been between chair and keyboard - during my tests I wrote wrong
g' \\ \new Vioce {a8 h}
but correctly is
g' \new Vioce {a8 h}
Thanks for advice
Zbynek
-Original Message-
Hi,
I've small problem:
I write Score for piano and I use parallelMusic.
I've two voices in
right hand. In second bar Voice two (RightB)
divides to two voices
again. But... lilypond joins voice RightA with
upper part of voice
RightB. In this position is generated one stem
only. I need three
separate voices in this position:
1. a'4.
2. g'4
3. a8 h
Can somebody help me?
Zbynek
\version 2.10.33
\include deutsch.ly
music = {
\time 3/4
\parallelMusic #'(RightA RightB Left) {
d''4.( e''8 d''4) |
d' fis' a'4 d' fis' a' d' g' |
d, d4 c, c h,, h, |
c''8( h') a'4.( g'8) |
e' g'4 g' \\ {a8 h} c' d' fis'4 |
c, c4 d, d d,, d, |
}
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
\music
\new Staff
\key g \major
\RightA \\
\RightB
\new Staff {
\key g \major
\clef bass
\Left
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
Your example can be reduced to
\version 2.11.37
\relative c''' { a8\rest ais4 }
which shows the same bug, namely a collision between the rest
and the note (which only seems to happen if the pitch is high enough so that
the note gets a ledger line). This is a regression against 2.10.33.
Strangely enough, you can't use standard tricks like
\once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #1
to add some spacing between the notes. The only solution I could find was
to add the following before the rest:
\once \override Rest #'X-extent = #'(0 . 1.5)
/Mats
Ole Schmidt wrote:
Dear all,
in the third bar on the first beat is a collision in the upper voice
(between the rest and the bis).
Is this is known issue? Does this have to do with the usage of
\partcombine? Is there a workaround?
thanks for help
best
ole
%
\version 2.11.36
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
testfile = \new Staff {
\set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
\time 6/4
\clef G_8
\partcombine
\relative c' {
R1.|
r2
\times 2/3 { r8 gis'4( } cis,4) r2 |
\times 2/3 { r8 bis'4( } gis4~ gis fis ~ fis) r4 |
}
\relative c' {
R1.| r2 r2 r4 b~( | b~ \times 2/3 { b8 cis4~ } cis4 cis e!) r |
} }
\score {
\testfile
}
%
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
with ragged-right = ##t there's no collision
d
On 10 Jan 2008, at 09:37, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Your example can be reduced to
\version 2.11.37
\relative c''' { a8\rest ais4 }
which shows the same bug, namely a collision between the rest
and the note (which only seems to happen if the pitch is high
enough so that
the note gets a ledger line). This is a regression against 2.10.33.
Strangely enough, you can't use standard tricks like
\once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #1
to add some spacing between the notes. The only solution I could
find was
to add the following before the rest:
\once \override Rest #'X-extent = #'(0 . 1.5)
/Mats
Ole Schmidt wrote:
Dear all,
in the third bar on the first beat is a collision in the upper
voice (between the rest and the bis).
Is this is known issue? Does this have to do with the usage of
\partcombine? Is there a workaround?
thanks for help
best
ole
%
\version 2.11.36
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
testfile = \new Staff {
\set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
\time 6/4
\clef G_8
\partcombine
\relative c' {R1.|
r2
\times 2/3 { r8 gis'4( } cis,4) r2 |
\times 2/3 { r8 bis'4( } gis4~ gis fis ~ fis) r4 |
}
\relative c' { R1.| r2 r2 r4 b~( | b~ \times 2/3
{ b8 cis4~ } cis4 cis e!) r |
} }
\score {
\testfile
}
%
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
Damian leGassick wrote:
with ragged-right = ##t there's no collision
When I try it here, I don't see any difference if I set ragged-right or
not.
Note that I have compiled LilyPond myself based on the latest version of
the source code in GIT, so if it's a very recent bug you may not see it in
your version.
/Mats
d
On 10 Jan 2008, at 09:37, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Your example can be reduced to
\version 2.11.37
\relative c''' { a8\rest ais4 }
which shows the same bug, namely a collision between the rest
and the note (which only seems to happen if the pitch is high enough
so that
the note gets a ledger line). This is a regression against 2.10.33.
Strangely enough, you can't use standard tricks like
\once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #1
to add some spacing between the notes. The only solution I could find
was
to add the following before the rest:
\once \override Rest #'X-extent = #'(0 . 1.5)
/Mats
Ole Schmidt wrote:
Dear all,
in the third bar on the first beat is a collision in the upper voice
(between the rest and the bis).
Is this is known issue? Does this have to do with the usage of
\partcombine? Is there a workaround?
thanks for help
best
ole
%
\version 2.11.36
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
testfile = \new Staff {
\set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
\time 6/4
\clef G_8
\partcombine
\relative c' {R1.|
r2
\times 2/3 { r8 gis'4( } cis,4) r2 |
\times 2/3 { r8 bis'4( } gis4~ gis fis ~ fis) r4 |
}
\relative c' { R1.| r2 r2 r4 b~( | b~ \times 2/3 { b8
cis4~ } cis4 cis e!) r |
} }
\score {
\testfile
}
%
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When I try it here, I don't see any difference if I set ragged-right or not. Note that I have compiled LilyPond myself based on the latest version of the source code in GIT, so if it's a very recent bug you may not see it in your version. I have to say I'm a little confused. I have added it as #554, but I dont really see an obvious collision here (2.11.37). Sure, there seems to be no white space between the rest and the accidental, but no overlapping either. Mats: your minimal example needs ragged-right to be set to true indeed, otherwise the rest and the note are spread on the whole line and there is no collision. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I try it here, I don't see any difference if I set ragged-right or
not.
Note that I have compiled LilyPond myself based on the latest version of
the source code in GIT, so if it's a very recent bug you may not see it in
your version.
I have to say I'm a little confused. I have added it as #554, but I
dont really see an obvious collision here (2.11.37). Sure, there seems
to be no white space between the rest and the accidental, but no
overlapping either.
Right, that's what I mean. If you compare to 2.10, you will see a
significant difference.
The fact that
\relative c''' { a8\rest \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding
= #10 ais4 }
doesn't make any difference is also a regression against 2.10.
Mats: your minimal example needs ragged-right to be set to true
indeed, otherwise the rest and the note are spread on the whole line
and there is no collision.
My apologies, I had several small examples in the same file and didn't
notice that
I had this setting earlier in the file.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Right, that's what I mean. If you compare to 2.10, you will see a
significant difference.
I have to take your word here :)
The fact that
\relative c''' { a8\rest \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding
= #10 ais4 }
doesn't make any difference is also a regression against 2.10.
I have mentioned it on the Issue's page.
My apologies, I had several small examples in the same file and didn't
notice that
I had this setting earlier in the file.
This is the FIRST TIME EVER that I see a (smallest) mistake in one of
your mails!
After all, who knows, you might be human in the end... :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
Valentin Villenave wrote:
This is the FIRST TIME EVER that I see a (smallest) mistake in one of
your mails!
Then you haven't read them so carefully! :-)
Anyway, I realize that my previous formulations of this bug (and
therefore your
description of it in the bug tracker) may be misleading.
The bug is an (almost) collision between a rest and an accidental and
the fact
that this only occurs when the note and the rest are outside the staff.
Even though the spacing algorithms have changed between 2.10 and 2.11
and it's partly subjective how closely spaced the objects could be
before calling
it a bug, the problem here is that there's no non-ugly way of fixing
the problem
for a user who wants a larger spacing.
Perhaps the true bug may be that the left-padding property is completely
ignored in
\relative c'' {
\override Score.AccidentalPlacement #'left-padding = #10
a8\rest ais4 }
The default setting of this property is 0.2, which seems to indicate
that the intention
is to avoid the edge-to-edge placement that we see with 2.11.37.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Git ebuild
Op woensdag 9 januari 2008, schreef milarepa7: Hello, I'd like to know if one of you use the git sources with portage? I didn't find any ebuild and I've to admit that it's not easy for me to write one. It's sure there's gentoo users working with these versions how do you do that? I use Gentoo, but install my lily manually from git to /usr/local/ ... w best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Mahatma Gandi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: different tempos
Hi Kostia, Welcome to Lilypond! =) Without seeing your exact code (Lilypond source file), it is difficult to diagnose the problem. However, I might recommend the following approach: 1. Writing all the music in a very short time signature (e.g., 2/4, or even 1/4). 2. Remove all TimeSignature and BarLine objects. That way, Lilypond can break at whatever point seems right to it, and there won't be any time signatures or bar lines to worry about. Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Orchestral score
Have you tried \override VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = #1000 /Mats Reilly wrote: Sorry to repost this problem so soon, but I really am stumped. On Jan 7, 2008, at 5:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am stumped. I have a score with 22 staves, one system to a page. I want Lilypond to layout the score so that the the score fills the page. It would be very nice if the first staff and last staff on each page lined up when laid side by side. In other words, I want Lilypond to stretch the interstaff spacing appropriately for each page. I have searched the manual and the LSR without success. I've tried setting VerticalAlighment #'max-stretch = #ly:align-interface::calc-max-stretch without any change. In particular, the first page is the worst. Lilypond is pushing the staves way down (actually off) the page and leaving a large gap at the top between the title and the first staff. I am running 2.11.36. There is nothing special about the code or music to post. This is a different problem from my prior question asking how to even out the staves over multiple pages in orchestral parts. The solution offered (to set ragged-last-bottom = #f ) worked great. The issue here is just that in a 32 pages orchestral score, the total vertical height of the score increases and decreases with the number of ledger lines and text and I find the look of the score awkward as I read through the pages. Is there a way to instruct Lilypond to use all the available vertical space on a page? Much obliged. Jeremiah ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Orchestral score
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you tried \override VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = #1000 Wow, I didn't know that one. I tried to add it to the LSR, but I seem to have misunderstood how it works: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=371 Can you enlighten me? Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Orchestral score
What I tried was just a copy of the example in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system#Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system
(without the paper-size and staff-size settings and removing the
unnecessary \book{...})
where I replaced the current setting of max-stretch with a large number.
Note that this is the first time I try to tweak any of these new
mechanisms for vertical
alignment, so I have no idea if it's a good suggestion or just something
that happened
to work with this specific example. Note also that it's something that
only works in
version 2.11.
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have you tried
\override VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = #1000
Wow, I didn't know that one.
I tried to add it to the LSR, but I seem to have misunderstood how it works:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=371
Can you enlighten me?
Cheers,
Valentin
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Orchestral score
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What I tried was just a copy of the example in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system#Vertical-spacing-inside-a-system
(without the paper-size and staff-size settings and removing the
unnecessary \book{...})
where I replaced the current setting of max-stretch with a large number.
OK, I understand why I wasn't aware of it: last time I read this page,
it was still 2.10...
Note that this is the first time I try to tweak any of these new
mechanisms for vertical
alignment, so I have no idea if it's a good suggestion or just something
that happened
to work with this specific example. Note also that it's something that
only works in
version 2.11.
No wonder the snippet doesn't work. I'll tag it as version-specific.
Thanks,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Line-width, Staff Size, Print Size
What is the relationship between the digital size of the line-width and staff height (in Lilypond specs, in the .ps file, and in the .pdf file) and the printed output? Is it true and invariant? If I specify that the line-width = 178 mm, is it truly 178 mm? If I specify a staff height (#(set-global-staff-size 17.82)), is the staff height truly 6.3 mm? Here's the situation: up to now I have printed out my musical manuscripts at home and adjusted the staff size by eye and ruler. If I needed enlargements, I photocopied and enlarged the original by eye and ruler. I am now preparing a major orchestral score and parts and sending the .pdf files electronically to a print shop. I will format the musical score for an 8.5 x 11 in original so that the print shop will enlarge the score perfectly to 11x14 inches and the parts to 9.5 x 12 inches respectively. I need to tell the print shop the enlargement percentages. I am not asking for help in arithmetic here --- I can do the math. For example, if I wanted 1 inch margins in my 11 x 14 in score (and if I were printing directly onto 11 x 14 inch paper), I would set the line-width = 228.6 mm for 11x14 in paper. *However,* since I am formatting the score for 8.5 x 11 in paper, I must scale the line-width to 177.2 mm (78% reduction). Then the printer will enlarge the digital original by 129% to yield a final size of 228.6 mm. Will this reasoning hold accurately in the digital realm? Any pitfalls to watch out for? Much obliged. Jeremiah ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Line-width, Staff Size, Print Size
Reilly reilly at together.net writes: I am now preparing a major orchestral score and parts and sending the .pdf files electronically to a print shop. I will format the musical score for an 8.5 x 11 in original so that the print shop will enlarge the score perfectly to 11x14 inches and the parts to 9.5 x 12 inches respectively. If it were me, I'd set the paper size for the 11x14 and 9.5x12 and let lilypond generate the pdf's at the true size. Then I'd use acrobat reader or some other printer to automatically resize the lager-size outputs for local printing on my 8 1/2x 11 inch paper. Carl Sorensen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Line-width, Staff Size, Print Size
What is the relationship between the digital size of the line-width and staff height (in Lilypond specs, in the .ps file, and in the .pdf file) and the printed output? Is it true and invariant? Depends on your printer and it might call for minor adjustments. But it should be 1:1. Print out a grid and find out. If I specify that the line-width = 178 mm, is it truly 178 mm? ... I did a test run with a score with linewidth = 155 \mm, and it come out as 155mm plus 1-1.5mm for the choral staff bracket. Why don't you simply test it. /Karl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Win98 SE?
I'm a newbie to things Gnu and would like to know whether trying to install and use Lilypond on my Win98 SE system is going to be impossible or a major headache. I've reviewed the forum archive and see that people have had problems with Win98 in the past, but being a newbie, I don't even understand what most of those problems were,and don't get a sense of whether ways have by nowbeen found to surmount them in the latest version of the software. Can anyone please advise me whether it really is feasible for a non-geekto try to use lilypondunder Win 98 SE, and how I might fix the problems thatI'm most likely to run into. Thanks NormNetscape. Just the Net You Need. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
systemSeperators
Hi all,
where do I have to put systemSeperatorMarkup = ##t to get those
double slashes in my score. I've tried inside the \paper { } block
whith no success
thank you for help
ole
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: systemSeperators
2008/1/10, Ole Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
where do I have to put systemSeperatorMarkup = ##t to get those
double slashes in my score. I've tried inside the \paper { } block
whith no success
\paper {
systemSeparatorMarkup = \slashSeparator
}
works here.
Maybe it's just a typo error...
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: systemSeperators
thanks a lot,
I don't now how to concatenate the information given in the manual,
it was pretty cryptic to me:
systemSeparatorMarkup
This contains a markup ob ject, which will be inserted between systems.
This is often used for orchestral scores. Unset by default.
The markup command \slashSeparator is provided as a sensible de-
fault, for example
ole
Am 10.01.2008 um 20:22 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
2008/1/10, Ole Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
where do I have to put systemSeperatorMarkup = ##t to get those
double slashes in my score. I've tried inside the \paper { } block
whith no success
\paper {
systemSeparatorMarkup = \slashSeparator
}
works here.
Maybe it's just a typo error...
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: systemSeperators
btw, can I change the size of the seperators- they look pretty cute
but I doubt if they help...(see jpg)
thanks
ole
inline: Bild 2.jpg
Am 10.01.2008 um 20:22 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
2008/1/10, Ole Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
where do I have to put systemSeperatorMarkup = ##t to get those
double slashes in my score. I've tried inside the \paper { } block
whith no success
\paper {
systemSeparatorMarkup = \slashSeparator
}
works here.
Maybe it's just a typo error...
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: systemSeperators
Ole Schmidt wrote:
where do I have to put systemSeperatorMarkup = ##t to get those
double slashes in my score. I've tried inside the \paper { } block
whith no success
Someone suggested it was a typo - sure enough,
seperator != separator.
Tim Reeves___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Git ebuild
Wilbert Berendsen wrote: I use Gentoo, but install my lily manually from git to /usr/local/ ... Thanks a lot, I've just done it and everything seems to work fine! I didn't compile by hand for a long time and that was a pleasure... The single strange thing that happened is that I can't compile the doc, but without ( .\configure --disable-documentation), everything is fine. Regards Matth -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Git-ebuild-tp14720470p14742756.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: systemSeperators
If you look at the declaration of slashSeparator (it is in titling-init.ly):
slashSeparator = \markup {
\hcenter
\vcenter \combine
\beam #2.0 #0.5 #0.48
\raise #0.7 \beam #2.0 #0.5 #0.48
}
You will easily see how to change it.
Quoting Ole Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
btw, can I change the size of the seperators- they look pretty cute
but I doubt if they help...(see jpg)
thanks
ole
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: systemSeperators
2008/1/10, Ole Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
btw, can I change the size of the seperators- they look pretty cute
but I doubt if they help...(see jpg)
thanks
What does the doc tell you?
systemSeparatorMarkup
This contains a markup ob ject, which will be inserted between systems.
OK. So it is in fact a markup. You can do whatever you want with it:
systemSeparatorMarkup = \markup {
\bold \huge Ole \normal was here }
This is often used for orchestral scores. Unset by default.
OK. By default, you won't have any.
The markup command \slashSeparator is provided as a sensible de-
fault, for example
The \slashSeparator is a shortcut to insert a nice (but tiny) slash. OK.
Let's see how it is made. The source file is in the /ly directory, and
we can see in titling-init.ly that the \slashseparator command is
actually defined as follows :
slashSeparator = \markup {
\hcenter
\vcenter \combine
\beam #2.0 #0.5 #0.48
\raise #0.7 \beam #2.0 #0.5 #0.48
}
You can play with these numbers the way you want.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
special characters in markup
I can no longer find (with the 2.11 docs) how to put special (reserved) characters into text markup. Can someone please remind me? TIA, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: special characters in markup
Germain G. Ivanoff-Trinadtzaty wrote: I can no longer find (with the 2.11 docs) how to put special (reserved) characters into text markup. Can someone please remind me? TIA, Paul Scott Maybe : \markup \char #'2014-Germain That's a good answer which I can use. I was actually thinking about normal characters like '' which have another syntactical meaning in Lily. Thanks, Paul ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: special characters in markup
Germain G. Ivanoff-Trinadtzaty wrote: I can no longer find (with the 2.11 docs) how to put special (reserved) characters into text markup. Can someone please remind me? TIA, Paul Scott Maybe : \markup \char #'2014-Germain That's a good answer which I can use. I was actually thinking about normal characters like '' which have another syntactical meaning in Lily. Thanks, Paul You're welcome. \markup az\er#ty will print : azer#ty -Germain ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: special characters in markup
2008/1/11, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's a good answer which I can use.
This is not really needed anymore, as LilyPond can support all UTF-8
characters natively.
I was actually thinking about normal characters like '' which have
another syntactical meaning in Lily.
Actually, the double quote is the only character you need to 'escape',
by preceding it with a backslash:
\markup This 'is' #a \quoted sentence\ \with $pecial {chars}
As you can see, the #, { or \ characters are otherwise looking good.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
opening Lilypond
Help! I have apparently successfully downloaded Lilypond to my Windows XP PC, but whenever I double click on the desktop icon all I get is the silly Let's take it for a test drive window. I'd really like to use your program; and feel silly asking How do I turn the darn thing on? I've tried rebooting the computer; didn't help. -Fencinflyer. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: opening Lilypond
Try reading the tutorial. - Graham On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:09:29 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Help! I have apparently successfully downloaded Lilypond to my Windows XP PC, but whenever I double click on the desktop icon all I get is the silly Let's take it for a test drive window. I'd really like to use your program; and feel silly asking How do I turn the darn thing on? I've tried rebooting the computer; didn't help. -Fencinflyer. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lilypond: Newsgroup?
Hi all, I guess there are no newsgroups reflecting the lilypond mailing lists at the moment.? If not, should we try to set them up? That would make some things a lot easier. Regards, Stefan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond: Newsgroup?
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:16:20 +0100 Stefan Slapeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess there are no newsgroups reflecting the lilypond mailing lists at the moment.? If not, should we try to set them up? That would make some things a lot easier. I can't see it making a huge difference. If you're interested, I believe that gmane supplies NNTP. I only spent 30 seconds looking at their site, so I'm not totally certain though. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond: Newsgroup?
I can't see it making a huge difference. If you're interested, I believe that gmane supplies NNTP. I only spent 30 seconds looking at their site, so I'm not totally certain though. I do - searching in old threads is a _LOT_ easier with a newsgroup client than via http archive! I've been working for with gmane for some years in boost C++ newsgroups and I've also been moderator there ... I didn't have any negative experience so far. The setup of a new group is very easy and straightforward. More difficult is the migration of the previous mailings. Shall I drop Lars a note? Stefan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
