Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Hi, 2013/10/18 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: Am 18.10.2013 00:03, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), How do you come up with than number? When I run grep -r \shape * | wc -l on the project folder it returns 1532 ??? the reason is 2-fold: - you didn't excape backslash, so shape strings that aren't actually \shape calls were counted, - i counted the number of \shapes from last Friday, which is when i started working on new \shape. Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. -- David Kastrup Janek, can you come up with a reliable way of determining the total number of slurs, ties etc in the project? It would be interesting to get a percentage of curves that needed manual treatmend. Of course you'd have to take your ft... shorthands into account too. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
2013/10/18 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com: Janek David N: Fantastic effort and a solid expansion idea for how to make a great function even better. I can't speak to how this new version of \shape will fit into the LilyPond language/code (i.e. if it will break or harm anything by adding it), but from an end-user standpoint I think this would be excellent; I'd say continue developing for sure. Very powerful addition from the looks of it. I'd be happy to contribute if that would help its progress. Great! How much could you give? 2013/10/18 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca: Hi Janek, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. Is there any way that Lilypond could create publication-quality slurs without \shape? ;) After several days of work i'm proud to present: - ability to use input shorthands when specifying offsets with \shape, - a version of \shape using polar coordinates. Nice! I'd like to hear your opinions. Do you like it? Should it be added to official LilyPond distribution? (* 2 Yes) ;-) Would anyone want to sponsor further development? Yes. Especially if it includes my pet feature request: a reinstatement of the #'attachment positioning option(s) that got lost around v2.4. That's possible, but i don't know how long it would take me. Could you send me a few examples of the old behavior (lilypond code, lilypond output, documentation) so that i could quickly estimate the difficulty of the task? thanks! Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org schrieb: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. -- David Kastrup Janek, can you come up with a reliable way of determining the total number of slurs, ties etc in the project? Maybe with assistance from Frescobaldi's parser? It would be interesting to get a percentage of curves that needed manual treatmend. Of course you'd have to take your ft... shorthands into account too. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
2013/10/18 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com: Looks great! One omission: you've touched on everything here except the shorthand you use throughout the attachments--namely using (x y) for (x . y) Indeed! Using 2-element lists is so much more convenient to me that i've already almost forgotten that one could add a dot there :) 2013/10/18 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com: Janek Warchoł wrote I'd like to hear your opinions. Do you like it? Should it be added to official LilyPond distribution? Looks good to me! Nice work. I'd say yes and yes. What other modes of specifying control-points position do you have in mind? Quite a few: - specifying absolute control-point coordinates, as if one was overriding control-points directly (could be useful for using on just one of the points, while others would be specified with different modes), - (for inner points) specifying offsets relative to outer points, - relative polar coordinates (i.e. move the 2nd point 10 degrees outwards), - polar coordinates relative to the line connecting outer points (instead of horizontal line) - my experiences say that this could be even better than current \polar. As it would make no sense to have 6 different functions using different modes, i would merge them together so that one could specify which mode to use for each control-point. best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org schrieb: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. -- David Kastrup Janek, can you come up with a reliable way of determining the total number of slurs, ties etc in the project? Maybe with assistance from Frescobaldi's parser? Probably easier to do with assistance from LilyPond's parser. #(define slur-count 0) oldSlur = ( ( = #(define-event-function (parser location) () (set! slur-count (1+ slur-count)) oldSlur) ... #(format #t \nSlur count: ~S\n slur-count) Now that's just the number of input slurs. If you want the number of output slurs, you probably would make an engraver. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org schrieb: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. -- David Kastrup Janek, can you come up with a reliable way of determining the total number of slurs, ties etc in the project? Maybe with assistance from Frescobaldi's parser? Probably easier to do with assistance from LilyPond's parser. #(define slur-count 0) oldSlur = ( ( = #(define-event-function (parser location) () (set! slur-count (1+ slur-count)) oldSlur) ... #(format #t \nSlur count: ~S\n slur-count) Now that's just the number of input slurs. If you want the number of output slurs, you probably would make an engraver. -- David Kastrup Cool. But with Frescobaldi it's basically all there too. I forgot about the 'accounting' branch of my fork. I'll look into that later today. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Hi David, 2013/10/18 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. You don't say ;-) I wish i could fix slur formatting in LilyPond, but that's way to difficult for me. 2013/10/18 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: Janek, can you come up with a reliable way of determining the total number of slurs, ties etc in the project? It would be interesting to get a percentage of curves that needed manual treatmend. Indeed, a very interesting statictic. 2013/10/18 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: #(define slur-count 0) oldSlur = ( ( = #(define-event-function (parser location) () (set! slur-count (1+ slur-count)) oldSlur) ... #(format #t \nSlur count: ~S\n slur-count) That's nice! Could you make it work with 2.17.3 (we had to freeze LilyPond version to ensure that no regressions in the scores appear, and so we're using 2.17.3 for almost all scores)? Now that's just the number of input slurs. If you want the number of output slurs, you probably would make an engraver. Nah, the above will suffice. I'm going to make a detailed analysis of the project and publish the statistics on the LilyPond Blog in a few days. best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
2013/10/17 Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca: PS: @Janek: would a library of templates, not snippets, be a useful test for a workflow management system? Blimey, i've almost missed this email! Please cc me when you have a question for me, as i'm not able to read the whole list. To answer your question: of course! Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
2013/10/17 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes: With my template system, most hymns take me 1/2 an hour at most, and probably 85% of that is music input, 10% of it is linking the template files together, and 5% of that is fixing input errors. So here is the challenging question: what would be required to have a hymn typesetter be able to look at the documentation of LilyPond, and start typesetting hymns with the delivered doc and styles within an hour? Just my 2ct (don't have time to elaborate in detail): i believe we lack a condensed quick-start tutorial. Learning Manual is simply too long - i imagine that at least 50% of newcomers willing to try LilyPond turn away when they see that they have to read a 150-page document first, *and then they'll have to use 800-page-long NR*. This translates to at least half day of work until i have any idea how to use it, and then a week until i'm able to do something useful. I believe we need something like this: http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/file/n5705620/LilyPond_introduction.pdf (it's in Polish, but simply look at the examples). This is 6 pages long, about 30 min reading (measured with a watch), and gives one almost all information needed. I could translate it later if there is interest. Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: 2013/10/18 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: #(define slur-count 0) oldSlur = ( ( = #(define-event-function (parser location) () (set! slur-count (1+ slur-count)) oldSlur) ... #(format #t \nSlur count: ~S\n slur-count) That's nice! Could you make it work with 2.17.3 (we had to freeze LilyPond version to ensure that no regressions in the scores appear, and so we're using 2.17.3 for almost all scores)? No. It's not just a matter of replacing ( with parenthesisOpenSymbol. Previous to 2.17.25, the parser had quite hardwired expectations and won't take well at all to seeing an event-function instead of an event here. And looking at the old parser code, it does not even go through any hook you could reasonably hijack. Either you modify the C++ code of the parser for your counting or you are out of luck. You really need to use the more complex output slur approach via an engraver for 2.17.3, putting an acknowledger on slur-interface or something like that. But regressions in the score should not really be an issue if you are just counting slurs once in a while. It's not like you need perfect output from the same run of LilyPond. And the grob acknowledger can also keep statistics on the number of tweaked slurs. The event function can't, since the slur is getting tweaked after it has done its job. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Hi all, while I am not that active with lilypond these days (distracted from family and work ;) ), I'd like to be ... just my opinion on this topic: How can lilypond create the publication-quality slurs I or whoever wants? Yes, of course there is always room for making it better ... but IMO we need shape and similar functions, because most times there are more than one optimal shape. Technically lilypond may calculate what looks best in terms of the predefined rules - but that may fit 19th century piano-music best, but might not be optimal for 21th cent. choral-music ... or whatever. So I appreciate the afford of making shape more intuitive to use. Best, Jan-Peter Am 18.10.13 08:50, schrieb David Kastrup: \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a recent project (this number is not a joke!), Well, it should be. It means that our slur shaping and quanting is apparently not doing its job. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
2013/10/18 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: That's nice! Could you make it work with 2.17.3 (we had to freeze LilyPond version to ensure that no regressions in the scores appear, and so we're using 2.17.3 for almost all scores)? No. It's not just a matter of replacing ( with parenthesisOpenSymbol. Previous to 2.17.25, the parser had quite hardwired expectations and won't take well at all to seeing an event-function instead of an event here. And looking at the old parser code, it does not even go through any hook you could reasonably hijack. Either you modify the C++ code of the parser for your counting or you are out of luck. Ok, i understand that this is not a simple fix (contrary to what i expected). BTW, this is a good opportunity to say: thank you again for making LilyPond easier to work with! But regressions in the score should not really be an issue if you are just counting slurs once in a while. It's not like you need perfect output from the same run of LilyPond. you're right, i'll try this way. best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Am 18.10.2013 10:17, schrieb Janek Warchoł: 2013/10/18 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: That's nice! Could you make it work with 2.17.3 (we had to freeze LilyPond version to ensure that no regressions in the scores appear, and so we're using 2.17.3 for almost all scores)? No. It's not just a matter of replacing ( with parenthesisOpenSymbol. Previous to 2.17.25, the parser had quite hardwired expectations and won't take well at all to seeing an event-function instead of an event here. And looking at the old parser code, it does not even go through any hook you could reasonably hijack. Either you modify the C++ code of the parser for your counting or you are out of luck. Ok, i understand that this is not a simple fix (contrary to what i expected). BTW, this is a good opportunity to say: thank you again for making LilyPond easier to work with! But regressions in the score should not really be an issue if you are just counting slurs once in a while. It's not like you need perfect output from the same run of LilyPond. you're right, i'll try this way. That's right, but of course you'll get _lots_ of compiler messages. Probably they won't influence the result, though. OTOH, if you'd analyse the input files with Frescobaldi you wouldn't have to _compile_ all those scores. I'll have a look if I can easily update my stub (which simply counts all kinds of items in the current document) to walk through the whole directory structure. Urs best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Automatic accidentals behaviour
Hello everybody,
I have been getting lots of great help from this list, but now for the first
time I post a question.
In the following example
\version 2.17.17
{ \accidentalStyle dodecaphonic * }
Lilypond shows natural on b and flat on bes, just like I want.
How can I set this behaviour without using the dodecaphonic style?
Accidentals all over is a bit too much for the rest of the music in
question. modern or even piano with this detail added would do fine for
my needs. I tried all the different styles, but of course I might have
missed something.
Greetings,
Andreas
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Automatic-accidentals-behaviour-tp152547.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic accidentals behaviour
Andreas Edlund andreas.edl...@gmail.com writes:
Hello everybody,
I have been getting lots of great help from this list, but now for the first
time I post a question.
In the following example
\version 2.17.17
{ \accidentalStyle dodecaphonic * }
Lilypond shows natural on b and flat on bes, just like I want.
I see no b and no bes.
How can I set this behaviour without using the dodecaphonic style?
Which behavior?
Accidentals all over is a bit too much for the rest of the music in
question.
You say you want a behavior showing the accidentals, but without showing
accidentals all over. What do you mean?
modern or even piano with this detail added would do fine for my
needs.
With what detail added?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic accidentals behaviour
sorry about that. The snippet should be: -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Automatic-accidentals-behaviour-tp152547p152549.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic accidentals behaviour
Am 18.10.2013 10:55, schrieb David Kastrup:
Andreas Edlund andreas.edl...@gmail.com writes:
Hello everybody,
I have been getting lots of great help from this list, but now for the first
time I post a question.
In the following example
\version 2.17.17
{ \accidentalStyle dodecaphonic * }
Lilypond shows natural on b and flat on bes, just like I want.
I see no b and no bes.
How can I set this behaviour without using the dodecaphonic style?
Which behavior?
I think he wants a behaviour like 'piano' but with the addition that b
and bes always get an accidental as in 'dodecaphonic'.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic accidentals behaviour
Yes, that's it. The first post did not render the example correctly, my mistake. So, how to achieve that? Of course I could force the accidental everytime this particular chord appears, but it would be nice to get it automatically. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Automatic-accidentals-behaviour-tp152547p152551.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic accidentals behaviour
In case you are interested in a non-automatic workaround (so you can get your
score done as you want it), you can use the symbol ! to force accidentals:
\version 2.17.17
{
b! bes'1 |
c'!4 cis' d'!8\pp dis'!4.\f |
}
This is described in the documentation on the following link (just scroll
down a bit until Known issues and warnings):
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#automatic-accidentals
There you will find:
Simultaneous notes are not considered in the automatic determination of
accidentals; only previous notes and the key signature are considered.
Forcing accidentals with ! or ? may be required when the same note name
occurs simultaneously with different alterations, as in ‘f! fis!’.
I hope this will be of any help.
Regards,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Automatic-accidentals-behaviour-tp152547p152552.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
garrettm30 wrote What I'm trying to deal with is the fact that the number of lines in the verses and the number of lines in the chorus very often do not match. See for example the attached image of where the verses and chorus meet in a particularly well-known hymn: You see that the chorus line there is not aligned with any of the verse lines, but rather both sides are centered according to the number of lines in their own section. I'm imagining some way to explicitly end a lyric context so that it won't the affect the spacing of a subsequent context when on the same line. I'm really just trying to figure out what is the best way to handle the verse/chorus transition. I expect I am going to encounter this kind of thing often since a lot of what I do are hymns. please have a look at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=503 this still needs some tweak-ing/override-ing to get the alignment correctly. Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Lyrics-to-hymn-new-user-tp152216p152553.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Lyrics to hymn - new user
Hi, Carl. I like your sample. What do you do to make the verses left aligned (and possibly shifted) at the start of a new system? Do you do it manually? I know one could do it fairly easy if at the start of every new verse in the lyrics one could put the directive to align the syllable to the left. I'm looking forward to learning more about your workflow with typesetting hymns, if you ever share it, especially your customized part-combine. Cheers, Eduardo ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
Hi Janek, Could you send me a few examples of the old behavior (lilypond code, lilypond output, documentation) so that i could quickly estimate the difficulty of the task? Unfortunately, the docs and download archive only goes back to v2.6, and I'm pretty sure we lost Slur #'attachment in v2.4.2, if not earlier. Here's a search of the list (showing others who feel/felt the same way as I did when the feature was withdrawn): http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=slur+attachmentsubmit=Search!idxname=lilypond-usermax=20result=normalsort=score The old behaviour was, for example, \override Slur #'attachment = #'(head . stem) to force the slur to go from the [left-hand] notehead to the [right-hand] stem tip. In a new implementation it could, I suppose, simply calculate the corresponding positions and modify Slur.positions accordingly. In any case, a setting like this would save a huge amount of manual effort and trialerror. BONUS: I would love for something like the following: stem is a constant -1, head is a constant +1, so one could use \override Slur #'attachment = #'(L . R) where L and R are numbers representing the position ***relative to 0, which is the center of the stem***. Does all that make sense? Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Eduardo Silva eduardo.su...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi, Carl. I like your sample. What do you do to make the verses left
aligned (and possibly shifted) at the start of a new system? Do you do it
manually? I know one could do it fairly easy if at the start of every new
verse in the lyrics one could put the directive to align the syllable to
the left.
I'm looking forward to learning more about your workflow with typesetting
hymns, if you ever share it, especially your customized part-combine.
Cheers,
Eduardo
Someone on the list (I can't remember who, precisely) wrote a macro that
allows one to left-align all the lyric syllables at an arbitrary musical
point. It looks at all the syllables at that point, figures out the longest
one (as typeset), centers it, and left aligns all the other syllables
relative to the longest one. Search the archive for \tagIt (that's the name
of the macro that was created) and you should get close to it. You need
2.17.something to use, since it uses David's friendlier way of referring to
properties (Something.something, instead of Something #'something), but it
can be translated to pre 2.17 references (I did this when I first used it,
since I was using 2.16 at the time.
This is one of the reasons for the barCheck voice. I use it to specify
where to align syllables, so that I don't have to clutter my lyrics or
assume that the line begins at a certain point. For the example I posted,
this is the \barCheckVerse definition:
barCheckVerse = {
\time 3/4 \key d \major \partial 4
\tagIt s4 s2. s2 s4 s2. s2 \bar \break
\tagIt s4 s2. s2 s4 s2. s2 \bar \break \spb
\tagIt s4 s2. s2 s4 s2. s2 \bar \break
\tagIt s4 s2. s2 s4 s2. s2 \bar |.
}
the \spb macro allows me to define an page break if I am outputting to a
slide layout. In my global include, it is defined as { }, but in my slide
layout header, it is defined as { \pageBreak }.
I am attaching my altered part-combiner.scm file. The essential difference
is that the parameter that defines how large an interval between two voices
is before it separates them (in automatic mode) is reversed so that instead
of breaking intervals greater than an octave (or whatever it was set to),
it breaks intervals less than a third. I have some tweaks that I didn't
include in my sample to manipulate slurs so that by default, slurs are
doubled (for when voices combine), but are single slurs in the correct
direction when the voices separate.
When I find time, I'll work on creating a clean git repository to house the
basic template/framework I've developed.
Carl
part-combiner.scm
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
2013/10/18 Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com: Someone on the list (I can't remember who, precisely) wrote a macro that allows one to left-align all the lyric syllables at an arbitrary musical point. It looks at all the syllables at that point, figures out the longest one (as typeset), centers it, and left aligns all the other syllables relative to the longest one. It was written by David Nalesnik, and can be found here: https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/custom-engravers/aligning-first-lyric-syllables.ily When I find time, I'll work on creating a clean git repository to house the basic template/framework I've developed. You're welcome to place your stuff in the openlilylib/snippets repository (https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets) - i think it'd be good to keep all lilypond stuff together. Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic generation of scores skeletons
Hello Johann,Here is what I've come to after some cleanup:menu@mac ./GenerateLilypondSkeleton.py -h-- Usage: ./GenerateLilypondSkeleton.py [-h|--help] [-d|--debug] [-b|--barNumbers] [(-n|--notes=) aLilypondNoteOrRest] fileNamefor example:./GenerateLilypondSkeleton.py -n dis ThemaAllegroWoO37Trio.jsonFrom the following JSON spec:menu@mac cat ThemaAllegroWoO37Trio.json{"version": "2.17.19","title" : "Thema allegro","__subtitle" : "pour instruments en Ut","__subsubtitle" : "(en Ré majeur, tonalité originale Mib)","composer" : "Ludwig van Beethoven (1808 -1854)","tagline": "J. Menu - September 2013","enteredby" : "Jacques Menu","instrumentName": "Bassoon","clef" : "bass","key" : "g \\major","time" : "2/4","initialUpBeat" : "8*1","firstBarNumber": 129,"finalBarPosition" : "150:4/8","doubleBarsPositions" : ["132:4/8"],"barNumbersAtBeginningOflines" : [135, 142, 146],"tempoMarks" : { "129:1/8":"Thema allegro", "144:1/8":"Coda"},"repeats": [ {"128:4/8-136:3/8": [1, []]}, {"136:4/8-144:3/8": [2, ["144:1/8-144:3/8", "144:1/8-144:4/8"]]} ],"partName" : "bassoonPart"}the following LP source files can be obtained automatically:
ThemaAllegroWoO37Trio_with_notes.ly
Description: Binary data
ThemaAllegroWoO37Trio_with_all_bar_numbers.ly
Description: Binary data
ThemaAllegroWoO37Trio_without_notes.ly
Description: Binary data
Removing the"barNumbersAtBeginningOflines" can be done simply by writing it"_barNumbersAtBeginningOflines" instead for example, which leads to:
ThemaAllegroWoO37Trio_without_forced_breaks.ly
Description: Binary data
I'm still working on the repeats alternatives, currently not handled, and the reason why I started all this actually.Also,"tempoMarks"could be specified as a list, as "repeats" is,for regularity.The constraints on JSON syntax make the latter a bit complex, I'm afraid, with number of repetitions and list of alternatives...A nice w-e!JM--Jacques MenuCh. de la Pierre 121023 Crissiermailto:jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
cadenza for two hands
Hello, Where in the manual (2.16.2) are instructions for coding a cadenza for two hands (piano)? Thank you, Mark Stephen Mrotek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: cadenza for two hands
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote: Where in the manual (2.16.2) are instructions for coding a cadenza for two hands (piano)? does this help? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#aligning-to-cadenzas regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: cadenza for two hands
Mr. Bailey, Thank you for your reply. Actually, I have used that documentation for scoring a cadenza for one hand. What I am doing is an unmetered cadenza for two hands. Mark -Original Message- From: bina...@gmail.com [mailto:bina...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simon Bailey Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:28 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist Subject: Re: cadenza for two hands On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote: Where in the manual (2.16.2) are instructions for coding a cadenza for two hands (piano)? does this help? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concer ns#aligning-to-cadenzas regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Lyrics to hymn - new user
From: janek.lilyp...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:36:20 +0200 Subject: Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user To: carlopeter...@gmail.com CC: eduardo.su...@hotmail.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org 2013/10/18 Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com: Someone on the list (I can't remember who, precisely) wrote a macro that allows one to left-align all the lyric syllables at an arbitrary musical point. It looks at all the syllables at that point, figures out the longest one (as typeset), centers it, and left aligns all the other syllables relative to the longest one. It was written by David Nalesnik, and can be found here: https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/custom-engravers/aligning-first-lyric-syllables.ily When I find time, I'll work on creating a clean git repository to house the basic template/framework I've developed. You're welcome to place your stuff in the openlilylib/snippets repository (https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets) - i think it'd be good to keep all lilypond stuff together. Janek Thank you, Carl and Janek. Awesome stuff. I liked your simple introduction to Lilypond, Janek, even though I don't speak any polish ;-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2.17 documentation
Hi all, I came across the following page of LilyPond's documentation now ( http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/changes-big-page.html ) and its title reads New features in 2.18 since 2.16. I think it was probably meant to be 2.17 instead of 2.18, am I right? Unless someone released a version 2.18 and is keeping it secret from me :) Regards, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-17-documentation-tp152562.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: 2.17 documentation
2013/10/18 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com: Hi all, I came across the following page of LilyPond's documentation now ( http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/changes-big-page.html ) and its title reads New features in 2.18 since 2.16. I think it was probably meant to be 2.17 instead of 2.18, am I right? Unless someone released a version 2.18 and is keeping it secret from me :) 2.17 is unstable and will become eventually the next stable release. Right? The changes page is intended to tell what changes 2.18 has since 2.16 and it is not finished until 2.18 is a reality. I agree in that, given 2.18 does not exist, the page actually shows changes of 2.17, but you will also agree in that 2.17 is not recommended for general adoption, instead of hiding the page until 2.18 comes out, we show it and leave it prepared to serve as an actual 2.18 page. Or, we could name it 2.17 since 2.16 to be clearer, and change this to 2.18 on its release. That would indeed be clearer because the page is under lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/ . -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: 2.17 documentation
Hi Francisco, I am well aware of everything you wrote about, and my suggestion would be to rename it to 2.17 since 2.16 as you say, and then change it back to 2.18 since 2.16 when that version is released. I just find it might confuse people if they come across a page talking about a version of a software that still does not exist (and particularly when this page in question is under the 2.17 documentation, as you rightly pointed out). Take care, Gilberto On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.comwrote: 2013/10/18 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com: Hi all, I came across the following page of LilyPond's documentation now ( http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/changes-big-page.html ) and its title reads New features in 2.18 since 2.16. I think it was probably meant to be 2.17 instead of 2.18, am I right? Unless someone released a version 2.18 and is keeping it secret from me :) 2.17 is unstable and will become eventually the next stable release. Right? The changes page is intended to tell what changes 2.18 has since 2.16 and it is not finished until 2.18 is a reality. I agree in that, given 2.18 does not exist, the page actually shows changes of 2.17, but you will also agree in that 2.17 is not recommended for general adoption, instead of hiding the page until 2.18 comes out, we show it and leave it prepared to serve as an actual 2.18 page. Or, we could name it 2.17 since 2.16 to be clearer, and change this to 2.18 on its release. That would indeed be clearer because the page is under lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/ . -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
Hi all,
I would like to change the shape of more than one laissezVibrer at the same
time in chord, but I can't seem to find an way to do it because they are
simultaneous. Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?
\version 2.17.28
\markup {The top laissezVibrer is looking like I want, but not the bottom
one.}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0.5) (3 . 0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c' c''1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
\markup {I would like the bottom laissezVibrer to look like this:}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . -0.5) (3 . -0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c'1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n152566/laissezVibrer.png
I already apologize if this is a silly question, but I can't find the answer
in the documentation.
Thanks a lot!
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-the-shape-of-more-than-one-laissezVibrer-in-chord-tp152566.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
2013/10/18 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I would like to change the shape of more than one laissezVibrer at the same
time in chord, but I can't seem to find an way to do it because they are
simultaneous. Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?
\version 2.17.28
\markup {The top laissezVibrer is looking like I want, but not the bottom
one.}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0.5) (3 . 0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c' c''1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
\markup {I would like the bottom laissezVibrer to look like this:}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . -0.5) (3 . -0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c'1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n152566/laissezVibrer.png
I already apologize if this is a silly question, but I can't find the answer
in the documentation.
Thanks a lot!
Gilberto
Hi Gilberto,
you might be interested in
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=715
and/or
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Tie-over-Repeat-Bar-td150149.html#a150174
HTH,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/18 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I would like to change the shape of more than one laissezVibrer at the same
time in chord, but I can't seem to find an way to do it because they are
simultaneous. Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?
\version 2.17.28
\markup {The top laissezVibrer is looking like I want, but not the bottom
one.}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0.5) (3 . 0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c' c''1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
\markup {I would like the bottom laissezVibrer to look like this:}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . -0.5) (3 . -0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c'1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n152566/laissezVibrer.png
I already apologize if this is a silly question, but I can't find the answer
in the documentation.
i'd probably cheat and do it like this(*):
\version 2.17.27
\new Staff {
{ \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0.5) (3 . 0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c''1\laissezVibrer }
\\
{ \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . -0.5) (3 . -0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c'1\laissezVibrer }
c' e' g'1
}
(*) for whole notes with laissezVibrer, otherwise, may become tricky
trying to make it _look_ like a chord.
or, seeing as they're more or less symmetrical, use harm's LSR link above. :)
regards,
sb
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and
quick to anger.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
Hi Harm, Thanks for your answer. I actually already came across that snippet you sent me while searching the repository , but it doesn't compile for me. On my 2.17.18, the compiler outputs: Unbound variable: $further As for the other link which contains your two .LY files, thanks a lot for it! That is looking promising, I will have a look on it now to see if I understand how to make it work on my score. Thanks! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-the-shape-of-more-than-one-laissezVibrer-in-chord-tp152566p152569.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
Now that's very clever! :D I just need to use this for a couple of two note chords in whole note, so I guess I will just cheat as well. Thanks a lot! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-the-shape-of-more-than-one-laissezVibrer-in-chord-tp152566p152570.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
2013/10/18 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com: Hi Harm, Thanks for your answer. I actually already came across that snippet you sent me while searching the repository , but it doesn't compile for me. On my 2.17.18, the compiler outputs: Unbound variable: $further For the LSR-snippet: use convert-ly As for the other link which contains your two .LY files, thanks a lot for it! That is looking promising, I will have a look on it now to see if I understand how to make it work on my score. Thanks! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-the-shape-of-more-than-one-laissezVibrer-in-chord-tp152566p152569.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Is there any lilypond-book programer?
Hi list!
I'm still having problems with lilypond-book.
Am I doing something wrong?
The file:
###
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Some text and now\\
\begin[notime]{lilypond}
\relative{c4 d e f g a b c}
\end{lilypond}
Some notes.
\end{document}
###
Command and terminal output (since is the only output I end up with, no
.aux .log , anything):
###
$ lilypond-book --output=out --pdf test.tex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.tex...
Running `pdflatex' on file `/tmp/tmp_AuT9R.tex' to detect default page
settings.
Dissecting...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 773, in ?
main ()
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 756, in main
chunks = do_file (files[0])
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 617, in do_file
do_process_cmd (chunks, input_fullname, global_options)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 475, in
do_process_cmd
output_files = split_output_files (options.lily_output_dir)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 465, in
split_output_files
for subdir in glob.glob (os.path.join (directory, '[a-f0-9][a-f0-9]')):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 37, in glob
sublist = glob1(dirname, basename)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 50, in glob1
return fnmatch.filter(names,pattern)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/fnmatch.py, line 47, in filter
_cache[pat] = re.compile(res)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 180, in compile
return _compile(pattern, flags)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 227, in _compile
raise error, v # invalid expression
sre_constants.error: bad character range
###
I had eliminate lilypond and tex with all their stuff from system
instalation.
I reinstall all (lilypond, TexLive2013).
It doesn't matter the system configuration.
And I still have the exact same problem.
I'm really sorprised since it semas that there is no one else having these
problem.
Actually, I'm thinking on reinstalling my complete system.
Thanks.
Marcos.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Is there any lilypond-book programer?
Didn't you also have an issue with lilyglyphs because of a wrong character
(dash instead of hyphen)?
The current error message points in that direction too. So you might actually
have something weird in your input file.
Maybe you should send your actual file as an attachment (to rule out email
mangling) so others can test it.
Best
Urs
Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi list!
I'm still having problems with lilypond-book.
Am I doing something wrong?
The file:
###
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Some text and now\\
\begin[notime]{lilypond}
\relative{c4 d e f g a b c}
\end{lilypond}
Some notes.
\end{document}
###
Command and terminal output (since is the only output I end up with, no
.aux .log , anything):
###
$ lilypond-book --output=out --pdf test.tex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.tex...
Running `pdflatex' on file `/tmp/tmp_AuT9R.tex' to detect default page
settings.
Dissecting...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 773, in ?
main ()
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 756, in main
chunks = do_file (files[0])
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 617, in do_file
do_process_cmd (chunks, input_fullname, global_options)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 475, in
do_process_cmd
output_files = split_output_files (options.lily_output_dir)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 465, in
split_output_files
for subdir in glob.glob (os.path.join (directory, '[a-f0-9][a-f0-9]')):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 37, in glob
sublist = glob1(dirname, basename)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 50, in glob1
return fnmatch.filter(names,pattern)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/fnmatch.py, line 47, in
filter
_cache[pat] = re.compile(res)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 180, in
compile
return _compile(pattern, flags)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 227, in
_compile
raise error, v # invalid expression
sre_constants.error: bad character range
###
I had eliminate lilypond and tex with all their stuff from system
instalation.
I reinstall all (lilypond, TexLive2013).
It doesn't matter the system configuration.
And I still have the exact same problem.
I'm really sorprised since it semas that there is no one else having
these
problem.
Actually, I'm thinking on reinstalling my complete system.
Thanks.
Marcos.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Is there any lilypond-book programer?
Yes.
Somewhere my terminal vim editor interpretates a minus sign copied from
firefox as a dash.
Now lilyglyth, thanks to you, work's prefectly :)
So I'll attach the actual file.
Thanks.
Marcos
2013/10/18 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
** Didn't you also have an issue with lilyglyphs because of a wrong
character (dash instead of hyphen)?
The current error message points in that direction too. So you might
actually have something weird in your input file.
Maybe you should send your actual file as an attachment (to rule out email
mangling) so others can test it.
Best
Urs
Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi list!
I'm still having problems with lilypond-book.
Am I doing something wrong?
The file:
###
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Some text and now\\
\begin[notime]{lilypond}
\relative{c4 d e f g a b c}
\end{lilypond}
Some notes.
\end{document}
###
Command and terminal output (since is the only output I end up with, no
.aux .log , anything):
###
$ lilypond-book --output=out --pdf test.tex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.tex...
Running `pdflatex' on file `/tmp/tmp_AuT9R.tex' to detect default page
settings.
Dissecting...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 773, in ?
main ()
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 756, in main
chunks = do_file (files[0])
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 617, in do_file
do_process_cmd (chunks, input_fullname, global_options)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 475, in
do_process_cmd
output_files = split_output_files (options.lily_output_dir)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 465, in
split_output_files
for subdir in glob.glob (os.path.join (directory,
'[a-f0-9][a-f0-9]')):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 37, in glob
sublist = glob1(dirname, basename)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 50, in glob1
return fnmatch.filter(names,pattern)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/fnmatch.py, line 47, in
filter
_cache[pat] = re.compile(res)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 180, in compile
return _compile(pattern, flags)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 227, in
_compile
raise error, v # invalid expression
sre_constants.error: bad character range
###
I had eliminate lilypond and tex with all their stuff from system
instalation.
I reinstall all (lilypond, TexLive2013).
It doesn't matter the system configuration.
And I still have the exact same problem.
I'm really sorprised since it semas that there is no one else having
these problem.
Actually, I'm thinking on reinstalling my complete system.
Thanks.
Marcos.
--
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
test.tex
Description: TeX document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Is there any lilypond-book programer?
I'm sorry!
I miss type lilyglyphs
2013/10/18 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
** Didn't you also have an issue with lilyglyphs because of a wrong
character (dash instead of hyphen)?
The current error message points in that direction too. So you might
actually have something weird in your input file.
Maybe you should send your actual file as an attachment (to rule out email
mangling) so others can test it.
Best
Urs
Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi list!
I'm still having problems with lilypond-book.
Am I doing something wrong?
The file:
###
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Some text and now\\
\begin[notime]{lilypond}
\relative{c4 d e f g a b c}
\end{lilypond}
Some notes.
\end{document}
###
Command and terminal output (since is the only output I end up with, no
.aux .log , anything):
###
$ lilypond-book --output=out --pdf test.tex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.tex...
Running `pdflatex' on file `/tmp/tmp_AuT9R.tex' to detect default page
settings.
Dissecting...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 773, in ?
main ()
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 756, in main
chunks = do_file (files[0])
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 617, in do_file
do_process_cmd (chunks, input_fullname, global_options)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 475, in
do_process_cmd
output_files = split_output_files (options.lily_output_dir)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 465, in
split_output_files
for subdir in glob.glob (os.path.join (directory,
'[a-f0-9][a-f0-9]')):
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 24, in glob
list = glob(dirname)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 37, in glob
sublist = glob1(dirname, basename)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/glob.py, line 50, in glob1
return fnmatch.filter(names,pattern)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/fnmatch.py, line 47, in
filter
_cache[pat] = re.compile(res)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 180, in compile
return _compile(pattern, flags)
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 227, in
_compile
raise error, v # invalid expression
sre_constants.error: bad character range
###
I had eliminate lilypond and tex with all their stuff from system
instalation.
I reinstall all (lilypond, TexLive2013).
It doesn't matter the system configuration.
And I still have the exact same problem.
I'm really sorprised since it semas that there is no one else having
these problem.
Actually, I'm thinking on reinstalling my complete system.
Thanks.
Marcos.
--
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
2013/10/18 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com: 2013/10/18 Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com: Someone on the list (I can't remember who, precisely) wrote a macro that allows one to left-align all the lyric syllables at an arbitrary musical point. It looks at all the syllables at that point, figures out the longest one (as typeset), centers it, and left aligns all the other syllables relative to the longest one. It was written by David Nalesnik, and can be found here: https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/custom-engravers/aligning-first-lyric-syllables.ily Update: there was some renaming in the repository, and the snippet is now here: https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/notation-snippets/aligning-first-lyric-syllables ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics to hymn - new user
2013/10/18 Eduardo Silva eduardo.su...@hotmail.com: Thank you, Carl and Janek. Awesome stuff. I liked your simple introduction to Lilypond, Janek, even though I don't speak any polish ;-) I'm glad you liked it :-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing the shape of more than one laissezVibrer in chord
On 19/10/13 07:07, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to change the shape of more than one laissezVibrer at the same
time in chord, but I can't seem to find an way to do it because they are
simultaneous. Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?
\version 2.17.28
\markup {The top laissezVibrer is looking like I want, but not the bottom
one.}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0.5) (3 . 0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c' c''1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
\markup {I would like the bottom laissezVibrer to look like this:}
{
\shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . -0.5) (3 . -0.5) (3 . 0)) LaissezVibrerTie
c'1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
\version 2.17.28
% extend laissez-vibrer tie
extendLV = #(define-music-function (parser location further) (number?) #{
\once \override LaissezVibrerTie.X-extent = #'(0 . 0)
\once \override LaissezVibrerTie.details.note-head-gap = #(/ further -2)
\once \override LaissezVibrerTie.extra-offset = #(cons (/ further 2) 0)
#})
{
\extendLV #2.5
c' c''1\laissezVibrer | R1 |
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Frescobaldi now needs git installed
The install instructions at http://frescobaldi.org/download.html need to
add git as a dependency. Without git installed, when trying to run
Frescobaldi I get:
nick@nick-desktop:~$ /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi, line 3, in module
import frescobaldi_app.main
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/main.py, line
176, in module
main()
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/main.py, line
135, in main
import mainwindow # contains MainWindow class
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/mainwindow.py,
line 40, in module
import menu
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/menu.py, line
47, in module
import vcs
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/__init__.py,
line 46, in module
app_repo = apprepo.AppRepo()
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/apprepo.py,
line 42, in __init__
self._activeBranch = self.current_branch()
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/gitrepo.py,
line 151, in current_branch
for branch in self.branches():
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/gitrepo.py,
line 137, in branches
return [line.strip() for line in self._run_git_command('branch', args)]
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/gitrepo.py,
line 119, in _run_git_command
raise GitError(str(error))
vcs.gitrepo.GitError: /bin/sh: 1: git: not found
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ties in complex polyphony
I'd like to tie the common notes below:
{
{a1~}\\{f4 e}
a1
}
But I'm not sure I'm doing it correctly.
Thoughts?
Sincerely,
Josh
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Is there any lilypond-book programer?
Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com writes:
Hi list!
I'm still having problems with lilypond-book.
Am I doing something wrong?
The file:
###
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Some text and now\\
\begin[notime]{lilypond}
\relative{c4 d e f g a b c}
\end{lilypond}
Some notes.
\end{document}
###
You forgot the most important detail of the file: its name.
###
$ lilypond-book --output=out --pdf test.tex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.tex...
Rename your file into test.lytex and run lilypond-book --pdf test.lytex
and maybe you have more luck.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Is there any lilypond-book programer?
I already try that with no luck at all.
Even so, I try it again :)
###
$ lilypond-book --pdf -o out test.lytex lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.lytex...
...
File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 227, in _compile
raise error, v # invalid expression
sre_constants.error: bad character range
###
So again, nothing...
Tomorrow I have time, so I think I'll try with the system.
Is there any Xubuntu user using lilypond-book? Actualy it should be the
same as any Ubuntu or Kubuntu. But who knows...
Thanks.
Marcos.
2013/10/19 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com writes:
Hi list!
I'm still having problems with lilypond-book.
Am I doing something wrong?
The file:
###
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
Some text and now\\
\begin[notime]{lilypond}
\relative{c4 d e f g a b c}
\end{lilypond}
Some notes.
\end{document}
###
You forgot the most important detail of the file: its name.
###
$ lilypond-book --output=out --pdf test.tex
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28
Reading test.tex...
Rename your file into test.lytex and run lilypond-book --pdf test.lytex
and maybe you have more luck.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Is there any lilypond-book programer?
Marcos Press tdy.p...@gmail.com writes: I already try that with no luck at all. Even so, I try it again :) ### $ lilypond-book --pdf -o out test.lytex lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.17.28 Reading test.lytex... ... File /home/tdy/lilypond/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py, line 227, in _compile raise error, v # invalid expression sre_constants.error: bad character range ### So again, nothing... Actually, it appears like Python throws an error while file name globbing. So either the absolute path of your directory or some file inside of it likely contains characters that Python is not happy with. Move your file to C:\MYTEMP or whatever other simply named directory with no previous content, and try again. If that works, it should give you a good clue where things go wrong. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi now needs git installed
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net schrieb:
The install instructions at http://frescobaldi.org/download.html need
to
add git as a dependency.
No, they don't.
We have to sort out this bug instead.
How did you get/download Frescobaldi?
The code that raises this error should only run when Frescobaldi runs inside a
Git repository - which is why I _assumed_ git to be present too.
So: is your Frescobaldi in a Git repository (it has a .git directory beside
frescobaldi_app)?
If yes: how did you get it without git installed?
Urs
Without git installed, when trying to run
Frescobaldi I get:
nick@nick-desktop:~$ /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi, line 3, in module
import frescobaldi_app.main
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/main.py, line
176, in module
main()
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/main.py, line
135, in main
import mainwindow # contains MainWindow class
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/mainwindow.py,
line 40, in module
import menu
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/menu.py, line
47, in module
import vcs
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/__init__.py,
line 46, in module
app_repo = apprepo.AppRepo()
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/apprepo.py,
line 42, in __init__
self._activeBranch = self.current_branch()
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/gitrepo.py,
line 151, in current_branch
for branch in self.branches():
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/gitrepo.py,
line 137, in branches
return [line.strip() for line in self._run_git_command('branch', args)]
File /home/nick/source/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/vcs/gitrepo.py,
line 119, in _run_git_command
raise GitError(str(error))
vcs.gitrepo.GitError: /bin/sh: 1: git: not found
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
