Re: Ties across voices
Am 31.03.2014 05:54, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 31/03/14 10:56, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Consider the example below:
\version 2.19.3
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q
How can I tie the lower voice's c d to the upper voice's c d, c?
You could use a third hidden voice:
It has been a longstanding wish to have native support for cross-voice
items such as slurs, ties, glissandi etc.
Or to have at least a nice blog post tutorial hint.
Or at least a ready-to-use snippet where one could point at.
Best
Urs
\version 2.19.3
transOn = {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\hide Stem
\hide Flag
\hide Beam
\hide Dots
\hide Accidental
\hide TupletBracket
\hide TupletNumber
}
transOff = {
\revert NoteColumn.ignore-collision
\revert NoteHead.no-ledgers
\revert NoteHead.transparent
\revert Stem.transparent
\revert Beam.transparent
\revert Flag.transparent
\revert Dots.transparent
\revert Accidental.transparent
\revert TupletBracket.transparent
\revert TupletNumber.transparent
}
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceThree \transOn s8 c_~ d^~ q }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ties across voices
On 03/31/2014 05:54 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
On 31/03/14 10:56, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Consider the example below:
\version 2.19.3
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q
How can I tie the lower voice's c d to the upper voice's c d, c?
You could use a third hidden voice:
\version 2.19.3
transOn = {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\hide Stem
\hide Flag
\hide Beam
\hide Dots
\hide Accidental
\hide TupletBracket
\hide TupletNumber
}
transOff = {
\revert NoteColumn.ignore-collision
\revert NoteHead.no-ledgers
\revert NoteHead.transparent
\revert Stem.transparent
\revert Beam.transparent
\revert Flag.transparent
\revert Dots.transparent
\revert Accidental.transparent
\revert TupletBracket.transparent
\revert TupletNumber.transparent
}
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceThree \transOn s8 c_~ d^~ q }
I use \hideNotes \unHideNotes in this case. Why is \transOn \transOff
better?
Rutger
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Piano scoring with centered dynamics
Hello, I'm new to LilyPond and am using it to engrave my own piano pieces. I notice that by default dynamics are aligned with notes. I'd like the dynamics to be centered between staves. I found a template here: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano- templates but when I generate the PDF, only the pedal parts show up. The dynamics do not appear. Maybe the template just needs to be updated. Anyway, if someone could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thanks, Westley Martínez ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ties across voices
Am 31.03.2014 09:59, schrieb Rutger Hofman:
On 03/31/2014 05:54 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
On 31/03/14 10:56, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Consider the example below:
\version 2.19.3
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q
How can I tie the lower voice's c d to the upper voice's c d, c?
You could use a third hidden voice:
\version 2.19.3
transOn = {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\hide Stem
\hide Flag
\hide Beam
\hide Dots
\hide Accidental
\hide TupletBracket
\hide TupletNumber
}
transOff = {
\revert NoteColumn.ignore-collision
\revert NoteHead.no-ledgers
\revert NoteHead.transparent
\revert Stem.transparent
\revert Beam.transparent
\revert Flag.transparent
\revert Dots.transparent
\revert Accidental.transparent
\revert TupletBracket.transparent
\revert TupletNumber.transparent
}
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceThree \transOn s8 c_~ d^~ q }
I use \hideNotes \unHideNotes in this case. Why is \transOn \transOff
better?
\hideNotes only makes the notes transparent and doesn't remove the
stencils. This _may_ work without problems, but will lead to
accidentals, ties and slurs etc. trying to avoid the (invisible) notes,
beams and particularly flags.
See
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/voice-contexts-in-temporary-polyphonic-sections/
The introductory image shows quite well what happens (even when it is
not about cross-voice ties).
HTH
Urs
Rutger
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
- Original Message - From: Westley Martínez aniko...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:21 AM Subject: Piano scoring with centered dynamics Hello, I'm new to LilyPond and am using it to engrave my own piano pieces. I notice that by default dynamics are aligned with notes. I'd like the dynamics to be centered between staves. I found a template here: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano- templates but when I generate the PDF, only the pedal parts show up. The dynamics do not appear. Maybe the template just needs to be updated. Anyway, if someone could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thanks, Westley Martínez 2.12 is a very very old version of lilypond. Is it true you're still using that? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
Am 30.03.2014 00:55, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Hi, I have a hard time to understand the difference between # and $ in LilyPond code blocks within Scheme functions. Same as elsewhere. Please read URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax 2.2.1 of the Extending manual says: Within LilyPond code blocks, use # to reference function arguments (eg., ‘#arg1’) or to start an inline Scheme expression containing function arguments (eg., ‘#(cons arg1 arg2)’). Where normal Scheme expressions using # don’t do the trick, you might need to revert to immediate Scheme expressions using $, for example as ‘$music’. This doesn't really help. 2.1. says: ... can deal with embedded Scheme expressions starting with $ and #. This is even less helpful. Please give me a meaningful explanation of what immediate Scheme expressions are and when and why you should use them. Those starting with $. You use them if you need either the copying action (like when a music expression is used more than once), or when the parser will not accept an expression starting with # because the syntax rules will only apply to certain types, requiring the type to be determined by the lexer already. Hm, I have to admit I still don't get it. Somehow I have the impression this is the type of documentation where you have to know the subject before in order to understand the explanation. Maybe a few examples would be helpful demonstrating both cases? Best Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am 30.03.2014 00:55, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Hi, I have a hard time to understand the difference between # and $ in LilyPond code blocks within Scheme functions. Same as elsewhere. Please read URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax Hm, I have to admit I still don't get it. Somehow I have the impression this is the type of documentation where you have to know the subject before in order to understand the explanation. Maybe a few examples would be helpful demonstrating both cases? You can assume that the documentation has not been written with the goal of being useless. So just saying I don't get it is not going to help when you don't bother pointing out what exactly you don't get. I am not going to rewrite the documentation from scratch a dozen times until it magically turns into Now I get it. So please be more specific about what of the referenced chapter you don't get. I am pretty sure that the current state of the documentation is better than random, so improving it entails figuring out the bad from the good parts, or the next version will not be better. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between # and $
So please be more specific about what of the referenced chapter you
don't get. I am pretty sure that the current state of the documentation
is better than random, so improving it entails figuring out the bad from
the good parts, or the next version will not be better.
--
David Kastrup
I've read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax
(as no doubt, Urs has) and tried to use $ in place of #. Can't get it to
compile. So, taking the following note doubler, how would $ be used instead
of #?
dubble = #(define-music-function( parser location arg )
(ly:music?)
#{ $arg $arg #}
)
{ c'' \dubble c' }
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax
(as no doubt, Urs has) and tried to use $ in place of #. Can't get it
to compile. So, taking the following note doubler, how would $ be
used instead of #?
dubble = #(define-music-function( parser location arg )
(ly:music?)
#{ $arg $arg #}
)
{ c'' \dubble c' }
Huh? Which # would you even want to replace here? #{ ... #} is inside
of Scheme. $arg already uses a $.
This code works fine as written.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
Am 31.03.2014 15:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax
(as no doubt, Urs has) and tried to use $ in place of #. Can't get it
to compile. So, taking the following note doubler, how would $ be
used instead of #?
dubble = #(define-music-function( parser location arg )
(ly:music?)
#{ $arg $arg #}
)
{ c'' \dubble c' }
Huh? Which # would you even want to replace here? #{ ... #} is inside
of Scheme. $arg already uses a $.
This code works fine as written.
For some reason the use of $arg doesn't compile for Phil. So he already
_has_ replaced #arg with $arg.
But I have to admit that the given example compiles fine on my side.
Did you compile with an older version, Phil?
And I _will_ re-read the chapter(s) and figure out where exactly I lose
track.
Urs
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between # and $
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax
(as no doubt, Urs has) and tried to use $ in place of #. Can't get it
to compile. So, taking the following note doubler, how would $ be
used instead of #?
dubble = #(define-music-function( parser location arg )
(ly:music?)
#{ $arg $arg #}
)
{ c'' \dubble c' }
Huh? Which # would you even want to replace here? #{ ... #} is inside
of Scheme. $arg already uses a $.
This code works fine as written.
Er - yes. I know it works fine. I ran it. However, the page I refer to
above says Another way to call the Scheme interpreter from LilyPond is the
use of dollar $ instead of a hash mark for introducing Scheme expressions.
So my presumption was that #(define-music-function is a hash mark for
introducing Scheme expressions and could be replaced by a $. But if I do
that, it fails to compile.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Difference between # and $
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between # and $
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax
(as no doubt, Urs has) and tried to use $ in place of #. Can't get it
to compile. So, taking the following note doubler, how would $ be
used instead of #?
dubble = #(define-music-function( parser location arg )
(ly:music?)
#{ $arg $arg #}
)
{ c'' \dubble c' }
Huh? Which # would you even want to replace here? #{ ... #} is inside
of Scheme. $arg already uses a $.
This code works fine as written.
Er - yes. I know it works fine. I ran it. However, the page I refer
to above says Another way to call the Scheme interpreter from
LilyPond is the use of dollar $ instead of a hash mark for introducing
Scheme expressions. So my presumption was that
#(define-music-function is a hash mark for introducing Scheme
expressions and could be replaced by a $. But if I do that, it fails
to compile.
Well, as mentioned in the documentation, $xxx is the same as \xxx. It's
accurate that one effect that is not explicitly listed is that if $xxx
or \xxx happen to evaluate to a music function, that music function is
called.
If you wrote
dubble = $(define-music-function( parser location arg )
(ly:music?)
#{ $arg $arg #}
)
{ c'' c' }
{ \dubble }
Then this would be similar to
dubble = { { c'' c' } { c'' c' } }
{ \dubble }
because the music function is called right after its definition. The
same happens with your example, but the \dubble occuring inside of your
music function argument is not yet defined.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Once only custos
Hello, I’d like to display a custo at the end of one line only to help, but not for the whole score. Couldn’t find an equivalent of: \once\override Staff.Custos.style = #’mensural though. Thanks for the help! Jacques Menu ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2.19.4 - when?
Hi. Can we expect 2.19.4 today? I guess it's about time. It's been a month since last development release. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: 2.19.4 - when?
Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl writes: Hi. Can we expect 2.19.4 today? I guess it's about time. It's been a month since last development release. Still two days until it will be a month. At any rate, we had a stable release in between, and those make quite a bit of additional work. So it's not like Phil has been slacking. A release on the immediately past weekend would have been the regular schedule. I've seen none of the respective activity, so my guess would be that Phil is pitching for next weekend. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
It would be good to update to the latest version (2.18.2). Also, if you post your file as a minimal example (make you file as short as possible) we can help you better. Thanks for posting. This board is a great resource to help you get started. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Piano-scoring-with-centered-dynamics-tp161005p161019.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
Please reply all to keep the information available to all. If you're using 2.18, why are you using documentation from 2.12? Please look in the 2.18 documents for the Dynamics context. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Westley Martínez To: Phil Holmes Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics I'm actually using 2.18 -- Westley Martínez On Mar 31, 2014 1:45 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: - Original Message - From: Westley Martínez aniko...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:21 AM Subject: Piano scoring with centered dynamics Hello, I'm new to LilyPond and am using it to engrave my own piano pieces. I notice that by default dynamics are aligned with notes. I'd like the dynamics to be centered between staves. I found a template here: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano- templates but when I generate the PDF, only the pedal parts show up. The dynamics do not appear. Maybe the template just needs to be updated. Anyway, if someone could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thanks, Westley Martínez 2.12 is a very very old version of lilypond. Is it true you're still using that? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
Please read the documentation on dynamics context, and let us know if it doesn't do what you want. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Westley Martínez To: Phil Holmes Cc: LilyPond User Group Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:02 PM Subject: Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics There doesn't seem to be any documentation for 2.18 that describes how to do centered dynamics for the piano, but it does show how to do centered lyrics. Is it possible to have the dynamics be centered like the lyrics? http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/piano-centered-lyrics On Mar 31, 2014 12:38 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: Please reply all to keep the information available to all. If you're using 2.18, why are you using documentation from 2.12? Please look in the 2.18 documents for the Dynamics context. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Westley Martínez To: Phil Holmes Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics I'm actually using 2.18 -- Westley Martínez On Mar 31, 2014 1:45 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: - Original Message - From: Westley Martínez aniko...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:21 AM Subject: Piano scoring with centered dynamics Hello, I'm new to LilyPond and am using it to engrave my own piano pieces. I notice that by default dynamics are aligned with notes. I'd like the dynamics to be centered between staves. I found a template here: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano- templates but when I generate the PDF, only the pedal parts show up. The dynamics do not appear. Maybe the template just needs to be updated. Anyway, if someone could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thanks, Westley Martínez 2.12 is a very very old version of lilypond. Is it true you're still using that? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
Hi Westley,
you are probably looking for something like this:
\new Staff \relative c' {
c2 d4 e |
c4 e e,2 |
g'4 a g a |
c1 |
}
\new Dynamics {
s1\ |
s1\f |
s2\dim s2-rit. |
s1\p |
}
You find it here:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#index-dynamics.
hth
patrick
On 31.03.2014, at 22:07, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Please read the documentation on dynamics context, and let us know if it
doesn't do what you want.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Westley Martínez
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: LilyPond User Group
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
There doesn't seem to be any documentation for 2.18 that describes how to do
centered dynamics for the piano, but it does show how to do centered lyrics.
Is it possible to have the dynamics be centered like the lyrics?
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/piano-centered-lyrics
On Mar 31, 2014 12:38 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Please reply all to keep the information available to all.
If you're using 2.18, why are you using documentation from 2.12? Please look
in the 2.18 documents for the Dynamics context.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Westley Martínez
To: Phil Holmes
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
I'm actually using 2.18
--
Westley Martínez
On Mar 31, 2014 1:45 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Westley Martínez aniko...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:21 AM
Subject: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
Hello, I'm new to LilyPond and am using it to engrave my own piano pieces. I
notice that by default dynamics are aligned with notes. I'd like the dynamics
to be centered between staves. I found a template here:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano-
templates
but when I generate the PDF, only the pedal parts show up. The dynamics do
not appear. Maybe the template just needs to be updated. Anyway, if someone
could point me in the right direction, that would be great.
Thanks,
Westley Martínez
2.12 is a very very old version of lilypond. Is it true you're still using
that?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics
There doesn't seem to be any documentation for 2.18 that describes how to do centered dynamics for the piano, but it does show how to do centered lyrics. Is it possible to have the dynamics be centered like the lyrics? http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/piano-centered-lyrics On Mar 31, 2014 12:38 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: Please reply all to keep the information available to all. If you're using 2.18, why are you using documentation from 2.12? Please look in the 2.18 documents for the Dynamics context. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - *From:* Westley Martínez aniko...@gmail.com *To:* Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net *Sent:* Monday, March 31, 2014 7:37 PM *Subject:* Re: Piano scoring with centered dynamics I'm actually using 2.18 -- Westley Martínez On Mar 31, 2014 1:45 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: - Original Message - From: Westley Martínez aniko...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:21 AM Subject: Piano scoring with centered dynamics Hello, I'm new to LilyPond and am using it to engrave my own piano pieces. I notice that by default dynamics are aligned with notes. I'd like the dynamics to be centered between staves. I found a template here: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/ lilypond-learning/Piano- templates but when I generate the PDF, only the pedal parts show up. The dynamics do not appear. Maybe the template just needs to be updated. Anyway, if someone could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thanks, Westley Martínez 2.12 is a very very old version of lilypond. Is it true you're still using that? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Attribution statements for Mutopia Project works
Greetings all, Are there established practices or examples of how to properly attribute works from the Mutopia Project that are licensed with a Creative Commons license? Say if you make a derivative work based on one? I have made (what I understand to be) derivative works by translating or transcribing some pieces into an alternative music notation system (Clairnote, http://clairnote.org). I came up with the following statement, based on the best practices described here: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Best_practices_for_attribution Typeset using LilyPond in Clairnote music notation by Paul Morris. This work (© 2014) is a derivative of the Mutopia Project work of the same title, typeset using LilyPond in standard music notation by Nikos Kouremenos (© 2014, Mutopia-2014/03/24-519). Both works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License — free to distribute, modify, and perform. This statement fits on three lines and would appear in the footer on the first page (just like the current copyright/license statement for Mutopia files). Thanks for any feedback on this, especially from anyone who has experience with this. It would be good to know that these statements are sufficient or if they could be improved. You can see actual examples here: http://clairnote.org/sheet-music/ (see any pdf from that page except Twinkle Twinkle, Swinging on a Gate, or 180 Fiddle Tunes) Thanks, -Paul P.S. For works in the public domain I would use slightly different wording: Typeset using LilyPond in Clairnote music notation by Paul Morris. This work (© 2014) is a derivative of the Mutopia Project work of the same title, typeset using LilyPond in standard music notation and placed in the public domain by Stelios Samelis (Mutopia-2012/12/23-931). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License— free to distribute, modify, and perform. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
specify number of measures per line in score
I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have
exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the
whole documentation and did not find such a simple feature. Am I missing
something?
\version 2.18.2
% comment line
\header {
title = Ruska narodna pesma.
composer = Narodna pesma
subtitle = -za gitaru-
}
melody = {
\key c \major
\time 3/4
e' f e |
e, gis b |
d c b |
a c e |
}
\score {
\relative c'
\new Staff \melody
\layout {
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
Hi Branko, On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the whole documentation and did not find such a simple feature. Am I missing something? Try this snippet: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=838 Hope this helps, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Adding notes symbols in lyrics positions
Hello all, Here's my problem: In a PianoStaff, I want to add some notes symbols (e.g. a quarter note, a rest) in lyrics position, i.e. between the two staves and in sync with the notes. I am interested in just placing the glyphs, no pitch needed, like on an invisible percussion stave with just one line. (well now, I hope I described it clearly enough) How could I accomplish this ? Thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Nihil verus. Omnia possibilia. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Fwd: specify number of measures per line in score
Forwarded conversation
Subject: specify number of measures per line in score
From: *Branko* brankom...@gmail.com
Date: 1 April 2014 02:06
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have
exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the
whole documentation and did not find such a simple feature. Am I missing
something?
\version 2.18.2
% comment line
\header {
title = Ruska narodna pesma.
composer = Narodna pesma
subtitle = -za gitaru-
}
melody = {
\key c \major
\time 3/4
e' f e |
e, gis b |
d c b |
a c e |
}
\score {
\relative c'
\new Staff \melody
\layout {
}
}
--
From: *David Nalesnik* david.nales...@gmail.com
Date: 1 April 2014 02:09
To: Branko brankom...@gmail.com
Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Branko,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have
exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the
whole documentation and did not find such a simple feature. Am I missing
something?
Try this snippet:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=838
Hope this helps,
David
--
From: *Branko* brankom...@gmail.com
Date: 1 April 2014 02:20
To: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
thanks, but that gives me this error:
test.ly:28:36: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning
here
\consists #
(bars-per-line-engraver '(4))
Unbound variable: bars-per-line-engraver
Interpreting music.../usr/share/lilypond/2.18.2/scm/lily-library.scm:242:5:
In procedure symbol-string in expression (process-procedure book paper
...):
/usr/share/lilypond/2.18.2/scm/lily-library.scm:242:5: Wrong type argument
in position 1 (expecting symbol): #unspecified
--
From: *Branko* brankom...@gmail.com
Date: 1 April 2014 02:23
To: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
sorry, didn't see that function defined in the beginning. it works, thanks.
--
From: *Branko* brankom...@gmail.com
Date: 1 April 2014 02:24
To: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
actually it does not work ;), it compiled but no changes in rendered pdf,
still my fourth bar ends on half width the page..
--
From: *David Nalesnik* david.nales...@gmail.com
Date: 1 April 2014 02:26
To: Branko brankom...@gmail.com
Branko,
OK! Glad to hear it.
--David
P.S. Don't forget to reply-all when answering an email on the -user
list. It defaults to reply to sender only, which is a little silly.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: actually it does not work ;), it compiled but no changes in rendered pdf, still my fourth bar ends on half width the page.. That's a separate issue--not a problem with the function at all. Your score only has 4 bars, and LilyPond chooses the best spacing. It won't automatically fill the line unless you include the following line in your \layout block: ragged-right = ##f --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
ok.. it works in a way.. when I have 4 measures in my score, it ends prematurely on half page width, as soon as there is 5th measure added, it spans 4 per line. Is it possible to have this fixed so that it shows my 4 measures spanning whole line, as a whole piece ( I don't have 5th measure) On 1 April 2014 02:09, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Branko, On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the whole documentation and did not find such a simple feature. Am I missing something? Try this snippet: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=838 Hope this helps, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: ok.. that did the trick, so I have to have both, function declared and ragged-right to do the job? is that right? thanks again for helping. No :) If your score is just 4 bars, all you need is the line in the layout block. This function is only really useful for long scores, where it would be really tedious to write \break wherever you want a manual line break. Anyway, maybe it will be useful to you in the future! --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
ok.. that did the trick, so I have to have both, function declared and ragged-right to do the job? is that right? thanks again for helping. On 1 April 2014 02:35, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: actually it does not work ;), it compiled but no changes in rendered pdf, still my fourth bar ends on half width the page.. That's a separate issue--not a problem with the function at all. Your score only has 4 bars, and LilyPond chooses the best spacing. It won't automatically fill the line unless you include the following line in your \layout block: ragged-right = ##f --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:42 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote: If your score is just 4 bars, all you need is the line in the layout block. (Sorry, I should be clearer: I meant the ragged-right line.) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
..so if I had 16 measures, and I wanted to have four lines each spanning four measures (short exercise for my little students) what would be the best approach? On 1 April 2014 02:42, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: ok.. that did the trick, so I have to have both, function declared and ragged-right to do the job? is that right? thanks again for helping. No :) If your score is just 4 bars, all you need is the line in the layout block. This function is only really useful for long scores, where it would be really tedious to write \break wherever you want a manual line break. Anyway, maybe it will be useful to you in the future! --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: ..so if I had 16 measures, and I wanted to have four lines each spanning four measures (short exercise for my little students) what would be the best approach? Put \break where you want the line breaks, and include ragged-right = ##t to get the last line to fill the whole space. Only use the function if you have something long. It could save you time then. --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: specify number of measures per line in score
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:50 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Branko brankom...@gmail.com wrote: ..so if I had 16 measures, and I wanted to have four lines each spanning four measures (short exercise for my little students) what would be the best approach? Put \break where you want the line breaks, and include ragged-right = ##t to get the last line to fill the whole space. **argh** I'm off today. ragged-right = ##f ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
tie slur in .. chord construct
Hi, lilyponders,
What shall I do to make slur d' df' displayed as the tie?
Emmanuel,
Ming
\version 2.19.3
\language english
{
c'1
d'( f'~ 1
df') f' 1
c' f'1
}
test_tieslur.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tie slur in .. chord construct
MING TSANG wrote
Hi, lilyponders,
What shall I do to make slur d' df' displayed as the tie?
Emmanuel,
Ming
\version 2.19.3
\language english
{
c'1
d'( f'~ 1
df') f' 1
c' f'1
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
test_tieslur.pdf (28K)
lt;http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/161039/0/test_tie%26slur.pdfgt;
Have you considered putting them in their own voice so you have total
control over them separately?
-
composer | sound designer
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/tie-slur-in-chord-construct-tp161039p161040.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: tie slur in .. chord construct
Ming,
Does this do what you want?
\version 2.19.3
\language english
{
c'1
d' f'~ 1
( df' f' 1 )
c' f'1
}
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
MING TSANG
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 6:49 PM
To: lilypond-user mailinglist
Subject: tie slur in .. chord construct
Hi, lilyponders,
What shall I do to make slur d' df' displayed as the tie?
Emmanuel,
Ming
\version 2.19.3
\language english
{
c'1
d'( f'~ 1
df') f' 1
c' f'1
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tie slur in .. chord construct
Mark: Thank you. This is exactly what I need.
Benjamin: I have consider split SA into separate voices (soprano and alto), but
I have already coded the whole hymn 32 measures in chord construct. All other
measures are ok except this one that contains slur tie in a chord construct.
Thank you.
Emmanuel,
Ming.
On Monday, March 31, 2014 10:29:06 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote:
Ming,
Does this do what you want?
\version 2.19.3
\language english
{
c'1
d' f'~ 1
( df' f' 1 )
c' f'1
}
Mark
From:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of MING
TSANG
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 6:49 PM
To: lilypond-user mailinglist
Subject: tie slur in .. chord construct
Hi, lilyponders,
What shall I do to make slur d' df' displayed as the tie?
Emmanuel,
Ming
\version 2.19.3
\language english
{
c'1
d'( f'~ 1
df') f' 1
c' f'1
}___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding notes symbols in lyrics positions
2014-04-01 2:33 GMT+02:00 Harald Christiansen haraldch...@gmail.com: Hello all, Here's my problem: In a PianoStaff, I want to add some notes symbols (e.g. a quarter note, a rest) in lyrics position, i.e. between the two staves and in sync with the notes. I am interested in just placing the glyphs, no pitch needed, like on an invisible percussion stave with just one line. Why not use DrumStaff than? Make the StaffSymbol transparent or linecount = 0 Or use lyrics, we have the markup-commands \note/\rest Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
