Re: use the \tweak command (was Re: Coloring ornaments)
I wrote:
try e.g.
{
c4-\tweak #'color #red -\prall
}
but this works as well, of course :-)
{
\once \override Script #'color = #red
c4\prall
}
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
LilyKDE, LilyPond for KDE: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/
New in LilyKDE-0.4.5: Hyphenation and settings GUI
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
use the \tweak command (was Re: Coloring ornaments)
Op dinsdag 11 maart 2008, schreef David Fedoruk:
Hello:
I am trying to color ornaments based on which of the composer or
editors suggested them. Setting a variable for each color and
articulation seems like it should be almost the same as for a simple
NoteHead. Since the articulation is a property of the note, the
override should be a simple extension of the ones in the manual. So
far my best guess based on what I've found in the manual and the list
archives is this:
% articulation-type (string)
color = \override NoteHead.articulation-type mordent = #darkred
Lilypond complains about the -type and also complains about
-mordent, so that is not right, but I do not know where to go from
here.
Help on this would be appreciated,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Objects-connected-to-the-input
try e.g.
{
c4-\tweak #'color #red -\prall
}
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/
LilyKDE: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: use the \tweak command (was Re: Coloring ornaments)
Yes, I've seen that page and it works for indvidual NoteHeads. I do
not want to colour the note heads, I want to color the ornament
(articulation) over it.
I just do not know how to specify the ornament specifically. I Know
that it is linked to or is a property of the NoteHead, i jut don't
know how to name it.
You can see that I've taken parts of the syntax for individual notes,
but that doesn't get the ornament. Lilypond chokes after
NoteHead.articulation. -type halts the program.
% articulation-type (string)
color = \override NoteHead.articulation-type mordent = #darkred
Lilypond complains about the -type and also complains about
-mordent, so that is not right, but I do not know where to go from
here.
Help on this would be appreciated,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Objects-connected-to-the-input
try e.g.
{
c4-\tweak #'color #red -\prall
}
I have successfully all the notes of one voice, but this did not catch
the ornaments. It was interesting, but not what I wanted
Cheers,
David
P.S. I just tried the \tweak solution again and got this error:
Bach_bwv814.ly:33:0: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
rhOne = {
Bach_bwv814.ly:41:32: error: syntax error, unexpected EVENT_IDENTIFIER
b'8.\tweak #'color #red
\mordent[ cs''16 ] d''16[ b' e'' b' ]
fs''8[ b'~ ] b'16[ b' e'' d'' ]| % bar 1
Bach_bwv814.ly:82:8: error: errors found, ignoring music expression
I believe the problem is that I am not naming the object I'm trying to
color correctly. There is another post about coloring a Cautionary
accidental
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-03/msg00275.html
His problem was that he called the object Voice.Accidental. This is
incorrect, it should be AccidentalCautionary. Thats why i think I'm
naming the object incorrectly.
Cheers again
∂œ
--
David Fedoruk
B.Mus. UBC,1986
Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003
http://recordjackethistorian.wordpress.com
Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough
for music Sergei Rachmaninov
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: use the \tweak command (was Re: Coloring ornaments)
Hi David
You almost have it right, but to color articulations you need to place a -
before the tweak, as it the \tweak were an articulation itself, like this:
\relative c'' {
c8
% B with red mordent
b -\tweak #'color #red \mordent
c
}
I don't think this was documented in the old manuals, but it is in the GDP
Learning Manual. See towards the end of Section 4.1.4 Tweaking methods, which
covers the use of \tweak in detail.
Trevor D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Fedoruk
Sent: 11 March 2008 09:09
To: Lilypond mailing list
Subject: Re: use the \tweak command (was Re:
Coloring ornaments)
Yes, I've seen that page and it works for
indvidual NoteHeads. I do
not want to colour the note heads, I want to
color the ornament
(articulation) over it.
I just do not know how to specify the ornament
specifically. I Know
that it is linked to or is a property of the
NoteHead, i jut don't
know how to name it.
You can see that I've taken parts of the syntax
for individual notes,
but that doesn't get the ornament. Lilypond chokes after
NoteHead.articulation. -type halts the program.
% articulation-type (string)
color = \override NoteHead.articulation-type
mordent = #darkred
Lilypond complains about the -type and
also complains about
-mordent, so that is not right, but I do
not know where to go from
here.
Help on this would be appreciated,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/l
ilypond/Objects-connected-to-the-input
try e.g.
{
c4-\tweak #'color #red -\prall
}
I have successfully all the notes of one voice,
but this did not catch
the ornaments. It was interesting, but not what I wanted
Cheers,
David
P.S. I just tried the \tweak solution again and
got this error:
Bach_bwv814.ly:33:0: error: syntax error,
unexpected STRING
rhOne = {
Bach_bwv814.ly:41:32: error: syntax error,
unexpected EVENT_IDENTIFIER
b'8.\tweak #'color #red
\mordent[ cs''16
] d''16[ b' e'' b' ]
fs''8[ b'~ ] b'16[ b' e'' d'' ]
| % bar 1
Bach_bwv814.ly:82:8: error: errors found,
ignoring music expression
I believe the problem is that I am not naming the
object I'm trying to
color correctly. There is another post about
coloring a Cautionary
accidental
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2
007-03/msg00275.html
His problem was that he called the object Voice.Accidental. This is
incorrect, it should be AccidentalCautionary. Thats why i think I'm
naming the object incorrectly.
Cheers again
∂œ
--
David Fedoruk
B.Mus. UBC,1986
Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003
http://recordjackethistorian.wordpress.com
Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough
for music Sergei Rachmaninov
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Coloring ornaments
David Fedoruk wrote: Hello: I am trying to color ornaments based on which of the composer or editors suggested them. Setting a variable for each color and articulation seems like it should be almost the same as for a simple NoteHead. Since the articulation is a property of the note, the override should be a simple extension of the ones in the manual. So far my best guess based on what I've found in the manual and the list archives is this: % articulation-type (string) color = \override NoteHead.articulation-type mordent = #darkred I cannot really imagine where you have read to come up with something like this. The articulations are separate objects and not a property of the note head. The object type for articulations is Script. The easiest solution is therefore \once \override Script #'color = #darkred c-\mordent The solution using \tweak that have been proposed as a solution to your problem will also work, but is only needed if you have several articulations stacked on top of each other on the same note and you only want to influence the color of one of them c-\tweak #'color #darkred -\mordent -\fermata /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Coloring ornaments
Hello: I am trying to color ornaments based on which of the composer or editors suggested them. Setting a variable for each color and articulation seems like it should be almost the same as for a simple NoteHead. Since the articulation is a property of the note, the override should be a simple extension of the ones in the manual. So far my best guess based on what I've found in the manual and the list archives is this: % articulation-type (string) color = \override NoteHead.articulation-type mordent = #darkred Lilypond complains about the -type and also complains about -mordent, so that is not right, but I do not know where to go from here. Help on this would be appreciated, Cheers, David -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 http://recordjackethistorian.wordpress.com Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music Sergei Rachmaninov ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
