Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
It clearly shows I think, that there is nothing wrong with the pretty name "GNU LilyPond" (yes, without the ugly underscore), but the nsis script should be written to use LilyPond and not the ugly GNU_LilyPond as installation folder. Though I very strongly object to having the meaningless, confusing and ugly GNU in an application name. (At least I won't rename LilyPondTool to GnuLilyPondTool, or GNULilyPondTool or GNU_LilyPond_Tool). Bert Valentin Villenave wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote: If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do. No, it only checks for the dir: http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L79 Actually I don't think uninstall removes anything from the registry anyway (but I haven't tested this and I may be wrong). Yes it does: http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L224 :-) Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
> Mark Austin wrote: > > 2009/10/10 Nick Payne : > > > >> Mark Austin wrote: > >> > >>> Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for > >>> a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to > >>> the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool: > >>> > >>> convert-ly.py --edit "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks > >>> Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" > >>> c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python: can't open file 'c:\Program > >>> Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py': [Errno 2] No such file or > >>> directory > >>> > >>> Similarly, when trying gto compile a tune, I get: > >>> > >>> LilyPond ready. > >>> %lilypond %args "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks > >>> Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" > >>> ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > >>> ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path > >>> Processing time: 3 seconds > >>> > >>> All the files convert and compile OK under the command line, and files > >>> that used to compile return the same errors. > >>> > >>> Have these files moved or something? > >>> > >>> > >> The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not > >> C:\Program Files\LilyPond... > >> > > > > That explains it. Is there a patch available? > > > > > Yes. Go to plugin options in jedit for lilypondtool and change the > lilypond path to the new location... > > Nick > > Or, easier still, though some purist might object, rename the folder back to C:\Program Files\LilyPond. That's what I did ;-) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all >> is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do. No, it only checks for the dir: http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L79 > Actually I don't think uninstall > removes anything from the registry anyway (but I > haven't tested this and I may be wrong). Yes it does: http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L224 :-) Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:12 PM 2009/10/11 Trevor Daniels : You don't need to uninstall; rename works fine if you want to keep the previous around. I didn't know that the installer could be fooled that easy. I rather remember the opposite: the installer refusing to cooperate even after having uninstalled a previous version. I've never had a problem after renaming (or deleting) the LilyPond directory. It's also a lot faster than uninstall. Of course if you've modified or added files you have to be careful if you want to keep them. If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do. The only entries in the registry are the location of lilypond.exe and the downloaded install files (if you have saved them). So as long as the name of the directory remains the same the old registry entry works fine. Actually I don't think uninstall removes anything from the registry anyway (but I haven't tested this and I may be wrong). Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> And here is a patch to revert the change.
This is similar to the patch I posted earlier -- except that yours does work :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
From 2dbcd7705dcfaa93eedf9df8eb50616d4503a885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:48:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use LilyPond instead of GNU_LilyPond
There have been many complaints about this name change,
including the fact that it breaks LilyPondTool.
---
gub/installer.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gub/installer.py b/gub/installer.py
index 9330367..8977b12 100644
--- a/gub/installer.py
+++ b/gub/installer.py
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ from gub import commands
pretty_names = {
'denemo': 'GNU_Denemo',
'git': 'Git',
-'lilypond': 'GNU_LilyPond',
+'lilypond': 'LilyPond',
'openoffice': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
'ooo-build': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
}
--
1.6.5
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On 2009-10-11, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels
> > wrote:
> > > I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
> > > the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
> > > old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference
> > > between our experiences.
> >
> > That must be the reason: here's my own screenshot of the 2.13.4-1
> > installer on a "virgin" Vista64 box (that never had LilyPond
> > installed).
>
> BTW, this looks like the commit that changed the behavior:
And here is a patch to revert the change.
-Patrick
>From 2dbcd7705dcfaa93eedf9df8eb50616d4503a885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:48:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use LilyPond instead of GNU_LilyPond
There have been many complaints about this name change,
including the fact that it breaks LilyPondTool.
---
gub/installer.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gub/installer.py b/gub/installer.py
index 9330367..8977b12 100644
--- a/gub/installer.py
+++ b/gub/installer.py
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ from gub import commands
pretty_names = {
'denemo': 'GNU_Denemo',
'git': 'Git',
-'lilypond': 'GNU_LilyPond',
+'lilypond': 'LilyPond',
'openoffice': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
'ooo-build': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
}
--
1.6.5
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
> > the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
> > old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference
> > between our experiences.
>
> That must be the reason: here's my own screenshot of the 2.13.4-1
> installer on a "virgin" Vista64 box (that never had LilyPond
> installed).
BTW, this looks like the commit that changed the behavior:
commit d3db053f7e4b65e3f288c5076f3a1cc839a2
Author: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Date: Fri Jul 3 15:21:27 2009 +0200
Prettier names for installers -- but still without spaces :-)
diff --git a/gub/installer.py b/gub/installer.py
index cbff88c..bb63988 100644
--- a/gub/installer.py
+++ b/gub/installer.py
@@ -16,8 +16,11 @@ from gub import commands
# UGH - we don't have the package dicts yet.
# barf, this should be in config file, not in code
pretty_names = {
-'lilypond': 'LilyPond',
+'denemo': 'GNU_Denemo',
'git': 'Git',
+'lilypond': 'GNU_LilyPond',
+'openoffice': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
+'ooo-build': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
}
-Patrick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain > the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep > old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference > between our experiences. That must be the reason: here's my own screenshot of the 2.13.4-1 installer on a "virgin" Vista64 box (that never had LilyPond installed). Cheers, Valentin <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 7:42 PM Trevor Daniels wrote: Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM Trevor Daniels wrote: Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed. This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin. No, I installed 2.13.4 on both XP and Windows 7, and on both systems it installed into C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond. I don't use LilyPondTool, and the installation definitely went into Program Files/LilyPond. That's why I was puzzled by the report. I've attached a screenshot of the install window, which shows clearly the name of the install program and the default directory name in my case. However, it seems the default directory name is actually picked up from the name set in the previous install if one is set there. Maybe this explains the difference. No, the previous installation was into C:\Program Files\LilyPond, and I followed the same procedure as previously of uninstalling previous version and then installing the new. I used the installer downloaded from http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.13.4-1.mingw.exe. Did you use that or perform your own build? I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference between our experiences. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Trevor Daniels wrote: Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM Trevor Daniels wrote: Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed. This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin. No, I installed 2.13.4 on both XP and Windows 7, and on both systems it installed into C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond. I don't use LilyPondTool, and the installation definitely went into Program Files/LilyPond. That's why I was puzzled by the report. I've attached a screenshot of the install window, which shows clearly the name of the install program and the default directory name in my case. However, it seems the default directory name is actually picked up from the name set in the previous install if one is set there. Maybe this explains the difference. No, the previous installation was into C:\Program Files\LilyPond, and I followed the same procedure as previously of uninstalling previous version and then installing the new. I used the installer downloaded from http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.13.4-1.mingw.exe. Did you use that or perform your own build? Nick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
2009/10/11 Trevor Daniels : > You don't need to uninstall; rename works > fine if you want to keep the previous around. I didn't know that the installer could be fooled that easy. I rather remember the opposite: the installer refusing to cooperate even after having uninstalled a previous version. If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 3:54 PM 2009/10/11 Hajo Dezelski : Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you uninstall the old version before you install the knew one. It is not only recommended, you can not install the new version without previously uninstalling the old one, because the installer refuses to continue. You don't need to uninstall; rename works fine if you want to keep the previous around. It's actually quite easy in Windows to keep several versions of LilyPond to hand. Simply rename all the directories in Program Files except the one you're currently using. The only slight problem I've seen is that the path accumulates refs to LP /bin which need to be removed occasionally for efficiency. Why do I do this? Well, it makes it much easier to track down any bugs to the first release in which they appeared. I've done this several times. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
2009/10/11 Hajo Dezelski : > Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you > uninstall the old version before you install the knew one. It is not only recommended, you can not install the new version without previously uninstalling the old one, because the installer refuses to continue. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Hello, I had the same problem and changed the directory in JEdit. If it is reversed to only Liliypond, I hope someone will write it in this list. Has the installation descripition in the documentation been changed? > However, it seems the default directory name is actually picked > up from the name set in the previous install if one is set there. > Maybe this explains the difference. Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you uninstall the old version before you install the knew one. Hajo --- ... indessen wandelt harmlos droben das Gestirn ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM Trevor Daniels wrote: Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed. This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin. No, I installed 2.13.4 on both XP and Windows 7, and on both systems it installed into C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond. I don't use LilyPondTool, and the installation definitely went into Program Files/LilyPond. That's why I was puzzled by the report. I've attached a screenshot of the install window, which shows clearly the name of the install program and the default directory name in my case. However, it seems the default directory name is actually picked up from the name set in the previous install if one is set there. Maybe this explains the difference. Trevor <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Trevor Daniels wrote: Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed. This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin. No, I installed 2.13.4 on both XP and Windows 7, and on both systems it installed into C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond. Nick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Valentin Villenave wrote Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:59 PM On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under Windows Vista and AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly didn't change anything and they went into a directory named Program Files/LilyPond. Have I missed something here? Well, it's easy to miss when you don't use LilyTool (actually that's what made me realize that the name had changed) :-) I haven't tested it under Vista, but I did install each one of the 2.13.4-* releases quite a number of times in a XP virtual machine (since I've been doing quite a few how-to video tutorials). Maybe you should double-check, for instance by launching the installer even whitout uninstalling LilyPond, you'll notice that the program is named GNU_LilyPond instead of just LilyPond. Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed. This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin. Valentin Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under Windows Vista and > AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly didn't > change anything and they went into a directory named Program Files/LilyPond. > Have I missed something here? Well, it's easy to miss when you don't use LilyTool (actually that's what made me realize that the name had changed) :-) I haven't tested it under Vista, but I did install each one of the 2.13.4-* releases quite a number of times in a XP virtual machine (since I've been doing quite a few how-to video tutorials). Maybe you should double-check, for instance by launching the installer even whitout uninstalling LilyPond, you'll notice that the program is named GNU_LilyPond instead of just LilyPond. Regards, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under Windows Vista and AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly didn't change anything and they went into a directory named Program Files/LilyPond. Have I missed something here? Trevor - Original Message - From: "Valentin Villenave" To: "Graham Percival" Cc: "lilypond-user" Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:23 PM Subject: Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival wrote: Patch appreciated, since we're such OMG stupid idiots to fix stuff ourselves. I'd have sent a patch if I knew where the mao the code is :-) Oh wait, I just found it. Patch attached. ... in fact, rather than "appreciated", let's say "required". We're having enough problems building for windows; I for one am not going to lift a finger to investigate this change. I do understand you. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > Patch appreciated, since we're such OMG stupid idiots to fix stuff > ourselves. I'd have sent a patch if I knew where the mao the code is :-) Oh wait, I just found it. Patch attached. > ... in fact, rather than "appreciated", let's say "required". > We're having enough problems building for windows; I for one am > not going to lift a finger to investigate this change. I do understand you. Cheers, Valentin 0001-Use-plain-LilyPond-name-instead-of-GNU_LilyPond.patch Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) > wrote: > > Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed > > in GNU_IMP? > > Why people always have the temptation to break things that work perfectly? > > OMG. > > Actually, I first noticed it with Neil's temporary 2.13.4 mingw build, > back in July. I can't find any trace of this pretty_name change on > Jan's Github repo, I assume it's just some temporary whimsical idea > from either Graham or Neil :-) Not deliberate. > Since it breaks LilyPondTool's default configuration, I believe it > would be wiser to revert this change, unless there's a more compelling > reason to keep it. Patch appreciated, since we're such OMG stupid idiots to fix stuff ourselves. ... in fact, rather than "appreciated", let's say "required". We're having enough problems building for windows; I for one am not going to lift a finger to investigate this change. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
2009/10/10 Valentin Villenave : > Actually, I first noticed it with Neil's temporary 2.13.4 mingw build, > back in July. I can't find any trace of this pretty_name change on > Jan's Github repo, I assume it's just some temporary whimsical idea > from either Graham or Neil :-) Nowt to do with me, I'm afraid; I just noticed it when producing that MinGW build (which I've had no success building since). I doubt it's a deliberate change. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: >> The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and >> not C:\Program Files\LilyPond... > > Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed > in GNU_IMP? > Why people always have the temptation to break things that work perfectly? > OMG. Actually, I first noticed it with Neil's temporary 2.13.4 mingw build, back in July. I can't find any trace of this pretty_name change on Jan's Github repo, I assume it's just some temporary whimsical idea from either Graham or Neil :-) Since it breaks LilyPondTool's default configuration, I believe it would be wiser to revert this change, unless there's a more compelling reason to keep it. Regards, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Have these files moved or something? The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not C:\Program Files\LilyPond... Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed in GNU_IMP? Why people always have the temptation to break things that work perfectly? OMG. Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Mark Austin wrote: 2009/10/10 Nick Payne : Mark Austin wrote: Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool: convert-ly.py --edit "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python: can't open file 'c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory Similarly, when trying gto compile a tune, I get: LilyPond ready. %lilypond %args "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path Processing time: 3 seconds All the files convert and compile OK under the command line, and files that used to compile return the same errors. Have these files moved or something? The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not C:\Program Files\LilyPond... That explains it. Is there a patch available? Yes. Go to plugin options in jedit for lilypondtool and change the lilypond path to the new location... Nick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
2009/10/10 Nick Payne : > Mark Austin wrote: >> >> Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for >> a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to >> the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool: >> >> convert-ly.py --edit "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks >> Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" >> c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python: can't open file 'c:\Program >> Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py': [Errno 2] No such file or >> directory >> >> Similarly, when trying gto compile a tune, I get: >> >> LilyPond ready. >> %lilypond %args "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks >> Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" >> ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: >> ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path >> Processing time: 3 seconds >> >> All the files convert and compile OK under the command line, and files >> that used to compile return the same errors. >> >> Have these files moved or something? >> > > The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not > C:\Program Files\LilyPond... That explains it. Is there a patch available? -- Mark Austin -- For Whigs admit no force but argument -- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Mark Austin wrote: Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool: convert-ly.py --edit "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python: can't open file 'c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory Similarly, when trying gto compile a tune, I get: LilyPond ready. %lilypond %args "C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly" ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path Processing time: 3 seconds All the files convert and compile OK under the command line, and files that used to compile return the same errors. Have these files moved or something? The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not C:\Program Files\LilyPond... Nick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
