Re: [Linux-ha-dev] LVM monitor change
Hi Dejan, I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out validate-all. I abolish vgck/vgdisplay carried out in validate-all and intend to make only the check of the parameter simply. How do you think? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Fri, 2012/4/6, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:32:05AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > > > I agree to your patch. > > Thank you for the reply. > > BTW, the monitor was shamelessly stolen from Vladislav. > > Applied. > > ocft test passed (after some struggle and eventually fixing the > ocft source). > > Cheers, > > Dejan > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > --- On Thu, 2012/4/5, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This is a proposed set of two patches which would eliminate use > > > of LVM commands in the monitor path. We already discussed the > > > issue elsewhere and I don't see any point in keeping > > > vgck/vgdisplay given that they don't result in better monitoring > > > under normal circumstances. And if the circumstances are such > > > that the new monitoring fails, I think that there'll be many > > > more problems on the node than a failed volume group. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > ___ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] LVM monitor change
Hi Hideo-san, On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:32:05AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > I agree to your patch. Thank you for the reply. BTW, the monitor was shamelessly stolen from Vladislav. Applied. ocft test passed (after some struggle and eventually fixing the ocft source). Cheers, Dejan > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > --- On Thu, 2012/4/5, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a proposed set of two patches which would eliminate use > > of LVM commands in the monitor path. We already discussed the > > issue elsewhere and I don't see any point in keeping > > vgck/vgdisplay given that they don't result in better monitoring > > under normal circumstances. And if the circumstances are such > > that the new monitoring fails, I think that there'll be many > > more problems on the node than a failed volume group. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dejan > > > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[Linux-ha-dev] about Issue #52 of resource-agents
Hi Tim I make a script version of findif now. In the script, I acquire information by the following commands. #ip -o -f inet6 route list I was going to confirm the following situation in Debian, but did not understand how I reappeared. https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/issues/52 In the case of the upper situation, I want to know how becomes the result of the ip command. Regards, Tomo ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
