Re: [LIH] errors in syslog

2000-04-04 Thread Nick Hill

--- Arun Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Many people still believe that gzip is a "better"
 compression
 algorithm than bzip2 - mainly because the small
 additional
 compression achieved by bzip2 is not worth the much
 higher
 compression time and CPU.
 

All i care about is bandwidth. that's cuz being behind
a 33.6/6 connection is not the best way to do things
on the net. :=\

 For things like PPP, the extra compression would be
 useless,
 if the time it takes to compress is more than the
 time it takes
 to transmit the uncompressed data.
 

I guess there is a trade off. But i think gzip doesn't
take much time, and i get better speeds on a Linux ISP
here (POL), who supports deflate compression. i get
about 4.2kbps at 'about 3 am... unmatchable by any
ISP, on a 33.6 modem... hyd. doesn't have 56k lines...

 comp.compession is a great newsgroup to read more
 about these issues.
 

Most of my time is spent reading emails. if i start
off with newsgroups, i'll need to the tune of 50hrs. a
day... ;-) thazz why i had to de-addict muhself from
USENET! ;-)

Nikhil.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

---
The LIH mailing list archives are available at:
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-india-help



Re: [LIH] errors in syslog

2000-04-04 Thread Bharat Ale

Hello all,

As according to PCQ, I've written scripts for DNS to use named.ca when
online and not use when offline. So when online, named has access to root
servers and not when offline.

Now the confusing part is when I see the /var/log/messages I see that when
online named starts and says

listening on [127.0.0.1] in lo
listening on [202.52.252.128] in ppp0

where the lower IP is my dynamic IP address.

Again as soon as I disconnect named restarts with new conf file and again it
is still listening on lo and ppp0. Why is this ? ppp0 is deactivated when I
disconnect but where is named getting my dynamic address from ? I  think
that's why I'm getting 'sysquery: findns error (NXDOMAIN) on
ns.pucampus.edu?'  error after I disconnect since there is no ppp0 active.

How do I correct this ? Above all, where is named getting my dynamic IP from
when I'm already offline and why is it still listening on ppp0? Is it normal
?

TIA

Bharat


---
LIH is all for free speech.  But it was created for a purpose - to help
people discuss issues about installing and running Linux.  If your
messages are counterproductive to this purpose, your privileges to
submit messages can and will be revoked.



Re: [LIH] errors in syslog

2000-04-03 Thread Nick Hill

i'm sorry fer callin' that properietary. realised that
after i hit send. sorry again. But AFAIK, the gzip
compression is better than the BSD comp... is there a
bzip2 compression on PPP? just wondering ;-)

Nikhil.

--- Arun Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 10:17:42AM -0700, Nick Hill
 wrote:
  that msg. comes when pppd is searching for
 compression
  modules. PPP offers 2 type of compressions, AFAIK.
  deflate and bsd-comp. BSD comp is properietary,
 and is
  not advised.
 
 BSD comp is NOT proprietary. It's licensed under the
 BSD license,
 a bonafide open source license. Please refer to the
 archives of
 LIG for more discussion.
 
 I'd advise you to be careful about making statements
 about licenses,
 since it ruffles a lot of feathers around here.
 
   -Arun
 

http://sharmas.dhs.org/~adsharma/opinions/gpl-is-unrealistic.html
 
 

---
 For information on this and other Linux India
 mailing lists check out
 http://lists.linux-india.org/
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

---
For information on this and other Linux India mailing lists check out
http://lists.linux-india.org/



Re: [LIH] errors in syslog

2000-04-03 Thread Arun Sharma

On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:23:17AM -0700, Nick Hill wrote:
 i'm sorry fer callin' that properietary. realised that
 after i hit send. sorry again. But AFAIK, the gzip
 compression is better than the BSD comp... is there a
 bzip2 compression on PPP? just wondering ;-)

Many people still believe that gzip is a "better" compression
algorithm than bzip2 - mainly because the small additional
compression achieved by bzip2 is not worth the much higher
compression time and CPU.

For things like PPP, the extra compression would be useless,
if the time it takes to compress is more than the time it takes
to transmit the uncompressed data.

comp.compession is a great newsgroup to read more about these issues.

-Arun

---
For more information on the LIH mailing list see:
http://lists.linux-india.org/lists/LIH