RE: Re: [PATCH 28/31] perf probe: Init symbol as kprobe
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:a...@redhat.com] > > Em Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:22:02AM +, Wang Nan escreveu: > > Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for > > uprobe if the first 'struct perf_probe_event' passed to it is a uprobe > > event. This is a trick because 'perf probe''s command line syntax > > constrains the first elements of the probe_event arrays must be kprobes > > if there is one kprobe there. > > > > However, with the incoming BPF uprobe support, that constrain is not > > hold since 'perf record' will also probe on k/u probes through BPF > > object, and is possible to pass an array with kprobe but the first > > element is uprobe. > > > > This patch init symbol maps for kprobes even if all of events are > > uprobes, because the extra cost should be small enough. > > Masami, are you Ok with this one? Yeah, looks OK for me ! :) Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu Thanks! > > - Arnaldo > > > Signed-off-by: Wang Nan > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov > > Cc: Brendan Gregg > > Cc: Daniel Borkmann > > Cc: David Ahern > > Cc: He Kuang > > Cc: Jiri Olsa > > Cc: Kaixu Xia > > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu > > Cc: Namhyung Kim > > Cc: Paul Mackerras > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > > Cc: Zefan Li > > Cc: pi3or...@163.com > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Link: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1436445342-1402-39-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com > > --- > > tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c > > index e720913..b94a8d7 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c > > @@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event > > *pevs, int npevs, > > { > > int i, ret; > > > > - ret = init_symbol_maps(pevs->uprobes); > > + ret = init_symbol_maps(false); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > > > -- > > 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 28/31] perf probe: Init symbol as kprobe
On 2015/9/2 4:11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:22:02AM +, Wang Nan escreveu: Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for uprobe if the first 'struct perf_probe_event' passed to it is a uprobe event. This is a trick because 'perf probe''s command line syntax constrains the first elements of the probe_event arrays must be kprobes if there is one kprobe there. However, with the incoming BPF uprobe support, that constrain is not hold since 'perf record' will also probe on k/u probes through BPF object, and is possible to pass an array with kprobe but the first element is uprobe. This patch init symbol maps for kprobes even if all of events are uprobes, because the extra cost should be small enough. Masami, are you Ok with this one? I think he would be okay with it because it is his idea :) Please refer to: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/558e5f42.1060...@hitachi.com Thank you. - Arnaldo Signed-off-by: Wang Nan Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Brendan Gregg Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: David Ahern Cc: He Kuang Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kaixu Xia Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Zefan Li Cc: pi3or...@163.com Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1436445342-1402-39-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com --- tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c index e720913..b94a8d7 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c @@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs, { int i, ret; - ret = init_symbol_maps(pevs->uprobes); + ret = init_symbol_maps(false); if (ret < 0) return ret; -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 28/31] perf probe: Init symbol as kprobe
Em Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:22:02AM +, Wang Nan escreveu: > Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for > uprobe if the first 'struct perf_probe_event' passed to it is a uprobe > event. This is a trick because 'perf probe''s command line syntax > constrains the first elements of the probe_event arrays must be kprobes > if there is one kprobe there. > > However, with the incoming BPF uprobe support, that constrain is not > hold since 'perf record' will also probe on k/u probes through BPF > object, and is possible to pass an array with kprobe but the first > element is uprobe. > > This patch init symbol maps for kprobes even if all of events are > uprobes, because the extra cost should be small enough. Masami, are you Ok with this one? - Arnaldo > Signed-off-by: Wang Nan > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov > Cc: Brendan Gregg > Cc: Daniel Borkmann > Cc: David Ahern > Cc: He Kuang > Cc: Jiri Olsa > Cc: Kaixu Xia > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu > Cc: Namhyung Kim > Cc: Paul Mackerras > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Zefan Li > Cc: pi3or...@163.com > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Link: > http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1436445342-1402-39-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com > --- > tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c > index e720913..b94a8d7 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c > @@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event > *pevs, int npevs, > { > int i, ret; > > - ret = init_symbol_maps(pevs->uprobes); > + ret = init_symbol_maps(false); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > -- > 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 28/31] perf probe: Init symbol as kprobe
Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for uprobe if the first 'struct perf_probe_event' passed to it is a uprobe event. This is a trick because 'perf probe''s command line syntax constrains the first elements of the probe_event arrays must be kprobes if there is one kprobe there. However, with the incoming BPF uprobe support, that constrain is not hold since 'perf record' will also probe on k/u probes through BPF object, and is possible to pass an array with kprobe but the first element is uprobe. This patch init symbol maps for kprobes even if all of events are uprobes, because the extra cost should be small enough. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Brendan Gregg Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: David Ahern Cc: He Kuang Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kaixu Xia Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Zefan Li Cc: pi3or...@163.com Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1436445342-1402-39-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com --- tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c index e720913..b94a8d7 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c @@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs, { int i, ret; - ret = init_symbol_maps(pevs->uprobes); + ret = init_symbol_maps(false); if (ret < 0) return ret; -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/