Linux-Networking Digest #485
Linux-Networking Digest #485, Volume #12 Mon, 6 Sep 99 06:13:47 EDT
Contents:
Re: funky ip behavior: ping eth1, and eth0 responds! (Thomas Kaemer)
Problem with NFS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts (Terry Paddy)
Re: strange login behavior (BLANCHER Cedric)
connection reset by peer ("Frank Bauer")
Can you send e-mail to an IP address? ("David Henry")
Re: multicast mrouted under RedHat 6.0? (Kevin Brown)
Re: port forwarding woes ("Cort Schaefer")
NFS server not allowing submounts (David Nillesen)
Apache configuration (Steven Sykes)
strange login behavior ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: hylafax help ("Marcus Jüttner")
Re: strange login behavior (BLANCHER Cedric)
Configuring Samba on a Home LAN ("fjsilver")
ipppd and defaultroute (Dmitri Barski)
Re: port forwarding woes ("Cort Schaefer")
gestetner 3225, help? ("Naor")
Re: [SuSE-6.2] wvdial and kppp flaw (Andrew Otwell)
Re: DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts ("Frank Bauer")
From: Thomas Kaemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: funky ip behavior: ping eth1, and eth0 responds!
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 06:54:16 +0200
Bruce Bantos schrieb:
>
> install, but I have disabled it in the /etc/sysconfig/network file
> (FORWARD_IPV4 = "no"). I configured eth0 to use ip = 192.168.0.100, and eth1
> to use 192.168.0.101. There are no errors on boot, and eth0 and eth1 come up
> ok. The correct i/o addresses and interrupts are assigned, as shown in
> As you can see, eth1 is getting the ping packets, but then eth0 is
> responding. My friends, what is up?
>
It's seeems that your problem is that the both cards are in the same
subnet. Try 2 different:
eth0 192.168.0.100 netmask 255.255.255.128
eth1 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.128
what do you want to do with this cards?
CU Thomas
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with NFS
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 07:54:24 GMT
Hello,
I configured my network so, that my users login via NIS and get their
home
directories via NFS.
No problem so far.
But now I upgraded to SuSE 6.2 and run into problems:
1) The old exports file results in no reacrtion from the NFS server,
givin a timeout medssage on the client.
2) Reducing the entries in /etc/exports to
/home (rw)
without any identification of hosts, allows the import of the home
directories at startup time, but I see an error in /var/log/messages:
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsgid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setgroups: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsgid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setgroups: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsgid -2: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setgroups: Invalid
argument
Sep 6 09:53:24 gym-isernhagen nfsd[154]: Unable to setfsuid -2: Invalid
argument
This behaviour should according to man exports happen, if ther is no
user nobody and no group nogroup available on the system.
BU IT IS.
Any help welcome
Thanks
Karl Sarnow
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Paddy)
Subject: DNS, hosts + Apache vHosts
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 08:43:22 GMT
Hello,
I have a 2 box test TCP/IP network set up. A Linux RH6/Apache-SSL
1.3.9 server and a Win98 client.
I have used an IP address of 169.254.100.20 for the Linux server and
169.254.100.10 for the Win98 box
on the Win98 "Hosts.sam" file I have
127.0.0.1 localhost
169.254.100.10 windowsbox
169.254.100.20 www.mybusiness.com
169.254.100.20 www.myotherbusiness.com
on the Linux server I have in the etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 localhosts
169.254.100.10 windowsbox
169.254.100.20 www.mybusiness.com
169.254.100.20 www.myotherbusiness.com
the "ServerName" is actually [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have setup Apache web server to have 2 virtual hosts - I'm pretty
sure that the setup is correct because httpd -S lists them correctly
and the syntax check apachectl configtest is OK
I have no DNS set up because I thought, on such a simple setup, the
respective "hosts" files would point to the right boxes.
When I point the browser at http://169.254.100.20/ I get the
index.html of mybusiness.com, this tells me that mybusiness.com is the
default virtual host. I also can PING 169.254.100.20
If I type http:// ww
Linux-Networking Digest #485
Linux-Networking Digest #485, Volume #11 Thu, 10 Jun 99 17:14:13 EDT
Contents:
NFS Mount problem (Mick Farmer)
Re: I =?iso-8859-1?Q?can=B4t?= get an ip address with DHCP. (Dann Church)
Re: Sharing shares across the Internet .. possible ?? (Dann Church)
Please recommend a network rack that's affordable (FenderAXE)
Re: Samba: Client for Novel and Microsoft Networks? ("Andrew Mc.Ghee")
Re: nfs client problems with Sun solaris 251 server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Problems with icmplog & partial solution ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: NETWORK NIGHTMARE (Sam Cable)
Re: modem schmodem (Sam Cable)
Re: rlogin/NIS (Dann Church)
Re: Samba with W95 clients (Nicholas E Couchman)
¢Û¢Þ¢²ºô¯¸§ó·s ("¤j®£Às")
Trouble with Samba (Bob Miller)
net-tools-1.5.x problem (Mark Johnson)
mailx (ignore list) (K. B. Lee)
ntop on rh6.0 problems ("BWhite")
DHCP server. Need help getting it to work. ("Alan")
Re: NFS Mount problem (Tim Haynes)
Re: CVS on Linux ("Michael Faurot")
Re: I'm So Close ("Leroy Banack")
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,uk.comp.os.linux
From: mick@penguin (Mick Farmer)
Subject: NFS Mount problem
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:12:31 GMT
Hi,
I'm running RH5.2 and mounting a filesystem from Solaris
2.6. However I issue the mount, either by hand or when
rebooting, I get the following error messages (on the
console and in syslog) although the mount succeeds. Why?
People have asked this question before, but I can't find an
explanation.
Jun 9 13:16:54 penguin kernel: portmap: RPC call returned error 111
Jun 9 13:16:54 penguin kernel: RPC: task of released request still queued!
Jun 9 13:16:54 penguin kernel: RPC: (task is on xprt_pending)
Jun 9 13:16:59 penguin kernel: portmap: RPC call returned error 111
Jun 9 13:16:59 penguin kernel: RPC: task of released request still queued!
Jun 9 13:16:59 penguin kernel: RPC: (task is on xprt_pending)
Jun 9 13:17:04 penguin kernel: portmap: RPC call returned error 111
Jun 9 13:17:04 penguin kernel: RPC: task of released request still queued!
Jun 9 13:17:04 penguin kernel: RPC: (task is on xprt_pending)
Jun 9 13:17:04 penguin kernel: lockd_up: no pid, 2 users??
Regards,
Mick
--
From: Dann Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I =?iso-8859-1?Q?can=B4t?= get an ip address with DHCP.
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 22:41:25 -0600
Haven't had this problem myself, but there's been much discussion in this group
about DHCP and cable modems. Many people have found that they have to reboot
the cable modem before booting into Linux because Windoze doesn't do a proper
release of the DHCP lease.
Good Luck!
--Dann Church
"Jörgen Lidén" wrote:
> Hi! I´m having trouble getting an ip address using DHCP. I´m running RedHat
> 5.2, kernel 2.2.9 with a cable modem. I´ve managed to get an ip address in
> some rare cases, but even then I can´t connect to my ISP server. I`ve read
> the DHCP mini-HOWTO and tried out the information given there but it won´t
> work. I´ve also upgraded dhcpcd to 1.3.16. Is there anyone that knows what I
> might be missing?
--
From: Dann Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sharing shares across the Internet .. possible ??
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 22:44:21 -0600
You can share a filesystem across the internet using NFS, but for the
"Network Neighborhood" stuff, I think you need to run Samba. Haven't
played with Samba at all myself, but I'm sure that there's some good
HOWTO's on it.
--Dann Church
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering if it is possible to share my system across the
> Internet ? What would be nice is if someone could just add me to their
> Network Neighborhood and treat me like a regular drive. With cable
> modem or ADSL, I don't think speed would be critical, and would VPN
> cover my security concerns ? Does NFS fill this need ??
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FenderAXE)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.networking
Subject: Please recommend a network rack that's affordable
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 04:38:44 GMT
Hi
I'm new to networking and need to buy an inexpensive network rack to
hold the patch panel, a hub, a monitor and a few other things --
nothing huge or expensive, just good and sturdy. A recommendation on
where to purchase a rack would be terrific.
Also, I need two 24 port patch panels, but I know nothing about them.
Can you recommend a brand name and a place to buy them?
Thanks!
FA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
From: "Andrew Mc.Ghee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba: Client for Novel and Microsoft Networks?
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 05:12:32 +1000
> Sherman & Petrov,
Linux-Networking Digest #485
Linux-Networking Digest #485, Volume #10 Sat, 13 Mar 99 20:13:35 EST
Contents:
Redhat 5.1 and kernel 2.2.1 ("Ovidiu Dressler")
Re: ISDN Router Recommendation ? (Heath Harry)
can't ping Linux --> win98 ("Eriksson")
Using the kernel firewall code like tcp wrappers to harden a single host.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Can I shutdown linux remotely? (David Efflandt)
Re: dialup-networking server (David Efflandt)
ISDN: What's a good adapter? (Erica Vogle)
Re: Redhat 5.1 and kernel 2.2.1 (Jim Roberts)
Re: Sextuple Boot (David Efflandt)
Re: Telnet to Linux from Win 98 (David Efflandt)
Re: Where to Get DHCP Client for Kernel 2.0.34 ? (David Efflandt)
IPchains and Masq in 2.2.1 kernel ("Douglas J. Olivier")
PPP dialing to ISP is not working with RedHat 5.2 and Gnome 1.0 (Frank Perreault)
Re: working ppp questions ("David A. Lee")
Diald and a few problems ("Tim Underwood")
Samba and long login/attach times from Win9x ("Tim Underwood")
Re: 2.2.X and NE2000 (Precious Metal)
Re: IPFWADM shows no masquerading entries (Malware)
Re: Can I shutdown linux remotely? (Juergen Heinzl)
Re: Sextuple Boot (Forrest)
Re: jiffies and traffic shaper (Malware)
Re: DNS look-ups with C++ (Malware)
From: "Ovidiu Dressler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 5.1 and kernel 2.2.1
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 20:39:20 +0200
Is there any problem if I upgrade kernel 2.0.35 to 2.2.1. on a Redhat 5.1.
machine ?
Should I also upgrade some packages ?
I looked at the Redhad support page for Redhat 5.2 upgrade and it doesn't
say anything about 5.1 upgrading.
Thank You,
Ovidiu D.
--
From: Heath Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISDN Router Recommendation ?
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 04:23:28 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Travers wrote:
> Looking for a recommendation on an ISDN router.
>
> Have had a look at the 3Com 511, Cisco 803 and the Ascend Pipeline 75/85
> models.
>
> Our network consists of an HP9000 K200, RS6000, 3 Linux Boxes running on
> Intel platform, 3 Ethernet Switches and 1 10/100 Fast Ethernet Switch and 30
> or so PC's running Windows 95.
>
> Do own one of the models above or something similar?
>
> 1) What's the performance like?
>
> 2) How easy is it to setup and maintain?
>
> 3) What do you think of the feature set on your router e.g firewall, NAT,
> dynamic bandwidth?
>
> Any information about your ISDN router would be most appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> David Travers
cisco 1003 with IOS 12 with a recent maintaince release, ip plus feature set
required for ip nat
or cisco 1603 with a recent maintaince release of 11.3, ip plus feature set
required for ip nat
the performance of both depens entirely of what servives yuo have configured,
but with a basic secure config, they will both easily saturate a 64K pipe as
well as a 128K ISDN bundeled MPPP (RFC1717) pipe.
also both will handle ip firewalling, wil very little overheads.
Regards,
Heath Harry.
--
From: "Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: can't ping Linux --> win98
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:56:42 +0100
I've tried to set up a network the last couple of days. But now I'm at a
standstill.
I do not know where to start.
The network consists of 4 computers. One linux box acting as a gateway with
IP masq. The other comps are Win98. All the win98 comps are configured
correctly and can share files printers etc, but I can't even ping to / from
the linux box.
Linux box = Pentium 60, 3com 3c900, Slackware 3.6, kernel 2.2.3,
I can connect to the internet with the linux box with a PPP script. And from
there I can do telnet, ftp whatever. So there is nothing wrong with the
TCP/IP function on any computer.
The cable (BNC) is working, I used it to connect one of the win98 comps, no
problem.
The card is detected at boot. ifconfig looks good. route aswell. netstat -nr
shows up as expected.
I've tried to just configure one win98 comp so it would be able to ping the
linux box. Removing all non essential stuff. TCP/IP, client for Microsoft
Networks and my ethernet adapter was all I spared. I configured the TCP/IP
like this:
IP address: 192.168.1.3
Netmask: 255.255.255.0 (same configuration as the linux box)
Gateway: 192.168.1.4
DNS:
host: mycomp
domain: zeus.mynet.com
DNSservers: IP addresses of my ISP's nameservres
Bindings: Client for microsoft networks - check
As for Identification on the win98 box I haven't changed anything. I use the
same comp name as I wrote in the /etc/host file on the linux box.
It could be my 3com card that is simply not working. I'll try that very
soon. But apart from that I d
