Backup Exec 12.5 on Linux [RHEL5.4]

2010-12-02 Thread Brian O'Mahony
We recently purchased a license for using the Linux Agent on a number of dell 
servers (the software was also purchased from dell).
We have been using an old version of BE in our Dublin office for years, and it 
uses Unix Agent V4.5
However the version installed in our BLR office is the new BE 12.5

I have installed the new agent from the CD, and set it up correctly, and can 
see it on the media server, but there is no folder hierarchy selection visible. 
On the old BE, we had to publish folders so the media server could see them, 
but I cant seem to find documentation on this for the new one. Has anyone got 
any experience with this?

The reason I am posting this here is I doubt Dell in cherrywood would entertain 
my requests for help as the server is in India, and server support down there 
is a pita to deal with remotely.

B



The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: IPMI

2010-08-06 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Ive been mucking about with nagios for the last few months. I was looking at 
op5 (ninja+merlin) and it looks nice, but to incorporate graphing etc, it seems 
you either need to hack the cfg files or purchase the paid version.

From what I can see these features are included in opsview and centreon.

My question is this, people with experience of either/both, which would you 
recommend?

B

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Eric Rostetter
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:14 PM
To: Jason Edgecombe
Cc: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: Re: IPMI

Quoting Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com:

 Would you please list a couple of these nagios-based systems? Preferably
 open-source.

Groundwork OpenSource (GWOS) Community Edition
Opsview
Centreon

Others I can't remember off the top of my head...

 Thanks,
 Jason

-- 
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

Go Longhorns!

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


Strange networking issue

2010-06-25 Thread Brian O'Mahony
I have a PE2850, running RHEL5.4, with a two port intel card in it. One port 
from both onboard and PCI NIC connect to the network in an active-backup bond. 
Yesterday at about 2pm we had a broadcast storm on one of the switches, and 
eth0 failed over to eth3. Everything was running fine (I didn't even notice the 
failover, nor did users). At 6pm, we had another strange networking issue (not 
sure what yet, but one of our VMware HA boxes decided to no longer be available 
by heartbeat). The eth3 interface dropped this:

Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel: e1000: eth3: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx 
Unit Hang
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   Tx Queue 0
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   TDH  a9
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   TDT  93
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   next_to_use  93
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   next_to_cleana9
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel: buffer_info[next_to_clean]
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   time_stamp   4257186b
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   next_to_watcha9
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   jiffies  42573ee7
Jun 24 18:07:43 ccvobdubpr kernel:   next_to_watch.status 0

There was no failover message. People started complaining this morning about 
the speed. A colleague ifdown/up the bond and all is ok. Until I checked the 
log:
Jun 25 08:38:03 ccvobdubpr kernel: e1000: eth3: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link 
is Up 10 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None

Currently we are running on eth0.

[r...@ccvobdubpr log]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
# Intel Corporation 82541GI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
#HWADDR=00:13:72:5F:10:6B
ONBOOT=yes
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
[r...@ccvobdubpr log]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth3
# Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller
DEVICE=eth3
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
HWADDR=00:1B:21:53:62:51
ONBOOT=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
[r...@ccvobdubpr log]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.4.0 (October 7, 2008)

Bonding Mode: fault-tolerance (active-backup)
Primary Slave: None
Currently Active Slave: eth0
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 1
Down Delay (ms): 0

Slave Interface: eth0
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:13:72:5f:10:6b

Slave Interface: eth3
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:1b:21:53:62:51

I have a number of questions here.
#1 why didn't it fail over. I take it it hung, and the interface slowed right 
down.
#2 Why did it come back up as 10Mb (It was definitely running fine between 2pm 
and 6pm yesterday)
#3 can I fix eth3 without a reboot.

Thanks

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RHEL5 server reboot - strange entries in PERC log

2010-04-22 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Yesterday a RHEL5 server rebooted on me in India. However, there was no one 
logged in as root (and no sudo permissions), and there was no entries in 
Operating System, OMSA or DRAC logs. I decided to go have a look at the 
controller log and I saw these entries:

04/21 11:50:52: MPT_Rec: INQ Error - Negotiating LD[6] pRfm a0738e00
04/21 11:50:55: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:50:56: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:50:56: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:51:01: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:51:02: MPT_Rec: INQ Error - Negotiating LD[6] pRfm a0775f60
04/21 11:51:04: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:51:04: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:51:04: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:51:04: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 11:51:35: MPT_Rec: INQ Error - Negotiating LD[6] pRfm a078eae0
04/21 13:10:13: Rejecting MISC opcode: unknown sub-opcode (0x26)
04/21 13:10:13: Rejecting Unknown FC DCMD 1f
04/21 13:10:33: MPT_Rec: INQ Error - Negotiating LD[6] pRfm a078d340
04/21 13:10:33: Rejecting MISC opcode: unknown sub-opcode (0x26)
04/21 13:10:33: Rejecting Unknown FC DCMD 1f
04/21 13:10:47: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 13:10:47: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 13:10:50: GET: SCSI_chn=fd, rtn status=0
04/21 13:11:14: MPT_Rec: INQ Error - Negotiating LD[6] pRfm a0747a40


Anyone have any ideas? I unfortunately am going to have to deal with Indian 
tech support on this, as the call center here has refused to deal with it, 
which is understandable I suppose with the equipment in BLR, but I was 
wondering if anyone here would have any ideas? I have generated a DSET that im 
going to send into them once I get a case opened.

Regards
B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: Help with multipath failover

2010-04-06 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Sorry for the delay in responding to this. I was away at the end of last week.

Anyways, to test I was running a ping from one terminal and then using the 
other terminal to run multipath -ll, and as far as I can see the actual 
multipathing is fine. However the machine isn't in the office and there is 
no-one on site till the morning.

What method would you suggest to measure if the I/O is interrupted? I would 
have thought if the ping was unsuccessful, then so to would be read/writes?

I also have two other quick questions:

1. Where do you go about deleting multipath configuration? When I use multipath 
-F it tells me the map is in use, so I stopped the service and logged out of 
the node, but the error stays the same.

2. Is there any tools you would recommend for monitoring read/write access to 
the SAN once it is in production? I just want to be able to monitor, preferably 
in real time, the read/write speeds, and whether there is bottlenecks - eg with 
the network to the SAN.

Thanks for all the help
B

-Original Message-
From: shyam_i...@dell.com [mailto:shyam_i...@dell.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:51 PM
To: Brian O'Mahony; cri...@erad.com; linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: RE: Help with multipath failover



Well you are testing link failover and not I/O failover then .. (:


I would ideally try to do I/O through one path yank out the cable and watch the 
I/O failover to the other path...
That is probably what you want to ensure if you want to use dm-multipath..

Also, make sure you change the configuration for failback from immediate to 
queue so that you won't see immediate I/O failures and see the I/O safely 
failover to the other path.

Thanks,
Shyam Iyer
Linux Engineering.

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com on behalf of Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Wed 3/31/2010 2:02 PM
To: 'cri...@erad.com'; linux-poweredge-Lists
Subject: Re: Help with multipath failover
 
Ping to san ip and yanking a cable

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


- Original Message -
From: Charles Riley cri...@erad.com
To: Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Wed Mar 31 18:34:12 2010
Subject: Re: Help with multipath failover

How are you determining that it doesn't fail over?

Charles Riley
eRAD, Inc.


- Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:

 Im connecting a PE2850 to a Equalogic SAN, using multipath. I have a
 PCI NIC with one connection to the SAN and one from the onboard
 controller too. The SAN is ona different network, and is at IP
 10.10.20.10.
 
 
 
 Here is the output from the multipath -ll
 
 [r...@ccvobtest2850 ~]# multipath -ll
 
 DubSanGrp01VolCC (36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6) dm-18
 EQLOGIC,100E-00
 
 [size=500G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
 
 \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled]
 
 \_ 3:0:0:0 sdc 8:32 [active][ready]
 
 \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled]
 
 \_ 4:0:0:0 sdd 8:48 [active][ready]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 And here is the multipath.conf:
 
 [r...@ccvobtest2850 ~]# cat /etc/multipath.conf
 
 ## Use user friendly names, instead of using WWIDs as names.
 
 defaults {
 
 user_friendly_names yes
 
 }
 
 blacklist {
 
 # wwid 26353900f02796769
 
 # devnode ^(ram|raw|loop|fd|md|dm-|sr|scd|st)[0-9]*
 
 # devnode ^hd[a-z]
 
 # devnode ^sd[a-b]
 
 }
 
 multipaths {
 
 multipath {
 
 wwid 36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6
 
 alias DubSanGrp01VolCC
 
 }
 
 }
 
 devices {
 
 device {
 
 vendor EQLOGIC
 
 product 100E-00
 
 path_grouping_policy failover
 
 getuid_callout /sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n
 
 features 1 queue_if_no_path
 
 path_checker readsector0
 
 failback immediate
 
 path_selector round-robin 0
 
 rr_min_io 10
 
 rr_weight priorities
 
 }
 
 }
 
 
 
 
 
 However when I unplug the cable to eth1, it doesn't failover. I am
 testing with a ping to the SAN at 10.10.20.10. As Im pretty new to all
 this, was wondering if anyone has any pointers on where I am going
 wrong.
 
 
 
 Thanks
 
 Brian
 
 
 
 The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
 privileged.
 It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by
 anyone else
 is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
 disclosure,
 copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
 reliance
 on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
 addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank
 you. 
 ___
 Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
 Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
 https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
 Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may

Help with multipath failover

2010-03-31 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Im connecting a PE2850 to a Equalogic SAN, using multipath. I have a PCI NIC 
with one connection to the SAN and one from the onboard controller too. The SAN 
is ona  different network, and is at IP 10.10.20.10.

Here is the output from the multipath -ll
[r...@ccvobtest2850 ~]# multipath -ll
DubSanGrp01VolCC (36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6) dm-18 EQLOGIC,100E-00
[size=500G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled]
 \_ 3:0:0:0 sdc 8:32  [active][ready]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled]
 \_ 4:0:0:0 sdd 8:48  [active][ready]



And here is the multipath.conf:
[r...@ccvobtest2850 ~]# cat /etc/multipath.conf
## Use user friendly names, instead of using WWIDs as names.
defaults {
user_friendly_names yes
}
blacklist {
#   wwid 26353900f02796769
#   devnode ^(ram|raw|loop|fd|md|dm-|sr|scd|st)[0-9]*
#   devnode ^hd[a-z]
#devnode ^sd[a-b]
}
multipaths {
multipath {
wwid36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6
alias   DubSanGrp01VolCC
}
}
devices {
device {
vendor EQLOGIC
product 100E-00
path_grouping_policy failover
getuid_callout /sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n
features 1 queue_if_no_path
path_checker readsector0
failback immediate
path_selector round-robin 0
rr_min_io 10
rr_weight priorities
}
}


However when I unplug the cable to eth1, it doesn't failover. I am testing with 
a ping to the SAN at 10.10.20.10. As Im pretty new to all this, was wondering 
if anyone has any pointers on where I am going wrong.

Thanks
Brian




The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

Re: Help with multipath failover

2010-03-31 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Ping to san ip and yanking a cable

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


- Original Message -
From: Charles Riley cri...@erad.com
To: Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Wed Mar 31 18:34:12 2010
Subject: Re: Help with multipath failover

How are you determining that it doesn't fail over?

Charles Riley
eRAD, Inc.


- Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:

 Im connecting a PE2850 to a Equalogic SAN, using multipath. I have a
 PCI NIC with one connection to the SAN and one from the onboard
 controller too. The SAN is ona different network, and is at IP
 10.10.20.10.
 
 
 
 Here is the output from the multipath –ll
 
 [r...@ccvobtest2850 ~]# multipath -ll
 
 DubSanGrp01VolCC (36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6) dm-18
 EQLOGIC,100E-00
 
 [size=500G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
 
 \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled]
 
 \_ 3:0:0:0 sdc 8:32 [active][ready]
 
 \_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][enabled]
 
 \_ 4:0:0:0 sdd 8:48 [active][ready]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 And here is the multipath.conf:
 
 [r...@ccvobtest2850 ~]# cat /etc/multipath.conf
 
 ## Use user friendly names, instead of using WWIDs as names.
 
 defaults {
 
 user_friendly_names yes
 
 }
 
 blacklist {
 
 # wwid 26353900f02796769
 
 # devnode ^(ram|raw|loop|fd|md|dm-|sr|scd|st)[0-9]*
 
 # devnode ^hd[a-z]
 
 # devnode ^sd[a-b]
 
 }
 
 multipaths {
 
 multipath {
 
 wwid 36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6
 
 alias DubSanGrp01VolCC
 
 }
 
 }
 
 devices {
 
 device {
 
 vendor EQLOGIC
 
 product 100E-00
 
 path_grouping_policy failover
 
 getuid_callout /sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n
 
 features 1 queue_if_no_path
 
 path_checker readsector0
 
 failback immediate
 
 path_selector round-robin 0
 
 rr_min_io 10
 
 rr_weight priorities
 
 }
 
 }
 
 
 
 
 
 However when I unplug the cable to eth1, it doesn’t failover. I am
 testing with a ping to the SAN at 10.10.20.10. As Im pretty new to all
 this, was wondering if anyone has any pointers on where I am going
 wrong.
 
 
 
 Thanks
 
 Brian
 
 
 
 The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
 privileged.
 It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by
 anyone else
 is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
 disclosure,
 copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
 reliance
 on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
 addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank
 you. 
 ___
 Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
 Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
 https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
 Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

Multipathing on PE2850 RHEL5.4

2010-03-26 Thread Brian O'Mahony
I have a PE2850 with two connections to the SAN, with multipathing set up:

[r...@ccvobtest2850 network-scripts]# multipath -ll
DubSanGrp01VolCC (36090a048d03f308d51b1f47c30a6) dm-18 EQLOGIC,100E-00
[size=500G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=2][active]
 \_ 3:0:0:0 sdc 8:32  [active][ready]
 \_ 4:0:0:0 sdd 8:48  [active][ready]

My connections to the san are eth1 and eth2

When I ifdown eth2, both paths stay up. However if I ifdown eth1, one path goes 
down and the other stays up. If I *then* down eth2 it goes down also.

Any ideas why this may be happening? Seems a bit weird


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: RHEL 5.3 Multipathing question

2010-02-23 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Was able to convince the department to go to RHEL5.4 and let them deal with 
updating clearcase due to this:

When more than 64 MPIO paths are established, system suffers a kernel panic.

See bugfix;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497411

And RH's advisory notice;
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html

-Original Message-
From: Eugene Vilensky [mailto:evilen...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:52 PM
To: Brian O'Mahony
Cc: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: Re: RHEL 5.3  Multipathing question

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Brian O'Mahony
brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:

 If this is the case I am going to have to get the department this server is 
 for to go back through their testing process of the software they are using 
 etc, which will probably knock us back two weeks +

 Does anyone have any documentation on this issue?

The wording of the report suggest that this is a general
recommendation.  Unlike their previous  5.2 recommendation, this
one does not link to a Bugzilla bug or the like.  You could try
opening an EQL case asking to clarify the situation.  I would also
like to know.

There are a few iSCSI enancements in the 5.4 release notes, but they
seem to be mostly HBA driver related.

-Eugene


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


RHEL 5.3 Multipathing question

2010-02-17 Thread Brian O'Mahony
I am setting up a RHEL5.3 machine connected to an iSCSI SAN (PS6000). The 
machine is a PE2850. I have two onboard network ports and an Intel NIC with two 
ports. One from each is connected to our lan, and the other on each is 
connected to our SAN network, which is segregated from everything else.

This is my first time setting up access for something with fault tolerance 
(previously it was all just for testbeds etc). I *had* originally set up the 
two SAN nics as a bond with the failover set to active-passive.

As I was reading more documentation, I came across multipathing, and I am 
wondering if it is needed in my case. The machine is going to be the only 
machine connected to the LUN presented by the PS6000. The LUN is 500Gb, and 
this will be chopped down further using the OS (either ext3 or ext4) into 
10x50Gb logical volumes.

Is multipath really needed and/or necessary in this case? Why?

I9m looking at setting it up anyways, but im in a bit of a rush and would 
rather not put things I don't fully understand on a production box.

Thx

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: Reverse DNS lookup syslog (Debian 4.0)

2010-02-16 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Not my call. Network engineers won't even entertain the idea.

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Jefferson Ogata
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:52 AM
To: linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS lookup  syslog (Debian 4.0)

On 2010-02-15 10:22, Brian O'Mahony wrote:
 Not possible with 600+ machines in different locations around the world. MAC 
 reservations for clients is not an option here.

Only 600+? Of course it's possible. The only legitimate reason to use
non-static assignment is if you don't have enough address space for your
devices and they need to take turns.

Not knowing what devices are attaching to your networks gives you
exactly the sort of problem you're currently trying to find a kluge for,
and invites unwelcome guests on your network.

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


RE: Reverse DNS lookup syslog (Debian 4.0)

2010-02-15 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Not possible with 600+ machines in different locations around the world. MAC 
reservations for clients is not an option here.

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Jefferson Ogata
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 11:10 PM
To: linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS lookup  syslog (Debian 4.0)

On 2010-02-12 14:58, Brian O'Mahony wrote:
 As our domain use DHCP for the windows clients, when I go back a few 
 days later, the syslog entries are close to useless to mea s the IP may 
 have changed. How do I get syslog to log the hostname of the connecting 
 machine?

Your real problem is that you are using DHCP to assign addresses from a 
pool. Reserve your IPs to MAC addresses so that machines don't change 
IPs and you've solved both problems.

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


RE: Reverse DNS lookup syslog (Debian 4.0)

2010-02-15 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Correct me if im wrong, but the way I understood it was:

Client connects to server, asks server to run application running on port 2401 
{cvspserver}. Syslogd traps this request with an entry to syslog with the 
connect string. Simultaneously to this request logging, runcvs kicks off the 
actual cvs binary with its settings.

How would the runcvs be generating the entry, and if that *is* the case how do 
I change it to catch the machine name?

Thanks

B

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Pavel Mateja
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 10:57 AM
To: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS lookup  syslog (Debian 4.0)

 Im running Debian 4.0 on a number of PowerEdge servers here and I am having
  some issues with syslog. These machines run various applications. In this
  case ill take cvs. When a remote machine connects to cvs I get : Feb 12
  14:54:04 buzz runcvs[1533]: connect from 172.16.165.144 (172.16.165.144)

I guess connect from 172.16.165.144 (172.16.165.144) is generated by runcvs 
not syslog nor syslog-ng. You have to force runcvs to do the lookup.
-- 
Pavel Mateja

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


RE: Reverse DNS lookup syslog (Debian 4.0)

2010-02-12 Thread Brian O'Mahony
FYI all runcvs has is :

menasor:/etc# cat /usr/local/bin/runcvs
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/cvs \
-T /cvs/tmp \
--allow-root=/cvs/AppDev \
--allow-root=/cvs1/Temp \
pserver

So I don't think it's the service that is being called either...

From: Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 3:25 PM
To: 'Todd LaPittus'
Cc: linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: RE: Reverse DNS lookup  syslog (Debian 4.0)

Tried use_dns - no change.

Also I have Debian 3.0 and 4.0 servers that I can't upgrade. Some internal 
legacy software that no one is willing to rewrite only runs on specific version 
of CVS... :(

B

From: Todd LaPittus [mailto:t...@lapittus.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 3:15 PM
To: Brian O'Mahony
Cc: linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS lookup  syslog (Debian 4.0)

For syslog-ng, try this directive:

use_dns(yes|no);

Also, you might consider doing a dist-upgrade to lenny on your etch boxes- 
security support for etch officially ends this Monday:

http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100121

//Todd

Brian O'Mahony wrote:
Im running Debian 4.0 on a number of PowerEdge servers here and I am having 
some issues with syslog. These machines run various applications. In this case 
ill take cvs. When a remote machine connects to cvs I get :
Feb 12 14:54:04 buzz runcvs[1533]: connect from 172.16.165.144 (172.16.165.144)

The machines are all pretty much just basic installs of Debian, with 
resolve.conf pointed at windows DNS servers.  When I do an nslookup of the IP:

buzz:~# nslookup 172.16.165.144
Server: 172.16.164.100
Address:172.16.164.100#53

144.165.16.172.in-addr.arpa name = galvin.X.com.

As our domain use DHCP for the windows clients, when I go back a few days 
later, the syslog entries are close to useless to mea s the IP may have 
changed. How do I get syslog to log the hostname of the connecting machine?

I have tried syslog-ng (albeit I didn't change many parameters) but to the same 
effect. I still get the IPs of the connecting machine.

Any ideas?

B



The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance

on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.























___

Linux-PowerEdge mailing list

Linux-PowerEdge@dell.commailto:Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com

https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge

Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: Third-party drives not permitted on Gen 11 servers

2010-02-10 Thread Brian O'Mahony
 Reminds me of my campus' IT urban folklore about the memory upgrade in an 
old GX360 big iron that used to run here - where IBM sold campus the upgrade 
and sent a team to flip the DIP switch to ENABLE it since it was already 
installed... this is just as predatory.

Have a IBM Z890 here and that's the case. In our case they didn't even send an 
engineer or team, they did it remotely through its dial home feature...

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Doug Simmons
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 3:36 AM
To: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: RE: Third-party drives not permitted on Gen 11 servers

Holy crap. Dell's gone IBM on us! I don't want to see this happen. Dell, are 
you listening?
sigh
Reminds me of my campus' IT urban folklore about the memory upgrade in an old 
GX360 big iron that used to run here - where IBM sold campus the upgrade and 
sent a team to flip the DIP switch to ENABLE it since it was already 
installed... this is just as predatory.
 
And I just got a rackfull of R710's
 
Doug I hate computers Simmons
SIUC
 



From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com on behalf of Steve Thompson
Sent: Sat 2/6/2010 4:37 PM
To: Robin Bowes
Cc: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: Re: Third-party drives not permitted on Gen 11 servers



On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Robin Bowes wrote:

 Where did you see the caddies available?

In addition to discount technology, as someone else mentioned, I have
bought them from:

http://www.servernexus.com/proddetail.php?prod=F9541

http://www.scsitray.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=105

Steve

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq



___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


RE: Warranty or?

2010-01-22 Thread Brian O'Mahony
I also tell them that it's a production server that we cannot afford to bring 
down / interfere with (which they generally are tbf)

B

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Rahul Nabar
Sent: 21 January 2010 22:50
To: Chase Bolt
Cc: linux-poweredge@dell.com; Dr A V Le Blanc
Subject: Re: Warranty or?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Chase Bolt cb...@datinggold.com wrote:
 I just humor them, call back 30 minutes later and tell them you did what
 they asked. Or if it is quick I just put them on hold, go get something
 to drink and then tell them it is complete with no change. They are
 probably just some low level techs reading off questions and responses
 from their screen.

+1 for Chase.

In addition options that work: contact your sales team.

What power edge model are you talking about?

-- 
Rahul

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


Re: Further SAN issues with RHEL4 Equalogic SAN

2009-12-08 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Thanks for the input Matthew. I was assuming that was what the case was. 

B

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


- Original Message -
From: Matthew Geier matt...@acfr.usyd.edu.au
To: Brian O'Mahony; linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com 
linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Sent: Tue Dec 08 01:00:00 2009
Subject: Re: Further SAN issues with RHEL4  Equalogic SAN

Brian O'Mahony wrote:
 Eugene

 Thanks for the pointer. Changed the mount to _netdev and it came up (there 
 was a lot of login errors on the screen, but eventually it logged in 
 successfully)

   
I get that with my MD3000i. The iSCSI daemon tries to log into the 
storage before the network interfaces all come up. After a couple of 
retries, it finds the route available and the login succeeds.





The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


Further SAN issues with RHEL4 Equalogic SAN

2009-12-07 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Im having further issues with the test box I have connected to the SAN.

I have assigned 500Gb of space to my PE2850. I have the SAN on a separate 
network, and after installing the iSCSI initiator, I can see the device

***
SFNet iSCSI Driver Version ...4:0.1.11-6(03-Aug-2007)
***
TARGET NAME : 
iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:0-8a0906-8d303fd04-a6307cf4b151-dubsangrp01volcc
TARGET ALIAS: DubSanGrp01VolCC
HOST ID : 7
BUS ID  : 0
TARGET ID   : 0
TARGET ADDRESS  : 10.10.10.20:3260,1
SESSION STATUS  : ESTABLISHED AT Mon Dec  7 14:16:19 GMT 2009
SESSION ID  : ISID 00023d01 TSIH bd

I then put a volume group (called SAN) of the full 500Gb on the device, and 
created a 90Gb logical volume, which I was able to write with an ext3 FS and 
mounted it.

When I rebooted the system hung on boot saying it could not find 
/dev/SAN/cc_san_lv01, I edited the fstab, and brought the system up. Sure 
enough /dev/SAN was missing. I created a second volume, cc_san_lv02, and once 
again on reboot the /dev/SAN is gone.

Why is it getting dropped on reboot?

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: Further SAN issues with RHEL4 Equalogic SAN

2009-12-07 Thread Brian O'Mahony
I forgot to mention that the created volumes show in the system-config-lvm 
screen. They show up with no filesystem in properties and when I try to format 
them, the complain that the device is missing.

From: Brian O'Mahony
Sent: 07 December 2009 14:38
Subject: Further SAN issues with RHEL4  Equalogic SAN

Im having further issues with the test box I have connected to the SAN.

I have assigned 500Gb of space to my PE2850. I have the SAN on a separate 
network, and after installing the iSCSI initiator, I can see the device

***
SFNet iSCSI Driver Version ...4:0.1.11-6(03-Aug-2007)
***
TARGET NAME : 
iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:0-8a0906-8d303fd04-a6307cf4b151-dubsangrp01volcc
TARGET ALIAS: DubSanGrp01VolCC
HOST ID : 7
BUS ID  : 0
TARGET ID   : 0
TARGET ADDRESS  : 10.10.10.20:3260,1
SESSION STATUS  : ESTABLISHED AT Mon Dec  7 14:16:19 GMT 2009
SESSION ID  : ISID 00023d01 TSIH bd

I then put a volume group (called SAN) of the full 500Gb on the device, and 
created a 90Gb logical volume, which I was able to write with an ext3 FS and 
mounted it.

When I rebooted the system hung on boot saying it could not find 
/dev/SAN/cc_san_lv01, I edited the fstab, and brought the system up. Sure 
enough /dev/SAN was missing. I created a second volume, cc_san_lv02, and once 
again on reboot the /dev/SAN is gone.

Why is it getting dropped on reboot?

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

Dell Equallogic SAN and RHEL4u6

2009-12-04 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Connecting up a rhel4u6 box to one of the SANs here and im seeing some issues 
with authentication.

If I disable chap, and allow connections from the pe2850 im using ofr testing, 
everything is fine, and I can see the disk and create logical volumes, 
filesystems, mount etc.

My problem is once I enable chap.

Here is the iscsi.conf:

DiscoveryAddress=10.10.10.10
OutgoingUsername=chap1
OutgoingPassword=xxx
LoginTimeout=15

I get the following error on the Equalogic Events log:

ERROR event from storage array PS6000DUB01
subsystem: MgmtExec
event: 7.4.3
 time: Thu Dec  3 15:39:36 2009

iSCSI login to target '10.10.10.20:3260,
iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:0-8a0906-8d303fd04-a6307cf4b151-dubsangrp01volcc'
from initiator '10.10.10.33:32861, iqn.1987-05.com.cisco:01.d060fab7a4a9'
failed for the following reason:
Initiator tried to bypass the security phase but we cannot.


I don't understand why its trying to bypass security - anyone got an idea for 
me?

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: Dell Equallogic SAN and RHEL4u6

2009-12-04 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Will look it up. Google didn't return anything except an issue with HP blades.

Thanks for the info.

B

 

This is a known error, and there is a KB article for this in the
Equallogic Support pages. Do a search for Initiator tried to bypass
the security phase but we cannot. on 

The solution is to restrict discovery of volumes that need chap
authentication by IP-Address ACL as well.


 I don't understand why its trying to bypass security - anyone got an
 idea for me?
 
 B
 



The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


NICs in RHEL / PE2850

2009-12-02 Thread Brian O'Mahony
I am setting up a 2850 to do some testing for moving our code repositories over 
to SAN storage. I have a pe2850 with two onboard NICs and a dual port PCI nic. 
All four ports are coming up as Intel e1000 ports. Is there any way of telling 
from inside the OS which exact port eth0,1,2,3 actually are? Ive seen RHEL 
change port around before, and I was just wondering how to check which 
interface corresponds to which physical port, as this will probably be 
important when we implement it.

On another note, has anyone got any suggestions on how to keep memory usage at 
about 80% while doing benchmark tests? I want to compare the read/write speed 
of local vs SAN storage, while the machines are in use. However the chances of 
getting to do it in the live environment are zero. If I can keep the memory 
usage at about 85% [cpu load is about .4 so is pretty negligible] I would have 
some data to look at.


Thanks

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

RE: NICs in RHEL / PE2850

2009-12-02 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Thanks Ben, will have a look at this. Actually using Openmanage for now as it 
has the details in there, but this wont always be an option.

-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com 
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Ben
Sent: 02 December 2009 10:46
Cc: linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: Re: NICs in RHEL / PE2850

On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Brian O'Mahony wrote:

 I am setting up a 2850 to do some testing for moving our code repositories 
 over to SAN storage. I have a pe2850 with two onboard NICs and a dual port 
 PCI nic. All four ports are coming up as Intel e1000 ports. Is there any 
 way of telling from inside the OS which exact port eth0,1,2,3 actually 
 are? Ive seen RHEL change port around before, and I was just wondering how 
 to check which interface corresponds to which physical port, as this will 
 probably be important when we implement it.

ethtool -p|--blink|--identify ethX is your friend.

Ben
-- 
Unix Support, MISD, University of Cambridge, England
Plugger of wire, typer of keyboard, imparter of Clue
 Life Is Short.  It's All Good.

___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq


OT: PE2850 Split Backplane

2009-11-30 Thread Brian O'Mahony
Sorry this is OT, but I cant find an answer on google.

I have a remote PE2850, with a split backplane. I need to reinstall this 
machine, but don't have anyone on site to take the daughter card out. Can this 
be done through the BIOS / PERC Controller BIOS?

Regards

B


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq

Machine Check Exception on a 6600

2009-10-28 Thread Brian O'Mahony
This morning (about 10:58) we had a Kernel Panic on our production CVS server. 
The errors were

CPU4: Machine Check Exception 0004
CPU5: Machine Check Exception 0004
Bank0: 135
Bank1: 135
Bank2: 135

Kernel Panic - not syncing : CPU context corrupt


The machine was hard locked and I needed to hold down the power button to 
reboot it. On reboot it checked the drives (uptime had been about 300days +) 
and after a while everything came up fine.

The system is running Debian 4. Everything in Server Administrator is green. No 
errors logged from that time. Doesn't seem to be anything in /var/logs either.

Any suggestions on what *might* be the cause. Im going to run diags when I get 
a chance. However I don't want to run them while developers are working (they 
have a scheduled release Friday) in case they manage to knock theCPU off again.

Regards
B



The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq