Re: Enscript question: Making page colored
I hope you found it useful.
A knowledge of enscript and postscript have been very helpful to me in
various situations, like printer problems and formatting problems.
Knowing postscript is like knowing html. There are editors around to
generate html for you, but, getting under the hood is important.
Joel
Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Joel Hammer:
\shade{val}
I tried this and didn't quite get what I wanted. So, I went back to
I'm not surprised. No Postscript coder am I.
basics (really) and read the first chapter about postscript again and
then looked at the postscript which enscript generates. There is a Box
routine generated in enscript's standard postscript output, so, this text
file gives a nice blue page on which are displayed two small pictures
(jpg's) side by side (converted to encapsulated postscript by convert).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 1 setrgbcolor 5 5 500 760 Box fill grestore}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] n ]{junk1.epsi}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] x3i y-1]{junk2.epsi}
Excellent stuff, Joel. Thanks!
enscript is run with this command:
enscript -o junk.ps junk.txt -e
If you want to get this to work, of course, you have to generate the
control code for zero, not the two characters [EMAIL PROTECTED] On my keyboard [cntrl v][0]
(followed by your next character or space) works. At least in vi in insert
mode.
Kurt
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (application.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- See the attached file for details DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
RedHatters, I have installed RH9.0 and the kernel-source*.rpm When I cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.x and run make oldconfig or cp /boot/config-2.4.x to /usr/src/linux-2.4.x/.config use `make xconfig' to add ntfs filesystem support and run `make dep bzImage modules' It fails every time with compile errors However downloading the latest 2.4.22 source and compiling it using the /boot/config-2.4.x file with just ntfs support enabled works. Can anyone tell me if they have successfully compiled the default RH source or is it just there to add 30MB+ to the system? -- James McDonald Systems Engineer Singleton NSW Australia ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
James McDonald wrote: RedHatters, I have installed RH9.0 and the kernel-source*.rpm When I cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.x and run make oldconfig or cp /boot/config-2.4.x to /usr/src/linux-2.4.x/.config use `make xconfig' to add ntfs filesystem support and run `make dep bzImage modules' It fails every time with compile errors However downloading the latest 2.4.22 source and compiling it using the /boot/config-2.4.x file with just ntfs support enabled works. Can anyone tell me if they have successfully compiled the default RH source or is it just there to add 30MB+ to the system? I'd guess the compiler conflict is rearing it's ugly head. Maybe the stock source is for gcc-3.2 or 2.95, and the new source is compatible with 3.3, and you are using 3.3. Just a guess. I don't use redhat, but the kernel compile problems I've heard about lately have involved the compiler. You can change the link (/usr/bin/gcc) to point to an older one to compile older source. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (your_details.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: linux-users list passing on virii
For what it's worth - I haven't got one from the list. And I don't think I missed any messages. -jhb- From: Gerry Doris [EMAIL PROTECTED] For what it's worth I sent a virus passed to me through this mailing list to Antony Stone on the MailScanner list. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable mail: Re: That movie
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports: account is full (quota exceeded) Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: LOCAL; Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Received: from [64.222.177.246] (HELO NETSERVER) by freemail.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4) with ESMTP id 2171755 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:44:23 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 0:01:32 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_003476AA Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (thank_you.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (movie0045.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (movie0045.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
James McDonald wrote: RedHatters, I have installed RH9.0 and the kernel-source*.rpm When I cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.x and run make oldconfig or cp /boot/config-2.4.x to /usr/src/linux-2.4.x/.config use `make xconfig' to add ntfs filesystem support and run `make dep bzImage modules' It fails every time with compile errors However downloading the latest 2.4.22 source and compiling it using the /boot/config-2.4.x file with just ntfs support enabled works. Can anyone tell me if they have successfully compiled the default RH source or is it just there to add 30MB+ to the system? Have you installed the RH supplied kernel headers? As I recall, RH doesn't install them on install, you have to do by hand. I can't remember if their in the first installation CD, or the Source CD's. HTH. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
I'd guess the compiler conflict is rearing it's ugly head. Maybe the stock source is for gcc-3.2 or 2.95, and the new source is compatible with 3.3, and you are using 3.3. Just a guess. I don't use redhat, but the kernel compile problems I've heard about lately have involved the compiler. You can change the link (/usr/bin/gcc) to point to an older one to compile older source. I have the standard install that came with RH9.0 of the compilors installed. So from what you say it's probably what the issue is. I am assuming that the `default' is gcc-3.2 or greater and that is what it uses. But the the kernel source need to be compiled using gcc-2.9x. I will test this theory. Thanks -- James McDonald Systems Engineer Singleton NSW Australia ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Why Microsoft has to go ...
Where do you think 90% of the ideas that now make up Windows came from? CASE method of programming... Copy and Steal Everything... I wonder how many companies lift algorithms straight out of OSS code and put it in their applications? -- James McDonald Systems Engineer Singleton NSW Australia ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (document_9446.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (application.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: More SCO Humor
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:32:54 -0700 Tom Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 31 August 2003 14:16, Kurt Wall carved in granite: Excellent! But I have to wonder about the cubicle picture - what happens if someone in the middle of a row suddenly has to go to the loo *really* bad? Pee in a cup? Which solves both the speed problem and the drug testing problem at once. This looks distinctly like Sundstrand when I worked there. You get in 5 minutes of real work, then you start heading for the can. By the time you get back to your desk you can work for another 5 minutes before it is time to start out again... ;-}) And then they wonder why you don't get enough work done for the optimistic schedule they sold to the customers. We used to use Sundstrand accelerometers. We liked them. Still do. I think Sundstrand actually OEM'd them, so when Sundstrand went belly up, we were lucky to not loose our supply. I have never actually come across anyone who worked there. Life is full of new experiences! -- ++···+ · Roger Oberholtzer · E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]· · OPQ Systems AB · WWW: http://www.opq.se/ · · Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 ·Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 · · 115 34 Stockholm · Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 · · Sweden · Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 · ++···+ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (document_all.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable Mail
Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.177.246] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AE0D63C00D0; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:51:57 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Your application Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 3:19:50 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_00EA0220 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_00EA0220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_00EA0220 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_details.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_details.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at plesk.rackshack.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This address no longer accepts mail. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 20937 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2003 05:15:38 - Received: from pool-64-222-177-246.man.east.verizon.net (HELO NETSERVER) (64.222.177.246) by 207.44.232.100 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 05:15:38 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: My details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 5:12:32 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_0151337C This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0151337C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_0151337C Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=application.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=application.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (application.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment movie0045.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by mars.zusket.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19u6Pe-00061r-DA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 02:21:19 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: My details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 4:25:04 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_0125B554 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0125B554 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_0125B554 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (movie0045.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment movie0045.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by server20.general23.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19u8I7-0001e1-7U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:21:40 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: My details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 6:25:26 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_0193F18B Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_0193F18B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_0193F18B Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (movie0045.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Why Microsoft has to go ...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 01:47, James McDonald wrote: I wonder how many companies lift algorithms straight out of OSS code and put it in their applications? Do you mean aside from SCO? Linux Personality KernelTM -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
Tom Marinis wrote: James McDonald wrote: RedHatters, I have installed RH9.0 and the kernel-source*.rpm When I cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.x and run make oldconfig or cp /boot/config-2.4.x to /usr/src/linux-2.4.x/.config use `make xconfig' to add ntfs filesystem support and run `make dep bzImage modules' It fails every time with compile errors However downloading the latest 2.4.22 source and compiling it using the /boot/config-2.4.x file with just ntfs support enabled works. Can anyone tell me if they have successfully compiled the default RH source or is it just there to add 30MB+ to the system? Have you installed the RH supplied kernel headers? As I recall, RH doesn't install them on install, you have to do by hand. I can't remember if their in the first installation CD, or the Source CD's. To be honest with you I don't understand what you mean by kernel headers if you mean the stuff that is located (symlinked back to the source) in the following dir yes it's there /lib/modules/2.4.20-8/build/ if you don't, then please explain after 4 yrs I am still a newbie sometimes. -- James McDonald (Would you like fries with that MCSE?) Singleton Australia 61+ (0)2 65712401 61+ 0428 320 219 20:25:00 up 22:49, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Linux 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 20:03:11 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment movie0045.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by server20.general23.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19u9Fj-0002jN-0i for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:23:17 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 7:26:59 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_01CC5825 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_01CC5825 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_01CC5825 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (movie0045.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- Please see the attached file for details. DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: linux-users list passing on virii
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 22:45:15 -0500 Jack Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth - I haven't got one from the list. And I don't think I missed any messages. We could always forward our copies to you. grin -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at plesk.rackshack.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This address no longer accepts mail. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23312 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2003 08:13:59 - Received: from pool-64-222-177-246.man.east.verizon.net (HELO NETSERVER) (64.222.177.246) by 207.44.232.100 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 08:13:59 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wicked screensaver Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 8:10:52 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_01F473A9 This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_01F473A9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_01F473A9 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=application.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=application.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (application.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: linux-users list passing on virii
On 9/2/2003 8:12 AM, someone claiming to be Collins Richey wrote: On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 22:45:15 -0500 Jack Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth - I haven't got one from the list. And I don't think I missed any messages. We could always forward our copies to you. grin But isn't it *really* just passing on failure notices of undeliverable virii? Some of which have the virii still attached. Can't the failure notices get filtered out? Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
delivery failures
Might it be possible for the list software to drop these at source, if it's not too much trouble ( just got a dozen at over 100k ea plus some teenies :)? R -- http://www.quen.net Fix reason firmly in her seat and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there is one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear. --Thomas Jefferson ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Returned mail
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot route mail to user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). ---BeginMessage--- See the attached file for details DELETED0.TXT Description: plain/text ---End Message--- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, James McDonald wrote: Tom Marinis wrote: James McDonald wrote: RedHatters, I have installed RH9.0 and the kernel-source*.rpm When I cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.x and run make oldconfig or cp /boot/config-2.4.x to /usr/src/linux-2.4.x/.config use `make xconfig' to add ntfs filesystem support and run `make dep bzImage modules' It fails every time with compile errors However downloading the latest 2.4.22 source and compiling it using the /boot/config-2.4.x file with just ntfs support enabled works. Can anyone tell me if they have successfully compiled the default RH source or is it just there to add 30MB+ to the system? Have you installed the RH supplied kernel headers? As I recall, RH doesn't install them on install, you have to do by hand. I can't remember if their in the first installation CD, or the Source CD's. To be honest with you I don't understand what you mean by kernel headers if you mean the stuff that is located (symlinked back to the source) in the following dir yes it's there /lib/modules/2.4.20-8/build/ if you don't, then please explain after 4 yrs I am still a newbie sometimes. It might help us to help you if you actually provided the errors you're experiencing so that we werent' fumbling in the dark trying to diagnose a problem that has no symptoms. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at plesk.rackshack.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This address no longer accepts mail. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 24969 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2003 09:35:54 - Received: from pool-64-222-177-246.man.east.verizon.net (HELO NETSERVER) (64.222.177.246) by 207.44.232.100 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 09:35:54 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 9:32:44 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_023F6C69 This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_023F6C69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_023F6C69 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=movie0045.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=movie0045.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (movie0045.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment your_document.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by smack.trouble-free.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uBTx-hl-J8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:46:06 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 9:49:53 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_024F1C38 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_024F1C38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_024F1C38 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_document.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_document.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (your_document.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (your_document.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially executable attachment your_document.pif This form of attachment has been used by recent viruses or other malware. If you meant to send this file then please package it up as a zip file and resend it. -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [64.222.177.246] (helo=NETSERVER) by smack.trouble-free.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uByU-00052e-QO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:17:39 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Approved Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:21:28 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_026C0085 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_026C0085 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please see the attached file for details. --_NextPart_000_026C0085 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=your_document.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=your_document.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
ADMIN: Email blocking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, Road Runner has joined the ever-growing list of ISPs who seem to think that disallowing mail from DHCP-assigned hosts is the Right Way to deal with sPAM. I've since worked around the issue (same as I did for AOL). If anyone notices that mail from this list suddenly stops showing up in your inbox, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll try to work around whatever filtering is taking place. Thanks. - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at linux-sxs.org) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org And I know better than most that what I envisionsed 10 years ago has _nothing_ in common with what Linux is today. There was certainly no premeditated design there. - Linus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VLJq2MO5UukaubkRAjMuAJ0X+G8qEJE0+sFDWEC4/ZydxC0E9QCghCyT M+Ruh7mhwehlS5IG4JQDBY8= =ralt -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
I have two directory heirarchies under /usr/src: /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.21-4 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.21-4 which are installed from seperate packages. The header files are text files with a suffice '.h' that provide variable and function definitions for inclusion into program source files. cmr On Tuesday 02 September 2003 05:30 am, you wrote: To be honest with you I don't understand what you mean by kernel headers if you mean the stuff that is located (symlinked back to the source) in the following dir yes it's there /lib/modules/2.4.20-8/build/ if you don't, then please explain after 4 yrs I am still a newbie sometimes. -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Undeliverable Mail
Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.177.246] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AE648E200D8; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:51:16 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:19:08 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=thank_you.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=thank_you.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Duplicate Posts
Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy from the list server, myself. I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according to my sent-mail file, I only made this post once. I'm curious as to why this is happening. Especially, as to whether something is mis-configured on my end. Thanks, cmr -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Duplicate Posts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Reinehr wrote: | Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 | /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy | from the list server, myself. | | I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according to my sent-mail | file, I only made this post once. | | I'm curious as to why this is happening. Especially, as to whether something | is mis-configured on my end. | | Thanks, | | cmr [...] Not here, just one copy. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 9:47am up 143 days, 18:36, 22 users, load average: 0.24, 0.23, 0.27 - - Hollywood is where if you don't have happiness you send out for it. -- Rex Reed -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/VLvOejAu2RVHwF4RAsc3AJ9hyLYiWg1cIS2s+s9RcYqygM9c9wCfd5yX rjuFIX9juKpvpw2a3ivloVo= =zT4Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? Harry G On Tue September 2 2003 10:51 am, Postmaster wrote: Delivery failed 1 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.177.246] by dpmail02.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AE648E200D8; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:51:16 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:19:08 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_02A0DC42 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=thank_you.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=thank_you.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQ AAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TI G1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl 8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQR QAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQA AAA AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAE BAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgAA AAA A AAA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAA MAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABA AAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgAA AAA AEAAAMAAA AAA A AAA A AAA [message truncated] Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service! Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
tool for managing projects
Would you please let me know some tool for mamaging projects ? Of course, that tool needs to run on Linux or Unix :-) Thanks, Vu ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (wicked_scr.scr) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender The file mime001.txt (wicked_scr.scr) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Duplicate Posts
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003, Mike Reinehr wrote: Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy from the list server, myself. I found one in my spam/duplicates mail folder this morning, but nuked it so don't have headers to examine. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc. UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys -- P.J. O'Rourke ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Duplicate Posts
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:31 am, Mike Reinehr wrote: Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy from the list server, myself. I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according to my sent-mail file, I only made this post once. I'm curious as to why this is happening. Especially, as to whether something is mis-configured on my end. I got duplicates of your msg and about two others Happens from time to time. Thanks, cmr -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ++ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 09/02/03 11:57 + ++ Always borrow from a pessimist-- he never expects it back. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: linux-users list passing on virii@earthlink.net
Tim Wunder wrote: But isn't it *really* just passing on failure notices of undeliverable virii? Some of which have the virii still attached. Can't the failure notices get filtered out? Tim I am getting these with the digest. I will have to unsubscribe until they are filtered out. I only have dial-up, and they are clogging my mail. I'd appreciate it if you (Tim) would send me a private post when this gets cleaned up. Au revoir. -- Leon A. Goldstein Powered by Libranet 2.8 Debian System G2 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: tool for managing projects
sf.net? gforge? what kind of project, and what are you looking to manage? On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, vu pham wrote: Would you please let me know some tool for mamaging projects ? Of course, that tool needs to run on Linux or Unix :-) Thanks, Vu ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Duplicate Posts
Thanks! At least I know now that it's not just an echo bouncing back to me. cmr On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:57 am, you wrote: On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:31 am, Mike Reinehr wrote: Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy from the list server, myself. I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according to my sent-mail file, I only made this post once. I'm curious as to why this is happening. Especially, as to whether something is mis-configured on my end. I got duplicates of your msg and about two others Happens from time to time. Thanks, cmr -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: tool for managing projects
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003, Net Llama! wrote: sf.net? gforge? what kind of project, and what are you looking to manage? SuSE 8.2 Professional comes with mrproject. I've looked at it very briefly so can't say how good it is. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``When dealing with any spammer, one must always keep in mind that you are dealing with someone who makes their living through forgery, fraud, theft, subterfuge and obfuscation. Stated simply, spammers lie.'' David Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: Email blocking
Douglas J Hunley wrote: Well, Road Runner has joined the ever-growing list of ISPs who seem to think that disallowing mail from DHCP-assigned hosts is the Right Way to deal with sPAM. I've since worked around the issue (same as I did for AOL). If anyone notices that mail from this list suddenly stops showing up in your inbox, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll try to work around whatever filtering is taking place. Thanks. FWIW, I received this mail and your other recent one (Upcoming downtime) with a duplicate. Klaus ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at plesk.rackshack.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This address no longer accepts mail. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 27727 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2003 12:48:42 - Received: from pool-64-222-177-246.man.east.verizon.net (HELO NETSERVER) (64.222.177.246) by 207.44.232.100 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 12:48:42 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Details Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:45:30 --0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_02EFE615 This is a multipart message in MIME format --_NextPart_000_02EFE615 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached file for details --_NextPart_000_02EFE615 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=document_9446.pif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=document_9446.pif TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA 4A4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v ZGUuDQ0KJADToEjPl8EmnJfBJpyXwSacFN0onI3BJpx/3iyc7cEmnMHeNZyawSacl8Em nJTBJpyXwSecBsEmnPXeNZyawSacf94tnI3BJpxSaWNol8EmnABQRQAA TAEEAF2zPz8AAOAADwELAQYAAABw1usBAAAQYAEAAABQ AgAABAAEAgAAEAAAF/EBAAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAA AOLrAQCcfuwBAAgA AAAgAC5zaHJpbmsAAFABAAAQxBAAAEAAAMAu c2hyaW5rAAAwYAEAABIAAADUAABAAADALnNocmluawAAQJABAAAS 5gAAQAAAwC5zaHJpbmsAADDQAQAAIgAAAPgA AEAAAMAA
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (document_9446.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: Email blocking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Klaus-Peter Schrage shocked and awed us all by speaking: FWIW, I received this mail and your other recent one (Upcoming downtime) with a duplicate. Klaus yeah. my fault. should be better now - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org And I know better than most that what I envisionsed 10 years ago has _nothing_ in common with what Linux is today. There was certainly no premeditated design there. - Linus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQE/VMhN2MO5UukaubkRAgibAKCur0OJ/oDiJW4gwetTZ0tE0TZ61QCXSxFP 777ECJrDM3CVVoE4fol8wg== =pLS3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... On 9/2/2003 11:38 AM, someone claiming to be Harry Giles wrote: I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? Harry G snip ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
xMule/eMule/aMule?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 anyone using any of these? what's your thoughts on the app? on the network? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org When I was young we didn't have MTV; we had to take drugs and go to concerts. -- Steven Pearl -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VMsB2MO5UukaubkRAj1zAJoD7ngDBovSMED20rE6oZj2LmbhggCfXG1s FEInhiLfQYUWHPeRjp5+GOo= =Nozj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: tool for managing projects
Net Llama! wrote: sf.net? gforge? what kind of project, and what are you looking to manage? There are three development projects and two administration works I need to control. I would like something that can help me to make schedules, check the progress of the projects ... Thanks, Vu On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, vu pham wrote: Would you please let me know some tool for mamaging projects ? Of course, that tool needs to run on Linux or Unix :-) Thanks, Vu ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Transvestite: n. - A guy who likes to eat, drink, and be Mary -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VNdV2MO5UukaubkRAtdPAJ4pFE2V/RjXoXN7GQHnrQgPpbKjiwCgkZW1 oKUGX34fhiGxjm7Wy2ByECs= =IWzE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? Doesn't mailman have something similar to majordomo's taboo_headers pattern checking? Converting to mailman from majordomo has long been on my list of things to do when I get a shipment of round tuits, and implementing the anti-spam/worm checks that I've got on majordomo is one of my major issues -- it's probably just RTFM when I get time. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects.'' Will Rogers ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 11:45, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? I've received _several_ copies of the virus itself and countless copies via notices. The notices were not from this list. -- Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On 9/2/2003 1:45 PM, someone claiming to be Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? Both. Some of the notices have the virus attached as part of the original e-mail. For instance, the message with the subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, dated this morning, 10:22 AM has the virus attached as the original undeliverable mail message. Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 13:45, Douglas J Hunley wrote: are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org I have not received the virus. Just a bunch of notices from some virus scanners saying they received a copy of the virus from the linux-users list. Obviously the address has been spoofed. And now the list is spammed by automagic messages from virus scanners. --Tom Wilson ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
Replies and notices --- lots and lots of them: probably 60 in the past two days. Douglas J Hunley wrote: Are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xMule/eMule/aMule?
I've played with it a bit. Its a decent concept (although inferior to bit torrent, IMO), but in practice it sux. Search results are nice, but few downloads complete. Kazaa(-lite) is much better for this type of thing (and runs in linux with wine). On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 anyone using any of these? what's your thoughts on the app? on the network? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org When I was young we didn't have MTV; we had to take drugs and go to concerts. -- Steven Pearl -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VMsB2MO5UukaubkRAj1zAJoD7ngDBovSMED20rE6oZj2LmbhggCfXG1s FEInhiLfQYUWHPeRjp5+GOo= =Nozj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
ADMIN: fscking viruses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm working on the virus problem and the lists we host. Fortunately, a MAJORITY of the viruses are being caught. However, some seem to slip through. I'm going to see what I can do about that. As for the 'virus notification' messages, I'm altering SpamAssassin to assign a higher score to them. This won't get rid of them, but those of you who filter your mail can continue using the X-Spam-Status header. If it says 'yes', you can junk the message. I'm assigning all these bounces to that same header check. - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Once you realize that documentation should be laughed at, peed upon, put on fire, and just ridiculed in general, THEN, and only then, have you reached the level where you can safely read it and try to use it to actually implement a driver. - Linus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VN242MO5UukaubkRAhoYAJ4kPv553tul8vlKLXTB7RM7lbdGmgCePjPe UZUi5mmrmEQqM/A3aP2Ws4o= =kABc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Updated Step
Douglas Hunley has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/internet_serving/sendm2.html to incorporate the following: Updated to include the REGEX class in site.conf.m4 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
just the notices - -Original Message- From: Douglas J Hunley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Transvestite: n. - A guy who likes to eat, drink, and be Mary -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VNdV2MO5UukaubkRAtdPAJ4pFE2V/RjXoXN7GQHnrQgPpbKjiwCgkZW1 oKUGX34fhiGxjm7Wy2ByECs= =IWzE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
ADMIN: viruses solved (I think)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. I've just recompiled Sendmail to use the totally cool config.mc from www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc . This should catch and reject SoBig.F at the MTA level. And like I said earlier, the virus bounces messages should be tagged as spam with the X-Spam-Status: Yes header - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org die_if_kernel(Whee... Hello Mr. Penguin, current-tss.kregs); -- 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VOPB2MO5UukaubkRAuspAJ4g5V5m6PoNZzKyhyImKRVT2YP1HACdGRI8 D57ImblBXGdFQZvIVtM0HEs= =JiZu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Report to Recipient(s)
Incident Information:- Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:failure notice The file mime001.txt (application.pif) you received was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: viruses solved (I think)
On 9/2/2003 2:38 PM, someone claiming to be Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. I've just recompiled Sendmail to use the totally cool config.mc from www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc . This should catch and reject SoBig.F at the MTA level. And like I said earlier, the virus bounces messages should be tagged as spam with the X-Spam-Status: Yes header Problem with that is, I filter on List-Id before filtering for X-Spam-Status :-( Oh, well... I have a Delete key... Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: viruses solved (I think)
On 9/2/2003 2:38 PM, someone claiming to be Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. I've just recompiled Sendmail to use the totally cool config.mc from www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc . This should catch and reject SoBig.F at the MTA level. And like I said earlier, the virus bounces messages should be tagged as spam with the X-Spam-Status: Yes header Forgot to add on my previous post: Thanks! Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xMule/eMule/aMule?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Net Llama! shocked and awed us all by speaking: I've played with it a bit. Its a decent concept (although inferior to bit torrent, IMO), but in practice it sux. Search results are nice, but few downloads complete. Kazaa(-lite) is much better for this type of thing (and runs in linux with wine). that's exactly what I wanted to hear. thanks - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org I don't work here. I'm a consultant. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VOjJ2MO5UukaubkRAmnpAJ47nNKN5xSFjsqFhO+TQNZf0YXiEACdE8OG xEPAF37FewXXwiOwC+XKZbc= =gSdh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Douglas J Hunley wrote: | Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: | |I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are |doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's |non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... | | | are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was | caught? | -- | Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 | http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org | FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 12:25pm up 143 days, 21:14, 22 users, load average: 1.11, 1.24, 1.33 - - The only way to amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/VOEcejAu2RVHwF4RAs/SAJ9x9SeVQ7/ON29gG9wYQ4Dcxhs4gACfRDXW p88Z8t9DRZfHwSGYZ7/lj4o= =gr8y -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: viruses solved (I think)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: Problem with that is, I filter on List-Id before filtering for X-Spam-Status :-( shame on you :) seriously, there shouldn't be too many that make it through. I jacked the scores up high enough that most (if not all) should get deleted at the MTA - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org His idea of safe sex is an 'X' spray-painted on the rump of animals that are known to kick. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VOmY2MO5UukaubkRAji/AJ9i2ucNakItHa/PBR579bvag6GH/wCeIsBL QsyOOA98aC56tXWZHAhp42Y= =Fba6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking: FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list. and you're not having the occasional .pif file make it past MD (like we've been discussing on the MD list for a while now)? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org Linux is a _real_ OS, not some we filled in the paperwork and it is now standards compliant. -- Linus Torvalds -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VOxx2MO5UukaubkRAntTAKCb5Ba3cperz/r4xyXDR81cCRLshgCgrYs9 WWgFL6It6SFD9BlK4GzBvlM= =z7WY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On 9/2/03 11:38, Harry Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? Harry G Its due to the SoBig worm. It must be using the lists e-mail on some ones infected machine and the bounces are coming back here. -- Ray Russell Mac OS X 10.2.6 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
| Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking:
|
|FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running
|MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list.
|
|
| and you're not having the occasional .pif file make it past MD (like we've
| been discussing on the MD list for a while now)?
| --
| Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
| http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org
Nope. I haven't received any attachments. MIMEDefang has been deleting all the
.pif's, regardless. No upstream filtering is going on either. (yeah, I've been
following the MD thread on this, but I have a pretty standard config under
2.60-cvs) Relevant defang filter below:
# This procedure returns true for entities with bad filenames.
sub filter_bad_filename ($) {
~my($entity) = @_;
~my($bad_exts, $re);
~# Bad extensions
~$bad_exts = '(ade|adp|app|asd|asf|asx|bas|bat|chm|cmd|com|cpl|crt|dll|exe|fxp|h
lp|hta|hto|inf|ini|ins|isp|jse?|lib|lnk|mdb|mde|msc|msi|msp|mst|ocx|pcd|pif|prg|reg
|scr|sct|sh|shb|shs|sys|url|vb|vbe|vbs|vcs|vxd|wmd|wms|wmz|wsc|wsf|wsh|\{)';
~# Do not allow:
~# - curlies
~# - bad extensions (possibly with trailing dots) at end or
~# followed by non-alphanum
~$re = '\.' . $bad_exts . '\.*([^-A-Za-z0-9_.,]|$)';
~return re_match($entity, $re);
}
- --
Andrew Mathews
- -
~ 1:56pm up 143 days, 22:45, 22 users, load average: 2.52, 1.90, 1.53
- -
You can create your own opportunities this week. Blackmail a senior executive.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/VPilejAu2RVHwF4RAjbYAJ9k6acL2l4SN2Hg9wBB97wxyAg2ZQCeJ0ZR
e/4Gdo2P3mVjVzaFRjAu+HQ=
=ZxWe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Slow printing on RHL 9
On 8/29/2003 4:39 PM, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote: On 8/29/2003 4:26 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: I'm conducting an experiment with a willing subject at work. I've installed RHL 9 and he's using it in his day to day activity. One of his activities involves logging onto an online 3PL site (Third Party Logistics) and printing a 2 page bar coded shipping document. RHL 9 is configured to use CUPS and the printer is a networked JetDirect printer (HP 2200). When he prints the document, it takes nearly 5 minutes for both pages to finally finish printing. Contrast this to the less than 1 minute it takes for the document to print via Windows. Now, if he logs into a remote X session on our RHL 7 server and prints from there, it prints fast, just like it does from Windows. Both the RHL 7 server and the RHL 9 desktop are running CUPS. The desktop machine is an AMD K6-2 500 MHz with 256MB RAM, the server is a 1GHz Intel. Any ideas on what I can try to speed up the printing? I'm using RH9 on my desktop at work, and printing is always quite snappy to the JetDirect printers here. I dont' suppose that barcode doc is available for me to try? Unfortunately, no. I'd be curious on what is taking so long. Is it his box that is taking forever to generate the postscript? That's what I'm thinking. The last page contains the bar code, and that takes forever. The first page comes out fairly quickly. ... Or to send the file over the network to the printer, or for the printer to process print it? Well, the server and the Windows boxen all deal with the same network and printer and don't have the problem. Also, have you tried printing to a PS file, and then using lpr to send it to the printer? No, but that's a good idea. I'll try that, but it's close to end of day here (and month end...), so I'll probly not get to it 'til Tuesday. OK... got back to this. Printing to a file goes quickly, using lpr to print it to the printer from the local desktop machine, takes a LONG time. The file is, um, large: $ ll *.ps -rw-r--r-- 1 tpw adm 27365874 Sep 2 16:05 2003245149827.ps For grins, I scp'd the .ps file to my Samba shared Home directory, opened it with Windows' GhostScript and printed it to the same printer. It went very quickly. :-( The server creates a similar large file, although the example I have is somewhat smaller: # ll *.ps -rw-rw-r-- 1 ddt ddt 20719300 Sep 2 16:25 2003245149879.ps So, I guess what I've determined is that the problem is with the RHL9 PC. I don''t know if it's CUPS, the driver, ghostscript, or what. Any more ideas? Thanks, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking: Nope. I haven't received any attachments. MIMEDefang has been deleting all the .pif's, regardless. No upstream filtering is going on either. (yeah, I've been following the MD thread on this, but I have a pretty standard config under 2.60-cvs) Relevant defang filter below: looks like our filter. you must just be getting lucky. it's weird, cause the ones that make it through won't infect you. the email and virus both are fscked up enough that they don't work as intended. oh well. I think I got a handle on everything now. the list seems much quieter now - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org panic(esp_handle: current_SC == penguin within interrupt!); --2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/esp.c -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VP652MO5UukaubkRAkRnAJ46Yx1A+t4QhQvCcCeKIfVmn8/xSwCgpcGH jbX5yBr37PdczN/fPd3Th30= =IV5r -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Slow printing on RHL 9
I couldn't find any information on the HP website, so first question is, is your HP2200 a postscript capable printer, or is it an HP PCL only printer? If your HP2200 is post script capable, then your print driver should, essentially, just be passing the printfile raw to the printer -- and should go very fast. Otherwise, the postscript has to first be translated into HP PCL which would go much more slowly. If you do have a postscript capable printer, but the wrong CUPS driver, it's possible that the postscript is being converted to HP PCL unnecessarily. cmr On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:33 pm, you wrote: OK... got back to this. Printing to a file goes quickly, using lpr to print it to the printer from the local desktop machine, takes a LONG time. The file is, um, large: $ ll *.ps -rw-r--r-- 1 tpw adm 27365874 Sep 2 16:05 2003245149827.ps For grins, I scp'd the .ps file to my Samba shared Home directory, opened it with Windows' GhostScript and printed it to the same printer. It went very quickly. :-( The server creates a similar large file, although the example I have is somewhat smaller: # ll *.ps -rw-rw-r-- 1 ddt ddt 20719300 Sep 2 16:25 2003245149879.ps So, I guess what I've determined is that the problem is with the RHL9 PC. I don''t know if it's CUPS, the driver, ghostscript, or what. Any more ideas? Thanks, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:45 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking: I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now... are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught? Doug, I am getting virii sent to me, I have actually lost count of how many times I have received a copy. All I seem to be doing at the moment is deleting mail. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Slow printing on RHL 9
According to http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=bpl10417locale=en_UStaskId=101prodSeriesId=28861prodTypeId=18972#P77_1875 it's a postscript capable printer. http://hp.sourceforge.net/ agrees It's using the standard Postscript driver, which should just work :-( Hmmm... there's a setting to convert text to postscript that's enabled... I'll try turning that off and seeing what happens... Thanks On 9/2/2003 4:42 PM, someone claiming to be Mike Reinehr wrote: I couldn't find any information on the HP website, so first question is, is your HP2200 a postscript capable printer, or is it an HP PCL only printer? If your HP2200 is post script capable, then your print driver should, essentially, just be passing the printfile raw to the printer -- and should go very fast. Otherwise, the postscript has to first be translated into HP PCL which would go much more slowly. If you do have a postscript capable printer, but the wrong CUPS driver, it's possible that the postscript is being converted to HP PCL unnecessarily. cmr On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:33 pm, you wrote: OK... got back to this. Printing to a file goes quickly, using lpr to print it to the printer from the local desktop machine, takes a LONG time. The file is, um, large: $ ll *.ps -rw-r--r-- 1 tpw adm 27365874 Sep 2 16:05 2003245149827.ps For grins, I scp'd the .ps file to my Samba shared Home directory, opened it with Windows' GhostScript and printed it to the same printer. It went very quickly. :-( The server creates a similar large file, although the example I have is somewhat smaller: # ll *.ps -rw-rw-r-- 1 ddt ddt 20719300 Sep 2 16:25 2003245149879.ps So, I guess what I've determined is that the problem is with the RHL9 PC. I don''t know if it's CUPS, the driver, ghostscript, or what. Any more ideas? Thanks, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
Net Llama! wrote: It might help us to help you if you actually provided the errors you're experiencing so that we werent' fumbling in the dark trying to diagnose a problem that has no symptoms. LOL, annoying isn't it. A non-specific, vague, `it don't work' post... Seeing as I formulated my original email from a 2 day old compile error residing in wet memory it was bound to be vague. But not to worry attached is the output of `make bzImage modules'. gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) kernel source is kernel-source-2.4.20-8.rpm -- James McDonald (Would you like fries with that MCSE?) Singleton Australia 61+ (0)2 65712401 61+ 0428 320 219 07:10:00 up 1 day, 9:34, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.02 Linux 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 20:03:11 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux error.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 08:38 am, Harry Giles wrote: I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else getting them? I'm getting megabytes of this stuff and other bounced mail. I think Doug is gonna work on a really spiffy filter to keep all of this bounced stuff from getting sent back out on linux-sxs.org g -- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd Rather Be Sailing ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
ssh error message
Whenever I use secure shell on my Linux servers these error messages appear in /var/log/messages: Aug 18 09:43:40 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28553]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=test-mobl2.amr.corp.com user=test Aug 18 09:43:49 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28555]: session opened for user test by (uid=500) Aug 28 09:44:20 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28590]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=uelinux.corp.com user=test Aug 28 09:44:33 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28592]: session opened for user test by (uid=500) The SSH session works but I get this authentication failure message appearing. I am guessing that this is not a problem, but does anyone know what it means and what causes it? Thanks, Brian ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: viruses solved (I think)
Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. I've just recompiled Sendmail to use the totally cool config.mc from www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc . This should catch and reject SoBig.F at the MTA level. And like I said earlier, the virus bounces messages should be tagged as spam with the X-Spam-Status: Yes header Doug, In your new sxs on sendmail the echo statements have the backtick,quote combination as you mentioned. Is there any shell or programming significance to this i.e. does the shell parse `' combinations in a special way... I know the var=backtick command backtick says assign the out-put of this command to the variable. So is the backtick,quote combo special also? -- James McDonald (Would you like fries with that MCSE?) Singleton Australia 61+ (0)2 65712401 61+ 0428 320 219 07:45:00 up 1 day, 10:09, 6 users, load average: 0.01, 0.08, 0.19 Linux 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 20:03:11 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ssh error message
On 09/02/03 14:45, Simper, Brian D wrote: Whenever I use secure shell on my Linux servers these error messages appear in /var/log/messages: Aug 18 09:43:40 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28553]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=test-mobl2.amr.corp.com user=test Aug 18 09:43:49 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28555]: session opened for user test by (uid=500) Aug 28 09:44:20 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28590]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=uelinux.corp.com user=test Aug 28 09:44:33 test-desk sshd(pam_unix)[28592]: session opened for user test by (uid=500) The SSH session works but I get this authentication failure message appearing. I am guessing that this is not a problem, but does anyone know what it means and what causes it? You using samba? Google is your friend: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8safe=offthreadm=5GPM6.136567%24_f3.1924988%40news20.bellglobal.comrnum=5prev=/groups%3Fas_epq%3Dauthentication%2520failure%253B%2520logname%253D%26safe%3Doff%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26lr%3D%26num%3D50%26hl%3Den -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 3:25pm up 3 days, 52 min, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.46, 0.18 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile
Quoth James McDonald: RedHatters, I have installed RH9.0 and the kernel-source*.rpm When I cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.x and run make oldconfig or cp /boot/config-2.4.x to /usr/src/linux-2.4.x/.config use `make xconfig' to add ntfs filesystem support and run `make dep bzImage modules' It fails every time with compile errors However downloading the latest 2.4.22 source and compiling it using the /boot/config-2.4.x file with just ntfs support enabled works. Can anyone tell me if they have successfully compiled the default RH source or is it just there to add 30MB+ to the system? I don't know. I rarely use vendor-provided kernel source. I start with pristine source from kernel.org and patch from there. Kurt -- New crypt. See /usr/news/crypt. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN: viruses solved (I think)
Quoth James McDonald: Douglas J Hunley wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. I've just recompiled Sendmail to use the totally cool config.mc from www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc . This should catch and reject SoBig.F at the MTA level. And like I said earlier, the virus bounces messages should be tagged as spam with the X-Spam-Status: Yes header Doug, In your new sxs on sendmail the echo statements have the backtick,quote combination as you mentioned. Is there any shell or programming significance to this i.e. does the shell parse `' combinations in a special way... I know the var=backtick command backtick says assign the out-put of this command to the variable. So is the backtick,quote combo special also? In this case, autoconf uses ` and ' as the delimiters on the left and right-hand side of quoted text. That is, the backtick is there for autoconf, not the shell. Kurt -- I could dance till the cows come home. On second thought, I'd rather dance with the cows till you come home. -- Groucho Marx ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: tool for managing projects
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:20, Bill Campbell wrote: SuSE 8.2 Professional comes with mrproject. I've looked at it very briefly so can't say how good it is. mrproject also comes bundled in other distros such as recent versions of Redhat. From what I can see, it's a lightweight MS Project clone. The homepage is here: http://mrproject.codefactory.se/ -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:53, Raymond Russell wrote: Its due to the SoBig worm. It must be using the lists e-mail on some ones infected machine and the bounces are coming back here. It would have to be a Windows box. -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: ADMIN:Upcoming Downtime
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:00, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Douglas J Hunley: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am having a new data feed installed next Monday (Sept 8). We're upgrading to 3.0Mbps down and 500kbps up. Obviously, there will be some downtime as we switch the cabling out and propogate the new DNS entries around. I think you'll all agree that the little bit of pain will be well worth it. Woo hoo! Youdaman! In the process of ditching my non-DHCP tolerant ISP (a previous email refers), I am (unfortunately) moving from 3.0/800 service to 1.5/500. -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
