Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-25 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 25 October 2001 07:01 am, you sent an epistle:
> On October 24, 2001 04:14 pm, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > No as I installed it on 3 other machines also I tried both the cd and dvd
> > neither worked.
>
> Is this by chance the 7.3 upgrade as opposed to a full install? (Perhaps I
> missed that). If so, according to the SuSE list there are known issues with
> it (there have been a number of threads discussing this).

Full install, AFAIK, Suse 7.2 Pro 

> Apparently, like Caldera, SuSE's upgrade install programs are invariably a
> challenge. Most of the seasoned SuSE users recommend getting the full
> version, backing up your data, then doing a full fresh install from
> scratch.

Tried that too and it still stuck at system check.

> Sad, really, that we have come so far over the past few years in Linux - we
> can run it as superclusters and in mainframes - but we can't seem to get
> consistently fool-proof OS upgrades.

It would seem that some twit altered a script file between 7.1 and 7.2. Lets 
hope they got 7.3 right, but I will not know till I try it. We will not see 
it till well into November.

-- 
-
To those who have been in harms way, to those that have made the
sacrifice in humanities name. At the going down of the sun and
in the morning I shall remember them. 
-
Keith Antoine aka "skippy"
18 Arkana St The Gap Queensland 4061 Australia PH 16 7 33002161
Retired Geriatric and Sometime Electronics Engineer : Knowall

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-25 Thread burns

On October 24, 2001 04:14 pm, Keith Antoine wrote:

> No as I installed it on 3 other machines also I tried both the cd and dvd
> neither worked.

Is this by chance the 7.3 upgrade as opposed to a full install? (Perhaps I 
missed that). If so, according to the SuSE list there are known issues with 
it (there have been a number of threads discussing this).

Apparently, like Caldera, SuSE's upgrade install programs are invariably a 
challenge. Most of the seasoned SuSE users recommend getting the full 
version, backing up your data, then doing a full fresh install from scratch. 

Sad, really, that we have come so far over the past few years in Linux - we 
can run it as superclusters and in mainframes - but we can't seem to get 
consistently fool-proof OS upgrades.
-- 
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-23 Thread Keith Antoine


On Tuesday 23 October 2001 01:33 am, you sent an epistle:

> Keith,
>
> Is it possible your install media is fubared, ie you need a
> replacement cdrom?

No as I installed it on 3 other machines also I tried both the cd and dvd 
neither worked.
-- 
-
To those who have been in harms way, to those that have made the
sacrifice in humanities name. At the going down of the sun and
in the morning I shall remember them. 
-
Keith Antoine aka "skippy"
18 Arkana St The Gap Queensland 4061 Australia PH 16 7 33002161
Retired Geriatric and Sometime Electronics Engineer : Knowall

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-22 Thread Collins Richey

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:10:25 -0400 Keith Antoine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > > I've no idea what th problem here is, but I too am worried. 
> Yours
> > > sounds a lot like the system I have here I wanted to put 7.3 on
> when it
> > > shows up.
> > >
> > > When it does hang, can you look in the alternate TTY's to see
> what was
> > > happening when it froze?
> >
> > 7.2 went on my Athlon 800 w/ 256Mb DDR no problems...
> >
> > was there anything in SuSE archives?
> 
> Well that tells me that its not the DDR ram, one down. Had no luck
> at the
> archives as I also have had no luck getting Suse to answer me. Now
> does anyone
> have suse up with one of the lastest athlons? Where is it checking
> when it 
> does
> the 'system check' and especially where is it at 50% ?
> 
> However since I wrote this and it bounced I have done the F2 text
> install:
> 
> It starts and completes a H/W detection, so thats fine. Searches for
> infofile 
> and Braille display find both I guess as it does not complain.States
> tha H/W 
> probing finished, starts YAST1 then initialises YAST2 checks system
> up to 40% 
> then on screen comes:
> 
> sh: -c: line 1: unexpected EOF while looking for `"'
> sh: -c: line 2: syntax error. unexpected end of file
> 
> Now AFAIK this only occurs with script files; I am guessing that as
> 7.1 goes 
> on fine, that something in a script file that has changed from
> version 7.1 is 
> stuffing up.
> 
> Is this a reasonable assumption ??
> 

Keith,

Is it possible your install media is fubared, ie you need a
replacement cdrom?

-- 
Collins Richey
Denver Area
gentoo_rc6 xfce+sylpheed
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-22 Thread Keith Antoine


Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > I've no idea what th problem here is, but I too am worried.  Yours
> > sounds a lot like the system I have here I wanted to put 7.3 on when it
> > shows up.
> >
> > When it does hang, can you look in the alternate TTY's to see what was
> > happening when it froze?
>
> 7.2 went on my Athlon 800 w/ 256Mb DDR no problems...
>
> was there anything in SuSE archives?

Well that tells me that its not the DDR ram, one down. Had no luck at the
archives as I also have had no luck getting Suse to answer me. Now does anyone
have suse up with one of the lastest athlons? Where is it checking when it 
does
the 'system check' and especially where is it at 50% ?

However since I wrote this and it bounced I have done the F2 text install:

It starts and completes a H/W detection, so thats fine. Searches for infofile 
and Braille display find both I guess as it does not complain.States tha H/W 
probing finished, starts YAST1 then initialises YAST2 checks system up to 40% 
then on screen comes:

sh: -c: line 1: unexpected EOF while looking for `"'
sh: -c: line 2: syntax error. unexpected end of file

Now AFAIK this only occurs with script files; I am guessing that as 7.1 goes 
on fine, that something in a script file that has changed from version 7.1 is 
stuffing up.

Is this a reasonable assumption ??

-- 
-
To those who have been in harms way, to those that have made the
sacrifice in humanities name. At the going down of the sun and
in the morning I shall remember them. 
-
Keith Antoine aka "skippy"
18 Arkana St The Gap Queensland 4061 Australia PH 16 7 33002161
Retired Geriatric and Sometime Electronics Engineer : Knowall

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-20 Thread Ted Ozolins

On October 20, 2001 01:04 am, you wrote:


> I have installed on other systems but the main difference being that I have
> a MB with ddr ram and an Athlon 1.4 bought just recently; 10 days ago,
> probably the "C" version. Does anyone know if this could be the answer and
> does 7.3 address this? This is just casting on dark waters and hope someone
> can help.
I have five machines here with W3.1 (just upgraded the server). I had 3.1 
balk on a couple of rhe machines, an AMD 750 Duron and an Intel P3-866. I 
keep a Mystique video card as a test card that I use whenever an install 
fails during hardware probing. In most cases the install continues flawlessly 
when I use the test card. Once I've completed the install I then (in run 
level 3) manually configure X to reflect the card I intend to use. The 
biggest culprit has been the ATI Rage Fury Pro. But once I've manually set 
things up all runs just fine.   
-- 
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, BC
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-20 Thread Douglas J Hunley

Ian Marchak babbled on about:
> Keith Antoine wrote:
> > I have installed on other systems but the main difference being that I
> > have a MB with ddr ram and an Athlon 1.4 bought just recently; 10 days
> > ago, probably the "C" version. Does anyone know if this could be the
> > answer and does 7.3 address this? This is just casting on dark waters and
> > hope someone can help.
>
> I've no idea what th problem here is, but I too am worried.  Yours
> sounds a lot like the system I have here I wanted to put 7.3 on when it
> shows up.
>
> When it does hang, can you look in the alternate TTY's to see what was
> happening when it froze?

7.2 went on my Athlon 800 w/ 256Mb DDR no problems...

was there anything in SuSE archives?
-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf  Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net

Real Time, adj.:
Here and now, as opposed to fake time, which only occurs there
and then.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-20 Thread Ian Marchak

Keith Antoine wrote:
>
> I have installed on other systems but the main difference being that I have a
> MB with ddr ram and an Athlon 1.4 bought just recently; 10 days ago, probably
> the "C" version. Does anyone know if this could be the answer and does 7.3
> address this? This is just casting on dark waters and hope someone can help.

I've no idea what th problem here is, but I too am worried.  Yours
sounds a lot like the system I have here I wanted to put 7.3 on when it
shows up.

When it does hang, can you look in the alternate TTY's to see what was
happening when it froze?
-- 
Linux SxS [http://hal.humberc.on.ca/~mrcn0031/sxs/]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



suse 7.2 & 7.3

2001-10-20 Thread Keith Antoine

I have had a ridiculous few weeks, just have not stopped, weekends as well 
and its all my own fault, just could not say "NO". An olod fool is the worst 
kind and seeing that I have stessed myself too thats the pits. But most of it 
was really worth it, to see he joy it brings, but not always. but I digress.

I ahd a few moments to do some of my own things and installing Suse 7.2 was 
one, along with multimedia and staroffice 6.0. I was going to buy 7.3 seeing 
its immenent release but have had a problem with 7.2; it would not install!! 
How dare it!

It does not get past the checking system (at 50%) it freezes. I am not 
willing to spend the money on 7.3 if its going to baulk.  Now 7.1 has no 
problems so why with 7.2 and will 7.3 have no probs?

I have installed on other systems but the main difference being that I have a 
MB with ddr ram and an Athlon 1.4 bought just recently; 10 days ago, probably 
the "C" version. Does anyone know if this could be the answer and does 7.3 
address this? This is just casting on dark waters and hope someone can help.

-- 
-
To those who have been in harms way, to those that have made the
sacrifice in humanities name. At the going down of the sun and
in the morning I shall remember them. 
-
Keith Antoine aka "skippy"
18 Arkana St The Gap Queensland 4061 Australia PH 16 7 33002161
Retired Geriatric and Sometime Electronics Engineer : Knowall

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users