Re: [Linuxwacom-devel] Changing to freedesktop bugzilla?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:30:08AM +0100, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> 12.01.2012 04:25, Peter Hutterer kirjoitti: >> > Trawling through my xorg bugs yesterday I found a few that were filed >> > against the Input/wacom component at bugs.freedesktop.org. This was created >> > ages ago, when Ping and I were talking about moving the driver over to >> > freedesktop.org in general. We decided to stay with sf.net in the end to >> > avoid too big a break for our users (this discussion happened ~2 years ago >> > or so) >> > >> > However, given sf's issue tracker moving to the freedesktop.org bugzilla >> > seems quite tempting. I personally find the issue tracker horrible. >> > There are a few advantages in using bugs.freedesktop.org: >> > - bugzilla is somewhat of a standard when it comes to bugreporting >> > - cross-referencing/reassigning bugs is easier between other components >> > such >> > as the X server >> > - tighter integration with xorg in general. X.org hackers tend to look at >> > the bugzilla, they don't look at our sf page. >> > - better references: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/12345 vs >> > >> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3456195&group_id=69596&atid=525124 >> > >> > Disadvantages: >> > - this should only be done for the xf86-input-wacom component (and >> > xsetwacom >> > bugs), kernel bugs should not go there (or at least would require a >> > different component). >> > - users would need to create a user account separate from sf.net >> > - technically off-site (I doubt that matters) >> > >> > And other things I missed. What's the general feeling on it? >> >> As a distro maintainer: yes please. >> >> would libwacom have a component of it's own? > > yeah, definitely. i'm tempted to even put xsetwacom into a separate > component though I'm not sure how smart that would be. > Sourceforge Tracker bad. Bugzilla good. Only having one choice good. :) I have accounts at both places so its not really a big deal for me which to use. I'm fine with whatever choice. Chris -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 ___ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
Re: [Linuxwacom-devel] Changing to freedesktop bugzilla?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:30:08AM +0100, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > 12.01.2012 04:25, Peter Hutterer kirjoitti: > > Trawling through my xorg bugs yesterday I found a few that were filed > > against the Input/wacom component at bugs.freedesktop.org. This was created > > ages ago, when Ping and I were talking about moving the driver over to > > freedesktop.org in general. We decided to stay with sf.net in the end to > > avoid too big a break for our users (this discussion happened ~2 years ago > > or so) > > > > However, given sf's issue tracker moving to the freedesktop.org bugzilla > > seems quite tempting. I personally find the issue tracker horrible. > > There are a few advantages in using bugs.freedesktop.org: > > - bugzilla is somewhat of a standard when it comes to bugreporting > > - cross-referencing/reassigning bugs is easier between other components such > >as the X server > > - tighter integration with xorg in general. X.org hackers tend to look at > >the bugzilla, they don't look at our sf page. > > - better references: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/12345 vs > > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3456195&group_id=69596&atid=525124 > > > > Disadvantages: > > - this should only be done for the xf86-input-wacom component (and xsetwacom > >bugs), kernel bugs should not go there (or at least would require a > >different component). > > - users would need to create a user account separate from sf.net > > - technically off-site (I doubt that matters) > > > > And other things I missed. What's the general feeling on it? > > As a distro maintainer: yes please. > > would libwacom have a component of it's own? yeah, definitely. i'm tempted to even put xsetwacom into a separate component though I'm not sure how smart that would be. Cheers, Peter -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 ___ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
Re: [Linuxwacom-devel] Changing to freedesktop bugzilla?
12.01.2012 04:25, Peter Hutterer kirjoitti: > Trawling through my xorg bugs yesterday I found a few that were filed > against the Input/wacom component at bugs.freedesktop.org. This was created > ages ago, when Ping and I were talking about moving the driver over to > freedesktop.org in general. We decided to stay with sf.net in the end to > avoid too big a break for our users (this discussion happened ~2 years ago > or so) > > However, given sf's issue tracker moving to the freedesktop.org bugzilla > seems quite tempting. I personally find the issue tracker horrible. > There are a few advantages in using bugs.freedesktop.org: > - bugzilla is somewhat of a standard when it comes to bugreporting > - cross-referencing/reassigning bugs is easier between other components such >as the X server > - tighter integration with xorg in general. X.org hackers tend to look at >the bugzilla, they don't look at our sf page. > - better references: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/12345 vs > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3456195&group_id=69596&atid=525124 > > Disadvantages: > - this should only be done for the xf86-input-wacom component (and xsetwacom >bugs), kernel bugs should not go there (or at least would require a >different component). > - users would need to create a user account separate from sf.net > - technically off-site (I doubt that matters) > > And other things I missed. What's the general feeling on it? As a distro maintainer: yes please. would libwacom have a component of it's own? t -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 ___ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
[Linuxwacom-devel] Changing to freedesktop bugzilla?
Trawling through my xorg bugs yesterday I found a few that were filed against the Input/wacom component at bugs.freedesktop.org. This was created ages ago, when Ping and I were talking about moving the driver over to freedesktop.org in general. We decided to stay with sf.net in the end to avoid too big a break for our users (this discussion happened ~2 years ago or so) However, given sf's issue tracker moving to the freedesktop.org bugzilla seems quite tempting. I personally find the issue tracker horrible. There are a few advantages in using bugs.freedesktop.org: - bugzilla is somewhat of a standard when it comes to bugreporting - cross-referencing/reassigning bugs is easier between other components such as the X server - tighter integration with xorg in general. X.org hackers tend to look at the bugzilla, they don't look at our sf page. - better references: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/12345 vs http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3456195&group_id=69596&atid=525124 Disadvantages: - this should only be done for the xf86-input-wacom component (and xsetwacom bugs), kernel bugs should not go there (or at least would require a different component). - users would need to create a user account separate from sf.net - technically off-site (I doubt that matters) And other things I missed. What's the general feeling on it? If we're not switching, I'll probably poke the fdo admins to remove the bugzilla component so we don't get bugreports that no-one looks at. Cheers, Peter -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 ___ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
