from:"Gerardo Chairez \[Addictive Media\]"

RE: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?)

2006-12-19 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

I thought that  Stood for paragraph

Gerardo Cháirez


-Mensaje original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Barney Carroll
Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de Diciembre de 2006 03:50 a.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?)

I somehow got the impression p stood for phrase... (?!)

Mariusz Nowak wrote:
> Anyway I wonder how it really should be treated.. (I'm not 100%
positive 
> that my approach is right) or maybe both way are semantically valid to

> treat p as I do and more strictly as you do..
> However due to lack of clear statement on it in w3c specs I doubt that

> there is a clear answer for that.

Regards,
Barney Carroll


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.




This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?)

2006-12-18 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

I thought that  Stood for paragraph

Gerardo Cháirez


-Mensaje original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Barney Carroll
Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de Diciembre de 2006 03:50 a.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?)

I somehow got the impression p stood for phrase... (?!)

Mariusz Nowak wrote:
> Anyway I wonder how it really should be treated.. (I'm not 100%
positive 
> that my approach is right) or maybe both way are semantically valid to

> treat p as I do and more strictly as you do..
> However due to lack of clear statement on it in w3c specs I doubt that

> there is a clear answer for that.

Regards,
Barney Carroll


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.




This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] [spam] urgent help with navigation li

2006-12-14 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

Thank you so much Terry I can see where my error was...
You just save my live.

Regards,

Gerardo Chairez

-Mensaje original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Thierry Koblentz
Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Diciembre de 2006 03:08 a.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] [spam] urgent help with navigation li

Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media] wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> I´m having some troubles trying to make this navigation works
> propertly... I just can´t figure it out what is wrong with the css.
>
> The site http://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/costena/
> The css http://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/costena/includes/global.css

Hi Gerardo,
Replace your #navegacion a {...} rule with the one below:
#navegacion a {float:left;display:block;padding:0 5px;line-height:1.8em}

---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.




This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

[WSG] [spam] urgent help with navigation li

2006-12-14 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

Hello Guys,

I´m having some troubles trying to make this navigation works
propertly... I just can´t figure it out what is wrong with the css

The site http://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/costena/
The css http://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/costena/includes/global.css
The navigation code:


Quiénes Somos 
Productos
RecetasNoticias
Promociones


Inicio | Contáctanos | Mapa
de Sitio | English 

On the top right side its the primary navigation items, there are few
items in html text that on the rollover sould be in the middle of the
red zone and the rollover image should be behind them, also, the last
item has to be an image as its the logo of the section and it cant be
done in html, can anyone help me please?

I know the site its in Spanish, but the css rules apply in every
language...

Also if anyone has further recommendations about this site would be
highly appreciated thanx again

Regards,

Gerardo Cháirez




This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

[WSG] tiny little problem with navigation

2006-12-12 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

Hello Guys,
 
I Have a question I just cant figure it out what am I doing wrong
http://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/costena/
 
On the top right side its the navigation items, I have little bit of
troubles trying to make the rollovers work properly, can anyone help me
please?
 
Also any other recommendations about this site would be highly
appreciated thanx again
 
Regards,
 
Gerardo Cháirez
 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] min-width and max-width - [was Pixel to Em conversion]

2006-04-27 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

I have to agree with you Bob on this one... keep it simple its my
mojo... also I really cant understand why it is designed for an
non-typical Resolution, such as 800X600... can anyone answer this?

-Mensaje original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Designer
Enviado el: Jueves, 27 de Abril de 2006 01:19 p.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: [WSG] min-width and max-width - [was Pixel to Em conversion]

As soon as I see someone mention 'min-width' or 'max-width' I despair 
and move on to the next message.  The reason? Because I know that 
somewhere between 75 and 90% of the site viewers will see a mess. (I 
mean IE, of course).  Yes, I do know that with a lot of messy code it is

sometimes/eventually possible to get away with 'fixes' but the resulting

page is often just a fragile house of cards which tumbles away to a 
shambles when the slightest change is made.

So, I always take the view that there must be another approach available

to achieve the design in question, and I forget about min and max 
widths.  (and I don't mean tables :-) )

Is this being too harsh?

-- 
Best Regards,

Bob McClelland

Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

RE: [WSG] Pixel to Em conversion.

2006-04-26 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]









I dunno if I understand
correctly your question, but if you need to have a fixed width for the right
column I think that you should put it in as pixels (220px) and give right-margin
to the main content area of 220px…

 

-Mensaje
original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de morten fjellman
Enviado el: Miércoles, 26 de Abril
de 2006 07:02 p.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: [WSG] Pixel to Em
conversion.

 

Hi,
I'm trying to get this layout to work with min- and max-width. The max-width
needs to be 880px wide and the min-width must be 680px. I have made the header
and menu in such a way that they can be compressed (to a point), but I can't
seem to figure out how to set the correct em or %. The right column must have a
fixed width of 220px and the main content area must have a flexible width. IE
problems with min- and max-width is not an issue on this project. 

Anyone who can explain to me how I should go about this?
The site can be seen here: http://www.fjellman.no/test/
I'm really stuck, so help is appreciated :)

Regards
Morten







This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.

RE: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

2006-04-21 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

You Know what? You should check Mexican Post Service site,
www.sepomex.gob.mx/ I was impressed beginning with the fact that not all
the navigation work properly... also, this is a joke, but the government
page for disable people of mexico could be a good one too
www.discapacinet.gob.mx

I have nothing against Mexican sites, Im mexican, but seriously, this
pages are the worst that I ever seen...

Hope these sites are helpful

Gerardo Chairez



Can anyone suggest some poorly designed web pages for web design
students to take apart? Preferably these would be from public
institutions.

The students at are learning web page design
. So I need some badly designed web
pages for them to run accessibility tests on.  I don't want to pick
on web pages from individuals, or those from small companies (unless
someone wants to volunteer their own). But a government or large
company is fair game.

For testing we are using "TAW" from the Centre for the Development of
Information and Communication Technologies in Asturias
.

Previously I used Australian Government web pages as examples of bad
design, but these seem to have had the obvious faults fixed (perhaps
by my ex-students?). I ran a sample of 250 pages in TAW and only got
a couple of errors.

The next step is for the students to reformat one on pages to display
on a mobile phone. For that I will probably use one on Bird Flu, as
per my talk next month for the WSG
.



Tom Worthington FACS HLM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 0419 496150
Director, Tomw Communications Pty LtdABN: 17 088 714 309
PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617http://www.tomw.net.au/
Director, ACS Communications Tech Board   http://www.acs.org.au/ctb/
Visiting Fellow, ANU  Blog: http://www.tomw.net.au/blog/atom.xml

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private
or
confidential information.
If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have
received
this e-mail in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
e-mail.
If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose
its
contents to any other party.

This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not
necessarily reflect those of
education.au limited except where the sender expressly states otherwise.

It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted
with
it for viruses or any other
defects.

education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or
consequence
caused directly or indirectly by this email.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__



_
This e-mail transmission and any attachments to it are intended solely
for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may
contain
confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended
recipient, your use, forwarding, printing, storing, disseminating,
distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited.  If you
received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately
by replying to this message and delete it from your computer.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

RE: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

2006-04-21 Thread Gerardo Chairez [Addictive Media]

Hey Tom you could find an excellent resource for this kind of "Research"
at
www.sitesthatsuck.org I found them pretty interesting...

-Mensaje original-
De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de CK
Enviado el: Viernes, 21 de Abril de 2006 01:05 p.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

Hi,

Thanks for asking clarification, the objective left me confused also.  
Some of the designs are passable, but the junk under the hood gives  
me hives.


CK
On Apr 20, 2006, at 9:56 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:

> Tom Worthington wrote:
>> Can anyone suggest some poorly designed web pages for web design  
>> students to take apart? Preferably these would be from public  
>> institutions.
>
> Just to clarify, are you looking for sites with a really bad visual  
> design (i.e. bad colour schemes, illegible text, etc) or sites that  
> use really badly coded HTML and CSS (i.e. invalid markup, layout- 
> tables, presentational elements/attributes, poorly written CSS,  
> works in IE only, etc.), or are you looking for both?
>
> -- 
> Lachlan Hunt
> http://lachy.id.au/
> **
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.



This message has been scanned by BitDefender
and found to be clean.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

RE: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?)

RE: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?)

RE: [WSG] [spam] urgent help with navigation li

[WSG] [spam] urgent help with navigation li

[WSG] tiny little problem with navigation

RE: [WSG] min-width and max-width - [was Pixel to Em conversion]

RE: [WSG] Pixel to Em conversion.

RE: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

RE: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information