Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread Mike
Actually I think the fake cylinder heads look much nicer than my 
battery box.  I wouldn't mind having something like that on my bike.


http://home.comcast.net/~damonhenry/Suzuki09.jpg


Naw, you just need a cover on the front box is all.  Go to McMaster 
and buy some 1/8" PVC and have at it with a heat gun!


Here's an idea.  What if you painted both boxes to match the tank?  I 
think that would really bring the whole thing together.


--

The Electric Motorcycle Portal
http://www.electricmotorcycles.net/

Electric Motorcycle Listserv
http://www.electricmotorcycles.net/listserv



Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread Mike
that they'll either: A) Think that it's some kind of electric 
piston, or B) won't consider it a real bike without cylinder heads, 
despite _knowing_ it's electric?  Of course, then there's the gas 
tank ...


I suspect it's B.  That's been my first hand impression with a lot of 
motorcyclists  unfortunately.



--

The Electric Motorcycle Portal
http://www.electricmotorcycles.net/

Electric Motorcycle Listserv
http://www.electricmotorcycles.net/listserv



Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread Mike
On the flip side, you didn't build a custom bike -- you fit your 
components into an existing frame, which (to me) is rather an 
accomplishment in itself.  Making a custom frame around the 
components is (in some sense) "easier".


A lot of the 'customs' aren't.  The builder often just buys the parts 
then fabs them up. Not all do this and I understand that it's not 
even a necessity but it bugs me.


I dunno about you guys but when I convert a bike, I think it's fun to 
try NOT to modify the frame at all.  So far both of my conversion are 
'drop in'.  You could pull the electric components and put the ICE 
back in, for what ever reason.



Maybe it's just my nerdy nature; chrome and unnecessary decoration 
are superfluous.


I'll agree with that to a medium-large degree. Nearly all my bikes 
(ICE and EV) are rattle canned. Though, I have to publicly admit that 
my number 2 bike (Rapier) is getting fancy ass doo-dads just 'cause.



I rather think this bike is pretty damn cool, despite being an ICE; 
It has "Road Warrior" written all over it:


http://www.bikeweb.com/node/980


I've seen that one before. I like it.

--

The Electric Motorcycle Portal
http://www.electricmotorcycles.net/

Electric Motorcycle Listserv
http://www.electricmotorcycles.net/listserv



Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread Eric Poulsen
True that battery box isn't pretty, but a bit of fairing would help 
looks and aerodynamics.  The cardboard doesn't help, either.  On the 
flip side, you didn't build a custom bike -- you fit your components 
into an existing frame, which (to me) is rather an accomplishment in 
itself.  Making a custom frame around the components is (in some sense) 
"easier".


In a larger sense, though, people seem to really shy away from the 
"rolling science project" look; they really want to hide the nature of 
the vehicle.  Personally, I like that look, provided it's not gratuitous 
or non-utilitarian.  Maybe it's just my nerdy nature; chrome and 
unnecessary decoration are superfluous. And don't get me started on 
those little leather tassels on the handlebars. *shudder*  Just seems 
odd that the only vehicles with those are choppers, and ... little pink 
bicycles for girls.


I rather think this bike is pretty damn cool, despite being an ICE; It 
has "Road Warrior" written all over it:


http://www.bikeweb.com/node/980

damon henry wrote:
Actually I think the fake cylinder heads look much nicer than my 
battery box.  I wouldn't mind having something like that on my bike.


http://home.comcast.net/~damonhenry/Suzuki09.jpg



From: Eric Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ElectricMotorcycles 
To: ElectricMotorcycles 
Subject: Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:56:47 -0800

Not at all impressed.

Also, this bike, and the CHP electric chopper 
(http://www.bikernet.com/bikebarn/PageViewer.asp?PageID=583) seem to 
have a need for a fake motor, or at least cylinder heads.  Why is 
that?  The CHP article even calls it an "Electric V-Twin," which is 
ridiculous, as the V-Twin refers to the piston engine layout.  Do 
they really think people are so stupid that they'll either: A) Think 
that it's some kind of electric piston, or B) won't consider it a 
real bike without cylinder heads, despite _knowing_ it's electric?  
Of course, then there's the gas tank ...


Of course, noone ever accused the custom chopper guys of having 
substance over style.




Mike wrote:
http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle001.jpg 



http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle002.jpg 



http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle003.jpg 



http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle004.jpg 





I'm not terribly impressed with the looks of that. Any one else?  It 
looks to me like they tossed some batteries in the frame then 
wrapped them with a bread box. Ness usually comes up with better 
looking stuff than that.







_
Check out all that glitters with the MSN Entertainment Guide to the 
Academy Awards®   
http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline2









Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread damon henry
Actually I think the fake cylinder heads look much nicer than my battery 
box.  I wouldn't mind having something like that on my bike.


http://home.comcast.net/~damonhenry/Suzuki09.jpg



From: Eric Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ElectricMotorcycles 
To: ElectricMotorcycles 
Subject: Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:56:47 -0800

Not at all impressed.

Also, this bike, and the CHP electric chopper 
(http://www.bikernet.com/bikebarn/PageViewer.asp?PageID=583) seem to have a 
need for a fake motor, or at least cylinder heads.  Why is that?  The CHP 
article even calls it an "Electric V-Twin," which is ridiculous, as the 
V-Twin refers to the piston engine layout.  Do they really think people are 
so stupid that they'll either: A) Think that it's some kind of electric 
piston, or B) won't consider it a real bike without cylinder heads, despite 
_knowing_ it's electric?  Of course, then there's the gas tank ...


Of course, noone ever accused the custom chopper guys of having substance 
over style.




Mike wrote:

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle001.jpg

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle002.jpg

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle003.jpg

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle004.jpg



I'm not terribly impressed with the looks of that. Any one else?  It looks 
to me like they tossed some batteries in the frame then wrapped them with 
a bread box. Ness usually comes up with better looking stuff than that.







_
Check out all that glitters with the MSN Entertainment Guide to the Academy 
Awards®   http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline2





Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread Mark Hastings
Well besides a basic ewww..
It says “The batteries should allow the bike to run
six hours at 80 mph."
Statements like that lead people to some real
disapointment if not true. ANd if it were where the
heck do I get me some! 

--- Eric Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Not at all impressed.
> 
> Also, this bike, and the CHP electric chopper 
>
(http://www.bikernet.com/bikebarn/PageViewer.asp?PageID=583)
> seem to 
> have a need for a fake motor, or at least cylinder
> heads.  Why is that?  
> The CHP article even calls it an "Electric V-Twin,"
> which is ridiculous, 
> as the V-Twin refers to the piston engine layout. 
> Do they really think 
> people are so stupid that they'll either: A) Think
> that it's some kind 
> of electric piston, or B) won't consider it a real
> bike without cylinder 
> heads, despite _knowing_ it's electric?  Of course,
> then there's the gas 
> tank ...
> 
> Of course, noone ever accused the custom chopper
> guys of having 
> substance over style.
> 
> 
> 
> Mike wrote:
> >>
>
http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle001.jpg
> 
> >>
> >>
>
http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle002.jpg
> 
> >>
> >>
>
http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle003.jpg
> 
> >>
> >>
>
http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle004.jpg
> 
> >>
> >
> > I'm not terribly impressed with the looks of that.
> Any one else?  It 
> > looks to me like they tossed some batteries in the
> frame then wrapped 
> > them with a bread box. Ness usually comes up with
> better looking stuff 
> > than that.
> >
> 
> 
> 




Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] Arlen Ness Electric Motorcycle

2007-02-09 Thread Eric Poulsen

Not at all impressed.

Also, this bike, and the CHP electric chopper 
(http://www.bikernet.com/bikebarn/PageViewer.asp?PageID=583) seem to 
have a need for a fake motor, or at least cylinder heads.  Why is that?  
The CHP article even calls it an "Electric V-Twin," which is ridiculous, 
as the V-Twin refers to the piston engine layout.  Do they really think 
people are so stupid that they'll either: A) Think that it's some kind 
of electric piston, or B) won't consider it a real bike without cylinder 
heads, despite _knowing_ it's electric?  Of course, then there's the gas 
tank ...


Of course, noone ever accused the custom chopper guys of having 
substance over style.




Mike wrote:
http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle001.jpg 

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle002.jpg 

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle003.jpg 

http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle004.jpg 



I'm not terribly impressed with the looks of that. Any one else?  It 
looks to me like they tossed some batteries in the frame then wrapped 
them with a bread box. Ness usually comes up with better looking stuff 
than that.







Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] NooB to Ecycles

2007-02-09 Thread Kevin Caldwell




High centre of gravity doesn't hurt bike handling, except when stopped.
In fact, if all the weight is as close as possible to a line through
the rear contact patch and the CG, the roll rate will be maximized, and
the higher CG actually helps. The roll is almost entirely generated by
the front tire countersteer force, and the longer moment arm it has,
the faster the roll rate. (Ref.: "Motorcycle Dynamics", Viatore
Cossalter)

Of course more mass does hurt handling and loads up the tires more,
which is the real problem with adding batteries, not the high CG. Plus 
a heavy bike with a high CG is easy to drop when stationary.

Kevin Caldwell

Andrew Wowk wrote:
If you have 20 miles one-way than you just might be able
to do it. You'll need a lot of batteries, though. Shooting for anything
more at highway speeds is not a good idea unless you know how to build
a BMS (battery management system) and have enough money to shell out
for Nimh, Nicad, or lithium ion batteries.  Most EM conversions will
probably crap out at less than 15 miles at freeway speeds. Keeping
speeds below 50 will really help. A Zivan charger, charging from a 120v
outlet could probably completely charge the batteries in 2 hrs or so.
  
  
With lead-acid you are pretty much stuck with a crappy range, or a
slightly-better-than crappy range. In the latter case you have to pile
the batteries on, meaning handling suffers, and the weight needs to be
placed higher in the frame making the bike a lot harder to corner.
  
  
A few ideas to play around with to maximize range:
  
1. Use lead-acid batteries with rectangular cells instead of spiral
wound to fit more in a smaller space. B&B are a good example. 
http://www.bb-battery.com
  
2. Strategically pick the bike you wish to convert. The more space you
have down lower the better. You also want a light frame, and a sports
bike with plastic to reduce drag would certainly help. Design your
battery supports to put the batteries as low as possible while still
maintaining enough ground clearance. You could put batteries underneath
the existing frame cradle.
  
  
3. Pre-heat the batteries before use. I have yet to see how well this
works. An electric blanket might do the job well (running from a 120v
outlet, NOT the batteries).
  
4. Removable range-extender batteries of some type. This way you can
chose when your bike will feel and handle like crap to get the extra
range. Adding battery capacity results in a fairly linear increase in
range, i.e., doubling the capacity will double the range.
  
good luck,
Andrew






Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] another newbie question

2007-02-09 Thread Kevin Caldwell




The page does say it may not work with MS IE, but I would think you'd
still get something. Works fine with Firefox.

Kevin Caldwell

Mark Hastings wrote:

  Ok it must just be something my computer is sitting
behind then. 
I thought I had checked it from this very computer but
perhaps something changed at my firewall or proxy.
*shrug*
Have never seen that error prior so I tried to look it
up and those seem to be the main culprits. I have
ruled the others out: malware/spyware/virus/adware


--- lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  
  
works for me on all links

--- Mark Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



  When I go to that page I receive:
412 Precondition Failed
The precondition on the request for the URL
/tools/evcalc/ evaluated to false.

I can't even get to www.evconvert.com

--- lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  
  
http://www.evconvert.com/tools/evcalc/

--- john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



  sorry if asked before, I couldn't find a
  

  

FAQ...


  

  I see an online calculator at

  

  

  
  http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/lab/8679/evcalc.html
  
  

  

  but its a little out-of-date and of uncertain
accuracy.

Does anybody have another one to
compare/test/calibrate?

My particular project needs to weigh
weight/aero/target-performance vs
motor/controller/battery choice, and  I have
  

  

no 


  

  experience in electric conversions.

thanks

John Fisher


  



 


  

  
  
  
  

  
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail
arrives.


  

http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/


  


  
  

  



 


  
  
  
  
The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search
Marketing.


  
  http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
  
  


  
  


  






Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] another newbie question

2007-02-09 Thread Mark Hastings
Ok it must just be something my computer is sitting
behind then. 
I thought I had checked it from this very computer but
perhaps something changed at my firewall or proxy.
*shrug*
Have never seen that error prior so I tried to look it
up and those seem to be the main culprits. I have
ruled the others out: malware/spyware/virus/adware


--- lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> works for me on all links
> 
> --- Mark Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > When I go to that page I receive:
> > 412 Precondition Failed
> > The precondition on the request for the URL
> > /tools/evcalc/ evaluated to false.
> > 
> > I can't even get to www.evconvert.com
> > 
> > --- lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > http://www.evconvert.com/tools/evcalc/
> > > 
> > > --- john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > sorry if asked before, I couldn't find a
> FAQ...
> > > > 
> > > > I see an online calculator at
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/lab/8679/evcalc.html
> > > > but its a little out-of-date and of uncertain
> > > > accuracy.
> > > > 
> > > > Does anybody have another one to
> > > > compare/test/calibrate?
> > > > 
> > > > My particular project needs to weigh
> > > > weight/aero/target-performance vs
> > > > motor/controller/battery choice, and  I have
> no 
> > > > experience in electric conversions.
> > > > 
> > > > thanks
> > > > 
> > > > John Fisher
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > >
> >
>

> > > Never miss an email again!
> > > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail
> > > arrives.
> > >
> >
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>

> The fish are biting. 
> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search
> Marketing.
>
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
> 
> 




Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] another newbie question

2007-02-09 Thread lyle sloan
works for me on all links

--- Mark Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> When I go to that page I receive:
> 412 Precondition Failed
> The precondition on the request for the URL
> /tools/evcalc/ evaluated to false.
> 
> I can't even get to www.evconvert.com
> 
> --- lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > http://www.evconvert.com/tools/evcalc/
> > 
> > --- john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > sorry if asked before, I couldn't find a FAQ...
> > > 
> > > I see an online calculator at
> > >
> >
>
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/lab/8679/evcalc.html
> > > but its a little out-of-date and of uncertain
> > > accuracy.
> > > 
> > > Does anybody have another one to
> > > compare/test/calibrate?
> > > 
> > > My particular project needs to weigh
> > > weight/aero/target-performance vs
> > > motor/controller/battery choice, and  I have no 
> > > experience in electric conversions.
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > 
> > > John Fisher
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> >
>

> > Never miss an email again!
> > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail
> > arrives.
> >
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 



 

The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php



Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] another newbie question

2007-02-09 Thread Mark Hastings
When I go to that page I receive:
412 Precondition Failed
The precondition on the request for the URL
/tools/evcalc/ evaluated to false.

I can't even get to www.evconvert.com

--- lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> http://www.evconvert.com/tools/evcalc/
> 
> --- john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > sorry if asked before, I couldn't find a FAQ...
> > 
> > I see an online calculator at
> >
>
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/lab/8679/evcalc.html
> > but its a little out-of-date and of uncertain
> > accuracy.
> > 
> > Does anybody have another one to
> > compare/test/calibrate?
> > 
> > My particular project needs to weigh
> > weight/aero/target-performance vs
> > motor/controller/battery choice, and  I have no 
> > experience in electric conversions.
> > 
> > thanks
> > 
> > John Fisher
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>

> Never miss an email again!
> Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail
> arrives.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> 
> 




Re: [ElectricMotorcycles] another newbie question

2007-02-09 Thread lyle sloan
http://www.evconvert.com/tools/evcalc/

--- john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> sorry if asked before, I couldn't find a FAQ...
> 
> I see an online calculator at
>
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/lab/8679/evcalc.html
> but its a little out-of-date and of uncertain
> accuracy.
> 
> Does anybody have another one to
> compare/test/calibrate?
> 
> My particular project needs to weigh
> weight/aero/target-performance vs
> motor/controller/battery choice, and  I have no 
> experience in electric conversions.
> 
> thanks
> 
> John Fisher
> 
> 



 

Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/