Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread John Scudder 
Thanks, Mahesh.

> On Jul 27, 2021, at 3:52 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani  
> wrote:
> 
> The surgery that I performed on the draft, and can be seen in the attached 
> files both as a diff and the full file was to remove the mpls-te module 
> dependency from this draft. We should therefore at least not be dependent on 
> the ietf-te module.

I tracked down the earlier thread with the RFC Editor and followed up there. 

Regards,

—John

___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread John Scudder 
RFC Editor state is MISSREF, as part of cluster C336: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C336. If I’m untangling the 
information there correctly, I think it’s blocked on (at least) 
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te.

Was the surgery that Tom mentions, expected to clear it out of MISSREF? If so, 
please give me some more details (either in this thread or offline) and I can 
check in with the RFC Editor.

Thanks,

—John

On Jul 27, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Reshad Rahman 
mailto:res...@yahoo.com>> wrote:


Adding John (AD).

On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch 
mailto:ie...@btconnect.com>> wrote:


From: Reshad Rahman mailto:res...@yahoo.com>>
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03



FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's 
been submitted to the RFC Editor.


Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue.  Whatever 
was done would appear to have been not enough.  I was expecting an action by 
the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant.

Tom Petch


Regards,
Reshad.

On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" 
mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of 
yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD 
module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch 
mailto:ie...@btconnect.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org>> 
on behalf of Reshad Rahman 
mailto:40yahoo@dmarc.ietf.org>>
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>
> BFD WG,
>
> Draft minutes have been posted @ 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
>
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> 
>
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD 
YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can 
progress.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Copying the LSR WG.
>
>
> Meeting recording is @ 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>
> ___
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread Reshad Rahman 
 Adding John (AD).

On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch 
 wrote:  
 
 From: Reshad Rahman 
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03



FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's 
been submitted to the RFC Editor.


Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue.  Whatever 
was done would appear to have been not enough.  I was expecting an action by 
the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant.

Tom Petch

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" 
 wrote:

    Hi,

    I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD 
module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

    Thanks,
    Yingzhen

    > On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch  wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman 

    > Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
    > To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
    > Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
    >
    > BFD WG,
    >
    > Draft minutes have been posted @ 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
    >
    > Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
    > 
    >
    > I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD 
YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can 
progress.
    >
    > Tom Petch
    >
    > Copying the LSR WG.
    >
    >
    > Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
    >
    > Regards,
    > Reshad.
    >
    > ___
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr



  ___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread tom petch 
From: Reshad Rahman 
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03



FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's 
been submitted to the RFC Editor.


Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue.  Whatever 
was done would appear to have been not enough.  I was expecting an action by 
the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant.

Tom Petch

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" 
 wrote:

Hi,

I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD 
module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch  wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman 

> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>
> BFD WG,
>
> Draft minutes have been posted @ 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
>
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> 
>
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD 
YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can 
progress.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Copying the LSR WG.
>
>
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>
> ___
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr



___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-05-20 Thread Reshad Rahman 


FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's 
been submitted to the RFC Editor.

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" 
 wrote:

Hi,

I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD 
module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman 

> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
> 
> BFD WG,
> 
> Draft minutes have been posted @ 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
> 
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> 
> 
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD 
YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can 
progress.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> Copying the LSR WG.
> 
> 
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> 
> ___
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr



___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-03-23 Thread Greg Mirsky 
Hi Reshad, et al,
I support the proposal to split the BFD YANG data model and move the TE
part of the model into a separate new document (working group or
individual, s suggested by WG Chairs).

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:34 AM tom petch  wrote:

>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman
> 
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>
> BFD WG,
>
> Draft minutes have been posted @
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
>
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> 
>
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD
> YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can
> progress.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Copying the LSR WG.
>
>
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>
> ___
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-03-23 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani 
+1

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Yingzhen Qu  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, 
> so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen
> 
>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman 
>> 
>> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
>> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
>> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>> 
>> BFD WG,
>> 
>> Draft minutes have been posted @ 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
>> 
>> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
>> 
>> 
>> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD 
>> YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can 
>> progress.
>> 
>> Tom Petch
>> 
>> Copying the LSR WG.
>> 
>> 
>> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Reshad.
>> 
>> ___
>> Lsr mailing list
>> Lsr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com





___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-03-22 Thread Yingzhen Qu 
Hi,

I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, 
so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman 
> 
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
> 
> BFD WG,
> 
> Draft minutes have been posted @ 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
> 
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> 
> 
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD 
> YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can 
> progress.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> Copying the LSR WG.
> 
> 
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> 
> ___
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

[Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-03-22 Thread tom petch 



From: Rtg-bfd  on behalf of Reshad Rahman 

Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

BFD WG,

Draft minutes have been posted @ 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/

Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.


I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD YANG 
draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can progress.

Tom Petch

Copying the LSR WG.


Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0

Regards,
Reshad.

___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr