Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-26 Thread R. Scott Belford

Jim Thompson wrote:


On Sep 23, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:


Jim Thompson wrote:



C) Build a MythTV box.   Record what you want, when you want,  
compress at will.



Actually MythTV may be the best option, all things considered.   (When 
are you going to give your "M"TV demo?)  Wayne



Whenever Scott schedules it (with appropriate warning for me, please.)


We can pick our venue for this.  Jim will be speaking at the Open Source 
Pizza on the third Tuesday of October, so that knocks out that locale 
for a month.  This could be a great 'first' Commercial Linux topic now 
that this monthly event, to be hosted by Commercial Data Systems, is 
being finalized.  If not one of these, then a Saturday session at 
McKinley can always be arranged.


This is a good topic for TPOSSCON, especially because we plan to have a 
lot of hands-on activities, but January is too far away.


Jim


--scott


Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-26 Thread Jim Thompson


On Sep 23, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:


Jim Thompson wrote:



C) Build a MythTV box.   Record what you want, when you want,  
compress at will.



Actually MythTV may be the best option, all things considered.   
(When are you going to give your "M"TV demo?)  Wayne


Whenever Scott schedules it (with appropriate warning for me, please.)

Jim



Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-23 Thread Hawaii Linux Institute

Jim Thompson wrote:


C) Build a MythTV box.   Record what you want, when you want, compress 
at will.


Actually MythTV may be the best option, all things considered.  (When 
are you going to give your "M"TV demo?)  Wayne


Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-23 Thread Jim Thompson


On Sep 22, 2005, at 9:52 PM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:


Jim Thompson wrote:

DTV (like HDTV without the H) has to be supported by any new  
TeeVee > 13" and all other receivers (such as VCRs, DV

Ds, etc.) by 2007.

HDTV (by which I mean at least 720p) is a different animal, of  
course.   The first two solutions below will decode > 480p, but  
getting a broadcaster to *send* 720p, 1080i or 1080p is a  
different kettle of fish.  (But hey, I'm over here on the rainy/ 
windward side, and DTV is hard to come by anyway.)


DTV on linux can be had for $170 per card (with up to 4 cards in a  
system, for those of you who want to build a MythTV box.) http:// 
www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html


If you're way itno "just do it in software" (and damn the  
Broadcast Flag, for when they eventually get it passed), then you  
could spend about $650 on a USSR + TVRX from ETTUS Research:  
http://www.ettus.com/   These run GNU Radio

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/

I may end up with one for some "experimentation".   When I do,  
I'll see about bringing it to some meeting or other.


Of course, you'll learn more watching the *other* screen.  :-)

Since I sorta mentioned Software Defined Radio (GNU Radio  
implements a SDR) I should also mention a plethora of SDR-based  
information here:  http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/sdr.html


And of course, what every geek HAM wants for Christmas: http:// 
www.flex-radio.com/  (Also has a full GPLed SDR stack.)



Good info, but I am afraid you might have strayed a little in the  
opposite direction, Jim(my the Geek).  :-) Tim & I were not talking  
about (H)DTV, but how to find a cheap way to stream video signals  
received from Oceanic Cable, at reduced resolution if necessary, so  
we can watch our favorite programs when out of town.


As I mentioned, currently there are two commercial solutions:  
slingbox and orb.  The former is a standalone unit but requires a  
static IP; whereas, the latter requires a PC but does not appear to  
require a static IP.  Both require a proprietary program to be  
installed at the client as well the server sites.  I believe this  
program involves compression, making it possible to transmit TV  
signals via home-based broadbands.  Wayne


C) Build a MythTV box.   Record what you want, when you want,  
compress at will.


(Use the (H)DTV card to record OTA broadcasts...)

Or... watch less TeeVee.   Might be good for you.




Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-22 Thread Hawaii Linux Institute

Jim Thompson wrote:
DTV (like HDTV without the H) has to be supported by any new TeeVee > 
13" and all other receivers (such as VCRs, DV

Ds, etc.) by 2007.

HDTV (by which I mean at least 720p) is a different animal, of 
course.   The first two solutions below will decode > 480p, but 
getting a broadcaster to *send* 720p, 1080i or 1080p is a different 
kettle of fish.  (But hey, I'm over here on the rainy/windward side, 
and DTV is hard to come by anyway.)


DTV on linux can be had for $170 per card (with up to 4 cards in a 
system, for those of you who want to build a MythTV box.) 
http://www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html


If you're way itno "just do it in software" (and damn the Broadcast 
Flag, for when they eventually get it passed), then you could spend 
about $650 on a USSR + TVRX from ETTUS Research: 
http://www.ettus.com/   These run GNU Radio

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/

I may end up with one for some "experimentation".   When I do, I'll 
see about bringing it to some meeting or other.


Of course, you'll learn more watching the *other* screen.  :-)

Since I sorta mentioned Software Defined Radio (GNU Radio implements a 
SDR) I should also mention a plethora of SDR-based information here:  
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/sdr.html


And of course, what every geek HAM wants for Christmas: 
http://www.flex-radio.com/  (Also has a full GPLed SDR stack.)


Good info, but I am afraid you might have strayed a little in the 
opposite direction, Jim(my the Geek).  :-) Tim & I were not talking 
about (H)DTV, but how to find a cheap way to stream video signals 
received from Oceanic Cable, at reduced resolution if necessary, so we 
can watch our favorite programs when out of town.


As I mentioned, currently there are two commercial solutions: slingbox 
and orb.  The former is a standalone unit but requires a static IP; 
whereas, the latter requires a PC but does not appear to require a 
static IP.  Both require a proprietary program to be installed at the 
client as well the server sites.  I believe this program involves 
compression, making it possible to transmit TV signals via home-based 
broadbands.  Wayne


Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-22 Thread Jim Thompson

Tim Newsham wrote:

Interesting product.  Unfortunately my wee little uplink from 
verizon just wouldn't cut it.



This is something I am very much interested in finding out.  768kbs 
may not be as bad as we think (depends on the compression I 
suppose).  There is another option called ORB, which requires a PC at 
the transmitting end.  The Sling is a standalone box.



My uplink is consideraly slower than 768kbps.  Try 160kbps-ish.



This is why they invented BitTorrent

I've often wondered why PBS dumps a ton of money into HDTV instead 
of streaming their content online.



Streaming video is for the general public, whereas HDTV is for those 
who can afford one.  When the president of CPB used to be a 
co-chainperson of the you-know-what party, which way do you think the 
funding is going to go.



You can blame in on the reps if you want, but the HDTV push happened 
under the dems in the late 90s.  "What!?" you say, "The democratic 
senators are against us [EMAIL PROTECTED]"  Yah, its a shocker.


DTV (like HDTV without the H) has to be supported by any new TeeVee > 
13" and all other receivers (such as VCRs, DV

Ds, etc.) by 2007.

HDTV (by which I mean at least 720p) is a different animal, of course.   
The first two solutions below will decode > 480p, but getting a 
broadcaster to *send* 720p, 1080i or 1080p is a different kettle of 
fish.  (But hey, I'm over here on the rainy/windward side, and DTV is 
hard to come by anyway.)


DTV on linux can be had for $170 per card (with up to 4 cards in a 
system, for those of you who want to build a MythTV box.) 
http://www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html


If you're way itno "just do it in software" (and damn the Broadcast 
Flag, for when they eventually get it passed), then you could spend 
about $650 on a USSR + TVRX from ETTUS Research: http://www.ettus.com/   
These run GNU Radio

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/

I may end up with one for some "experimentation".   When I do, I'll see 
about bringing it to some meeting or other.


Of course, you'll learn more watching the *other* screen.  :-)

Since I sorta mentioned Software Defined Radio (GNU Radio implements a 
SDR) I should also mention a plethora of SDR-based information here:  
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/sdr.html


And of course, what every geek HAM wants for Christmas: 
http://www.flex-radio.com/  (Also has a full GPLed SDR stack.)


Jim



Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-22 Thread Tim Newsham
Interesting product.  Unfortunately my wee little uplink from verizon just 
wouldn't cut it.


This is something I am very much interested in finding out.  768kbs may not 
be as bad as we think (depends on the compression I suppose).  There is 
another option called ORB, which requires a PC at the transmitting end.  The 
Sling is a standalone box.


My uplink is consideraly slower than 768kbps.  Try 160kbps-ish.

I've often wondered why PBS dumps a ton of money into HDTV instead of 
streaming their content online.


Streaming video is for the general public, whereas HDTV is for those who can 
afford one.  When the president of CPB used to be a co-chainperson of the 
you-know-what party, which way do you think the funding is going to go.


You can blame in on the reps if you want, but the HDTV push happened under 
the dems in the late 90s.  "What!?" you say, "The democratic senators are 
against us [EMAIL PROTECTED]"  Yah, its a shocker.


Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/


Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-22 Thread Hawaii Linux Institute

Tim Newsham wrote:

Interesting product.  Unfortunately my wee little uplink from verizon 
just wouldn't cut it.


This is something I am very much interested in finding out.  768kbs may 
not be as bad as we think (depends on the compression I suppose).  There 
is another option called ORB, which requires a PC at the transmitting 
end.  The Sling is a standalone box.



I've often wondered why PBS dumps a ton of money into HDTV instead of 
streaming their content online.


Streaming video is for the general public, whereas HDTV is for those who 
can afford one.  When the president of CPB used to be a co-chainperson 
of the you-know-what party, which way do you think the funding is going 
to go.  Wayne


(The last comment is clearly improper here, will never do that again.  
Too much Katrina/FEMA.)


Re: [LUAU] Slingbox @ CompUSA

2005-09-22 Thread Tim Newsham
When I travel (especially to overseas), I often wish that I could connect to 
Oceanic Cable.  OTOH, when here, it is close to impossibility to try to watch 
TV shows broadcast in China or Taiwan.  The Slingbox seems to answer these 
needs.


Interesting product.  Unfortunately my wee little uplink from verizon just 
wouldn't cut it.  If I lived in a forward looking country like South Korea 
where broadband really meant broadband perhaps this would work a bit 
better.  Or perhaps I wouldn't even need it.  I've often wondered why PBS 
dumps a ton of money into HDTV instead of streaming their content online. 
(Well not really;  "congress" would be the answer to that).  There are so 
many great PBS shows that just don't make it here.


Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/