[BAROQUE-LUTE] My adventure in f-minoRe: a suite Le triste depart
Dear baroque lute friends, just hours ago I managed to finish my trip to the f-minor key, by playing a suite written(?) to the poor (of course not economically!) young Lord Danby The young Lord was perhaps just leaving either Hannover or Hamburg, when his (French?) lute teacher wrote a small suite to this youngster to make him feel missed and thus kind of happy and melancholic... But who knows... :-) Anyhow, the last part was - as usual - a Gigue, which is generally a hard case to an old man as I am: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCxRmUW8XFk But the Gigue anyhow made the suite complete. And here you'll find - in case interested - the whole suite: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhYSNQgI9jE And if you happen to want to see the written music, or even better to play it, you'll find the original tabulature here: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/wikla/mus/11_courseLute/TristeDepartSuite/ My comment on f-minor: For a while I'll definitely leave the notes Ab and especially the Db to others... Back to the problematic G#'s and especially to the beautiful C#'s! Anyhow, actually the f-minor by baroque d-minor lute was very fun, interesting and enjoyable... :-)) Love and peace, Arto To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:49:17 -0800 (PST), hera caius wrote On Thomann: OT120 - 91 euro LCA120 - 30 euro It means it is 3x cheaper. Obviously the OT120 has much more features. Is that so? From the description on Korg's website it didn't sound at all like it. Does the OT have custom programmable tempraments? Does it have the follow/playback feature (i.e. you don't need to manualy change the playback pitch). Focus in? The only plus I could find for the OT was it's slightly larger range of base pitch, but with a custom programmed temprament that shouldn't be too big a problem. I use OT120 from 2007 and it was perfect for all situations and all instruments including Harpsichord, Positif Organ, Viola da Gamba, Violin, Baroque flute and all my lutes and guitars.It also has line in and out for more electric and amplified signal. But the LCA also has Mic in Headphone/Speaker out. Or are you talking about a real line-in? Cheers, Ralf Mattes But hey, that's my opinion... Good luck, Caius --- On Thu, 2/9/12, Jaroslaw Lipski jaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: From: Jaroslaw Lipski jaroslawlip...@wp.pl Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 5:40 PM Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
Yes, Thomann has it even cheaper which makes me think even more if I really need those other features. LCA120 has a line in too. The accuracy should be the same as it is meant for orchestral instruments. The design is really nice and handy - after folding it fits easily in any jacket pocket and can be kept safely on a music stand (as it is flat). Big screen makes it even more convenient for a concert situation. My main concern is preset programming feature which I haven't had opportunity to try. Otherwise it looks to me like everything I need during a concert or rehearsal. But obviously anyone of you that had any experience with LCA120 is welcomed to comment. I know OT120, it is good but not absolutely necessary in my opinion. The main reason for not using cheaper equivalents was a lack of temperament presets. LCA 120 has it (once you programme it). So... Anyway, thanks for a post All best Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 09:49, hera caius pisze: On Thomann: OT120 - 91 euro LCA120 - 30 euro It means it is 3x cheaper. Obviously the OT120 has much more features. I use OT120 from 2007 and it was perfect for all situations and all instruments including Harpsichord, Positif Organ, Viola da Gamba, Violin, Baroque flute and all my lutes and guitars.It also has line in and out for more electric and amplified signal. But hey, that's my opinion... Good luck, Caius --- On Thu, 2/9/12, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: From: Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edulute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 5:40 PM Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
Hello Jaroslaw and all, Did you already check presentation video? Unfortunately this is in Japanese. I don't know where is English version. http://www.korg.co.jp/Product/Tuner/Movie/02.html * Toshiaki Kakinami E-mail : tk...@orchid.plala.or.jp Blog : http://kakitoshilute.blogspot.com * -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Jaroslaw Lipski Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:41 AM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
Well, my Japanese is not good enough, but there is a short French version on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4ZjwFyAjSU Thanks :) Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 14:43, T.Kakinami pisze: Hello Jaroslaw and all, Did you already check presentation video? Unfortunately this is in Japanese. I don't know where is English version. http://www.korg.co.jp/Product/Tuner/Movie/02.html * Toshiaki Kakinami E-mail : tk...@orchid.plala.or.jp Blog : http://kakitoshilute.blogspot.com * -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Jaroslaw Lipski Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:41 AM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: [mplpost] Musicians can now fly in friendlier skies
Watch out for the puddle jumpers (Bombardier and what have you) that they use for short flights. Some of them have miniscule overheads and not much more space under the seat. I had to gate check my lute a couple of years ago when I flew to Milwaukee. The leg from Seattle to Chicago was fine, but the connector to Milwaukee was a puddle jumper and there was no way to take my lute in the cabin. Fortunately, the crew was very cooperative, and handled it carefully (they handed it back to me when I got off the plane; it didn't go through the usual baggage meatgrinder). Guy -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Mast Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 5:11 PM To: Nancy Carlin Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: [mplpost] Musicians can now fly in friendlier skies This is very good news indeed! I'm assuming my 7 course lute in a Kingham case will fit in overhead for most airplanes, but it would be nice to know before flying which specific airplanes offer the most roomy overheads. Is this information available? I assume that when booking flights, the type of airplane in service can be known. On Feb 9, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Nancy Carlin wrote: See below for good news about flying with your lutes. Delivered-To: lila-nancycarlinassociates:com-na...@nancycarlinassociates.com X-Envelope-To: na...@nancycarlinassociates.com X-Virus-Check-By: mailwash13.pair.com X-Spam-Check-By: mailwash13.pair.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=disabled version=3.002005 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Filtered: 0a530e8e58cc107def36ac6139926d69 Mailing-List: contact maplepost-h...@icomm.ca; run by ezmlm X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: [1] mailto:maplep...@icomm.ca List-Help: [2] mailto:maplepost-h...@icomm.ca List-Unsubscribe: [3] mailto:maplepost-unsubscr...@icomm.ca List-Subscribe: [4] mailto:maplepost-subscr...@icomm.ca Reply-To: maplep...@icomm.ca Delivered-To: mailing list maplep...@icomm.ca DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=zROn8jLADHYD/E9x+pJxTGXP+KJATwZAfHP68WcsPkI=; b=COAAQnMi2pPzUkORqBAlRefDiaoADw26BSWUi8AQsM+cnsDiq5Bc0kcUZ0vF5CD/rh hqIc0Rb/1sG4jcnJ5dt+H8GbpRhySg81M/VGiozDgYA46XBUHjPHQthkF7uwQjjQPl0U hIGQjpXx4QZ/3VsNWCGx7ox/xJ0e1MW//B/Yg= Sender: prashantmj...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:06:58 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sRt0QUeoblqB3Vs8e-kJ48A2aFA -- Forwarded message -- From: American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada broadc...@afm.org [image: AFM - American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada] *FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE* *February 7, 2012* *Contact: Honore Stockley * *(315) 422-4488 ext. 104* *hon...@bentley-hall.com* *The AFM applauds the passage of the FAA Bill that sets a consistent national policy allowing musical instruments on airplanes* After five years and 23 short-term extensions, Congress has passed legislation reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the next four years. Included in the bill are provisions that create a uniform national policy regarding musical instruments on airplanes. Any instrument that can be safely stored in the overhead compartment or underneath the seat may be brought on board as carry-on luggage. Additionally, the bill sets standard weight and size requirements for checked instruments, and permits musicians to purchase a seat for oversized instruments, such as cellos, that are too delicate to be checked. Existing law allowed each airline to set their own policy regarding musical instruments, and size requirements varied widely for both carry-on and checked baggage. The American Federation of Musicians (AFM) has been lobbying Congress to enact such a policy for nearly a decade. This is great news for professional musicians throughout the U.S. and Canada who carry the tools of our trade our instruments aboard commercial aircraft, said AFM President Ray Hair. Ending the confusion over musical instruments as carry-on baggage has been a top legislative priority for nearly a decade. I am proud of our Government Relations Director, Hal Ponder and his assistant Laura Brigandi in our Washington legislative office for seeing the effort through. Musicians can now fly in friendlier skies. The FAA reauthorization was passed by the House of Representatives on Friday, February 3 by a 248-169 vote. It subsequently
[LUTE] Re: [mplpost] Musicians can now fly in friendlier skies
Thanks for that observation, Guy. Will keep it in mind when flying with my instrument. On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Guy Smith wrote: Watch out for the puddle jumpers (Bombardier and what have you) that they use for short flights. Some of them have miniscule overheads and not much more space under the seat. I had to gate check my lute a couple of years ago when I flew to Milwaukee. The leg from Seattle to Chicago was fine, but the connector to Milwaukee was a puddle jumper and there was no way to take my lute in the cabin. Fortunately, the crew was very cooperative, and handled it carefully (they handed it back to me when I got off the plane; it didn't go through the usual baggage meatgrinder). Guy -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Mast Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 5:11 PM To: Nancy Carlin Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: [mplpost] Musicians can now fly in friendlier skies This is very good news indeed! I'm assuming my 7 course lute in a Kingham case will fit in overhead for most airplanes, but it would be nice to know before flying which specific airplanes offer the most roomy overheads. Is this information available? I assume that when booking flights, the type of airplane in service can be known. On Feb 9, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Nancy Carlin wrote: See below for good news about flying with your lutes. Delivered-To: lila-nancycarlinassociates:com-na...@nancycarlinassociates.com X-Envelope-To: na...@nancycarlinassociates.com X-Virus-Check-By: mailwash13.pair.com X-Spam-Check-By: mailwash13.pair.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=disabled version=3.002005 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Filtered: 0a530e8e58cc107def36ac6139926d69 Mailing-List: contact maplepost-h...@icomm.ca; run by ezmlm X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: [1] mailto:maplep...@icomm.ca List-Help: [2] mailto:maplepost-h...@icomm.ca List-Unsubscribe: [3] mailto:maplepost-unsubscr...@icomm.ca List-Subscribe: [4] mailto:maplepost-subscr...@icomm.ca Reply-To: maplep...@icomm.ca Delivered-To: mailing list maplep...@icomm.ca DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=zROn8jLADHYD/E9x+pJxTGXP+KJATwZAfHP68WcsPkI=; b=COAAQnMi2pPzUkORqBAlRefDiaoADw26BSWUi8AQsM+cnsDiq5Bc0kcUZ0vF5CD/rh hqIc0Rb/1sG4jcnJ5dt+H8GbpRhySg81M/VGiozDgYA46XBUHjPHQthkF7uwQjjQPl0U hIGQjpXx4QZ/3VsNWCGx7ox/xJ0e1MW//B/Yg= Sender: prashantmj...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:06:58 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sRt0QUeoblqB3Vs8e-kJ48A2aFA -- Forwarded message -- From: American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada broadc...@afm.org [image: AFM - American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada] *FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE* *February 7, 2012* *Contact: Honore Stockley * *(315) 422-4488 ext. 104* *hon...@bentley-hall.com* *The AFM applauds the passage of the FAA Bill that sets a consistent national policy allowing musical instruments on airplanes* After five years and 23 short-term extensions, Congress has passed legislation reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the next four years. Included in the bill are provisions that create a uniform national policy regarding musical instruments on airplanes. Any instrument that can be safely stored in the overhead compartment or underneath the seat may be brought on board as carry-on luggage. Additionally, the bill sets standard weight and size requirements for checked instruments, and permits musicians to purchase a seat for oversized instruments, such as cellos, that are too delicate to be checked. Existing law allowed each airline to set their own policy regarding musical instruments, and size requirements varied widely for both carry-on and checked baggage. The American Federation of Musicians (AFM) has been lobbying Congress to enact such a policy for nearly a decade. This is great news for professional musicians throughout the U.S. and Canada who carry the tools of our trade our instruments aboard commercial aircraft, said AFM President Ray Hair. Ending the confusion over musical instruments as carry-on baggage has been a top legislative priority for nearly a decade. I am proud of our Government Relations Director, Hal Ponder and his assistant Laura Brigandi in our Washington legislative office for seeing the effort through. Musicians can now fly in friendlier skies. The FAA reauthorization was passed by the House of
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
One consideration might be that the LCA-120 appears to no longer be made... Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Jaroslaw Lipski jaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: Yes, Thomann has it even cheaper which makes me think even more if I really need those other features. LCA120 has a line in too. The accuracy should be the same as it is meant for orchestral instruments. The design is really nice and handy - after folding it fits easily in any jacket pocket and can be kept safely on a music stand (as it is flat). Big screen makes it even more convenient for a concert situation. My main concern is preset programming feature which I haven't had opportunity to try. Otherwise it looks to me like everything I need during a concert or rehearsal. But obviously anyone of you that had any experience with LCA120 is welcomed to comment. I know OT120, it is good but not absolutely necessary in my opinion. The main reason for not using cheaper equivalents was a lack of temperament presets. LCA 120 has it (once you programme it). So... Anyway, thanks for a post All best Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 09:49, hera caius pisze: On Thomann: OT120 - 91 euro LCA120 - 30 euro It means it is 3x cheaper. Obviously the OT120 has much more features. I use OT120 from 2007 and it was perfect for all situations and all instruments including Harpsichord, Positif Organ, Viola da Gamba, Violin, Baroque flute and all my lutes and guitars.It also has line in and out for more electric and amplified signal. But hey, that's my opinion... Good luck, Caius --- On Thu, 2/9/12, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: From: Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edulute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 5:40 PM Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
I am not sure if this is correct as it appears on Korg.uk http://www.korg.co.uk/products/tuners/lca120/tu_lca120.asp It is being sold by many dealers online too. Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 17:41, David Smith pisze: One consideration might be that the LCA-120 appears to no longer be made... Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: Yes, Thomann has it even cheaper which makes me think even more if I really need those other features. LCA120 has a line in too. The accuracy should be the same as it is meant for orchestral instruments. The design is really nice and handy - after folding it fits easily in any jacket pocket and can be kept safely on a music stand (as it is flat). Big screen makes it even more convenient for a concert situation. My main concern is preset programming feature which I haven't had opportunity to try. Otherwise it looks to me like everything I need during a concert or rehearsal. But obviously anyone of you that had any experience with LCA120 is welcomed to comment. I know OT120, it is good but not absolutely necessary in my opinion. The main reason for not using cheaper equivalents was a lack of temperament presets. LCA 120 has it (once you programme it). So... Anyway, thanks for a post All best Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 09:49, hera caius pisze: On Thomann: OT120 - 91 euro LCA120 - 30 euro It means it is 3x cheaper. Obviously the OT120 has much more features. I use OT120 from 2007 and it was perfect for all situations and all instruments including Harpsichord, Positif Organ, Viola da Gamba, Violin, Baroque flute and all my lutes and guitars.It also has line in and out for more electric and amplified signal. But hey, that's my opinion... Good luck, Caius --- On Thu, 2/9/12, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: From: Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edulute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 5:40 PM Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
From what I read of the reviews it's just the thing if equal temperment is your goal. It will accept *one* other temperment that you'll have to input yourself. From a review on Amazon: We specifically wanted a tuner that could do non-equal temperament (if you don't know what I mean by that, then this review might not be very helpful to you). This one is programmable, so I figured it would be fine... We'll mostly do 1/4 comma meantone, it's probably a pre- programmed setting. No. There are no preprogrammed settings. And you can only store one program, so I hope we don't want to try a different tuning any time soon. Furthermore, there was no feature to tune one octave and copy those settings to other octaves, so I had to make a spreadsheet, calculate all of the cents displacements for all of the octaves, and individually add each one. As I said, I hope we don't want to try a different tuning any time soon I won't be running out to get one. Sean On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Jaroslaw Lipski wrote: I am not sure if this is correct as it appears on Korg.uk http://www.korg.co.uk/products/tuners/lca120/tu_lca120.asp It is being sold by many dealers online too. Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 17:41, David Smith pisze: One consideration might be that the LCA-120 appears to no longer be made... Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: Yes, Thomann has it even cheaper which makes me think even more if I really need those other features. LCA120 has a line in too. The accuracy should be the same as it is meant for orchestral instruments. The design is really nice and handy - after folding it fits easily in any jacket pocket and can be kept safely on a music stand (as it is flat). Big screen makes it even more convenient for a concert situation. My main concern is preset programming feature which I haven't had opportunity to try. Otherwise it looks to me like everything I need during a concert or rehearsal. But obviously anyone of you that had any experience with LCA120 is welcomed to comment. I know OT120, it is good but not absolutely necessary in my opinion. The main reason for not using cheaper equivalents was a lack of temperament presets. LCA 120 has it (once you programme it). So... Anyway, thanks for a post All best Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 09:49, hera caius pisze: On Thomann: OT120 - 91 euro LCA120 - 30 euro It means it is 3x cheaper. Obviously the OT120 has much more features. I use OT120 from 2007 and it was perfect for all situations and all instruments including Harpsichord, Positif Organ, Viola da Gamba, Violin, Baroque flute and all my lutes and guitars.It also has line in and out for more electric and amplified signal. But hey, that's my opinion... Good luck, Caius --- On Thu, 2/9/12, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: From: Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edulute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 5:40 PM Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: korg lca-120
In the US it does not appear on the korg site and support indicates it is no longer available. Same message on US Amazon site. It must be different in other countries. David Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Jaroslaw Lipski jaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: I am not sure if this is correct as it appears on Korg.uk http://www.korg.co.uk/products/tuners/lca120/tu_lca120.asp It is being sold by many dealers online too. Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 17:41, David Smith pisze: One consideration might be that the LCA-120 appears to no longer be made... Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: Yes, Thomann has it even cheaper which makes me think even more if I really need those other features. LCA120 has a line in too. The accuracy should be the same as it is meant for orchestral instruments. The design is really nice and handy - after folding it fits easily in any jacket pocket and can be kept safely on a music stand (as it is flat). Big screen makes it even more convenient for a concert situation. My main concern is preset programming feature which I haven't had opportunity to try. Otherwise it looks to me like everything I need during a concert or rehearsal. But obviously anyone of you that had any experience with LCA120 is welcomed to comment. I know OT120, it is good but not absolutely necessary in my opinion. The main reason for not using cheaper equivalents was a lack of temperament presets. LCA 120 has it (once you programme it). So... Anyway, thanks for a post All best Jaroslaw W dniu 2012-02-10 09:49, hera caius pisze: On Thomann: OT120 - 91 euro LCA120 - 30 euro It means it is 3x cheaper. Obviously the OT120 has much more features. I use OT120 from 2007 and it was perfect for all situations and all instruments including Harpsichord, Positif Organ, Viola da Gamba, Violin, Baroque flute and all my lutes and guitars.It also has line in and out for more electric and amplified signal. But hey, that's my opinion... Good luck, Caius --- On Thu, 2/9/12, Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl wrote: From: Jaroslaw Lipskijaroslawlip...@wp.pl Subject: [LUTE] korg lca-120 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edulute@cs.dartmouth.edu Date: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 5:40 PM Anyone using Korg LCA-120? I just wonder if the difference between this model and OT-120 is worth paying almost twice as much money. My first impression is that what is unique for OT-120 is Sound back mode and eight presets for historical temperaments, however one can programme his own presets in LCA-120, so in this respect the difference doesn't seem to be huge. On the other hand LCA-120 is very handy, flat and has a big LCD which is very good for a concert situation. Any thoughts? All best Jaroslaw To get on or off this list see list information at [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: tuning software?
Hello to all! I can highly recommend AP-Tuner: http://www.aptuner.com/cgi-bin/aptuner/apmain.html Shareware, runs on windows and under wine. Can be configuered for any instrument, temperaments, calibrated, stretch table, transposing... All the best, Michael -Original Message- From: David Tayler vidan...@sbcglobal.net To: lute lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: tuning software? Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:45:47 -0800 (PST) This looks kind of cool [1]http://www.musicmasterworks.com/tuning_software.html __ From: David Tayler vidan...@sbcglobal.net To: lute lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Wed, February 1, 2012 12:42:25 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: tuning software? I recommend the horribly named android app GStrings. Mulititemperament multifunction with many programmable features. OK, it isn't windows, sorry. Sequoia has a built in tuner but I like the android app. Or a dedicated strobe. __ From: Ed Durbrow [2]edurb...@sea.plala.or.jp To: David van Ooijen [3]davidvanooi...@gmail.com; LuteNet list [4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Mon, January 30, 2012 7:22:44 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: tuning software? The tuner in Logic (OSX) seems pretty good. There is Tuna Pitch, app and widget, which I just tried and seems to work well, also Mac. On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:41 AM, David van Ooijen wrote: Does anybody use tuning software for Windows and/or Mac, and if so, any feedback on the software used? Ed Durbrow Saitama, Japan [1][1][5]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch [2][2][6]http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ [3][3][7]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ -- References 1. [4][8]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 2. [5][9]http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 3. [6][10]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ To get on or off this list see list information at [7][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. [12]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 2. [13]http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 3. [14]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ 4. [15]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 5. [16]http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 6. [17]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ 7. [18]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.musicmasterworks.com/tuning_software.html 2. mailto:edurb...@sea.plala.or.jp 3. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com 4. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 5. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 6. http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 7. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ 8. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 9. http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 10. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ 11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html 12. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 13. http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 14. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ 15. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch 16. http://www.musicianspage.com/musicians/9688/ 17. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ 18. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Cantiones Sarmatoruthenicae 76-80
Cantio Sarmatoruthenica LXXX - http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/audio/384.mp3 http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/images/384.pdf Cantio Sarmatoruthenica LXXIX - http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/audio/383.mp3 http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/images/383.pdf Cantio Sarmatoruthenica LXXVIII - http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/audio/382.mp3 http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/images/382.pdf Cantio Sarmatoruthenica LXXVII - http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/audio/381.mp3 http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/images/381.pdf Cantio Sarmatoruthenica LXXVI - http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/audio/380.mp3 http://www.torban.org/sarmatoruthenicae/images/380.pdf Enjoy. Amitiés, RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Kapsberger
Yet another Kapsberger video :) enjoy http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 dt To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Kapsberger
Congratulations David, excellent performance! That's what I call a very personal view of this beautiful toccata, unlike anything I've heard before. Would you mind to tell how this interpretation developed? Do you have the tab in front just as a guideline to improvise figurations over it, or you've done a new intabulation? Regards. 2012/2/11 David Tayler [1]vidan...@sbcglobal.net Yet another Kapsberger video :) enjoy [2]http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 dt To get on or off this list see list information at [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Bruno Correia Pesquisador autonomo da pratica e interpretac,ao historicamente informada no alaude e teorba. Doutor em Praticas Interpretativas pela Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. -- References 1. mailto:vidan...@sbcglobal.net 2. http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Kapsberger
I have the chords, and some pivot points marked to make transitions, my thinking was to try to make a prototype version of the unmeasured preludes you see for example in Chambonnieres, and to make this I mixed elements from the early style, sections of contrasting points, some toccata or ricercar style scales, irregular rhythms from vocal ornamentation end experiments in NeoClassical meters which were in vogue in the first decade. Also I listened to the way harp players let certain tones ring longer by striking them in a certain way, and since I play a little harp I borrowed this from the harp players. In fact all of the notes appear in sources from the early 17th century, so I just recombined fragments I have seen in other pieces along the Kapsberger roadmap. So there is some Uccellini and Ferraboasco in there, and so on. I also decided I would use mainly two fingers from the right hand (plus thumb) since most books mark only two fingers and this was the hardest part, but of course it is just an idea. From: Bruno Correia bruno.l...@gmail.com To: lute-cs.dartmouth.edu lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Fri, February 10, 2012 7:47:47 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Kapsberger Congratulations David, excellent performance! That's what I call a very personal view of this beautiful toccata, unlike anything I've heard before. Would you mind to tell how this interpretation developed? Do you have the tab in front just as a guideline to improvise figurations over it, or you've done a new intabulation? Regards. 2012/2/11 David Tayler [1][1]vidan...@sbcglobal.net Yet another Kapsberger video :) enjoy [2][2]http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 dt To get on or off this list see list information at [3][3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Bruno Correia Pesquisador autonomo da pratica e interpretac,ao historicamente informada no alaude e teorba. Doutor em Praticas Interpretativas pela Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. -- References 1. mailto:[4]vidan...@sbcglobal.net 2. [5]http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 3. [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:vidan...@sbcglobal.net 2. http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html 4. mailto:vidan...@sbcglobal.net 5. http://youtu.be/CpQw0UH-YV4 6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
