[LUTE] Re: Linear algebra

2018-05-13 Thread Arto Wikla
Well, if you have high 1st fret and low 4th fret, you get Db on the 
b-letter of the 5th course, and C# on the 4th fret of the e-letter on 
the 3rd course (assuming "renaissance" tuning in G). And of course 
tastino for the b-letter for the C#, not to speak of the F# (instead of 
Gb) is a good idea!


Arto

On 13/05/18 23:00, Ralf Mattes wrote:
  
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 21:44 CEST, Arto Wikla  schrieb:
  

Tiny comment: f#-gb, d#-eb, c#-db, etc. are not octaves! ;-)


To that I can only answer with that famous quote from Thomas Binkley: "Details!"

  ;-)

  Cheers, RalfD






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: Linear algebra

2018-05-13 Thread Ralf Mattes
 
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 21:44 CEST, Arto Wikla  
schrieb: 
 
> Tiny comment: f#-gb, d#-eb, c#-db, etc. are not octaves! ;-)

To that I can only answer with that famous quote from Thomas Binkley: "Details!"

 ;-)

 Cheers, RalfD






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Linear algebra

2018-05-13 Thread anotherdamn6c
   I agree, Rainer, I think it's accepted there's no _perfect_ way to
   introduce meantone or its variants to lute. The trade off of 2 or 3
   cents (which I will barely --if at all-- notice) in a 5th or octave for
   10 cents for nicer thirds is acceptable to me.
   - nb. If one is using gut strings all bets are off after a week or so
   anyway, esp'ly anything above the 5th fret. This related to the age of
   the gut, weather, finger oils, overstrumming/plucking/fingering wear.
   - nb2. The act of pressing or over pressing a digit behind a fret will
   also affect that tuning.
   - nb3. The attempted meantone fretting of fixed fret instruments like
   citterns and orpharions shows that it was given at the very least lip
   service and, at most, worth spending money on and a real pursuit at the
   time.
   To my ear, a gut strung instrument that stays in perfect equal
   temperament for any length of time is equally a chimera. ... unless
   you're wealthy.
   This is my 2 cents and you may continue with your mathematics now.
   Sean

   On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Rainer
   <[1]rads.bera_g...@t-online.de> wrote:

 A clarification:
 Suppose you want to place the frets on a lute so that:
 1) All unisons are pure. That means the f on the second course has
 the same frequency as the open 1. course, the g on the second string
 has the same pitch as the b on the 1. course, ... over all courses.
 2) All octaves are pure. The c on the fourth course has half the
 frequency of the first course, 
 Then you have no choice left except equal temperament.
 The reason is that lutes cannot be tuned in any meantone
 temperament. You always have to accept false unisons or octaves.
 Rainer
 PS
 I use 1/6 comma meantone. However, I have no Baroque lutes nor have
 I ever tried accord nouveaux...
 On 13.05.2018 21:04, Ralf Mattes wrote:

   Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 20:43 CEST, Ron Andrico
 <[2]praelu...@hotmail.com> schrieb:

 Ralf and Rainer, I believe you are in agreement.   Octaves,
 fourths and
 fifths are pure and other intervals are an approximation.

 No, that's not what I (or Rainer) said. And it's wrong: Octaves are
 alway pure in all (western) tuning
 systems. Fifth/forth can be pure but then will be incomensurable
 with octaves (i.e. you can't stack
 fifth/forth and ever end up with pure octaves. As a matter of fact
 no pure intervals are comensurable.
 That IS a mathematic fact).
   Cheers, RalfD

 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:rads.bera_g...@t-online.de
   2. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Linear algebra

2018-05-13 Thread Arto Wikla

Tiny comment: f#-gb, d#-eb, c#-db, etc. are not octaves! ;-)

Arto

On 13/05/18 22:30, Rainer wrote:

A clarification:

Suppose you want to place the frets on a lute so that:

1) All unisons are pure. That means the f on the second course has the 
same frequency as the open 1. course, the g on the second string has the 
same pitch as the b on the 1. course, ... over all courses.


2) All octaves are pure. The c on the fourth course has half the 
frequency of the first course, 


Then you have no choice left except equal temperament.

The reason is that lutes cannot be tuned in any meantone temperament. 
You always have to accept false unisons or octaves.


Rainer

PS

I use 1/6 comma meantone. However, I have no Baroque lutes nor have I 
ever tried accord nouveaux...



On 13.05.2018 21:04, Ralf Mattes wrote:
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 20:43 CEST, Ron Andrico 
 schrieb:
    Ralf and Rainer, I believe you are in agreement.  Octaves, 
fourths and

    fifths are pure and other intervals are an approximation.


No, that's not what I (or Rainer) said. And it's wrong: Octaves are 
alway pure in all (western) tuning
systems. Fifth/forth can be pure but then will be incomensurable with 
octaves (i.e. you can't stack
fifth/forth and ever end up with pure octaves. As a matter of fact no 
pure intervals are comensurable.

That IS a mathematic fact).

  Cheers, RalfD





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html