Re: Build bot reactivated
Am 24.10.2015 um 20:25 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 24.10.2015 um 07:26 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Do you think the warning is too extreme? No, this is sadly true. Just replacing LyX files will break LyX's functions. One need to set the PATH prefix in LyX etc. to keep it running. So it OK to warn people. Clearly, it would be better to build the complete installer, but I'm not sure if it is worth the effort, especially because Uwe is working mainly on Windows. Well, I can now grab your build and bundle an installer for LyX 2.2 alpha based on Qt 5.5. But note that there is a nasty bug in Qt 5.5 on Windows which forces us to wait for Qt 5.6. Tanks, but not worth the effort. And I will disable it again because it's only a waste of electric energy if not a real installer is created. many thanks Peter and best regards Uwe
Re: Build bot reactivated
On 10/24/2015 01:26 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am 23.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Richard Heck: On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: I've reactivated the build-bot for Windows binaries of the master branch. It uses GCC 4.8.2 and Qt 5.5.1 (32 bit). http://syntheticpp.github.io/LyX-bleeding-edge Maybe it helps a bit for 2.2. You should add a warning that using those binaries could melt you monitor and has also been found to cause cancer in laboratory rats. ;-) Do you think the warning is too extreme? No, people who don't know what they're doing should definitely not mess with this. Richard
Re: Build bot reactivated
Am 24.10.2015 um 07:26 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Do you think the warning is too extreme? No, this is sadly true. Just replacing LyX files will break LyX's functions. One need to set the PATH prefix in LyX etc. to keep it running. So it OK to warn people. Clearly, it would be better to build the complete installer, but I'm not sure if it is worth the effort, especially because Uwe is working mainly on Windows. Well, I can now grab your build and bundle an installer for LyX 2.2 alpha based on Qt 5.5. But note that there is a nasty bug in Qt 5.5 on Windows which forces us to wait for Qt 5.6. many thanks Peter and best regards Uwe
Build bot reactivated
I've reactivated the build-bot for Windows binaries of the master branch. It uses GCC 4.8.2 and Qt 5.5.1 (32 bit). http://syntheticpp.github.io/LyX-bleeding-edge Maybe it helps a bit for 2.2. Peter
Re: Build bot reactivated
Am 23.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Richard Heck: On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: I've reactivated the build-bot for Windows binaries of the master branch. It uses GCC 4.8.2 and Qt 5.5.1 (32 bit). http://syntheticpp.github.io/LyX-bleeding-edge Maybe it helps a bit for 2.2. You should add a warning that using those binaries could melt you monitor and has also been found to cause cancer in laboratory rats. ;-) Do you think the warning is too extreme? Clearly, it would be better to build the complete installer, but I'm not sure if it is worth the effort, especially because Uwe is working mainly on Windows. Peter Richard
Re: Build bot reactivated
On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: I've reactivated the build-bot for Windows binaries of the master branch. It uses GCC 4.8.2 and Qt 5.5.1 (32 bit). http://syntheticpp.github.io/LyX-bleeding-edge Maybe it helps a bit for 2.2. You should add a warning that using those binaries could melt you monitor and has also been found to cause cancer in laboratory rats. ;-) Richard
Re: Build bot reactivated
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Richard Heckwrote: > On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> >> I've reactivated the build-bot for Windows binaries of the master branch. >> It uses GCC 4.8.2 and Qt 5.5.1 (32 bit). >> >> http://syntheticpp.github.io/LyX-bleeding-edge >> >> Maybe it helps a bit for 2.2. > > > You should add a warning that using those binaries could melt you monitor > and has also been found to cause cancer in laboratory rats. ;-) > Last I heard, before the previous major release LyX was a child eating monster... :) Liviu > Richard > -- Do you think you know what math is? http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/ian-stewart-2013-08-02 Or what it means to be intelligent? http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/john-duncan-2013-08-30 Think again: http://www.ideasroadshow.com/library