Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 06:18:07PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Garst R. Reese wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Don't know either. Could you try to run lyx2lyx manually on UserGuide.lyx to create a UserGuide.lyx in the latest format and load this? I've already tried that. No help. Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my large file to display! Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
Garst R. Reese wrote: Could you try to run lyx2lyx manually on UserGuide.lyx to create a UserGuide.lyx in the latest format and load this? I've already tried that. No help. Thanks, Garst Looks like I was wrong. Running lyx2lyx on my large file made it come up quickly. Manual lyx2lyx took about 7s. My guess is that there is a race somewhere. Hopefully it will go away as the cleanup continues. Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 06:18:07PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Garst R. Reese wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my large file to display! Thanks, Garst More info: top shows lyx running, the lyx python, then lyx, then lyx python ... Could a timeout be causing lyx2lyx to run repeatedly ? Don't know either. Could you try to run lyx2lyx manually on UserGuide.lyx to create a UserGuide.lyx in the latest format and load this? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:08:15PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Looks like I was wrong. Running lyx2lyx on my large file made it come up quickly. Manual lyx2lyx took about 7s. My guess is that there is a race somewhere. Hopefully it will go away as the cleanup continues. Not too sure. The core cleanup doesn't touch lyx2lyx at all... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:35:44AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:54:26PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my large file to display! Are you accessing your X session over a 1200 baud phone line? Seriously, I don't have a clue. Andre' Doesn't explain it either. I have started up LyX over a 56k phone line and it takes 4-5 minutes only. Plus one minute for the splash screen :-( BTW this is much more than earlier LyX versions. And the funny thing is that traffic is going *from* my home computer (X server) *to* the one running LyX (client) all the time at about 5k. Compression doesn't help, changing the cipher to blowfish doesn't help... this is X tunnelled over ssh 1.2 (yes, I know I should upgrade) Martin pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 06:18:07PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > "Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > > > > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > Don't know either. > > Could you try to run lyx2lyx manually on UserGuide.lyx to create a > UserGuide.lyx in the latest format and load this? I've already tried that. No help. Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: > You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include > profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the > debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my large file to display! Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
"Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > Could you try to run lyx2lyx manually on UserGuide.lyx to create a > > UserGuide.lyx in the latest format and load this? > > I've already tried that. No help. > Thanks, > Garst Looks like I was wrong. Running lyx2lyx on my large file made it come up quickly. Manual lyx2lyx took about 7s. My guess is that there is a race somewhere. Hopefully it will go away as the cleanup continues. Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 06:18:07PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > "Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include > > > profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the > > > debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. > > > > OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my > > large file to display! > > > > Thanks, > > Garst > > More info: > top shows lyx running, the lyx & python, then lyx, then lyx & python ... > Could a timeout be causing lyx2lyx to run repeatedly ? Don't know either. Could you try to run lyx2lyx manually on UserGuide.lyx to create a UserGuide.lyx in the latest format and load this? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:08:15PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Looks like I was wrong. Running lyx2lyx on my large file made it > come up quickly. Manual lyx2lyx took about 7s. My guess is that there > is a race somewhere. Hopefully it will go away as the cleanup > continues. Not too sure. The core cleanup doesn't touch lyx2lyx at all... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:35:44AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:54:26PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include
> > > profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the
> > > debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless.
> >
> > OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my
> > large file to display!
>
> Are you accessing your X session over a 1200 baud phone line?
>
> Seriously, I don't have a clue.
>
> Andre'
Doesn't explain it either. I have started up LyX over a 56k phone line
and it takes 4-5 minutes "only". Plus one minute for the splash screen
:-(
BTW this is much more than earlier LyX versions. And the funny thing
is that traffic is going *from* my home computer ("X server") *to* the
one running LyX ("client") all the time at about 5k. Compression
doesn't help, changing the cipher to blowfish doesn't help... this is
X tunnelled over ssh 1.2 (yes, I know I should upgrade)
Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: UG + other slowness
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:54:26PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my large file to display! Are you accessing your X session over a 1200 baud phone line? Seriously, I don't have a clue. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:54:26PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include > > profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the > > debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. > > OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my > large file to display! Are you accessing your X session over a 1200 baud phone line? Seriously, I don't have a clue. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Garst R. Reese wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my large file to display! Thanks, Garst More info: top shows lyx running, the lyx python, then lyx, then lyx python ... Could a timeout be causing lyx2lyx to run repeatedly ? G.
Re: UG + other slowness
"Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include > > profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the > > debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. > > OK, I did that. gprof said lyx took 9.81s, but it took 27 minutes for my > large file to display! > > Thanks, > Garst More info: top shows lyx running, the lyx & python, then lyx, then lyx & python ... Could a timeout be causing lyx2lyx to run repeatedly ? G.
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:32:01PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: It seems that you are the only one seeing this. Really strange. With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is slow? I can't complile on this machine with -g, if that's what you mean. You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. But try recent CVS first. Maybe Sunday noon Greenwich time... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: But try recent CVS first. Maybe Sunday noon Greenwich time... Thanks Andre' I just finished compiling -D 2003-07-27 18:00 I suppose that is 22:00 GMT if the 18:00 is my local time. Loading time is now OK, typing is very slow. Would backing up to noon GMT help that? Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:21:43AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: But try recent CVS first. Maybe Sunday noon Greenwich time... Thanks Andre' I just finished compiling -D 2003-07-27 18:00 I suppose that is 22:00 GMT if the 18:00 is my local time. Loading time is now OK, typing is very slow. Would backing up to noon GMT help that? Not much I suppose. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: Not much I suppose. :) OK, Thanks
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:32:01PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > It seems that you are the only one seeing this. > > > > Really strange. > > > > With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is > > slow? > I can't complile on this machine with -g, if that's what you mean. You could try'CXXFLAGS=-pg configure --disable-debug... ' to include profile, but no debug information. This links much faster than the debug-enabled version and should shoul the bottleneck nevertheless. But try recent CVS first. Maybe Sunday noon Greenwich time... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: > But try recent CVS first. Maybe Sunday noon Greenwich time... > Thanks Andre' I just finished compiling -D "2003-07-27 18:00" I suppose that is 22:00 GMT if the 18:00 is my local time. Loading time is now OK, typing is very slow. Would backing up to noon GMT help that? Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:21:43AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > But try recent CVS first. Maybe Sunday noon Greenwich time... > > > Thanks Andre' > I just finished compiling -D "2003-07-27 18:00" > I suppose that is 22:00 GMT if the 18:00 is my local time. > Loading time is now OK, typing is very slow. Would backing up to noon > GMT help that? Not much I suppose. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Not much I suppose. :) OK, Thanks
Re: UG + other slowness
Garst R. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. | My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. | My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, | 96Mb. | So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm | the only one | complaining. It seems that you are the only one seeing this. Really strange. With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is slow? -- Lgb
Re: UG + other slowness
Garst R. Reese wrote: My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, 96Mb. So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm the only one complaining. Asger worked very hard to make LyX usable again. After he left on Sunday the rest of us pitched in to break it once more... -- Angus
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:21:17PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. That won't change for a few weeks. Instead of re-inserting clever speed hacks I'd like to clean up the core first. Speeding it up afterwards should be fairly straight-forward. My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, 96Mb. I promise you this will be sufficient to load the UserGuide again at 1.4.0 release time. So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm the only one complaining. Probably not too many people use current CVS for serious work (guess why ;-}) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Garst R. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. | My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. | My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, | 96Mb. | So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm | the only one | complaining. It seems that you are the only one seeing this. Really strange. With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is slow? On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. I note though that Jean-Marc really has done something weird and wonderful to the Environments combox on the toolbar. Open and close a few docs and you'll end up with an empty combox and messages of the form: Trying to select non existent layout type Title -- Angus
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:40:22PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. real0m4.121s user0m2.070s sys 0m0.020s Athlon 1700+ Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thursday 31 July 2003 16:21, Garst R. Reese wrote: My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, 96Mb. Could you please use directly lyx2lyx outside lyx and see how much time it takes? The syntax is , assuming you are on lyx-devel directory, lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx file.lyx newfile.lyx So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm the only one complaining. Python 2.2.1 Gcc 3.2 xforms 1.02 CFLAGS='-O2' ../configure --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug --with-aspell --disable-nls --with-included-boost This is fine. Thanks, Garst -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:40:22PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: | On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. | | real0m4.121s | user0m2.070s | sys 0m0.020s | | Athlon 1700+ There is a while from there to over an hour... -- Lgb
Re: UG + other slowness
Jose' Matos wrote: Could you please use directly lyx2lyx outside lyx and see how much time it takes? bash$ time ./lyx2lyx /home/garst/eagle/NLM-ECG/LYX/NLM-ECG.lyx ~/tmp/NLM-ECG14.lyx 5.25user 0.08system 0:07.75elapsed 68%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (483major+464minor)pagefaults 0swaps No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday time for cvs -D? Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. I note though Angus that Jean-Marc really has done something weird and wonderful to Angus the Environments combox on the toolbar. Open and close a few Angus docs and you'll end up with an empty combox and messages of the Angus form: Trying to select non existent layout type Title Can you give a minimal recipe to get this now? JMarc
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: Probably not too many people use current CVS for serious work (guess why ;-}) Yeah, but I screwed up and blew away my 1.3, edited a doc in 1.4 and got stuck :) Not to worry. Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: It seems that you are the only one seeing this. Really strange. With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is slow? I can't complile on this machine with -g, if that's what you mean. Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thursday 31 July 2003 4:31 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. I note though Angus that Jean-Marc really has done something weird and wonderful to Angus the Environments combox on the toolbar. Open and close a few Angus docs and you'll end up with an empty combox and messages of the Angus form: Trying to select non existent layout type Title Can you give a minimal recipe to get this now? JMarc $ qlyxcvs ~/lyx/docs/UserGuide_ro.lyx then, File-Close File-Open ~/lyx/docs/UserGuide.lyx Bingo. The combox is not re-filled and the error message appears. Angus
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thursday 31 July 2003 17:30, Garst R. Reese wrote: 5.25user 0.08system 0:07.75elapsed 68%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (483major+464minor)pagefaults 0swaps And how much time does it takes to load this new file. I know that this question looks crazy, but I have a reason. No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday time for cvs -D? Thanks, Garst -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: UG + other slowness
Jose' Matos wrote: And how much time does it takes to load this new file. I know that this question looks crazy, but I have a reason. I killed it at 35minutes I suppose that answers your question :) No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday time for cvs -D? Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 19:39, Garst R. Reese wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: And how much time does it takes to load this new file. I know that this question looks crazy, but I have a reason. I killed it at 35minutes I suppose that answers your question :) No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday time for cvs -D? I see it too, but only if preview enabled. Kornel - -- Kornel Benko [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPyl3tLewfbDGmeqhAQGsAAP9Ht0+te4L5BqbgCzc7icp8zNjGtqbgkRm x7/yW96Vo88IPoHxqWdpjZYKwCLKoOBueN/8DotAMbGjTbXD0hNDFJ1cMMYro+fC CsHhtLiR61UUwrAUfLB8VBJHKh9htg9xtR+EyORoQo9VupHg99Uis5Z/VTvZm7Os j+hkKAbe4rY= =1TgJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: UG + other slowness
Garst R. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | It seems that you are the only one seeing this. | | Really strange. | | With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is | slow? | I can't complile on this machine with -g, if that's what you mean. No, only the -dbg any switch -- Lgb
Re: UG + other slowness
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: No, only the -dbg any switch Comment read: `#LyX 1.4 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/' Running '/usr/local/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t225 '/home/garst/eagle/NLM-ECG/LYX/NLM-ECG.lyx'' This where it hangs, lyx2lyx -t225 ... outfile.lyx from a terminal, it works fine, completes in 5s or so. bash$ time /usr/local/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t225 /home/garst/eagle/NLM-ECG/LYX/NLM-ECG.lyx ~/tmp/NLM-ECG3.lyx This is with a new build after rm -rf'ing and recreating my build directory, autogen.sh, cd build, configure as before, make , make install. Truly strange. Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. | My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. | My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, | 96Mb. | So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm | the only one | complaining. It seems that you are the only one seeing this. Really strange. With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is slow? -- Lgb
Re: UG + other slowness
Garst R. Reese wrote: > My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. > My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. > My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, > 96Mb. > So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm > the only one > complaining. Asger worked very hard to make LyX usable again. After he left on Sunday the rest of us pitched in to break it once more... -- Angus
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:21:17PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. That won't change for a few weeks. Instead of re-inserting clever speed hacks I'd like to clean up the core first. Speeding it up afterwards should be fairly straight-forward. > My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. > My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, > 96Mb. I promise you this will be sufficient to load the UserGuide again at 1.4.0 release time. > So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why > I'm the only one complaining. Probably not too many people use current CVS for serious work (guess why ;-}) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. > | My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. > | My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, > | 96Mb. > | So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm > | the only one > | complaining. > > It seems that you are the only one seeing this. > > Really strange. > > With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is > slow? On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. I note though that Jean-Marc really has done something weird and wonderful to the Environments combox on the toolbar. Open and close a few docs and you'll end up with an empty combox and messages of the form: Trying to select non existent layout type Title -- Angus
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:40:22PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. real0m4.121s user0m2.070s sys 0m0.020s Athlon 1700+ Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thursday 31 July 2003 16:21, Garst R. Reese wrote: > My files now do eventually load, but the UG takes about an hour to load. > My large problem doc now loads, but lyx is too slow to be useable. > My pre-Chemnitz version is working. This is a pretty ancient box, 233Mz, > 96Mb. Could you please use directly lyx2lyx outside lyx and see how much time it takes? The syntax is , assuming you are on lyx-devel directory, lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx file.lyx > newfile.lyx > So it looks like the problem is not yours, but I'm puzzled as to why I'm > the only one complaining. > Python 2.2.1 > Gcc 3.2 > xforms 1.02 > CFLAGS='-O2' ../configure --enable-optimization="-O2" --disable-debug > --with-aspell --disable-nls --with-included-boost This is fine. > Thanks, >Garst -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:40:22PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: | > On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. | | real0m4.121s | user0m2.070s | sys 0m0.020s | | Athlon 1700+ There is a while from there to over an hour... -- Lgb
Re: UG + other slowness
Jose' Matos wrote: > > Could you please use directly lyx2lyx outside lyx and see how much time it > takes? > bash$ time ./lyx2lyx /home/garst/eagle/NLM-ECG/LYX/NLM-ECG.lyx > ~/tmp/NLM-ECG14.lyx 5.25user 0.08system 0:07.75elapsed 68%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (483major+464minor)pagefaults 0swaps No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday time for cvs -D? Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. I note though Angus> that Jean-Marc really has done something weird and wonderful to Angus> the Environments combox on the toolbar. Open and close a few Angus> docs and you'll end up with an empty combox and messages of the Angus> form: Trying to select non existent layout type Title Can you give a minimal recipe to get this now? JMarc
Re: UG + other slowness
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Probably not too many people use current CVS for serious work > (guess why ;-}) > Yeah, but I screwed up and blew away my 1.3, edited a doc in 1.4 and got stuck :) Not to worry. Thanks, Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > It seems that you are the only one seeing this. > > Really strange. > > With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is > slow? I can't complile on this machine with -g, if that's what you mean. Garst
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thursday 31 July 2003 4:31 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On a 2.7GHz machine the UG loads in 2-3 secs. I note though > Angus> that Jean-Marc really has done something weird and wonderful to > Angus> the Environments combox on the toolbar. Open and close a few > Angus> docs and you'll end up with an empty combox and messages of the > Angus> form: Trying to select non existent layout type Title > > Can you give a minimal recipe to get this now? > > JMarc $ qlyxcvs ~/lyx/docs/UserGuide_ro.lyx then, File->Close File->Open ~/lyx/docs/UserGuide.lyx Bingo. The combox is not re-filled and the error message appears. Angus
Re: UG + other slowness
On Thursday 31 July 2003 17:30, Garst R. Reese wrote: > 5.25user > 0.08system > 0:07.75elapsed > 68%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (483major+464minor)pagefaults 0swaps And how much time does it takes to load this new file. I know that this question looks crazy, but I have a reason. > No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday > time for cvs -D? > Thanks, > Garst -- José Abílio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Re: UG + other slowness
Jose' Matos wrote: > > And how much time does it takes to load this new file. I know that this > question looks crazy, but I have a reason. I killed it at 35minutes I suppose that answers your question :) > > No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday > > time for cvs -D? > > Thanks, > > Garst >
Re: UG + other slowness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 19:39, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Jose' Matos wrote: > > > > And how much time does it takes to load this new file. I know that this > > question looks crazy, but I have a reason. > > I killed it at 35minutes > I suppose that answers your question :) > > > > No problem there. I'll try Asger's Sunday cvs. What is a safe Sunday > > > time for cvs -D? I see it too, but only if preview enabled. Kornel - -- Kornel Benko [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPyl3tLewfbDGmeqhAQGsAAP9Ht0+te4L5BqbgCzc7icp8zNjGtqbgkRm x7/yW96Vo88IPoHxqWdpjZYKwCLKoOBueN/8DotAMbGjTbXD0hNDFJ1cMMYro+fC CsHhtLiR61UUwrAUfLB8VBJHKh9htg9xtR+EyORoQo9VupHg99Uis5Z/VTvZm7Os j+hkKAbe4rY= =1TgJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: UG + other slowness
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > It seems that you are the only one seeing this. | > | > Really strange. | > | > With debugging turned on, are you able to see in what phase it is | > slow? | I can't complile on this machine with -g, if that's what you mean. No, only the -dbg any switch -- Lgb
Re: UG + other slowness
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > No, only the -dbg any switch Comment read: `#LyX 1.4 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/' Running '/usr/local/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t225 '/home/garst/eagle/NLM-ECG/LYX/NLM-ECG.lyx'' This where it hangs, lyx2lyx -t225 ... > outfile.lyx from a terminal, it works fine, completes in 5s or so. bash$ time /usr/local/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t225 /home/garst/eagle/NLM-ECG/LYX/NLM-ECG.lyx > ~/tmp/NLM-ECG3.lyx This is with a new build after rm -rf'ing and recreating my build directory, autogen.sh, cd build, configure as before, make , make install. Truly strange. Thanks, Garst
