Re: LyX home page oddity
On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet) but with a better phrasing :) I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. Are there objections if I change the advertisement to its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else (except for other documents typeset with TeX). ? I suppose this will not loose us potential users from the word-processor world but avoid putting off potential users from the LaTeX world. Günter
Re: LyX home page oddity
Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet) but with a better phrasing :) I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. +1 p Are there objections if I change the advertisement to its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else (except for other documents typeset with TeX). ? I suppose this will not loose us potential users from the word-processor world but avoid putting off potential users from the LaTeX world. Günter
Re: LyX home page oddity
On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output >>> > yet? >>> To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these >>> two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who has >>> never seen LaTeX output yet)" but with a better phrasing :) >> I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. Are there objections if I change the advertisement to > its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily > produced - looks like nothing else (except for other documents typeset > with TeX). ? I suppose this will not loose us potential users from the word-processor world but avoid putting off potential users from the LaTeX world. Günter
Re: LyX home page oddity
Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output > >>> > yet? > > >>> To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these > >>> two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who has > >>> never seen LaTeX output yet)" but with a better phrasing :) > > >> I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. +1 p > > Are there objections if I change the advertisement to > > > its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily > > produced - looks like nothing else (except for other documents typeset > > with TeX). > > ? > > I suppose this will not loose us potential users from the word-processor > world but avoid putting off potential users from the LaTeX world. > > Günter
Re: LyX home page oddity
On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet) but with a better phrasing :) I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. But this hype does compromise the creditability of LyX. I don't think we should use such marketing speak without a grain of salt. Something like its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else (except for other documents typeset with TeX). would not only be accurate, but also hint to the point that, unlike some of the competition, LyX not only uses TeX fonts and conventions but the true TeX engine for the typesetting. Günter
Re: LyX home page oddity
Guenter Milde wrote: But this hype does compromise the creditability of LyX. I don't think we should use such marketing speak without a grain of salt. I don't think so. But frankly: I don't care. Jürgen
Re: LyX home page oddity
On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output >> > yet? >> To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these >> two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who has >> never seen LaTeX output yet)" but with a better phrasing :) > I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. But this hype does compromise the creditability of LyX. I don't think we should use such marketing speak without a grain of salt. Something like its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else (except for other documents typeset with TeX). would not only be accurate, but also hint to the point that, unlike some of the competition, LyX not only uses TeX fonts and conventions but the true TeX engine for the typesetting. Günter
Re: LyX home page oddity
Guenter Milde wrote: > But this hype does compromise the creditability of LyX. I don't think we > should use such marketing speak without a grain of salt. I don't think so. But frankly: I don't care. Jürgen
Re: LyX home page oddity
Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.de writes: On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like any document typeset with LaTeX. Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet) but with a better phrasing :) JMarc
Re: LyX home page oddity
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet) but with a better phrasing :) I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. Jürgen
Re: LyX home page oddity
Guenter Mildewrites: > On www.lyx.org, I read: > > On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or > richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like > nothing else. > > However, my experience is: > > ... its printed output - or > richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like > any document typeset with LaTeX. > > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output > yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet)" but with a better phrasing :) JMarc
Re: LyX home page oddity
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output > > yet? > > To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these > two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who has > never seen LaTeX output yet)" but with a better phrasing :) I mean, this is advertisement. I would just leave it as it is. Jürgen
LyX home page oddity
On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like any document typeset with LaTeX. Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet?
LyX home page oddity
On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like any document typeset with LaTeX. Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet?
Chinese LyX, LyX home page stuff
A recent short thread mentioned chinese lyx at http://hpws3.ihep.ac.cn/~zhaojw/. (Are the folks who are working on Asian character input in touch with this person?) So why don't we have a link to there at www.lyx.org? Might it be time for an "international" page, where we have links to LyX pages in N languages, especially including those languages for which patches are needed? In fact, now that I think of it, the first two sections of the devel.lyx.org translation page don't belong there. Stuff describing all the languages we can type in LyX belongs on the LyX home page. On the devel page, we should just say "if there's no po/kmap file for your language please write one" or something like that. The last section on the devel page, which describes ongoing doc translation efforts, OTOH, *does* belong on devel. Am I going to have to write this thing myself? An American? -Amir
Chinese LyX, LyX home page stuff
A recent short thread mentioned chinese lyx at http://hpws3.ihep.ac.cn/~zhaojw/. (Are the folks who are working on Asian character input in touch with this person?) So why don't we have a link to there at www.lyx.org? Might it be time for an "international" page, where we have links to LyX pages in N languages, especially including those languages for which patches are needed? In fact, now that I think of it, the first two sections of the devel.lyx.org translation page don't belong there. Stuff describing all the languages we can type in LyX belongs on the LyX home page. On the devel page, we should just say "if there's no po/kmap file for your language please write one" or something like that. The last section on the devel page, which describes ongoing doc translation efforts, OTOH, *does* belong on devel. Am I going to have to write this thing myself? An American? -Amir
lyx home page
While we're at it, why isn't Peter Sütterlin's main LyX page (http://www.uni-sw.gwdg.de/~pit/LyX/) linked in the lyx links (in addition to his translation page, which is linked from the devel.lyx translations page). -Amir ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely powerful, I'm willing to make changes to translations.php3 when necessary... too bad its group is asierra!
Re: lyx home page
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote: ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely powerful, I'm willing to make changes to translations.php3 when necessary... too bad its group is asierra! Uhh, yes, I put it on line for you, remember? Fortunately I don't have to do it any more since you can do it yourself (so don't cry ;) Lars, please change the group to lyxweb and the owner to karger. Alejandro
lyx home page
While we're at it, why isn't Peter Sütterlin's main LyX page (http://www.uni-sw.gwdg.de/~pit/LyX/) linked in the lyx links (in addition to his translation page, which is linked from the devel.lyx translations page). -Amir ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely powerful, I'm willing to make changes to translations.php3 when necessary... too bad its group is asierra!
Re: lyx home page
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely > powerful, I'm willing to make changes to translations.php3 when necessary... > too bad its group is asierra! Uhh, yes, I put it on line for you, remember? Fortunately I don't have to do it any more since you can do it yourself (so don't cry ;) Lars, please change the group to lyxweb and the owner to karger. Alejandro