Re: make rpmdist failing
On 7/26/23 18:46, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how much is our rpm-build being used during recent years... Yes, that seems to fix it. It's using Qt5, as far as I can see. It's now in. Thanks! Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how > >much is our rpm-build being used during recent years... > > Yes, that seems to fix it. It's using Qt5, as far as I can see. It's now in. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 7/24/23 05:52, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > RPM build errors: > > > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > > > /usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml > > > > > Does this patch help? > > > > Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how > > much is our rpm-build being used during recent years... > > Yes, that seems to fix it. It's using Qt5, as far as I can see. > > Scott suggested a while back I do this instead of installing directly, the > thought being that constantly over-writing my installation with new updates > could lead to problems, or at least to stray files that never get removed. Indeed, I think I learned that from Kornel. I can install with a .deb and that way it is easy to uninstall. Perhaps checkinstall is an alternative, but I never tried it. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
On 7/24/23 05:52, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml Does this patch help? Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how much is our rpm-build being used during recent years... Yes, that seems to fix it. It's using Qt5, as far as I can see. Scott suggested a while back I do this instead of installing directly, the thought being that constantly over-writing my installation with new updates could lead to problems, or at least to stray files that never get removed. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 11:52 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Does this patch help? I would expect this to fix the issue. > Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how > much is our rpm-build being used during recent years... I have dabbled about this before. :-) The issue is that the rpm spec is dependent on the distribution being used. > Pavel -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> RPM build errors:
> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml
>
Does this patch help?
Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how
much is our rpm-build being used during recent years...
Pavel
diff --git a/development/lyx.spec.in b/development/lyx.spec.in
index b5333b27a8..9ee9555bcf 100644
--- a/development/lyx.spec.in
+++ b/development/lyx.spec.in
@@ -90,3 +90,4 @@ texhash
%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/%{name}
%{_datadir}/icons/*
%{_datadir}/applications/*
+%{_datadir}/metainfo/*
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
On 7/22/23 20:10, José Matos wrote: On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 23:59 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I suspect rpmdist dislikes the hyphens after RC1. Are you sure that this is typical of rpm naming? You could try underscores instead. In the past our release nme were more like lyx-2.4.0rc1 Jean-Marc is right regarding the name scheme: [name]-[version]-[release].[arch].rpm 2.4.0-RC1-devel does not work but 2.4.0-RC1.devel would where 2.4.0 is the version and RC1-devel is the release. Notice also that nowadays rpm supports the pre-release naming scheme like 2.4.0~rc1 for the version. This is only relevant if you plan to later release lyx-2.4.0-1 to ensure that rpm considers that this version is newer than lyx-2.4.0~rc1-1 (for example) OK, after changing the version in configure.ac to 2.4.0~RC1.1, I get further. But then I get: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml Any idea what that is? Full rpm-related output below. Riki + TEXMF=/usr/share/texmf + mkdir -p /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64/usr/share/texmf/tex/ latex + mv /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64/usr/share/lyx/tex /home/ri kiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64//usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/lyx + cp -a lib/images/lyx.png /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64/usr/ share/lyx/images/ + /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j16 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed 2.4.0~RC1.1-2 --uni que-debug-suffix -2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64 --unique-debug-src-base lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64 -- run-dwz --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit 11000 -S debugsourcefiles .list /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILD/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1 extracting debug info from /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64/usr/ bin/lyx extracting debug info from /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64/usr/ bin/lyxclient extracting debug info from /home/rikiheck/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lyx-2.4.0~RC1.1-2.x86_64/usr/ bin/tex2lyx /usr/bin/gdb /usr/bin/gdb /tmp/tmp.OR6YbGHPBg (1/1) 100 % 4136 B / 21.3 KiB = 0.190 /tmp/tmp.MOjAyU9Hxr (1/1) 100 % 23.5 KiB / 187.6 KiB = 0.125 /usr/bin/gdb /tmp/tmp.LMb3FJ2a5s (1/1) 100 % 130.1 KiB / 1016.2 KiB = 0.128 original debug info size: 279980kB, size after compression: 232736kB /usr/bin/sepdebugcrcfix: Updated 3 CRC32s, 0 CRC32s did match. 19714 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-ldconfig + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-lto /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/csv2lyx.py is executable but has no shebang, removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/fen2ascii.py is executable but has no shebang, removi ng executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/prefs2prefs_prefs.py is executable but has no shebang , removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/fig2pdftex.py is executable but has no shebang, remov ing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/lyxpak.py is executable but has no shebang, removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/convertDefault.py is executable but has no shebang, r emoving executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/clean_dvi.py is executable but has no shebang, removi ng executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/legacy_lyxpreview2ppm.py is executable but has no she bang, removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/fig2pstex.py is executable but has no shebang, removi ng executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/lyxpreview2bitmap.py is executable but has no shebang , removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/lyxpreview_tools.py is executable but has no shebang, removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/docbook_copy.py is executable but has no shebang, rem oving executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/prefs2prefs.py is executable but has no shebang, remo ving executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/TeXFiles.py is executable but has no shebang, removin g executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/include_bib.py is executable but has no shebang, remo ving executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/ext_copy.py is executable but has no shebang, removin g executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/html2latexwrapper.py is executable but has no shebang , removing executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/convert_pdf.py is executable but has no shebang, remo ving executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/docbook2epub.py is executable but has no shebang, rem oving executable bit *** WARNING: ./usr/share/lyx/scripts/layout2layout.py is executable but has no shebang,
Re: make rpmdist failing
On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 23:59 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I suspect rpmdist dislikes the hyphens after RC1. Are you sure that > this is typical of rpm naming? You could try underscores instead. > > In the past our release nme were more like lyx-2.4.0rc1 Jean-Marc is right regarding the name scheme: [name]-[version]-[release].[arch].rpm 2.4.0-RC1-devel does not work but 2.4.0-RC1.devel would where 2.4.0 is the version and RC1-devel is the release. Notice also that nowadays rpm supports the pre-release naming scheme like 2.4.0~rc1 for the version. This is only relevant if you plan to later release lyx-2.4.0-1 to ensure that rpm considers that this version is newer than lyx-2.4.0~rc1-1 (for example) Best regards, -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
Le 22/07/2023 à 21:05, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : I've finally decided to use the rpmdist target rather than installing directly, but it is failing here: $(LN_S) $(srcdir)/lib/images/lyx.png . ; \ The problem is that LN_S does not seem to be defined, so it is trying to execute the image. Try to add AC_PROG_LN_S somewhere in configure.ac $RPMBUILD -ta lyx-2.4.0-RC1-devel.tar.gz ; saved_status=$?; \ rm lyx.png; exit $saved_status error: line 5: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Version: 2.4.0-RC1-devel I suspect rpmdist dislikes the hyphens after RC1. Are you sure that this is typical of rpm naming? You could try underscores instead. In the past our release nme were more like lyx-2.4.0rc1 JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: make rpmdist failing
Am Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:05:11 -0400
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> I've finally decided to use the rpmdist target rather than installing
> directly, but it is failing here:
>
> $(LN_S) $(srcdir)/lib/images/lyx.png . ; \
>
> The problem is that LN_S does not seem to be defined, so it is trying to
> execute the image.
>
> Temporarily replacing that with cp leads to:
>
> rpm: -ta: unknown option
>
> I needed to install the rpm-build package, but shouldn't this adapt? or
> warn me?
>
> Next problem:
>
> $RPMBUILD -ta lyx-2.4.0-RC1-devel.tar.gz ; saved_status=$?; \
> rm lyx.png; exit $saved_status
> error: line 5: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Version: 2.4.0-RC1-devel
>
> This seems to be in the lyx.spec file, not in the filename itself.
>
> Finally, does a similar target exist for cmake? If so, how to call it?
Not yet.
But in cmake it would be something like
set(RPM_VERSION_SUFFIX whatever_that_may_be)
set(PACKAGE whatever_that_may_be)
set(VERSION whatever_that_may_be)
set(DESTINATION whatever_that_may_be)
configure_file("${TOP_SRC_DIR}/development/lyx.spec.in"
"${DESTINATION}/lyx${PROGRAM_SUFFIX}.spec")
OTOH, why would we need it in cmake? We create already the rpm-package there.
> Riki
Kornel
pgpfjZBBA5kEz.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
make rpmdist failing
I've finally decided to use the rpmdist target rather than installing directly, but it is failing here: $(LN_S) $(srcdir)/lib/images/lyx.png . ; \ The problem is that LN_S does not seem to be defined, so it is trying to execute the image. Temporarily replacing that with cp leads to: rpm: -ta: unknown option I needed to install the rpm-build package, but shouldn't this adapt? or warn me? Next problem: $RPMBUILD -ta lyx-2.4.0-RC1-devel.tar.gz ; saved_status=$?; \ rm lyx.png; exit $saved_status error: line 5: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Version: 2.4.0-RC1-devel This seems to be in the lyx.spec file, not in the filename itself. Finally, does a similar target exist for cmake? If so, how to call it? Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: Have you tried it with an empty body? My RPM complains about the empty body and it never gets substituted. I thought I had tried it, but obviously did not. The attached patch works for me. Can you please test wether it works for you too? Georg--- lyx-1.4-cvs/config/lyxinclude.m4 2004-10-12 10:46:18.0 +0200 +++ lyx-1.4-cvs-rpm-test/config/lyxinclude.m4 2004-10-22 12:37:03.0 +0200 @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ dnl AC_DEFUN([LYX_VERSION_SUFFIX],[ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for install target ... ]) +RPM_VERSION_SUFFIX='' AC_ARG_WITH(version-suffix, [ --with-version-suffix[=version] install lyx files as lyxversion], [if test x$withval = xyes;
Re: CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > Have you tried it with an empty body? My RPM complains about the > empty body and it never gets substituted. I thought I had tried it, but obviously did not. The attached patch works for me. Can you please test wether it works for you too? Georg--- lyx-1.4-cvs/config/lyxinclude.m4 2004-10-12 10:46:18.0 +0200 +++ lyx-1.4-cvs-rpm-test/config/lyxinclude.m4 2004-10-22 12:37:03.0 +0200 @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ dnl AC_DEFUN([LYX_VERSION_SUFFIX],[ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for install target ... ]) +RPM_VERSION_SUFFIX='""' AC_ARG_WITH(version-suffix, [ --with-version-suffix[=] install lyx files as lyx], [if test "x$withval" = "xyes";
CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
Did something change recently with the RPM spec file or the build process?
+ ./configure --with-frontend=xforms --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --bin
dir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share --without-warnings --disable-debug --enable-op
timization=-O2 %{version_suffix}
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
configure: WARNING: invalid host type: %{version_suffix}
configuring LyX version 1.4.0cvs
WARNING: This is a development version. Expect bugs.
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... yes
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `%{version_suffix}': machine
`%{version_suffix}' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/sh config/config.sub %{version_suffix} failed
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | crown of her husband | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
Re: CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
Am Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2004 19:46 schrieb Kayvan A. Sylvan:
Did something change recently with the RPM spec file or the build
process?
Yes. I made rpms with version suffix work (at on my machine).
+ ./configure --with-frontend=xforms --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --bin
dir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share --without-warnings --disable-debug
--enable-op
timization=-O2 %{version_suffix}
Why is that %{version_suffix}? This should be an empty variable or a
string like --with-version-suffix=1.4
It is set in the second line of the spec file. How does it look like?
Georg
Re: CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2004 19:46 schrieb Kayvan A. Sylvan:
Did something change recently with the RPM spec file or the build
process?
Yes. I made rpms with version suffix work (at on my machine).
+ ./configure --with-frontend=xforms --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --bin
dir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share --without-warnings --disable-debug
--enable-op
timization=-O2 %{version_suffix}
Why is that %{version_suffix}? This should be an empty variable or a
string like --with-version-suffix=1.4
Have you tried it with an empty body? My RPM complains about the
empty body and it never gets substituted.
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | crown of her husband | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
Did something change recently with the RPM spec file or the build process?
+ ./configure --with-frontend=xforms --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --bin
dir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share --without-warnings --disable-debug --enable-op
timization=-O2 %{version_suffix}
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
configure: WARNING: invalid host type: %{version_suffix}
configuring LyX version 1.4.0cvs
WARNING: This is a development version. Expect bugs.
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... yes
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `%{version_suffix}': machine
`%{version_suffix}' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/sh config/config.sub %{version_suffix} failed
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | "crown of her husband" | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
Re: CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
Am Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2004 19:46 schrieb Kayvan A. Sylvan:
> Did something change recently with the RPM spec file or the build
process?
Yes. I made rpms with version suffix work (at on my machine).
> + ./configure --with-frontend=xforms --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --bin
> dir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share --without-warnings --disable-debug
--enable-op
> timization=-O2 %{version_suffix}
Why is that %{version_suffix}? This should be an empty variable or a
string like "--with-version-suffix=1.4"
It is set in the second line of the spec file. How does it look like?
Georg
Re: CVS lyx: make rpmdist failing
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2004 19:46 schrieb Kayvan A. Sylvan:
> > Did something change recently with the RPM spec file or the build
> process?
>
> Yes. I made rpms with version suffix work (at on my machine).
>
> > + ./configure --with-frontend=xforms --prefix=/usr
> --mandir=/usr/share/man --bin
> > dir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share --without-warnings --disable-debug
> --enable-op
> > timization=-O2 %{version_suffix}
>
> Why is that %{version_suffix}? This should be an empty variable or a
> string like "--with-version-suffix=1.4"
Have you tried it with an empty body? My RPM complains about the
empty body and it never gets substituted.
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | "crown of her husband" | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
